Separate Financial Statements
of Bank Pekao S.A. for the year ended on 31 December 2020
Warsaw, February 2021
This document is a free translation of the Polish original. Terminology current in Anglo-Saxon countries has been used where practicable for the purposes of this translation in order to aid understanding. The binding Polish original should be referred to in matters of interpretation.
II.Separate statement of comprehensive income
III.Separate statement of financial position
IV.Separate statement of changes in equity
V.Separate cash flow statement
VI.Notes to the separate financial statements
4. Significant accounting policies
8. Interest income and expense
9. Fee and commission income and expense
11. Result on financial assets and liabilities measured at fai value through profit or loss
13. Net allowances for expected credit losses
14. Other operating income and expenses
16. Depreciation and amortization
17. Total gains (losses) from subsidiaries and associates
21. Cash and balances with Central Bank
22. Loans and advances to banks
23. Financial assets and liabilities held for trading
24. Derivative financial instruments (held for trading)
25. Loans and advances to customers
27. Investment (placement) securities
28. Assets and liabilities held for sale
29. Investments in subsidiaries
32. Property, plant and equipment
35. Assets pledged as security for liabilities
36. Amounts due to other banks
47. Other capital and reserves, retained earnings and profit for the period
48. Additional information to the cash flow statement
49. Related party transactions
50. Repo and reverse repo transactions
51. Company Social Benefits Fund (‘ZFŚS’)
NOTE |
2020 |
2019 RESTATED |
|
8 |
5 576 227 |
6 420 302 |
|
Interest income calculated using the effective interest method |
|
5 334 553 |
6 157 882 |
Financial assets measured at amortised cost |
|
4 703 919 |
5 513 813 |
Financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income |
|
630 634 |
644 069 |
Other interest income related to financial assets measured at fair value through profit or loss |
|
241 674 |
262 420 |
Interest expense |
8 |
(547 786) |
(1 110 680) |
Net interest income |
|
5 028 441 |
5 309 622 |
Fee and commission income |
9 |
2 519 607 |
2 453 654 |
Fee and commission expense |
9 |
(463 789) |
(373 381) |
Net fee and commission income |
|
2 055 818 |
2 080 273 |
Dividend income |
10 |
236 680 |
291 427 |
Result on financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value through profit or loss and foreign exchange result |
11 |
158 185 |
128 400 |
Result on fair value hedge accounting |
26 |
(847) |
(1 666) |
Result on derecognition of financial assets and liabilities not measured at fair value through profit or loss |
12 |
60 543 |
70 953 |
Net allowances for expected credit losses |
13 |
(1 549 497) |
(624 107) |
Operating income |
14 |
67 516 |
98 069 |
Operating expenses |
14 |
(130 546) |
(90 075) |
Administrative expenses |
15 |
(3 733 887) |
(3 786 262) |
Personnel expenses |
|
(1 804 236) |
(1 823 257) |
Other administrative expenses |
|
(1 929 651) |
(1 963 005) |
Depreciation and amortization |
16 |
(496 033) |
(460 868) |
Gains (losses) on subsidiaries and associates |
17 |
847 |
- |
PROFIT BEFORE INCOME TAX |
|
1 697 220 |
3 015 766 |
Income tax expense |
18 |
(570 796) |
(768 299) |
NET PROFIT |
|
1 126 424 |
2 247 467 |
Earnings per share (in PLN per share) |
19 |
|
|
|
4.29 |
8.56 |
|
diluted for the period |
|
4.29 |
8.56 |
NOTE |
2020 |
2019 |
|
|
1 126 424 |
2 247 467 |
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
Item that are or may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss: |
|
|
|
Change in fair value of financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income: |
|
696 234 |
130 089 |
Profit or loss on fair value measurement |
|
742 428 |
192 127 |
Profit or loss reclassification to income statement after derecognition |
|
(46 194) |
(62 038) |
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges |
26 |
466 716 |
75 223 |
Tax on items that are or may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss |
18 |
(220 960) |
(39 009) |
Items that will never be reclassified to profit or loss: |
|
|
|
Effects of the revaluation or sale of investments in equity instruments designated at fair value through other comprehensive |
|
88 080 |
(7 462) |
Remeasurements of the defined benefit liabilities |
|
(10 370) |
(2 665) |
Tax on items that will never be reclassified to profit or loss |
18 |
(14 765) |
1 924 |
Other comprehensive income (net of tax) |
|
1 004 935 |
158 100 |
Total comprehensive income |
|
2 131 359 |
2 405 567 |
NotE |
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
Cash and due from Central Bank |
21 |
4 456 272 |
5 138 758 |
Loans and advances to banks |
23 |
2 917 839 |
2 243 908 |
Financial assets held for trading |
23 |
1 613 337 |
1 279 495 |
Derivative financial instruments (held for trading) |
24 |
4 842 279 |
2 085 989 |
Loans and advances to customers |
25 |
128 726 959 |
131 675 384 |
1. Measured at amortised cost |
|
126 951 240 |
129 886 963 |
2. Measured at fair value through profit or loss |
|
187 001 |
242 639 |
3. Measured at fair value through other comprehensive income |
|
1 588 718 |
1 545 782 |
Hedging instruments |
26 |
779 063 |
377 208 |
Investments (placement) securities |
27 |
72 657 423 |
45 873 297 |
1. Measured at fair value through profit or loss |
|
160 486 |
125 454 |
2. Designated at fair value through profit or loss |
|
- |
- |
3. Measured at fair value through other comprehensive income (debt securities) |
|
44 606 162 |
30 964 680 |
4. Designated at fair value through other comprehensive income (equity instruments) |
|
331 690 |
225 332 |
5. Measured at amortised cost |
|
27 559 085 |
14 557 831 |
Assets held for sale |
23 |
35 738 |
17 175 |
Investments in subsidiaries |
29 |
1 542 792 |
1 626 449 |
Investments in associates |
30 |
- |
- |
Intangible assets |
31 |
1 139 355 |
739 777 |
Property, plant and equipment |
32 |
1 834 635 |
1 842 378 |
Investment properties |
33 |
- |
- |
Income tax assets |
18 |
939 978 |
777 116 |
1. Current tax assets |
|
- |
- |
2. Deferred tax assets |
|
939 978 |
777 116 |
Other assets |
34 |
895 326 |
973 058 |
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
222 380 996 |
194 649 992 |
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
Amounts due to Central Bank |
21 |
- |
4 550 |
Amounts due to other banks |
36 |
5 225 544 |
3 043 969 |
Financial liabilities held for trading |
23 |
742 804 |
184 799 |
Derivative financial instruments (held for trading) |
24 |
4 636 116 |
2 040 368 |
Amounts due to customers |
37 |
178 827 283 |
158 544 670 |
Hedging instruments |
26 |
1 072 959 |
614 765 |
Debt securities issued |
38 |
523 305 |
1 604 344 |
Subordinated liabilities |
39 |
2 757 876 |
2 764 493 |
Income tax liabilities |
|
309 449 |
168 318 |
1. Current tax liabilities |
|
309 449 |
168 318 |
2. Deferred tax liabilities |
|
- |
- |
Provisions |
40 |
1 052 781 |
773 057 |
Other liabilities |
41 |
2 585 508 |
2 379 871 |
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
|
197 733 625 |
172 123 204 |
Equity |
|
|
|
Share capital |
46 |
262 470 |
262 470 |
Other capital and reserves |
47 |
21 573 419 |
20 016 851 |
Retained earnings and net profit for the period |
47 |
2 811 482 |
2 247 467 |
TOTAL EQUITY |
|
24 647 371 |
22 526 788 |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
222 380 996 |
194 649 992 |
For the period from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2020
|
SHARE CAPITAL |
OTHER CAPITAL AND RESERVES |
RETAINED EARNINGS AND NET PROFIT for the period |
TOTAL EQUITY |
|||||
TOTAL OTHER CAPITAL AND RESERVES |
SHARE PREMIUM |
GENERAL BANKING RISK FUND |
OTHER RESERVE CAPITAL |
REVALUATION RESERVES |
OTHER |
||||
Note |
46 |
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
Equity as at 1.01.2020 |
262 470 |
20 016 851 |
9 137 221 |
1 982 459 |
8 300 933 |
363 111 |
233 127 |
2 247 467 |
22 526 788 |
Comprehensive income |
- |
1 004 935 |
- |
- |
- |
1 004 935 |
- |
1 126 424 |
2 131 359 |
Remeasurements of the defined benefit liabilities (net of tax) |
- |
(8 400) |
- |
- |
- |
(8 400) |
- |
- |
(8 400) |
Revaluation of debt financial instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income (net of tax) |
- |
563 950 |
- |
- |
- |
563 950 |
- |
- |
563 950 |
Revaluation or sale of investments in equity instruments designated at t fair value through other comprehensive income (net of tax) |
- |
71 345 |
- |
- |
- |
71 345 |
- |
- |
71 345 |
Revaluation of hedging financial instruments |
- |
378 040 |
- |
- |
- |
378 040 |
- |
- |
378 040 |
Net profit for the period |
- |
0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 126 424 |
1 126 424 |
Appropriation of retained earnings |
- |
562 409 |
- |
- |
562 409 |
- |
- |
(562 409) |
- |
Dividend paid |
- |
0 |
- |
- |
0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Profit appropriation |
- |
562 409 |
- |
- |
562 409 |
- |
- |
(562 409) |
- |
Other |
- |
(10 776) |
- |
- |
(10 776) |
- |
- |
- |
(10 776) |
Acquisition of the organised part of the enterprise of the Pekao Investment Banking S.A |
- |
(10 776) |
- |
- |
(10 776) |
- |
- |
- |
(10 776) |
Equity as at 31.12.2020 |
262 470 |
21 573 419 |
9 137 221 |
1 982 459 |
8 852 566 |
1 368 046 |
233 127 |
2 811 482 |
24 647 371 |
For the period from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2019
SHARE CAPITAL |
OTHER CAPITAL AND RESERVES |
RETAINED EARNINGS AND NET PROFIT for the period |
TOTAL EQUITY |
||||||
TOTAL OTHER CAPITAL AND RESERVES |
SHARE PREMIUM |
GENERAL BANKING RISK FUND |
OTHER RESERVE CAPITAL |
REVALUATION RESERVES |
OTHER |
||||
Note |
46 |
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity as at 1.01.2019 |
262 470 |
20 185 676 |
9 137 221 |
1 982 459 |
8 627 858 |
205 011 |
233 127 |
1 373 852 |
21 821 998 |
Comprehensive income |
- |
158 100 |
- |
- |
- |
158 100 |
- |
2 247 467 |
2 405 567 |
Remeasurements of the defined benefit liabilities (net of tax) |
- |
(2 159) |
- |
- |
- |
(2 159) |
- |
- |
(2 159) |
Revaluation of debt financial instruments and loans measured at fair value through other comprehensive income (net of tax) |
- |
105 372 |
- |
- |
- |
105 372 |
- |
- |
105 372 |
Revaluation or sale of investments in equity instruments designated at fair value through other comprehensive income (net of tax) |
- |
(6 044) |
- |
- |
- |
(6 044) |
- |
- |
(6 044) |
Revaluation of hedging financial instruments |
- |
60 931 |
- |
- |
- |
60 931 |
- |
- |
60 931 |
Net profit for the period |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2 247 467 |
2 247 467 |
Appropriation of retained earnings |
- |
578 298 |
- |
- |
578 298 |
- |
- |
(2 310 600) |
(1 732 302) |
Dividend paid |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(1 732 302) |
(1 732 302) |
Profit appropriation |
- |
578 298 |
- |
- |
578 298 |
- |
- |
(578 298) |
- |
Other |
- |
(905 223) |
- |
- |
(905 223) |
- |
- |
936 748 |
31 525 |
Coverage of negative impact of IFRS 9 implementation |
- |
(936 748) |
- |
- |
(936 748) |
- |
- |
936 748 |
- |
Transfer of a part of CDM assets and liabilities to the Bank |
- |
31 525 |
- |
- |
31 525 |
- |
- |
- |
31 525 |
Equity as at 31.12.2019 |
262 470 |
20 016 851 |
9 137 221 |
1 982 459 |
8 300 933 |
363 111 |
233 127 |
2 247 467 |
22 526 788 |
NOTE |
2020 |
2019 Restated |
|
Cash flow from operating activities – indirect method |
|
|
|
Profit before income tax |
|
1 697 220 |
3 015 766 |
Adjustments for: |
|
26 701 695 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
16 |
496 033 |
460 868 |
(Gains) losses on investing activities |
|
(50 319) |
(86 372) |
Net interest income |
8 |
(5 028 441) |
(5 309 622) |
Dividend income |
10 |
(236 680) |
(291 427) |
Interest received |
|
5 477 538 |
6 376 534 |
Interest paid |
|
(710 942) |
(1 138 084) |
Income tax paid |
|
(703 356) |
(615 472) |
Change in loans and advances to banks |
|
81 796 |
83 160 |
Change in financial assets held for trading |
|
(340 951) |
(389 961) |
Change in derivative financial instruments (assets) |
|
(2 756 290) |
(630 013) |
Change in loans and advances to customers |
|
2 879 327 |
(9 359 628) |
Change in investment (placement) securities |
|
(26 647) |
176 172 |
Change in other assets |
|
488 407 |
(534 753) |
Change in amounts due to banks |
|
2 373 171 |
85 991 |
Change in financial liabilities held for trading |
|
558 005 |
82 370 |
Change in derivative financial instruments (liabilities) |
|
2 595 748 |
120 974 |
Change in amounts due to customers |
|
20 539 974 |
8 625 640 |
Change in debt securities issued |
|
1 525 |
17 071 |
Change in subordinated liabilities |
|
- |
2 008 |
Payments for short-term leases and leases of low-value assets |
|
(2 185) |
(8 092) |
Change in provisions |
|
279 724 |
118 097 |
Change in other liabilities |
|
786 258 |
138 696 |
Net cash flows from operating activities |
|
28 398 915 |
939 923) |
Cash flow from investing activities |
|
|
|
Investing activity inflows |
|
351 008 315 |
136 298 026 |
Sale of investment securities |
|
350 771 655 |
135 988 504 |
Sale of intangible assets and property, plant and equipment |
31, 32 |
- |
18 095 |
Dividend received |
10 |
236 660 |
291 427 |
Investing activity outflows |
|
(377 953 640) |
(143 980 921) |
Acquisition of investment securities |
|
(377 165 906) |
(143 520 085) |
Acquisition of intangible assets and property, plant and equipment |
31, 32 |
(787 734) |
(460 836) |
Net cash flows from investing activities |
|
(26 945 325) |
(7 682 895) |
NOTE |
2020 |
2019 Restated |
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
Financing activity inflows |
|
479 940 |
2 376 280 |
Due to loans and advances received from banks |
48 |
- |
245 881 |
Issue of debt securities |
48 |
479 940 |
1 380 399 |
Issue of subordinated liabilities |
48 |
- |
750 000 |
Financing activity outflows |
|
(1 857 363) |
(3 645 896) |
Repayment of loans and advances received from banks |
48 |
(183 301) |
(215 429) |
Redemption of debt securities |
48 |
(1 560 496) |
(1 507 034) |
Dividends and other payments to shareholders |
|
- |
(1 732 302) |
Payments for the principal portion of the lease liabilities |
|
(113 566) |
(191 131) |
Net cash flows from financing activities |
|
(1 377 423) |
(1 269 616) |
Total net cash flows |
|
76 167 |
(8 012 588) |
including: effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash and cash equivalents held |
|
172 095 |
(10 906) |
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
76 167 |
(8 012 588) |
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period |
48 |
7 220 182 |
15 232 770 |
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period |
48 |
7 296 349 |
7 220 182 |
Bank Polska Kasa Opieki Spółka Akcyjna (hereafter ‘Bank Pekao S.A.’ or ‘the Bank’), with its headquarters in Poland in Warsaw 00-844, Grzybowska Street 53/57, was incorporated on 29 October 1929 in the Commercial Register of the District Court in Warsaw and has been continuously operating since its incorporation.
Bank Pekao S.A. is registered in the National Court Registry – Enterprise Registry of the Warsaw District Court, XII Commercial Division of the National Court Registry in Warsaw under the reference number KRS 0000014843 (no changes in the name or identification data compared to the previous reporting period).
The Bank’s shares are quoted on the Warsaw Stock Exchange (WSE). The Bank’s securities, traded on regulated markets, are classified in the banking sector.
Bank Pekao S.A. is a universal commercial bank, offering a broad range of banking services on domestic financial markets, provided to retail and corporate clients, in compliance with the scope of services, set forth in the Bank’s Articles of Association.
The Bank runs both PLN and forex operations, and it actively participates in both domestic and foreign financial markets. Moreover, acting through its subsidiaries, the Bank provides stockbroking, leasing, factoring operations and offering other financial services.
According to IFRS 10 ‘Consolidated financial statements’, the parent entity of Bank Pekao S.A. is Powszechny Zakład Ubezpieczeń S.A. (hereinafter ‘PZU S.A.’) with its registered office in Warsaw at Al. Jana Pawła II 24.
The Bank also prepares Consolidated Financial Statements of Bank Pekao S.A. Group.
The share ownership structure of the Bank is presented in the Note 6.1 of the Report on the activities of Bank Pekao S.A. Group for the year 2020 - prepared jointly with the Report on the activities of Bank Pekao S.A.
Acquisition of an organized part of the enterprise of Pekao Investment Banking S.A.
On 29 May 2020 the Bank acquired an organized part of the enterprise of Pekao Investment Banking S.A. related to the provision of brokerage services. Other activities of Pekao Investment Banking S.A. related to oferent investment banking services remained with the Company.
The transaction of acquisition of an organized part of the enterprise of Pekao Investment Banking S.A. has been recognized in accordance with the adopted accounting policy applied to business combinations under common control. The Bank recognized the acquired assets and assumed liabilities at their current book value. As a result of this transaction, the Bank did not recognize any goodwill or profit on a bargain purchase. The difference in the amount of PLN 10 776 thousand between the value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities and the payment made was recognized in the Bank's equity.
These separate financial statements were approved for publication by the Bank’s Management Board on 24 February 2021.
General information
The financial statements have been prepared in Polish zloty, and all data in the financial statements are presented in PLN thousand (PLN ‘000), unless indicated otherwise.
The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis on the assumption that the Bank will continue its business operations substantially unchanged in scope for a period of at least one year from the balance sheet date.
The accounting principles as described below have been consistently applied for all the reporting periods. The principles have been applied consistently by all the Bank entities.
Separate Financial Statements of the Bank for the year ended on 31 December 2020 have been prepared based on the following valuation methods:
at fair value for derivatives, financial assets and liabilities held for trading, financial assets designated as measured at fair value through profit and loss at initial recognition, equity instruments, financial assets classified to business model whose objective is achieved by both collecting contractual cash flows and selling financial assets that do meet SPPI criteria (Solely Payments of Principal and Interest criteria) and financial assets that do not meet SPPI criteria,
at amortized cost for financial assets, classified to business model whose objective is to hold financial assets in order to collect contractual cash and meeting SPPI criteria at the same time, for other financial liabilities,
at historical cost for non-financial assets and liabilities,
non-current assets (or disposal groups) classified as held for sale are measured at the lower of the carrying amount or the fair value less costs to sell.
The separate financial statements include the requirements of all the International Financial Reporting Standards and International Accounting Standards approved by the European Union and related interpretations. Changes in published standards and interpretations, which became effective on or after 1 January 2020, had no material impact on the Bank’s financial statements.
The financial statements does take into consideration interpretations and amendments to Standards, pending approval by the European Union or approved by the European Union but came into force or shall come into force after the balance sheet date (Note 4.10 and Note 4.11). In the Bank’s opinion, amendments to Standards and interpretations will not have a material impact on the separate financial statements of the Bank.
Comparability of financial data
In the separate financial statements for the year ended on 31 December 2020, the Bank changed the presentation of selected items in the profit and loss account. The item ‘Net other operating income and expenses’ has been presented in two separate lines, i.e. as ‘Other operating income’ and ‘Other operating expenses’.
The above-mentioned changes resulted in restatement of comparable data, but without impact on the financial result level.
The impact of changes on the comparative data of the income statement is presented in the table below.
SEPARATE INCOME STATEMENT |
DATE FOR 31.12.2019 BEFORE RESTATEMENT |
RESTATEMENT |
DATE FOR 31.12.2019 AFTER RESTATEMENT |
Net other operating income and expenses |
7 994 |
(7 994) |
- |
Other operating income |
- |
98 069 |
98 069 |
Other operating expenses |
- |
(90 075) |
(90 075) |
In the separate financial statements for the year ended on 31 December 31 2020 the Bank changed presentation of selected items of the separate statement of cash flows:
cash flows from operating activities determined using the indirect method have been presented as ‘Gross profit’ and adjustments (previously ‘Net profit’ and adjustments), therefore the item ‘Income tax’ has been rejected from the item ‘Total adjustments’,
position ‘Other investment inflows’ was presented in line ‘Changes in investment (placement) securities’.
The impact of changes on the comparative data of the statement of cash flows is presented in the table below:
CASH FLOW STATEMENT |
DATE FOR 2019 BEFORE RESTATEMENT |
RESTATEMENT |
DATE FOR 2019 AFTER RESTATEMENT |
Profit before income tax |
- |
3 015 766 |
3 015 766 |
Net profit for the period |
2 247 467 |
(2 247 467) |
- |
Income tax |
768 299 |
(768 299) |
- |
Change in other assets |
(534 751) |
(2) |
(534 753) |
Change in investment (placement) securities |
(836 350) |
1 012 522 |
176 172 |
Other investing inflows |
1 012 520 |
(1 012 520) |
- |
Preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS requires the Bank to make certain estimates and to adopt certain assumptions, which affect the amounts of assets and liabilities presented in the financial statements.
Estimates and assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis by the Bank and rely on historic data and other factors including expectation of the future events which seems justified in given circumstances. In particular, as at 31 December 2020, the Bank included in its estimates the impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on individual items of the Bank's assets and liabilities. However, taking into account the significant uncertainty as to the further development of the economic situation, the estimates made may change in the future. The uncertainty of the estimates made by the Bank as at 31 December 2020 concerns mainly:
forecasts regarding macroeconomic assumptions, in particular those relating to key economic indicators ( the level of the expected economic recovery, GDP, employment, housing prices, possible disruptions in capital markets, etc.),
possible business disruptions due to decisions made by public institutions, enterprises and consumers to help contain the spread of the virus,
the effectiveness of the support programs that have been designed to support businesses and consumers.
Significant accounting estimates that are affected by the aforementioned forecasts and the related uncertainties relate primarily to expected credit losses and the determination of the recoverable amount of non-financial assets.
Estimates and underlying assumptions are subject to a regular review. Revisions to accounting estimates are recongised prospectively starting from the period in which the estimates are revised.
Information on the applied estimates and the underlying uncertainty related to significant risk of the material adjustments in the subsequent financial statements are presented below.
Impairment of loans and advances to customers, expected credit losses
At each balance sheet date the Bank assesses whether there is any objective evidence (‘trigger’) that credit exposures are impaired taking into consideration actual definition of Default.
The definition of Default consistently considers all financial instruments. For financial instruments that are not impaired, the Bank asses if credit risk has increased significantly since initial recognition. If at balance sheet date credit risk concerning the financial instrument has not increase significantly since initial recognition, the Bank asses impaired allowances for expected losses with regard to the financial instrument as an amount equal 12-month expected credit losses. Otherwise, the Bank asses impaired allowances for expected losses with regard to the financial instrument as an amount equal expected credit losses over the expected life (lifetime horizon) of that financial instrument (lifetime expected credit losses).
The Bank, in order to determine the value of expected credit losses, ring fence individually significant financial instruments, in particular all credit exposures of the borrower, for whom total Bank’s exposure exceeds the threshold value as at balance sheet date equal 1 million PLN and the -financial restructuring instruments of debtors being the entrepreneurs within the meaning of the Article 43 of the Civil Code.
For all individually significant financial instruments , which are impaired as at balance sheet date, the Bank measures the impairment allowance (impairment credit loss) as part of individual assessment. The individual assessment is carrying out by the Bank’s employees and consists of individual verification of the default occurrence and projection of future cash flows from foreclosure, less costs incurred for obtaining and selling the collateral or other repayment resources.
The Bank compares the estimated future cash flows applied for measurement of individual expected credit losses with the actual cash flows on a regular basis.
For all other financial instruments the Bank measures the allowance according to IFRS 9 based on the expected credit losses and taking into account forecasts and expected future economic conditions in the context of credit risk.
More information about the applied assumptions and the underlying uncertainty related to the estimates in respect to expected credit losses, as well as the sensitivity analysis concerning impairment of loans and advances estimates were presented in Note 6.2 ’.
Impairment of non-current assets (including goodwill)
At each balance sheet date the Bank reviews its non-current assets for indications of impairment. The Bank performs an impairment test of goodwill on a yearly basis or more often if impairment triggers occur.
Where such indications exist, the Bank makes a formal estimation of the recoverable value (of a given assets or – in the case of goodwill - all cash-generating units to which the goodwill relates). If the carrying amount of a given asset is in excess of its recoverable value, impairment is defined and a write-down is recorded to adjust the carrying amount to the level of its recoverable value. The recoverable amount of an asset or a cash-generating unit is the higher of its fair value less costs to sell and its value-in-use.
Estimation of the value-in-use of an assets (or cash generating unit) requires assumptions to be made regarding, among other, future cash flows which the Bank may obtain from the given asset (or cash generating unit), any changes in amount or timing of occurrence of these cash flows and other factors such as the lack of liquidity. The adoption of different measurement assumptions may affect the carrying amount of some of the group’s non-current assets.
As at 31 December 2020, the Bank assessed whether the current market conditions and the existing uncertainty regarding the macroeconomic situation caused by COVID-19 have an impact on the impairment of non-current assets. As a result of this analysis, no need was found to make impairment allowances of non-current assets, including goodwill. The main assumptions used in the goodwill impairment test are presented in Note 31.
Measurement of derivatives, unquoted debt securities measured at fair value through other comprehensive income and loans and advances to customers measured at fair value through other comprehensive income and measured at fair value through profit or loss
The fair value of non-option derivatives, debt securities measured at fair value through other comprehensive income and loans and advances to customers measured at fair value through other comprehensive income and measured at fair value through profit or loss that do not have a quoted market price on an active market is measured using valuation models based on discounted cash flows. Options are valued using option valuation models. Variables used for valuation purposes include, where possible, the data from observable markets. However, the Bank also adopts assumptions concerning counterparty’s credit risks which affect the valuation of instruments. The adoption of other measurement assumptions may affect the valuation of these financial instruments. The assumptions used for fair value measurement are described in detail in Note 5.7.
Provisions for defined benefit plans
The principal actuarial assumptions applied to estimation of provisions for defined benefit plans, as well as the sensitivity analysis were presented in Note 42.
Provisions for legal risk regarding foreign currency mortgage loans in CHF
As at 31 December 2020 the Bank assessed the probability of the impact of legal risk regarding foreign currency mortgage loans in CHF on future expected cash flows from loan exposures and the probability of cash outflows.
Given the inconsistent judicial decisions regarding foreign currency mortgage loans in CHF and the short period of historical data regarding lawsuits related to the above-mentioned loans, the estimation of the provision required the Bank to adopt expert assumptions and is associated with significant uncertainty.
Details on the main assumptions used to estimate the provisions for legal risk regarding foreign currency mortgage loans in CHF are presented in Note 5.2.
Provisions for commission refunds in the event of early repayment of loan
As at 31 December 2020 the Bank assessed the legal risk arising from the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (hereinafter the ‘CJEU’) on consumer loans and estimated the possible amount of cash outflow as a refund of commission to the customer in relation to early repayment of consumer loans (for loans prepaid before the judgment of the CJEU, i.e. before 11 September 2019).
In addition, with regard to balance-sheet exposures as at 31 December 2020, the Bank estimated the possible prepayments of these exposures in the future.
The estimates required the Bank to adopt expert assumptions primarily regarding the scale of complaints and amounts reimbursed for prepaid loans before the CJEU judgment, as well as the expected scale of prepayments and future returns for balance sheet exposures, and are associated with significant uncertainty.
Details on the estimated provision for earlier repayments of consumer loans are presented in Note 40.
Transactions and balances
Foreign currency transactions are calculated into the functional currency using the spot exchange rate from the date of the transaction. Gains and losses from foreign currency translation differences resulting from settlements of such transactions and from the statement of financial position valuation of monetary assets and liabilities expressed in foreign currencies are recognized in the income statement.
Foreign currency translation differences arising from non-monetary items, such as equity instruments classified as financial assets measured at fair value through the profit or loss are recognized together with the changes in the fair value of that item in the income statement.
Foreign currency translation differences arising from non-monetary items such as equity instruments classified as financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income are recognized in the revaluation reserves.
Goodwill arising on acquisition of the entity operating abroad as well as any adjustments of the balance sheet value of assets and liabilities to fair value arising on the acquisition of the entity are treated as assets and liabilities of a foreign entity i.e. they are expressed in the functional currency of the overseas entity and translated at the closing exchange rate as described above.
Interest income and expense
The Bank recognizes in the income statement all interest income and expense related to financial instruments measured at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method, financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income and financial assets and liabilities measured through profit or loss.
The effective interest rate is the discount rate of estimated future cash inflows and payments made during the expected period until the expiry date of the financial instruments, and in justified cases in a shorter time, to the gross carrying amount of such financial asset or to the amortised cost of financial liability. The calculation of the effective interest rate includes all commissions paid and received by parties to the agreement, transaction costs and all other premiums and discounts, comprising an integral part of the effective interest rate.
Interest income includes interest and commission fees received or due from loans, interbank deposits and securities measured at amortised cost recognized in the calculation of effective interest rate of loans and financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income or through profit or loss and hedging derivatives.
Gross carrying amount of the financial asset is the basis for interest income calculation except for credit-impaired financial assets (‘in Stage 3’) and purchased or originated credit-impaired financial assets (POCI assets). At the recognition of impairment of financial assets measured at amortized cost or financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income, the interest income is still recognized in profit or loss but is calculated by applying the effective interest rate to the gross carrying amount less the impairment charges.
Interest expense related to liabilities associated with client accounts and debt securities issued are recognized in the profit or loss using the effective interest rate.
Fee and commission income and expense
Fee and commission income is generated from financial services provided by the Bank. Fee and commission income and expense is recognized in the profit or loss using the following methods:
fees and commissions directly attributable to financial asset or liability origination (both income and expense) are recognized in the income statement using the effective interest rate method and are described above,
fees and commissions relating to the loans and advances without a defined repayment schedule and without a defined interest rate schedule e.g. overdraft facilities and credit cards are amortized over the life of the product using the straight line method,
other fees and commissions arising from the Bank’s financial services offering (customer account transaction charges, credit card servicing transactions, bonuses from card providers in order to cover the marketing card cost, brokerage activity and canvassing) as well as the trade margins on foreign exchange transactions with the Bank’s clients are recognized in the income statement up-front when the corresponding service is provided.
Income and expense from bancassurance
The Bank splits the remuneration for sale of insurance products linked to loans into separate components, i.e. dividing the remuneration into proportion of fair value of financial instrument and fair value of intermediary service to the sum of those values. The fair values of particular components of the remuneration are determined based on market data to a highest degree.
The particular components of the Bank’s remuneration for sale of insurance products linked to loans are recognized in the income statement according to the following principles:
remuneration from financial instrument – as part of effective interest rate calculation, included in interest income,
remuneration for intermediary service – upfront at the time when the insurance product in sold, included in fee and commission income.
Additionally the Bank estimates the part of the remuneration which will be refunded in the future (eg. due to early termination of insurance contract, early repayment of loan). The estimate of the provision for future refunds is based on the analysis of historical data and expectations in respect to refunds trend in the future.
Result on financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value through profit or loss and foreign exchange result
Result on financial assets measured at fair value through profit or loss includes:
Foreign exchange result
The foreign exchange gains (losses) are calculated taking into account the positive and negative foreign currency translation differences, whether realized or unrealized from the daily valuation of assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies. The revaluation is perform using the average exchange announced by the NBP on the balance sheet date.
The foreign exchange result includes swap points from derivative transactions, entered into by the Bank for the purpose of managing the Bank’s liquidity in foreign currencies.
Income from foreign exchange positions includes also foreign currency translation differences from valuation of investments in foreign operations arising on disposal thereof. Until the disposal, foreign currency translation differences from valuation of assets in foreign operations are recognized in ‘Other capital and reserves’.
Result on derivatives, loans and advances to customers and securities measured at fair value through profit or loss.
The income referred to above includes gains and losses realized on a sale or a change in the fair value of financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value through profit or loss.
The accrued interest and unwinding of a discount or a premium on loans and advances to customers and debt securities measured at fair value through profit or loss is presented in the net interest income.
Gains (losses) on financial assets/liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss
This includes gains and losses arising from changes realized on a sale or a change in the fair value of assets and liabilities, designated at fair value through profit or loss.
The accrued interest and unwinding of a discount or a premium on financial assets/liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss are recognized in the interest result.
Other operating income/expense
Other operating income includes mainly revenues from received compensations, revenues from operating leases, recovery of debt collection costs and miscellaneous revenues. Other operating expenses include mainly the costs of provision for legal claims, cost of provisions for current and future legal risk related to foreign currency mortgage loans in CHF, impairment allowance on fixed assets, client claims, compensation paid and miscellaneous expenses.
Financial assets
Financial assets are classified into the following categories:
financial assets measured at amortised cost,
financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income,
financial assets measured at fair value through profit or loss.
The above mentioned classification is based on the entity’s business model for managing the financial assets and the characteristics regarding the contractual cash flows (i.e. whether the contractual payments are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding ( i.e.‘criterion SPPI’).
The financial assets could be classified depending on the Bank’s business model to the following categories:
a business model whose objective is to hold financial assets in order to collect contractual cash flows,
a business model whose objective is achieved by both collecting contractual cash flows and selling financial assets,
other business model than business model whose objective is to hold financial assets in order to collect contractual cash flows and business model whose objective is achieved by both collecting contractual cash flows and selling financial assets.
The business model assessment
The assessment of the business model is made at the initial recognition of the asset (with the exception of the first adoption of IFRS 9 – when implementing the Standard, the Bank classified the particular groups of the asset in accordance with the business model applied at the date of the implementation of the IFRS 9 i.e. 1 January 2018, not at the initial recognition of the financial asset.
The business model criteria refers to the way the Bank’s managing financial assets in order to generate cash flows.
The Bank evaluates the purpose of the business model, to which the particular financial assets are classified on the level of particular portfolios of the assets – performing the analysis on those portfolio level is a reliable reflection of the Bank’s business activities regarding these models and also reflects to information analysis of those activities provided to the Bank’s management.
The assessment of the business model is based on the analysis of the following information regarding the portfolio of the financial assets:
applied policies and business aims for the particular portfolio and its practical implementation. In particular, the management's strategy regarding the acquisition of revenues from contractual interest payments, maintaining a specific interest rate profile of the portfolio, managing the liquidity gap and obtaining cash flows as a result of the sale of financial assets is assessed,
the manner in which the profitability of the portfolio is assessed and reported to the Bank's Management Board,
types of risk that affect the profitability and effectiveness of a given business model (and financial assets held under this business model) and the manner of managing the identified types of risk,
the way in which the managers of business operations are remunerated under a given business model - eg whether the remuneration depends on changes in the fair value of financial assets or the value of contractual cash flows obtained,
frequency, value and moment of sale of financial assets made in prior reporting periods, the reasons for these sales and expectations regarding future sales activity. However, information on sales activity is analyzed taking into account the overall assessment of the Bank's implementation of the adopted method of managing financial assets and generating cash flows.
Before making a decision regarding allocating a portfolio of financial assets to a business model which purpose is to obtain contractual cash flows, the Bank reviews and evaluates significant and objective quantitative data influencing the allocation of asset portfolios to the relevant business model, in particular:
the value of sales of financial assets made within the particular portfolios,
the frequency of sales of financial assets as part of particular portfolios,
expectation analysis regarding the value of planned sales of financial assets and their frequency of the particular portfolios, this analysis is carried out on the basis of probable scenarios of the Bank's business activities in the future.
The portfolios of financial assets from which sales are made that do not result from an increase in credit risk meet the assumptions of the business model, which purpose is to obtain contractual cash flows, provided that these sales:
are at low volume (even with a relatively high frequency of sales) or
are made rarely - as a result of one-off events, which the probability to occur again in the future, according to the Bank’s professional judgment is rare (even with a relatively high volume) or
they occur close to the maturity date of the financial assets being sold, and the revenue obtained from such sales is similar to those which could be obtained from remaining contractual cash flows as if the financial asset was held in the Bank's portfolio to the original maturity date.
The following sales are excluded from the analysis of sales value:
the sales resulting from an increase in the credit risk of financial assets, regardless of their frequency and volume,
the sales resulting from one-off events, which the probability to occur again in the future, according to the Bank’s professional judgment is rare,
the sales made close to maturity.
A held to obtain contractual cash flows or sale business model includes a portfolio of financial assets whose purpose is, in particular, managing current liquidity levels, maintaining the assumed profitability profile and/or adjust the duration of the asset and financial liabilities, and a level of sales are higher than for those financial assets classified in a model which purpose is to obtain contractual cash flows.
The business model comprising financial assets held for sale and other includes assets that do not meet the criteria to be classified into the business model, which purpose is to obtain contractual cash flows the business model which purpose is to obtain contractual cash flows or sales and also acquiring cash flows from interest and capital is not the main business target.
Assessment, whether the contractual payments are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding (SPPI criteria)
For the purposes of assessing cash flow characteristics, ‘principal’ is defined as the fair value of a financial asset at the time of initial recognition. ‘Interest’ is defined as the time value of money and the credit risk related to the unpaid part of principal and also other risks and costs associated with a standard loan agreement/ a security (e.g. liquidity risk or administrative costs) and margin.
When assessing whether the contractual cash flows constitute solely payments of principal and interest, the Bank analyzes contractual cash flows. This analysis includes an assessment whether the contractual terms include any provisions that the contractual payments could be changed or the amount of the contractual payments could be changed in a way that from an economic point of view they will not only represent repayments of principal and interest on the outstanding principal. When making this assessment, the Bank takes into account the occurrence of, among others:
conditional events that may change the amount or timing of the payment,
financial leverage (for example, interest terms include a multiplier greater than 1),
terms regarding the extension of the contract or prepayment option,
terms that the Bank’s cash flow claim is limited to a specified assets (eg non-recourse assets),
terms that modify the time value of money – e.g. mismatch of the frequency of the revaluation of the reference interest rate to its tenor.
The SPPI test is conducted for each financial asset classified into the business model, which purpose is to obtain contractual cash flows or a business model which purpose is to obtain contractual cash flows or sale, as at the initial recognition date or as at the latest significant annex date changing the terms of contractual cash flows.
The Bank performs an SPPI test at the level of homogeneous groups of standard products or at the level of a single contract for non-standard products or at the level of ISIN code for debt securities.
In situation when the time value of money is modified for a particular financial asset, the Bank is required to make an additional assessment (i.e. Benchmark Test) to determine whether the contractual cash flows are still solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding by determining how different the contractual (undiscounted) cash flows could be from the (undiscounted) cash flows that would arise if the time value of money element was not be modified (the benchmark cash flows). Benchmark Testing is not permitted for situation that some terms modify contractual cash flows, such as the built-in leverage element.
Financial assets measured at amortized cost
Financial assets are measured at amortized cost if at the same time they meet the following two criteria:
the financial asset is held within a business model whose objective is to hold financial assets in order to collect contractual cash flows, and
the contractual terms of the financial asset give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding (SPPI criteria are met).
Financial assets measured at amortized cost include amounts due from the Central Bank, amounts due from other banks, loans and advances to customers, investment debt securities, receivables reverse-repo and buy-sell-back transactions, meeting the criteria described in the previous paragraph.
Upon initial recognition, these assets are measured at fair value increased by transaction costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition or issue of a financial asset.
After initial recognition, these assets are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest rate. The calculation of the effective interest rate includes all commissions paid and received by the parties, transaction costs and other bonuses and discounts constituting an intergrated part of the effective interest rate.
Interest accrued using the effective interest rate is recognized in net interest income.
Since the impairment recognition, the interest recognized in the income statement is calculated based on the net carrying amount, whereas the interest recognized in the statement of financial position is accrued on the gross carrying amount. The impairment allowances are estimated for the part of accrued interest exposure, which the Bank consider as difficult to recover.
Allowances for expected credit losses reduce the gross carrying amount of assets, on the other hand they are recognized in the income statement under ‘Net allowances for expected credit losses’.
Financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income
Financial assets (excluding equity instruments) are measured at fair value through other comprehensive income when they simultaneously meet the following two conditions and have not been designated for measurement at fair value through profit or loss:
the financial asset is held within a business model whose objective is achieved by both collecting contractual cash flows and selling financial assets and
the contractual terms of the financial asset give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding (SPPI criteria are met).
Financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income include investment debt securities as well as loans and advances to customers that meet the criteria described in the previous paragraph.
Interest accrued using the effective interest rate is recognized in net interest income.
The effects of changes in fair value are recognized in other comprehensive income until the asset is excluded from the statement of financial position, when accumulated profit or loss is recognized in the income statement under ‘Result on derecognition of financial assets and liabilities not measured at fair value through profit or loss’.
An allowance for expected credit losses from financial assets that are measured at fair value through other comprehensive income is recognized in other comprehensive income and does not reduce the carrying amount of the financial asset in the statement of financial position. On the other hand, an expected credit risk allowance is recognized in the income statement under ‘Net allowances for expected credit losses’.
Purchased or originated credit-impaired financial assets (POCI)
The Bank distinguishes the category of purchased or originated credit-impaired assets. POCI are assets that are credit-impaired on initial recognition. Financial assets that were classified as POCI at initial recognition should be treated as POCI in all subsequent periods until they are derecognition.
POCI assets may arise through:
by purchasing a contract that meets the definition of POCI (e.g. as a result of a merger with another entity or purchaseof a portfolio of assets),
by concluding a contract that is POCI at the time of original granting (e.g. granting a loan to a customer in a bad financial condition),
by modifying the contract (e.g. under restructuring) qualifying this contract to be derecognised, resulting in a recognitionof a new contract meeting the definition of POCI. Conditions for qualifying a contract to be derecognised are described below.
At initial recognition, POCI assets are recognized in the balance sheet at their fair value, in particular they do not have recognized impairment allowance.
POCI assets do not constitute a separate accounting category of financial assets. They are classified into accounting categories in accordance with the general principles for classification of financial assets. The categories in which POCI assets may exist are a category of financial assets measured at amortized cost and financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income.
Investments in equity instruments
For investments in equity instruments not held for trading, the Bank may irrevocably choose to present changes in their fair value in other comprehensive income. The Bank makes a decision in this respect based on an individual analysis of each investment. In sucha a case the amounts presented in other comprehensive income are never subsequently transferred to profit or loss. In case of sale of an equity investment elected to be measured at fair value through other comprehensive income, a result on sale is transferred to the item ‘Other reserve capital’.
Equity investments not designated for measurement at fair value through other comprehensive income at the initial recognition are measured at fair value through profit or loss. Changes in the fair value of such investments, as well as the result on sales, are recognized in the income statement under ‘Result on financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value through profit or loss and foreign exchange result’.
Dividends from equity instruments, both measured at fair value through profit or loss and designated for valuation through other comprehensive income, are recognized in the income statement when the Bank's right to receive payment is established.
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
In this category, the Bank qualifies derivatives (non-hedging instruments), debt and equity securities, loans and receivables that were acquired or included in this category with the intention of selling in the short term. In addition, this category includes financial assets not held for trading that are compulsorily measured at fair value through profit or loss for which the SPPI test has not been passed.
Moreover, at initial recognition, the Bank may irrevocably designate selected financial assets that meet the amortized cost measurement criteria or at fair value through other comprehensive income for measurement at fair value through profit or loss if it eliminates or significantly reduces the accounting mismatch that would otherwise arise from measuring assets at different methods.
Changes in the fair value of assets, which occur during the period from transaction date to transaction settlement date, shall be recognized similarly as in the case of the asset held.
Credits and loans are recognized on the date of cash disbursement to the debtor.
Derivative instruments are recognized or derecognized on transaction dates.
Reclassification of financial asset
Financial assets are not reclassified in the reporting periods following the initial recognition, except for the reporting period following the change of the business model for managing financial assets by the Bank.
The reclassification of financial assets is applied prospectively from the reclassification date - without restatement of previously recognized gains or losses (including impairment gains or losses) or interest.
The following are not changes in business model:
a change in intention related to particular financial assets (even in circumstances of significant changes in market conditions),
the temporary disappearance of a particular market for financial assets,
a transfer of financial assets between parts of the entity with different business models.
Modifications of financial assets
If the terms of the financial asset agreement change, the Bank assesses whether the cash flows generated by the modified asset differ significantly from those generated by the asset before modifying the terms of its agreement. If a significant difference is identified, the original financial asset is derecognised, and the modified financial asset is recognized in the books at its fair value. Income or expense arising as at the date of determining the effects of the significant modification is recognized in the profit and loss in the item ‘Profit (loss) on derecognition of financial assets and liabilities not measured at fair value through profit or loss.
If the cash flows generated by the modified asset measured at amortized cost are not materially different from the original cash flows, the modification does not result in derecognition of the financial asset. In this case, the Bank recalculates the gross carrying amount of the financial asset, and the result on the immaterial modification is recognized in interest income. Quantitative information about financial assets that were subject to modification that didn’t result in derecognition was presented in Note 5.2 ‘Credit risk’.
The assessment whether a given modification of financial assets is significant or insignificant modification depends on the fulfillment of qualitative and quantitative criteria.
The Bank has adopted the following quality criteria to determine significant modifications:
currency conversion, unless it results from existing contractual provisions or requirements of applicable legal regulations,
change (replacement) of the debtor, excluding the addition/departure of the joint debtor or taking over the loan in inheritance,
consolidation of several exposures into one under an annex or settlement/restructuring agreement,
change in the type interest rate from fixed to variable or vice versa
The occurrence of at least one of these criteria results in a significant modification.
The Bank has adopted the following quantitative criteria to determine significant modifications:
extension of the loan term by at least one year and at least a doubling of the residual maturity to the original maturity (meeting both conditions jointly) for Stage 1 and Stage 2, or
increasing the current loan amount/limit by at least 10% for Stage 1 and Stage 2 or increasing the current loan amount/limit for a contract in Stage 3.
If the terms of a financial asset agreement are modified, and the modification does not result in derecognition of the asset from the balance sheet, the determination, whether the credit risk of a given asset significantly increases, is made by comparing:
lifetime PD on the reporting date, based on modified conditions, with
lifetime PD estimated on the basis of data valid at the date of initial recognition and initial contractual terms.
In the case of modification of financial assets, the Bank analyzes whether the modification has improved or restored the Bank's ability to collect interest and principal. As part of this process, the Bank assesses the borrower's ability to pay in relation to modified terms of agreement.
Impairment of financial assets
A financial asset is credit-impaired when one or more events that have a detrimental impact on the estimated future cash flows of that financial asset have occurred. Evidence that a financial asset is credit-impaired include observable data about the following events:
1) significant financial difficulty of the issuer or the borrower,
2) a breach of contract, such as a default or past due event,
3) the lender(s) of the borrower, for economic or contractual reasons relating to the borrower’s financial difficulty, having granted to the borrower a concession(s) that the lender(s) would not otherwise consider,
4) it is becoming probable that the borrower will enter bankruptcy or other financial reorganization,
5) the disappearance of an active market for that financial asset because of financial difficulties, or
6) the purchase or origination of a financial asset at a deep discount that reflects the incurred credit losses.
The Bank recognises a loss allowance for expected credit losses on a financial asset that is measured at amortised cost or at fair value through other comprehensive income, a financial lease receivable, a contract asset or a loan commitment and a financial guarantee contract.
A loss allowance for financial assets that are measured at fair value through other comprehensive income is recognised in other comprehensive income and is not reducing the carrying amount of the financial asset in the statement of financial position.
If, at the reporting date, the credit risk on a financial instrument has not increased significantly since initial recognition, the Bank measures the loss allowance for that financial instrument at an amount equal to 12-month expected credit losses.
At each reporting date, the Bank measures the loss allowance for a financial instrument at an amount equal to the lifetime expected credit losses if the credit risk on that financial instrument has increased significantly since initial recognition.
For financial instruments in Stage 3, the Bank measures the expected credit losses in the amount equal to the expected credit losses over the life of such instruments.
The Bank recognises in profit or loss, as an impairment gain or loss, the amount of expected credit losses (or reversal) that is required to adjust the loss allowance at the reporting date to the amount that is required to be recognised in accordance with this chapter.
For loan commitments and financial guarantee contracts, the date that the Bank becomes a party to the irrevocable commitment shall be considered to be the date of initial recognition for the purposes of applying the impairment requirements.
Since initial recognition of POCI assets, the Bank recognises the cumulative changes in lifetime expected credit losses as a loss allowance for purchased or originated credit-impaired financial assets. At each reporting date, the Bank recognises in profit or loss the amount of the change in lifetime expected credit losses as an impairment gain or loss. An entity shall recognise favourable changes in lifetime expected credit losses as an impairment gain, even if the lifetime expected credit losses are less than the amount of expected credit losses that were included in the estimated cash flows on initial recognition.
The Bank measures the loss allowance at an amount equal to lifetime expected credit losses for:
1) trade receivables or contract assets that result from transactions that are within the scope of IFRS 15,
2) receivables that result from transactions that are within the scope of IFRS 16 (other than receivables from finance lease).
Expected credit losses are not recognized for impairment of equity instruments.
The methodology for calculating expected credit losses is described in detail in ‘The description of the model for impairment allowance’ in Note 5.2.
Derivative financial instruments and hedge accounting
The Bank acquires the derivative financial instruments: currency transactions (spot, forward, currency swap and currency options, CIRS), exchange rate transactions (FRA, IRS, CAP), derivative transactions based on security prices, indices of stocks and commodities. Derivative financial instruments are initially recorded at fair value as at the transaction date and subsequently re-measured at fair value at each balance sheet date. The fair value is established on the basis of market quotations for an instrument traded in an active market, as well as on the basis of valuation techniques, including models using discounted cash flows and options valuation models, depending on which valuation method is appropriate.
Positive valuation of derivative financial instruments is presented in the statement of financial position in the line ‘Derivative financial instruments (held for trading)’ or ‘Hedging instruments’ on an asset side, whereas the negative valuation - ‘Derivative financial instruments (held for trading)’ or ‘Hedging instruments’ on a liabilities side.
In case of contracts that are not financial instruments with a component of an instrument meeting the above conditions the built-in derivative instrument is classified in accordance with assets or liabilities of derivatives financial instruments with respect to the income statement in accordance with derivative financial instruments valuation principles.
The method of recognition of the changes in the fair value of an instrument depends on whether a derivative instrument is classified as held for trading or is designated as a hedging item under hedge accounting.
The changes in fair value of the derivative financial instruments held for trading are recognized in the income statement.
The Bank designates some of its derivative instruments as hedging items in applying hedge accounting. The Bank decided to take advantage of the choice which gives IFRS 9 and continues to apply the hedge accounting requirements of IAS 39. This decision will apply to all hedging relationships, for which the Bank applies and will apply hedge accounting in the future. The Bank implemented fair value hedge accounting as well as cash flow hedge accounting.
Fair value hedge accounting principles
Changes in the measurement to fair value of financial instruments indicated as hedged positions are recognized - in the part ensuing from hedged risk - in the income statement. In the remaining part, changes in the carrying amount are recognized in accordance with the principles applicable for the given class of financial instruments.
Changes in the fair market valuation of derivative financial instruments, indicated as hedging positions in fair value hedge accounting, are recognized in the profit or loss in the same caption, in which the gains/losses from change in the value of hedged positions are recognized i.e. in the item ‘Net income from fair value hedge accounting’
Interest income on derivative instruments hedging interest positions hedged is presented as interest margin.
The Bank ceases to apply hedge accounting, when the hedging instrument expires, is sold, dissolved or released (the replacement of one hedging instrument with another or extension of validity of given hedging instrument is not considered an expiration or release, providing such replacement or extension of validity is a part of a documented hedging strategy adopted by given unit), or does not meet the criteria of hedge accounting or the Bank ceases the hedging relation.
An adjustment for the hedged risk on hedged interest position is amortized in the income statement at the point of ceasing to apply hedge accounting.
Cash flow hedge accounting principles
Changes in the fair value of the derivative financial instruments indicated as cash flow hedging instruments are recognized:
directly in the caption ‘Revaluation reserves’ in the part constituting the effective hedge,
in the income statement in the line ‘Result on financial assets and liabilities held for trading and foreign exchange result’ in the part representing ineffective hedge.
The amounts accumulated in the ‘Revaluation reserves’ are transferred to the income statement in the period, in which the hedge is reflected in the income statement and are presented in the same lines as individual components of the hedged position measurement, i.e. the interest income from hedging derivatives in cash flow hedge accounting is recognized in the interest result, whereas gains/losses from foreign exchange revaluation are presented in the foreign exchange gains (losses).
The Bank ceases to apply hedge accounting when the hedging instrument expires or is sold, or if the Bank revokes the designation, or when hedge no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting. In such cases, the accumulated gains or losses related to such hedging item, initially recognized in ‘Revaluation reserves’, if the hedge was effective, are still presented in equity until the planned transaction was closed and recognized in the income statement.
If the planned transaction is no longer probable, the cumulative gains or losses recognized in ‘Revaluation reserves’ are transferred to the income statement for the given period.
Financial liabilities
The Bank classifies financial liabilities other than financial guarantee contracts and loan commitments, as measured at amortized cost or at fair value through profit or loss.
Financial liabilities valued at amortized cost include liabilities to banks and customers, loans taken by the Bank, issued own debt securities and subordinated liabilities.
De-recognition of financial instruments from the statement of financial position
Financial assets are derecognized when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the financial assets expire or when the Bank transfers the contractual rights to receive the cash flows in a transaction in which substantially all risk and rewards of ownership of the financial asset are transferred.
The Bank derecognizes a credit or a loan receivable, or its part, when it is sold. Additionally, the Bank writes-off a receivable against the corresponding impairment provision (completely or partially) when the debt redemption process is completed and when no further cash flows from the given receivable are expected. Such cases are documented in compliance with the current tax regulations.
Accumulated profits and losses that have been recognized in other comprehensive income from equity instruments designated to be measured at fair value through other comprehensive income are not recognized in the profit and loss account when these financial instruments are removed from the balance sheet.
The Bank derecognizes a financial liability, or its part, when the liability expires. The liability expires when the obligation stated in the agreement is settled, redeemed or the period for its collection expires.
Repo and reverse-repo agreements
Repo and reverse-repo transactions, as well as sell-buy back and buy-sell back transactions are classified as sales or purchase transactions of securities with the obligation of repurchase or resale at an agreed date and price.
Sales transactions of securities with the repurchase obligation granted (repo and sell-buy back) are recognized as at transaction date in amounts due to other banks or amounts due to customers from deposits depending upon the counterparty to the transaction. Securities purchased in reverse-repo and buy-sell back transactions are recognized as loans and receivables from banks or as loans and receivables from customers, depending upon the counterparty to the transaction.
The difference between the sale and repurchase price is recognized as interest income or expense, and amortized over the contractual life of the contract using the effective interest rate method.
Recognition of the provision for legal risk regarding foreign currency mortgage loans in CHF
With respect to foreign currency mortgage loans in CHF outstanding at 31 December 2020, the Bank recognizes that legal risk has an impact on the expected cash flow from the loan exposure and the amount of the provision is the difference between the expected cash flow from the given exposure and the contractual cash flows.
In connection with the above, the Bank adopts the approach that the amount of the provision for unpaid loan exposures as at 31 December 2020 (including existing and possible future claims) is recognized in ‘Impairment allowances for loan exposures’ (in correspondence with ‘Net allowances for expected credit losses’).
In the case of the part of the provision related to repaid foreign currency mortgage loans in CHF (including existing and possible future claims), the amount of the provision is recognized as ‘Provisions’ in correspondence with ‘Other operating expenses’.
The Bank estimates the legal risk provisions for foreign currency mortgage loans in CHF in accordance with the methodology described in Note 5.2.
Intangible assets
Goodwill
Goodwill is defined as a surplus of the purchasing price over the fair value of acquired assets, assumed liabilities and contingent liabilities of the acquired subsidiary, associate or a unit under joint control. Goodwill at initial recognition is carried at purchase price reduced by any accumulated impairment losses. Impairment is determined by estimating the recoverable value of the cash generating unit, to which given goodwill pertains.
If the recoverable value of the cash generating unit is lower than the carrying amount an impairment charge is made. Impairment identified in the course of such tests is not reversed.
Goodwill on acquisition of subsidiaries is presented in intangible assets and goodwill on acquisition of associates is presented under the caption ‘Investments in associates’.
Other intangible assets
Intangible assets are assets controlled by the Bank which do not have a physical form which are identifiable and represent future economic benefits for the Bank directly attributable to such assets.
These assets include:
computer software licenses,
copyrights,
costs of completed development works.
Intangible assets are initially carried at purchase price. Subsequently intangible assets are stated at cost less accumulated amortization and accumulated impairment losses.
Intangible assets with a definite useful life are amortized over their estimated useful life. Intangible assets with indefinite useful life are not amortized.
All intangible assets are reviewed on a periodical basis to verify if any significant impairment triggers occurred, which would require performing a test for impairment and a potential impairment charge.
As far as intangible assets with indefinite useful life and those still not put into service are concerned, impairment test is performed on a yearly basis and additionally when impairment triggers are identified.
Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment are defined as controlled non-current assets and assets under construction. Non-current assets include certain tangible assets with an expected useful life longer than one year, which are maintained for the purpose of own use.
Property, plant and equipment are recognized at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment write downs. Historical cost consists of purchase price or development cost and costs directly related to the purchase of
a given asset.
Each component of property, plant and equipment, the purchase price or production cost of which is significant compared to the purchase price or production cost of the entire item is a subject to separate depreciation. The Bank separates the initial value of property, plant and equipment into its significant parts.
Subsequent expenditures relating to property plant and equipment are capitalized only when it is probable that such expenditures will result in future economic benefits to the Bank, and the cost of such expenses can be reliably measured.
Service and maintenance costs of property, plant and equipment are expensed in the reporting period in which they have been incurred.
Borrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset form part of the cost of that asset. Other borrowing costs are recognized as an expense.
Depreciation and amortization
Depreciation expense for property, plant and equipment and investment properties and the amortization expense for intangible assets are calculated using straight line method over the expected useful life of an asset. Depreciated value is defined as the purchase price or cost to develop a given asset, less residual value of the asset. Depreciation rates and residual values of assets, determined for balance-sheet purposes, are subject to regular reviews, with results of such reviews recognized in the same period.
The statement of financial position depreciation and amortization rates applied to property, plant and equipment, investment properties and intangible assets are as follows:
a) depreciation rates applied for non-current assets
Buildings and structures and cooperative ownership rights to residential premises and cooperative ownership rights to commercial premises |
1.5% – 10.0% |
Technical equipment and machines |
4.5% – 30.0% |
Vehicles |
7% – 20.0% |
b) amortization rates for intangible assets
Buildings and structures and cooperative ownership rights to residential premises and cooperative ownership rights to commercial premises |
1.5% – 10.0% |
Technical equipment and machines |
4.5% – 30.0% |
Vehicles |
7% – 20.0% |
c) depreciation rates for investment properties
Buildings and structures |
1.5% – 10.0% |
Land, non-current assets under construction and intangible assets under development are not subject to depreciation and amortization.
Depreciation are charged to the income statement in the item ‘Depreciation and amortization’, wheres the impairment losses are charged to the income statement in the item ‘Other operating expenses’.
Investment properties
Investment properties assets are recognized initially at purchase cost, taking the transaction costs into consideration. Upon initial recognition, investment property assets are measured using the purchasing price model.
Investment property assets are derecognized from the statement of financial position when disposed of, or when such investment property is permanently decommissioned and no future benefits are expected from its sale. Any gains or losses resulting from de-recognition of an investment property are recognized in the income statement in the period when such de-recognition occurred.
Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations
Non-current assets held for sale include assets, the carrying amount of which is to be recovered by way of resale and not from their continued use. The only assets classified as held for sale are those available for immediate sale in their present condition, and the sale of which is highly probable, i.e. when the decision has been made to sell a given asset, an active program to identify a buyer has been launched and the divestment plan is completed. Moreover, such assets are offered for sale at a price which approximates its present fair value, and it is expected that the sale will be recognized as completed within one year from the date of such asset is reclassified into this category.
Non-current assets held for sale are recognized at the carrying amount or at fair value reduced by the cost of such assets, whichever is lower. Assets classified in this category are not subject to depreciation.
A discontinued operation is a component of the Bank’s business which constitutes a separate line of business or a geographical area of operations, which was sold, made available for sale or to be disposed, or is a subsidiary acquired exclusively with a view to re-sale. Classification as a discontinued operation occurs on disposal or when the operation meets the criteria to be classified as held for sale. When an operation is classified as held for sale, the comparative figures in the income statement are represented as if the operation had been discontinued from the beginning of the comparative period.
Leases
At inception of a contract, the Bank assesses whether the contract is, or contains, a lease. A contract is, or contains, a lease if the contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration.
The Bank is a party to lease contracts, based on which the Bank accepts the right to use an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration.
The Bank is also a party to lease contracts, based on which the Bank transfers the right to use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration.
Bank as a lessee
The Bank, as a lessee, recognizes the lease contract as a component of the right-to-use assets and the corresponding lease liability on the date when the subject of the lease is available for use. Each lease payment is allocated between the liability and accrued interest on the liability. Interest expense is recognized in the income statement over the lease term to obtain a constant periodic interest rate on the remaining balance of the lease liability. The right-of-use asset is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the shorter of two periods: the useful life of the asset or the lease term. The Bank recognizes the right-of-use assets in the item of the statement of financial position ‘Property, plant and equipment’ and lease liabilities - in the item of the statement of financial position ‘Amounts due to customers’ or ‘Amounts due to banks’.
The right-of-use assets are measured at cost, comprising:
the amount of the initial measurement of the lease liability,
any lease payments made at or before the commencement date, less any lease incentives received,
any initial direct costs incurred by the lessee, and
an estimate of costs to be incurred by the lessee in dismantling and removing the underlying asset, restoring the site on which it is located, if the lessee incurs liabilities regarding these costs.
On the date when the lease commences, the Bank, as a lessee, measures the lease liability in the present value of lease payments outstanding as at that date. The lease liabilities include the current value of the following lease payments:
fixed payments less any lease incentives receivable,
variable lease payments that depend on an index or a rate,
amounts expected to be payable by the lessee under residual value guarantees,
the exercise price of a purchase option if the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise that option, and
payments of penalties for terminating the lease, if the lease term reflects the lessee exercising an option to terminate the lease.
The lease payments are discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease, if the rate can be readily determined, or the Bank’s incremental borrowing rate.
After the lease commencement date, the Bank taken into account changes in lease payments (resulting, inter alia, from changes in the index, rate, lease term), by remeasuring the lease liabilities and the right-of-use assets.
The Bank does not recognize the right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for short-term lease contracts and lease contracts of low-value assets. Short-term lease payments and payments for leases of low-value assets are recognized as an expense in the income statement on a straight-line basis. Short-term lease contracts are lease contracts that have a lease term of 12 months or less. Low-value assets include mainly lease of space (land) for ATMs.
Bank as a lessor
At commencement date of a lease, the Bank, as a lessor, classifies each lease contract as an operating lease or a finance lease. The Bank classifies a lease as a finance lease whether it transfers substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of an underlying asset. Conversely, if substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the underlying asset are not transferred, the lease is considered to be an operating lease. In the process of determining the classification of a lease contract, the Bank takes into account elements such as whether the lease term accounts for the major part of the economic life of the underlying asset.
Finance lease
At the commencement date, the Bank, as a lessor, recognizes assets held under a finance lease in its statement of financial position and present them as a receivables from finance lease (presented in item ‘Loans and advances to customers’) at an amount equal to the net investment in the lease, i.e. at present value of lease payments and any unguaranteed residual value assigned to the Bank.
At the finance lease commencement date, the lease payments included in the measurement of the net investment in the lease comprise the following payments for the right to use the underlying asset during the lease term that are not received at the commencement date:
fixed payments, less any lease incentives payable,
variable lease payments that depend on an index or a rate,
any residual value guarantees provided to the Bank as a lessor,
the exercise price of a purchase option if the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise that option, and
payments of penalties for terminating the lease, if the lease term reflects the lessee exercising an option to terminate the lease.
During the lease term, the Bank, as a lessor, recognizes interest income, based on a pattern reflecting a constant periodic rate of return on the Bank's net investment in the lease. Lease payments paid over the lease term, reduce both the principal and the accrued interest.
The Bank applies the derecognition and impairment requirements in IFRS 9 to the net investment in the lease. The estimated unguaranteed residual values used in computing the gross investment in the lease are regularly reviewed by the Bank.
Operating lease
During the lease term, the Bank, as a lessor, recognizes lease payments from operating lease as income on a straight-line basis and presents them in the item ‘Other operating income’. The depreciation of leased assets is recognized in accordance with the principles applied by the Bank for property, plant and equipment.
Provisions
The provisions are recognized when the Bank has a present obligation (legal or constructive) resulting from the past events, it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation.
If the effect of the time value of money is material, the amount of a provision is established by discounting forecasted future cash flows to the present value, using the discount rate reflecting current market estimates of the time value of money and the possible risk associated with the obligation.
The provisions include provisions for litigation and claims (in this provision for legal risk regarding foreign currency mortgage loans in CHF and provision for early repayments of consumer loans), provisions relating to long-term employee benefits, in this those measured by an actuary and provisions for restructuring costs. The provision for restructuring costs is recognized when the general recognition criteria for provisions and detailed criteria for recognition of provisions for restructuring cost under IAS 37 ‘Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets’ are met. The amount of employment restructuring provision is calculated by the Bank on the basis of the best available estimates of direct outlays resulting from restructuring activities, which are not connected with the Bank’s current activities.
The provisions are charged to the income statement, except for actuarial gains and losses from the measurement of the defined benefit plans obligations, which are recognized in other comprehensive income.
Deferred income and accrued expenses (liabilities)
This caption includes primarily commission income settled using the straight line method and other income charged in advance, that will be recognized in the income statement in the future periods.
Accrued expenses include accrued costs resulting from services provided for the Bank by counterparties which will be settled in future periods, accrued payroll and other employee benefits (including annual and Christmas bonuses, other bonuses and awards and accrued holiday pay).
Deferred income and accrued expenses are presented in the statement of financial position under the caption ‘Other liabilities’.
Government grants
The Bank recognizes government grants when there is reasonable assurance that it will comply with any conditions attached to the grant and the grant will be received. Government grants are recognized in profit or loss in the periods in which the related expenses are recognized which the grants are intended to compensate. For the settlement of the grant, the Bank uses the income method. Government grants related to assets are presented in the statement of financial position of the Bank as a reduction in the carrying value of the asset.
Equity of the Bank
Equity is comprised of the capital and funds created by the companies of the Bank in accordance with the binding legal regulations and the appropriate laws and Articles of Association. Equity also includes retained earnings. Subsidiaries’ equity line items, other that share capital, are added to the relevant equity line items of the parent company, in the proportion of the Bank’s interest.
The equity of the Bank includes only those parts of the subsidiaries’ equity which were created after the date of purchase of shares or stocks by the parent entity.
The Bank equity consists of the following:
a) share capital - applies only to the capital of the Bank as the parent entity and is presented at nominal value specified in the Articles of Association and in the entry in the Enterprises Registry,
b) ‘issue premium’ - surplus generated during share issues over the nominal value of such issues, remaining after the issue costs are covered. Moreover, this item also includes a change in the value of minority shares, ensuing from an increase of the share of the Parent entity in Bank’s share capital,
c) the general banking risk fund is established at Bank Pekao S.A. in keeping with the Banking Act dated 29 August 1997 from profit after tax,
d) other reserve capital utilized for the purposes defined in the Statute is created from appropriations of profits,
e) revaluation reserve includes the impact of revaluation of debt financial instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income, revaluation or sale of investments in equity instruments designated at fair value through other comprehensive income, revaluation of derivative instruments hedging cash flows, remeasurements of the defined benefit liabilities and the value of deferred tax for items classified as temporary differences, recognized as valuation allowance. In the statement of financial position, the valuation allowance is presented as net value,
f) other capital:
other supplementary capital, established in keeping with provisions under the Articles of Association of companies from profit appropriations,
bonds convertible to shares - includes the fair value of financial instruments issued as part of transactions settled in equity instruments,
brokerage activity fund for stock broking operations, carried out by Bank Pekao S.A.,
retained earnings from prior periods includes undistributed profit and uncovered losses generated/incurred in prior periods by subsidiaries consolidated full method,
net profit/loss which constitutes profit/loss presented in the income statement for the relevant period. Net profit is after accounting for income tax.
Bank’s Pekao S.A. phantom shares-settled share-based payment transaction
The cost of transactions settled with employees in phantom shares is measured by reference to the fair value of the liability as of the balance sheet date.
The fair value of the liability is estimated based upon the Bank’s shares price on the (WSE) as of the balance sheet date and expected number of phantom shares to which full rights will be acquired.
The cost of phantom share-based payments is recognized in personnel expenses together with the accompanying increase in the value of liabilities towards employees presented in ‘Provisions’.
The accumulated cost recognized for transactions settled in phantom shares for each balance sheet date until the vesting date reflects the extent of elapse of the vesting period and the number of rights to shares the rights to which – in the opinion of the Bank’s Management Board for that date based on best available estimates of the number of phantom shares – will be eventually vested.
Income tax expense comprises current and deferred tax. The income tax expense is recognized in the income statement excluding the situations when it is recognized directly in equity. The current tax is the tax payable of the Bank entities on their taxable income for the period, calculated based on binding tax rates, and any adjustment to tax payable in respect of previous years. The receivables resulting from taxes are disclosed if the Bank’s companies has sufficient certainty that they exist and that they will be recovered.
Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are calculated, using the balance sheet method, on temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes. Deferred income tax is determined using tax rates based on legislation enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date and expected to apply when the deferred tax asset or the deferred tax liability is realized.
A deferred tax asset is recognized for negative temporary differences to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary difference can be utilized.
A deferred tax liability is calculated using the balance sheet method based on identification of positive temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for tax purposes.
Contingent liabilities and commitments
The Bank enters into transactions which are not recognized in the statement of financial position as assets or liabilities, but which result in contingent liabilities and commitments. Contingent liabilities are characterized as:
a potential obligation the existence of which will be confirmed upon occurrence or non-occurrence of uncertain future events that are beyond the control of the Bank (e.g. litigations),
a current obligation which arises as a result of past events but is not recognized in the statement of financial position as it is improbable that it will result in an outflow of benefits to settle the obligation or the amount of the obligation cannot be reliably measured (mainly: unused credit lines and guarantees and letters of credit issued).
Financial guarantees
Financial guarantees are measured at the higher of:
the amount of the loss allowance or
the amount initially recognised less the cumulative amount of income recognised in accordance with the principles of IFRS 15.
STANDARD/ |
Description |
IMPACT ASSESSMENT |
IAS 1 (amendment) ‘Presentation of financial statements’ and IAS 8 (amendment) ‘Accounting policies, changes in accounting estimates and errors’ |
The amendments clarify and align the definition of ‘material’ and provide guidance to help improve consistency in the application of that concept whenever it is used in IFRS Standards. |
The standards amendments did not have a material impact on the financial statements in the period of its first application. |
IFRS 9 (amendment) ‘Financial instruments’ |
The changes are mandatory and apply to all hedging relationships that are affected by uncertainty arising from the interest rate benchmark reform. The amendments introduce a temporary exemption from the application of specific hedge accounting requirements in such a way that the interest rate benchmark reform does not result in the termination of hedge accounting. The key exemptions resulting from the Changes relate to: the requirement that flows are 'highly likely', risk components, prospective assessment, retrospective effectiveness test (applies to IAS 39), reclassification of the provision for cash flow hedges. |
The Bank decided to apply these changes in the standards earlier, i.e. the principles resulting from these changes were adopted as binding in 2019. |
IFRS 3 (amendment) ‘Business combinations’ |
The amendments narrowed and clarified the definition of a business. They also permit a simplified assessment of whether an acquired set of activities and assets is a group of assets rather than a business. |
The standard’s amendment did not have a material impact on the financial statements in the period of its first application. |
MSSF 16 (amendment) ‘Leasing’ |
The amendments introduce an optional practical expedient that simplifies how a lessee accounts for rent concessions that are a direct consequence of COVID-19. A lessee that applies the practical expedient is not required to assess whether eligible rent concessions are lease modifications, and accounts for them in accordance with other applicable guidance. The resulting accounting will depend on the details of the rent concession. For example, if the concession is in the form of a one-off reduction in rent, it will be accounted for as a variable lease payment and be recognised in profit or loss. The practical expedient will only apply if: the revised consideration is substantially the same or less than the original consideration, the reduction in lease payments relates to payments due on or before 30 June 2021, and no other substantive changes have been made to the terms of the lease. |
The standard’s amendment did not have a material impact on the financial statements in the period of its first application. |
STANDARD/ |
Description |
IMPACT ASSESSMENT |
IFRS 4 (amendment) ‘Insurance contracts’ |
The main amendments include: deferral of the date of initial application of IFRS 17 by two years to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2023, extension of the temporary exemption from applying IFRS 9 by two years. As a result, the qualifying entities will be required to apply IFRS 9 for annual period beginning on or after 1 January 2023. Date of application: annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2021. |
The Bank claims that the standard’s amendments will not have a material impact on the financial statements in the period of its first application |
IFRS 9 (amendment) ‘Financial instruments’ and IFRS 7 (amendment) ‘Financial instruments: disclosures’ and IFRS 17 (amendment) ‘Insurance contracts’ and IFRS 16 (amendment) ‘Leasing’ |
The main amendments include: 1. accounting for modifications to financial assets, financial liabilities and lease liabilities required as a direct consequence of the interest rate benchmark reform and performed on an economically equivalent basis, by updating the effective interest rate. 2. hedge accounting is not discontinued solely because of the interest rate benchmark reform. Hedging relationships (and related documentation) must be amended to reflect modifications to the hedged item, hedging instrument and hedged risk. Amended hedging relationships should meet all qualifying criteria to apply hedge accounting, including effectiveness requirements. 3. in order to allow users to understand the nature and extent of risks arising from the interest rate benchmark reform to which the entity is exposed to and how the entity manages those risks as well as the entity’s progress in transitioning from interest rate benchmarks to alternative benchmark rates, and how the entity is managing this transition, the amendments require that an entity discloses information about: how the transition from interest rate benchmarks to alternative benchmark rates is managed, the progress made at the reporting date, and the risks arising from the transition; quantitative information about non-derivative financial assets, non-derivative financial liabilities and derivatives that continue to reference interest rate benchmarks subject to the reform, disaggregated by significant interest rate benchmark; to the extent that the interest rate benchmark reform has resulted in changes to an entity’s risk management strategy, a description of these changes and how is the entity managing those risks. Date of application: annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2021. |
The Bank is currently analyzing the impact of those changes on the financial statements. |
Description |
IMPACT ASSESSMENT |
|
IFRS 17 ‘Insurance Contracts’ |
The new standard requires insurance liabilities to be measured at a current fulfillment value and provides a more uniform measurement and presentation approach for all insurance contracts. These requirements are designed to achieve the goal of a consistent, principle-based accounting for insurance contracts. IFRS 17 supersedes IFRS 4 ‘Insurance Contracts’ and related interpretations while applied.
Date of application: annual periods beginning on or after |
The Bank claims that the new standard will not have a material impact on the financial statements in the period of its first application. |
IAS 1 (amendment) ‘Presentation of financial statements’ |
The amendments affect requirements in IAS 1 for the presentation of liabilities. In particular, these amendments clarify that the classification of liabilities as current or non-current should be based on rights that are in existence at the end of the reporting period. Date of application: annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2023. |
The Bank claims that the standard’s amendments will not have a material impact on the financial statements in the period of its first application. |
IFRS 3 (amendment) ‘Business combinations’ |
The amendments to IFRS 3 include: Update IFRS 3 so that it refers to the 2018 Conceptual Framework instead of the 1989 Framework, Add to IFRS 3 a requirement that, for transactions and other events within the scope of IAS 37 or IFRIC 21, an acquirer applies IAS 37 or IFRIC 21 (instead of the Conceptual Framework) to identify the liabilities it has assumed in a business combination, and Add to IFRS 3 an explicit statement that an acquirer does not recognize contingent assets acquired in a business combination. Date of application: annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2022. |
The Bank claims that the standard’s amendments will not have a material impact on the financial statements in the period of its first application. |
IAS 16 (amendment) ‘Property, plant and equipment’ |
The amendments to IAS 16 prohibit deducting from the cost of an item of property, plant and equipment any proceeds from selling items produced while bringing that asset to the location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by management. Instead, an entity recognises the proceeds from selling such items, and the cost of producing those items, in profit or loss. Date of application: annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2022. |
The Bank claims that the standard’s amendments will not have a material impact on the financial statements in the period of its first application. |
IAS 37 (amendment) ‘Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets’ |
The amendments to IAS 37 specify that the ‘cost of fulfilling’ an onerous contract comprises the ‘costs that relate directly to the contract’. Costs that relate directly to a contract can either be incremental costs of fulfilling that contract or an allocation of other costs that relate directly to fulfilling contracts. Date of application: annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2022. |
The Bank claims that the standard’s amendments will not have a material impact on the financial statements in the period of its first application. |
IAS 1 (amendment) ‘Presentation of financial statement’’ |
The amendments to IAS 1 include: an entity is required to disclose its material accounting policy information instead of its significant accounting policies; clarification that accounting policy information may be material because of its nature, even if the related amounts are immaterial; clarification that accounting policy information is material if users of an entity’s financial statements would need it to understand other material information in the financial statements; and clarification that if an entity discloses immaterial accounting policy information, such information shall not obscure material accounting policy information. Date of application: annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2023. |
The Bank claims that the standard’s amendments will not have a material impact on the financial statements in the period of its first application. |
IAS 8 (amendment) |
The amendments to IAS 8 include: the definition of a change in accounting estimates is replaced with a definition of accounting estimates. Under the new definition, accounting estimates are “monetary amounts in financial statements that are subject to measurement uncertainty; clarification that a change in accounting estimate that results from new information or new developments is not the correction of an error. In addition, the effects of a change in an input or a measurement technique used to develop an accounting estimate are changes in accounting estimates if they do not result from the correction of prior period errors; clarification that a change in an accounting estimate may affect only the current period’s profit or loss, or the profit or loss of both the current period and future periods. The effect of the change relating to the current period is recognized as income or expense in the current period. The effect, if any, on future periods is recognized as income or expense in those future periods. Date of application: annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2023. |
The Bank claims that the standard’s amendments will not have a material impact on the financial statements in the period of its first application. |
MSSF 16 (amendment) ‘Leasing’ |
The amendments introduce an optional practical expedient that simplifies how a lessee accounts for rent concessions that are a direct consequence of COVID-19. A lessee that applies the practical expedient is not required to assess whether eligible rent concessions are lease modifications, and accounts for them in accordance with other applicable guidance. The resulting accounting will depend on the details of the rent concession. For example, if the concession is in the form of a one-off reduction in rent, it will be accounted for as a variable lease payment and be recognized in profit or loss. The practical expedient will only apply if: the revised consideration is substantially the same or less than the original consideration, the reduction in lease payments relates to payments due on or before 30 June 2021, and no other substantive changes have been made to the terms of the lease Date of application: periods beginning on or after 1 April 2021. |
The Bank claims that the standard’s amendments will not have a material impact on the financial statements in the period of its first application. |
The risk management policy of the Bank aims at optimizing the structure of the balance sheet and off-balance sheet items taking into consideration the assumed risks-income relation and overall impact of variuos risks that the Bank undertakes in conducting its business activities. Risks are monitored and controlled with reference to profitability and capital coverage and are regularly reported in accordance with rules presented below.
All significant risks incurred in the course of the Bank’s operations are described in the further part of the Note.
The Supervisory Board provides supervision over the risk management system, assessing its adequacy and effectiveness. Moreover, the Supervisory Board supervises the compliance of the Bank’s policy with respect to risk taking with the Bank’s strategy and financial plan. Carrying out their tasks, the Supervisory Board is assisted by the Risk Committee.
Management Board
The Management Board is responsible for the development, implementation and functioning of risk management processes by, among others, introduction of relevant, internal regulations, taking into consideration the results of internal audit inspections.
The Management Board is responsible for the effectiveness of the risk management system, internal control system, internal capital computation process and the effectiveness of the review of the process of computing and monitoring of internal capital. Moreover, the Management Board introduces the essential adjustments or improvements to those processes and systems whenever necessary. This need may be a consequence of changes to risk levels of the Bank’s operations, business environment factors or irregularities in the functioning of processes or systems.
Periodically, the Management Board submits to the Supervisory Board concise information on the types, scale and significance of risks the Bank is exposed to, as well as on methods used in the management of such risks.
The Management Board is responsible for assessing, whether activities such as identification, measurement, monitoring, reporting and control or mitigation are carried out appropriately within the scope of the risk management process. Moreover, the Management Board examines whether the management at all levels is effectively managing the risks within the scope of their competence.
Committees
Performing these risk management tasks, the Management Board is supported by the relevant committees:
Assets, Liabilities and Risk Management Committee - in market risk management, liquidity and capital adequacy,
Liquidity and Market Risk Committee, acting as support for the Assets, Liabilities and Risk Management Committee – in liquidity and market risk management,
Operational Risk Committee – in operational risk management,
Credit Committee – in making credit decisions within the powers, and in the case of issuing recommendations on the largest transactions presented to the Management Board for decision,
Safety Committee – in the field of security and business continuity management,
Model Risk Committee – in model risk management,
Recovery Plan Committee – for supporting the proces of creating, maintaining and updating the Recovery Plan.
Credit risk is one of the basic risks associated with activities of the Bank. The percentage share of credits and loans in the Bank’s statement of financial position makes the maintenance of this risk at safe level essential to the Bank’s performance. The process of credit risk management is centralized and managed mainly by Risk Management Division units, situated at the Bank Head Office or in local units.
Risk management process covers all credit functions – credit analysis, making credit decisions, monitoring and loan administration, as well as restructuring and collection.
These functions are conducted in compliance with the Bank’s credit policy, adopted by the Bank’s Management Board and the Bank’s Supervisory Board for a given reporting year. The effectiveness and efficiency of credit functions are achieved using diverse credit methods and methodologies, supported by advanced IT tools, integrated into the Bank’s general IT system. The Bank’s procedures facilitate credit risk mitigation, in particular those related to transaction risk evaluation, to establishing collateral, setting authorization limits for granting loans and limiting of exposure to some areas of business activity in line with current client’s segmentation scheme in the Bank.
Credit granting authorizations, restrictions on crediting the specific business activities as well as internal and external prudential standards include not only credits, loans and guarantees, but also derivatives transactions and debt securities.
The Bank’s lending activity is limited by the restrictions of the external regulation as well as internal prudential standards in order to increase safety. These restrictions refer in particular to credit exposure concentration, credit quality ratios and exposure limits for particular foreign countries, foreign banks and domestic financial institutions.
The Bank established the following portfolio limits in the Bank’s credit policy:
exposure limits for sectors of economy,
share of significant exposures in the loan portfolio of the Bank,
customer segment limits and FX limits,
product limits (mortgage loans to private individuals, exposures to business entities secured by mortgage, inculidng financing commercial real estate),
The internal limits system operating in the Bank also includes a number of detailed limits supporting key limits set out in the credit policy.
Moreover, the Bank limits higher risk credit transactions, marked by excess risk by restricting the decision-making powers in such cases to higher-level decision-making bodies.
The management of the Bank’s credit portfolio quality is further supported by regular reviews and continuous monitoring of timely loan repayments and the financial condition of the borrowers.
Rating models utilized in the credit risk management process
For credit risk management purposes, the Bank uses the internal rating models depending on the client’s segment and/or exposure type.
The rating process is a significant element of credit risk assessment in relation to clients and transactions, and constitutes a preliminary stage of the credit decision-making process of granting a new credit or changing the terms and conditions of an existing credit and of the credit portfolio quality monitoring process.
In the credit risk measurement the following three parameters are used: PD, LGD and EAD. PD is the probability of a client’s failure to meet its obligations and hence the violation of contract terms and conditions by the borrower within one year horizon, such default may be subject-matter or product-related. LGD indicates the estimated value of the loss to be incurred for any credit transaction from the date of occurrence of such default. EAD reflects the estimated value of credit exposure as at such date.
The risk parameters based on the rating models are designed for calculation of the expected losses resulted from credit risk.
The value of expected loss is one of the significant assessment criteria taken into consideration by the decision-making bodies in the course of the crediting process. In particular, this value is compared to the requested margin level.
The level of minimum margins for given products or client segments is determined based upon risk analysis, taking into consideration the value of risk parameters assessed.
The client and transaction rating, as well as other credit risk parameters hold a significant role in the Credit Risk Management Information System. For each rating model, the credit risk reports provide information on the comparison between the realized parameters and the theoretical values for each rating class.
Credit risk reports are generated on a monthly basis, with their scope varying depending upon the recipient of the report (the higher the management level, the more aggregated the information presented). Credit risk reports are being used in the credit risk management process.
For internal purposes, within the Bank the following rating models are used, developed in accordance with provisions of Regulation (EU) no 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms:
1) For the private individuals, the Bank uses the following models applicable for:
mortgage loans,
consumer loans,
renewable limits.
2) For the corporate clients, the Bank uses rating models dividing clients into:
non-financial enterprises:
o corporate clients,
o small and medium enterprises (SME),
specialized lending (commercial real estate financing),
local government units.
The following exposure types are not covered by internal rating models:
1) retail exposures immaterial in terms of size and perceived risk profile:
overdrafts,
exposures related to credit cards,
exposures related to the Building Society (Kasa Mieszkaniowa) unit,
other loans.
2) corporate clients:
exposures to stock exchanges and other financial intermediators,
exposures to insurance companies,
project financing,
purchased receivables,
exposures to investment funds,
exposures to leasing companies and financial holding companies,
other loans immaterial in terms of size and perceived risk profile.
3) exposures to regional governments and local authorities which are not treated as exposures to central governments, for which the number of significant counterparties is limited.
4) Bank’s exposures to Pekao Group entities, subject to appropriate prudential requirements.
The tables below present the quality of the loan portfolio.
The distribution of rated portfolio for individual client segment (excluding impaired loans)
RATING CLASS |
RANGE OF PD |
31.12.2020 |
|||||||||||
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT OF ON-BALANCE EXPOSURES |
NOMINAL AMOUNT OF OFF-BALANCE EXPOSURES |
% PORT-FOLIO |
|||||||||||
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 (lifetime ecl - CREDIT-IMPAIRED) |
PURCHASED OR ORIGINATED CREDIT-IMPAIRED (POCI) |
TOTAL |
STAGE 1 (12M ECL) |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 (lifetime ecl - CREDIT-IMPAIRED) |
TOTAL |
|||||
individual assessment |
group assessment |
individual assessment |
group assessment |
||||||||||
MORTGAGE LOANS |
|||||||||||||
1 |
0.00% <= PD < 0.06% |
9 427 476 |
1 397 961 |
|
|
|
10 825 437 |
270 897 |
479 |
|
|
271 376 |
17.5% |
2 |
0.06% <= PD < 0.19% |
4 223 460 |
1 161 191 |
|
|
|
5 384 651 |
287 367 |
537 |
|
|
287 904 |
9.0% |
3 |
0.19% <= PD < 0.35% |
24 407 668 |
5 112 529 |
|
|
|
29 520 197 |
298 535 |
37 889 |
|
|
336 424 |
47.2% |
4 |
0.35% <= PD < 0.73% |
10 585 602 |
2 558 630 |
|
|
|
13 144 232 |
195 676 |
38 329 |
|
|
234 005 |
21.1% |
5 |
0.73% <= PD < 3.50% |
543 562 |
1 313 860 |
|
|
|
1 857 422 |
101 870 |
37 841 |
|
|
139 711 |
3.2% |
6 |
3.50% <= PD < 14.00% |
36 358 |
600 638 |
|
|
|
636 996 |
14 659 |
60 045 |
|
|
74 704 |
1.1% |
7 |
14.00% <= PD < 100.00% |
2 594 |
567 408 |
|
|
|
570 002 |
246 |
11 041 |
|
|
11 287 |
0.9% |
Total |
49 226 720 |
12 712 217 |
|
|
|
61 938 937 |
1 169 250 |
186 161 |
|
|
1 355 411 |
100.0% |
|
CONSUMER LOANS |
|||||||||||||
1 |
0.00% <= PD < 0.09% |
820 562 |
147 240 |
|
|
|
967 802 |
1 |
- |
|
|
1 |
8.7% |
2 |
0.09% <= PD < 0.18% |
1 623 714 |
147 160 |
|
|
|
1 770 874 |
158 |
- |
|
|
158 |
16.0% |
3 |
0.18% <= PD < 0.39% |
2 774 848 |
155 910 |
|
|
|
2 930 758 |
25 |
- |
|
|
25 |
26.4% |
4 |
0.39% <= PD < 0.90% |
2 249 802 |
234 957 |
|
|
|
2 484 759 |
91 |
- |
|
|
91 |
22.4% |
5 |
0.90% <= PD < 2.60% |
1 105 232 |
466 568 |
|
|
|
1 571 800 |
20 |
2 |
|
|
22 |
14.2% |
6 |
2.60% <= PD < 9.00% |
317 618 |
398 689 |
|
|
|
716 307 |
2 |
5 |
|
|
7 |
6.5% |
7 |
9.00% <= PD < 30.00% |
84 197 |
294 287 |
|
|
|
378 484 |
- |
8 |
|
|
8 |
3.4% |
8 |
30.00% <= PD < 100.00% |
18 416 |
243 084 |
|
|
|
261 500 |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
2.4% |
Total |
|
8 994 389 |
2 087 895 |
|
|
|
11 082 284 |
297 |
15 |
|
|
312 |
100.0% |
LIMITS |
|||||||||||||
1 |
0.00% <= PD < 0.02% |
1 525 |
6 888 |
|
|
|
8 413 |
45 511 |
403 620 |
|
|
449 131 |
46.6% |
2 |
0.02% <= PD < 0.11% |
7 841 |
31 815 |
|
|
|
39 656 |
31 717 |
190 209 |
|
|
221 926 |
26.7% |
3 |
0.11% <= PD < 0.35% |
8 665 |
52 654 |
|
|
|
61 319 |
7 044 |
57 153 |
|
|
64 197 |
12.8% |
4 |
0.35% <= PD < 0.89% |
9 548 |
38 977 |
|
|
|
48 525 |
11 126 |
17 824 |
|
|
28 950 |
7.9% |
5 |
0.89% <= PD < 2.00% |
906 |
18 497 |
|
|
|
19 403 |
296 |
6 415 |
|
|
6 711 |
2.7% |
6 |
2.00% <= PD < 4.80% |
644 |
10 461 |
|
|
|
11 105 |
158 |
6 472 |
|
|
6 630 |
1.8% |
7 |
4.80% <= PD < 100.00% |
108 |
8 447 |
|
|
|
8 555 |
109 |
6 213 |
|
|
6 322 |
1.5% |
Total |
|
29 237 |
167 739 |
|
|
|
196 976 |
95 961 |
687 906 |
|
|
783 867 |
100.0% |
Individual client segment - total |
58 250 346 |
14 967 851 |
|
|
|
73 218 197 |
1 265 508 |
874 082 |
|
|
2 139 590 |
|
The distribution of rated portfolio for individual client segment (excluding impaired loans)
RANGE OF PD |
31.12.2019 |
||||||||||||||||||
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT OF ON-BALANCE EXPOSURES |
NOMINAL AMOUNT OF OFF-BALANCE EXPOSURES |
% PORT-FOLIO |
|||||||||||||||||
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 (lifetime ecl - CREDIT-IMPAIRED) |
PURCHASED OR ORIGINATED CREDIT-IMPAIRED (POCI) |
TOTAL |
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 (lifetime ecl - CREDIT-IMPAIRED) |
TOTAL |
|||||||||||
individual assessment |
group assessment |
individual assessment |
group assessment |
||||||||||||||||
MORTGAGE LOANS |
|||||||||||||||||||
1 |
0.00% <= PD < 0.06% |
9 233 873 |
1 485 203 |
|
|
|
10 719 076 |
291 995 |
194 |
|
|
292 189 |
18.3% |
||||||
2 |
0.06% <= PD < 0.19% |
4 177 756 |
1 249 785 |
|
|
|
5 427 541 |
318 470 |
187 |
|
|
318 657 |
9.5% |
||||||
3 |
0.19% <= PD < 0.35% |
22 531 902 |
4 762 961 |
|
|
|
27 294 863 |
348 180 |
24 159 |
|
|
372 339 |
46.0% |
||||||
4 |
0.35% <= PD < 0.73% |
9 480 685 |
2 521 353 |
|
|
|
12 002 038 |
199 831 |
32 424 |
|
|
232 255 |
20.3% |
||||||
5 |
0.73% <= PD < 3.50% |
636 636 |
1 294 035 |
|
|
|
1 930 671 |
109 036 |
32 316 |
|
|
141 352 |
3.4% |
||||||
6 |
3.50% <= PD < 14.00% |
45 478 |
648 205 |
|
|
|
693 683 |
13 996 |
58 877 |
|
|
72 873 |
1.3% |
||||||
7 |
14.00% <= PD < 100.00% |
3 749 |
719 254 |
|
|
|
723 003 |
330 |
10 047 |
|
|
10 377 |
1.2% |
||||||
Total |
46 110 079 |
12 680 796 |
|
|
|
58 790 875 |
1 281 838 |
158 204 |
|
|
1 440 042 |
100.0% |
|||||||
CONSUMER LOANS |
|||||||||||||||||||
1 |
0.00% <= PD < 0.09% |
728 599 |
147 737 |
|
|
|
876 336 |
4 |
- |
|
|
4 |
7.3% |
||||||
2 |
0.09% <= PD < 0.18% |
1 537 399 |
198 793 |
|
|
|
1 736 192 |
59 |
- |
|
|
59 |
14.6% |
||||||
3 |
0.18% <= PD < 0.39% |
2 734 533 |
223 202 |
|
|
|
2 957 735 |
41 |
- |
|
|
41 |
24.9% |
||||||
4 |
0.39% <= PD < 0.90% |
2 619 406 |
152 819 |
|
|
|
2 772 225 |
329 |
- |
|
|
329 |
23.2% |
||||||
5 |
0.90% <= PD < 2.60% |
1 708 634 |
165 775 |
|
|
|
1 874 409 |
43 |
- |
|
|
43 |
15.7% |
||||||
6 |
2.60% <= PD < 9.00% |
623 057 |
332 672 |
|
|
|
955 729 |
4 |
19 |
|
|
23 |
8.0% |
||||||
7 |
9.00% <= PD < 30.00% |
156 692 |
308 864 |
|
|
|
465 556 |
1 |
201 |
|
|
202 |
3.9% |
||||||
8 |
30.00% <= PD < 100.00% |
21 284 |
268 797 |
|
|
|
290 081 |
- |
6 |
|
|
6 |
2.4% |
||||||
Total |
|
10 129 604 |
1 798 659 |
|
|
|
11 928 263 |
481 |
226 |
|
|
707 |
100.0% |
||||||
LIMITS |
|||||||||||||||||||
1 |
0.00% <= PD < 0.02% |
1 111 |
5 580 |
|
|
|
6 691 |
34 123 |
332 426 |
|
|
366 549 |
36.0% |
||||||
2 |
0.02% <= PD < 0.11% |
9 364 |
40 404 |
|
|
|
49 768 |
41 943 |
271 628 |
|
|
313 571 |
35.1% |
||||||
3 |
0.11% <= PD < 0.35% |
11 564 |
65 151 |
|
|
|
76 715 |
8 897 |
64 278 |
|
|
73 175 |
14.5% |
||||||
4 |
0.35% <= PD < 0.89% |
4 580 |
45 388 |
|
|
|
49 968 |
1 898 |
18 048 |
|
|
19 946 |
6.8% |
||||||
5 |
0.89% <= PD < 2.00% |
2 264 |
26 539 |
|
|
|
28 803 |
501 |
7 740 |
|
|
8 241 |
3.6% |
||||||
6 |
2.00% <= PD < 4.80% |
1 125 |
18 019 |
|
|
|
19 144 |
262 |
6 757 |
|
|
7 019 |
2.5% |
||||||
7 |
4.80% <= PD < 100.00% |
211 |
9 460 |
|
|
|
9 671 |
202 |
5 670 |
|
|
5 872 |
1.5% |
||||||
Total |
|
30 219 |
210 541 |
|
|
|
240 760 |
87 826 |
706 547 |
|
|
794 373 |
100.0% |
||||||
Individual client segment - total |
56 269 902 |
14 689 996 |
|
|
|
70 959 898 |
1 370 145 |
864 977 |
|
|
2 235 122 |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
The distribution of rated portfolio for corporate client segment (excluding impaired loans)
RATING CLASS |
RANGE OF PD |
31.12.2020 |
|||||||||||
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT OF ON-BALANCE EXPOSURES |
NOMINAL AMOUNT OF OFF-BALANCE EXPOSURES |
% PORT-FOLIO |
|||||||||||
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 (lifetime ecl - CREDIT-IMPAIRED) |
PURCHASED OR ORIGINATED CREDIT-IMPAIRED (POCI) |
TOTAL |
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 (lifetime ecl - CREDIT-IMPAIRED) |
TOTAL |
|||||
individual assessment |
group assessment |
individual assessment |
group assessment |
||||||||||
CORPORATES |
|||||||||||||
1 |
0.00% <= PD < 0.14% |
122 099 |
140 |
|
|
|
122 239 |
471 598 |
131 |
|
|
471 729 |
1.0% |
2 |
0.14% <= PD < 0.25% |
1 011 543 |
3 521 |
|
|
|
1 015 064 |
2 139 727 |
17 586 |
|
|
2 157 313 |
5.4% |
3 |
0.25% <= PD < 0.42% |
2 522 666 |
5 956 |
|
|
|
2 528 622 |
6 194 806 |
40 235 |
|
|
6 235 041 |
15.0% |
4 |
0.42% <= PD < 0.77% |
5 863 163 |
85 402 |
|
|
|
5 948 565 |
6 452 169 |
520 941 |
|
|
6 973 110 |
22.1% |
5 |
0.77% <= PD < 1.42% |
5 568 552 |
731 633 |
|
|
|
6 300 185 |
6 592 749 |
356 656 |
|
|
6 949 405 |
22.7% |
6 |
1.42% <= PD < 2.85% |
2 467 610 |
579 431 |
|
|
|
3 047 041 |
2 579 710 |
568 572 |
|
|
3 148 282 |
10.6% |
7 |
2.85% <= PD < 6.00% |
3 954 244 |
828 511 |
|
|
|
4 782 755 |
3 316 399 |
405 511 |
|
|
3 721 910 |
14.6% |
8 |
6.00% <= PD < 12.00% |
1 212 857 |
1 578 229 |
|
|
|
2 791 086 |
1 186 916 |
618 521 |
|
|
1 805 437 |
7.9% |
9 |
12.00% <= PD < 100.00% |
15 135 |
143 710 |
|
|
|
158 845 |
36 308 |
203 597 |
|
|
239 905 |
0.7% |
Total |
|
22 737 869 |
3 956 533 |
|
|
|
26 694 402 |
28 970 382 |
2 731 750 |
|
|
31 702 132 |
100.0% |
SMEs |
|||||||||||||
1 |
0.00% <= PD < 0.06% |
16 014 |
55 |
|
|
|
16 069 |
23 521 |
100 |
|
|
23 621 |
1.0% |
2 |
0.06% <= PD < 0.14% |
192 212 |
2 495 |
|
|
|
194 707 |
246 236 |
3 682 |
|
|
249 918 |
10.7% |
3 |
0.14% <= PD < 0.35% |
626 147 |
36 791 |
|
|
|
662 938 |
417 039 |
19 206 |
|
|
436 245 |
26.4% |
4 |
0.35% <= PD < 0.88% |
644 033 |
62 747 |
|
|
|
706 780 |
327 976 |
35 695 |
|
|
363 671 |
25.7% |
5 |
0.88% <= PD < 2.10% |
481 445 |
85 207 |
|
|
|
566 652 |
162 376 |
22 431 |
|
|
184 807 |
18.0% |
6 |
2.10% <= PD < 4.00% |
239 868 |
57 842 |
|
|
|
297 710 |
85 155 |
9 394 |
|
|
94 549 |
9.4% |
7 |
4.00% <= PD < 7.00% |
92 500 |
45 809 |
|
|
|
138 309 |
37 030 |
19 426 |
|
|
56 456 |
4.7% |
8 |
7.00% <= PD < 12.00% |
59 119 |
27 267 |
|
|
|
86 386 |
9 175 |
1 636 |
|
|
10 811 |
2.3% |
9 |
12.00% <= PD < 22.00% |
14 454 |
16 963 |
|
|
|
31 417 |
3 023 |
747 |
|
|
3 770 |
0.8% |
10 |
22.00% <= PD < 100.00% |
13 291 |
24 301 |
|
|
|
37 592 |
2 992 |
1 354 |
|
|
4 346 |
1.0% |
Total |
|
2 379 083 |
359 477 |
|
|
|
2 738 560 |
1 314 523 |
113 671 |
|
|
1 428 194 |
100.0% |
Corporate client segment - total |
25 116 952 |
4 316 010 |
|
|
|
29 432 962 |
30 284 905 |
2 845 421 |
|
|
33 130 326 |
|
The distribution of rated portfolio for corporate client segment (excluding impaired loans)
RANGE OF PD |
31.12.2019 |
||||||||||||
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT OF ON-BALANCE EXPOSURES |
NOMINAL AMOUNT OF OFF-BALANCE EXPOSURES |
% PORT-FOLIO |
|||||||||||
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 (lifetime ecl - CREDIT-IMPAIRED) |
PURCHASED OR ORIGINATED CREDIT-IMPAIRED (POCI) |
TOTAL |
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 (lifetime ecl - CREDIT-IMPAIRED) |
TOTAL |
|||||
individual assessment |
group assessment |
individual assessment |
group assessment |
||||||||||
CORPORATES |
|||||||||||||
1 |
0.00% <= PD < 0.14% |
275 630 |
671 |
|
|
|
276 301 |
859 367 |
2 001 |
|
|
861 368 |
2.2% |
2 |
0.14% <= PD < 0.25% |
1 880 637 |
8 227 |
|
|
|
1 888 864 |
5 346 078 |
25 827 |
|
|
5 371 905 |
13.8% |
3 |
0.25% <= PD < 0.42% |
3 963 063 |
169 016 |
|
|
|
4 132 079 |
4 506 882 |
219 586 |
|
|
4 726 468 |
16.9% |
4 |
0.42% <= PD < 0.77% |
6 078 657 |
194 449 |
|
|
|
6 273 106 |
5 281 087 |
334 418 |
|
|
5 615 505 |
22.7% |
5 |
0.77% <= PD < 1.42% |
4 799 018 |
295 243 |
|
|
|
5 094 261 |
3 606 115 |
384 703 |
|
|
3 990 818 |
17.3% |
6 |
1.42% <= PD < 2.85% |
3 169 057 |
563 146 |
|
|
|
3 732 203 |
2 621 428 |
254 241 |
|
|
2 875 669 |
12.6% |
7 |
2.85% <= PD < 6.00% |
559 941 |
226 291 |
|
|
|
786 232 |
1 543 789 |
356 684 |
|
|
1 900 473 |
5.1% |
8 |
6.00% <= PD < 12.00% |
1 212 535 |
1 813 748 |
|
|
|
3 026 283 |
986 933 |
393 162 |
|
|
1 380 095 |
8.4% |
9 |
12.00% <= PD < 100.00% |
121 795 |
249 586 |
|
|
|
371 381 |
7 523 |
159 192 |
|
|
166 715 |
1.0% |
Total |
|
22 060 333 |
3 520 377 |
|
|
|
25 580 710 |
24 759 202 |
2 129 814 |
|
|
26 889 016 |
100.0% |
SMEs |
|||||||||||||
1 |
0.00% <= PD < 0.06% |
17 333 |
2 702 |
|
|
|
20 035 |
29 066 |
310 |
|
|
29 376 |
1.1% |
2 |
0.06% <= PD < 0.14% |
223 137 |
3 459 |
|
|
|
226 596 |
233 168 |
2 854 |
|
|
236 022 |
9.9% |
3 |
0.14% <= PD < 0.35% |
770 220 |
55 836 |
|
|
|
826 056 |
394 508 |
17 389 |
|
|
411 897 |
26.6% |
4 |
0.35% <= PD < 0.88% |
813 715 |
82 688 |
|
|
|
896 403 |
247 706 |
42 686 |
|
|
290 392 |
25.4% |
5 |
0.88% <= PD < 2.10% |
602 666 |
80 864 |
|
|
|
683 530 |
128 830 |
14 136 |
|
|
142 966 |
17.7% |
6 |
2.10% <= PD < 4.00% |
253 834 |
44 055 |
|
|
|
297 889 |
71 490 |
5 690 |
|
|
77 180 |
8.0% |
7 |
4.00% <= PD < 7.00% |
100 628 |
46 823 |
|
|
|
147 451 |
20 074 |
2 813 |
|
|
22 887 |
3.7% |
8 |
7.00% <= PD < 12.00% |
65 851 |
48 545 |
|
|
|
114 396 |
27 723 |
7 639 |
|
|
35 362 |
3.2% |
9 |
12.00% <= PD < 22.00% |
82 690 |
30 797 |
|
|
|
113 487 |
18 795 |
1 254 |
|
|
20 049 |
2.9% |
10 |
22.00% <= PD < 100.00% |
16 074 |
54 124 |
|
|
|
70 198 |
775 |
1 249 |
|
|
2 024 |
1.5% |
Total |
|
2 946 148 |
449 893 |
|
|
|
3 396 041 |
1 172 135 |
96 020 |
|
|
1 268 155 |
100.0% |
Corporate client segment - total |
25 006 481 |
3 970 270 |
|
|
|
28 976 751 |
25 931 337 |
2 225 834 |
|
|
28 157 171 |
|
The distribution of rated portfolio for local government units segment (excluding impaired loans)
RANGE OF PD |
31.12.2020 |
||||||||||||||
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT OF ON-BALANCE EXPOSURES |
NOMINAL AMOUNT OF OFF-BALANCE EXPOSURES |
% PORT-FOLIO |
|||||||||||||
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 (lifetime ecl - CREDIT-IMPAIRED) |
PURCHASED OR ORIGINATED CREDIT-IMPAIRED (POCI) |
TOTAL |
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 (lifetime ecl - CREDIT-IMPAIRED) |
TOTAL |
|||||||
individual assessment |
group assessment |
individual assessment |
group assessment |
||||||||||||
LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNITS |
|||||||||||||||
1 |
0.00% <= PD < 0.04% |
5 529 |
- |
|
|
|
5 529 |
60 890 |
- |
|
|
60 890 |
3.2% |
||
2 |
0.04% <= PD < 0.06% |
223 197 |
- |
|
|
|
223 197 |
9 959 |
- |
|
|
9 959 |
11.3% |
||
3 |
0.06% <= PD < 0.13% |
84 722 |
- |
|
|
|
84 722 |
120 552 |
- |
|
|
120 552 |
10.0% |
||
4 |
0.13% <= PD < 0.27% |
381 489 |
- |
|
|
|
381 489 |
130 319 |
- |
|
|
130 319 |
24.9% |
||
5 |
0.27% <= PD < 0.50% |
310 006 |
- |
|
|
|
310 006 |
56 900 |
- |
|
|
56 900 |
17.8% |
||
6 |
0.50% <= PD < 0.80% |
459 694 |
- |
|
|
|
459 694 |
61 000 |
- |
|
|
61 000 |
25.4% |
||
7 |
0.80% <= PD < 1.60% |
129 683 |
- |
|
|
|
129 683 |
23 275 |
- |
|
|
23 275 |
7.4% |
||
8 |
1.60% <= PD < 100.00% |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
0.0% |
||
Total |
|
1 594 320 |
- |
|
|
|
1 594 320 |
462 895 |
- |
|
|
462 895 |
100.0% |
||
RATING CLASS |
RANGE OF PD |
31.12.2019 |
|||||||||||
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT OF ON-BALANCE EXPOSURES |
NOMINAL AMOUNT OF OFF-BALANCE EXPOSURES |
% PORT-FOLIO |
|||||||||||
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 (lifetime ecl - CREDIT-IMPAIRED) |
PURCHASED OR ORIGINATED CREDIT-IMPAIRED (POCI) |
TOTAL |
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 (lifetime ecl - CREDIT-IMPAIRED) |
TOTAL |
|||||
individual assessment |
group assessment |
individual assessment |
group assessment |
||||||||||
LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNITS |
|||||||||||||
1 |
0.00% <= PD < 0.04% |
19 171 |
- |
|
|
|
19 171 |
58 069 |
- |
|
|
58 069 |
3.4% |
2 |
0.04% <= PD < 0.06% |
242 222 |
- |
|
|
|
242 222 |
1 017 |
- |
|
|
1 017 |
10.8% |
3 |
0.06% <= PD < 0.13% |
137 284 |
- |
|
|
|
137 284 |
24 028 |
- |
|
|
24 028 |
7.2% |
4 |
0.13% <= PD < 0.27% |
513 020 |
- |
|
|
|
513 020 |
192 381 |
- |
|
|
192 381 |
31.3% |
5 |
0.27% <= PD < 0.50% |
326 835 |
- |
|
|
|
326 835 |
35 200 |
- |
|
|
35 200 |
16.0% |
6 |
0.50% <= PD < 0.80% |
572 450 |
- |
|
|
|
572 450 |
8 000 |
- |
|
|
8 000 |
25.7% |
7 |
0.80% <= PD < 1.60% |
101 926 |
- |
|
|
|
101 926 |
17 525 |
- |
|
|
17 525 |
5.3% |
8 |
1.60% <= PD < 100.00% |
6 467 |
- |
|
|
|
6 467 |
184 |
- |
|
|
184 |
0.3% |
Total |
|
1 919 375 |
- |
|
|
|
1 919 375 |
336 404 |
- |
|
|
336 404 |
100.0% |
For specialized lending, the Bank adopts slotting criteria approach within internal rating method which uses supervisory categories in the process of assigning risk weigh category.
The distribution of the portfolio exposure to specialized lending (excluding impaired loans)
|
31.12.2020 |
||||||||||||
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT OF ON-BALANCE EXPOSURES |
NOMINAL AMOUNT OF OFF-BALANCE EXPOSURES |
% PORT-FOLIO |
|||||||||||
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 (lifetime ecl - CREDIT-IMPAIRED) |
PURCHASED OR ORIGINATED CREDIT-IMPAIRED (POCI) |
TOTAL |
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 (lifetime ecl - CREDIT-IMPAIRED) |
TOTAL |
|||||
individual assessment |
group assessment |
individual assessment |
group assessment |
||||||||||
EXPOSURE TO SPECIALIZED LENDING |
|||||||||||||
High |
|
448 501 |
- |
|
|
|
448 501 |
22 137 |
- |
|
|
22 137 |
7.2% |
Good |
|
2 475 145 |
1 911 825 |
|
|
|
4 386 970 |
686 820 |
8 882 |
|
|
695 702 |
78.0% |
Satisfactory |
|
104 804 |
842 280 |
|
|
|
947 084 |
17 460 |
3 |
|
|
17 463 |
14.8% |
Low |
|
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
0.0% |
Total |
|
3 028 450 |
2 754 105 |
|
|
|
5 782 555 |
726 417 |
8 885 |
|
|
735 302 |
100.0% |
SUPERVISORY CATHEGORY |
|
31.12.2019 |
|||||||||||
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT OF ON-BALANCE EXPOSURES |
NOMINAL AMOUNT OF OFF-BALANCE EXPOSURES |
% PORT-FOLIO |
|||||||||||
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 (lifetime ecl - CREDIT-IMPAIRED) |
PURCHASED OR ORIGINATED CREDIT-IMPAIRED (POCI) |
TOTAL |
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 (lifetime ecl - CREDIT-IMPAIRED) |
TOTAL |
|||||
individual assessment |
group assessment |
individual assessment |
group assessment |
||||||||||
EXPOSURE TO SPECIALIZED LENDING |
|||||||||||||
High |
|
654 675 |
- |
|
|
|
654 675 |
51 116 |
- |
|
|
51 116 |
9.8% |
Good |
|
4 173 576 |
- |
|
|
|
4 173 576 |
1 321 969 |
- |
|
|
1 321 969 |
75.9% |
Satisfactory |
|
298 261 |
608 620 |
|
|
|
906 881 |
68 463 |
- |
|
|
68 463 |
13.5% |
Low |
|
- |
55 415 |
|
|
|
55 415 |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
0.8% |
Total |
|
5 126 512 |
664 035 |
|
|
|
5 790 547 |
1 441 548 |
- |
|
|
1 441 548 |
100.0% |
Portfolio of exposures not covered by the rating model (excluding impaired loans), broken down by delays in repayment
|
31.12.2020 |
|||||||||||||
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT OF ON-BALANCE EXPOSURES |
NOMINAL AMOUNT OF OFF-BALANCE EXPOSURES |
|
||||||||||||
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 (lifetime ecl - CREDIT-IMPAIRED) |
PURCHASED OR ORIGINATED CREDIT-IMPAIRED (POCI) |
TOTAL |
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 (lifetime ecl - CREDIT-IMPAIRED) |
TOTAL |
% PORT-FOLIO |
|||||
individual assessment |
group assessment |
individual assessment |
group assessment |
|||||||||||
EXPOSURES NOT COVERED BY THE RATING MODEL |
||||||||||||||
Not past due |
13 948 942 |
3 486 651 |
|
|
|
17 435 593 |
31 214 361 |
750 173 |
|
|
31 964 534 |
99.8% |
||
Past due, of which: |
36 407 |
55 059 |
|
|
|
91 466 |
22 909 |
1 414 |
|
|
24 323 |
0.2% |
||
up to 1 month |
36 375 |
37 440 |
|
|
|
73 815 |
22 909 |
977 |
|
|
23 886 |
0.2% |
||
between 1 month and 2 months |
- |
10 692 |
|
|
|
10 692 |
- |
35 |
|
|
35 |
0.0% |
||
between 2 and 3 months |
32 |
6 927 |
|
|
|
6 959 |
- |
402 |
|
|
402 |
0.0% |
||
Total |
|
13 985 349 |
3 541 710 |
|
|
|
17 527 059 |
31 237 270 |
751 587 |
|
|
31 988 857 |
100.0% |
|
|
|
31.12.2019 |
||||||||||||
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT OF ON-BALANCE EXPOSURES |
NOMINAL AMOUNT OF OFF-BALANCE EXPOSURES |
|
||||||||||||
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 (lifetime ecl - CREDIT-IMPAIRED) |
PURCHASED OR ORIGINATED CREDIT-IMPAIRED (POCI) |
TOTAL |
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 (lifetime ecl - CREDIT-IMPAIRED) |
TOTAL |
% PORT-FOLIO |
|||||
individual assessment |
group assessment |
individual assessment |
group assessment |
|||||||||||
EXPOSURES NOT COVERED BY THE RATING MODEL |
||||||||||||||
Not past due |
21 915 112 |
410 776 |
|
|
|
22 325 888 |
22 797 500 |
158 974 |
|
|
22 956 474 |
99.2% |
||
Past due, of which: |
52 592 |
43 548 |
|
|
|
96 140 |
44 371 |
246 588 |
|
|
290 959 |
0.8% |
||
up to 1 month |
52 592 |
28 819 |
|
|
|
81 411 |
44 371 |
1 809 |
|
|
46 180 |
0.3% |
||
between 1 month and 2 months |
- |
13 582 |
|
|
|
13 582 |
- |
491 |
|
|
491 |
0.0% |
||
between 2 and 3 months |
- |
1 147 |
|
|
|
1 147 |
- |
244 288 |
|
|
244 288 |
0.5% |
||
Total |
|
21 967 704 |
454 324 |
|
|
|
22 422 028 |
22 841 871 |
405 562 |
|
|
23 247 433 |
100.0% |
|
Portfolio of impaired exposures, broken down by delays in repayment
|
31.12.2020 |
||||||||||||
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT OF ON-BALANCE EXPOSURES |
NOMINAL AMOUNT OF OFF-BALANCE EXPOSURES |
% PORT-FOLIO |
|||||||||||
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 (lifetime ecl - CREDIT-IMPAIRED) |
PURCHASED OR ORIGINATED CREDIT-IMPAIRED (POCI) |
TOTAL |
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 (lifetime ecl - CREDIT-IMPAIRED) |
TOTAL |
|||||
individual assessment |
group assessment |
individual assessment |
group assessment |
||||||||||
IMPAIRED EXPOSURES |
|||||||||||||
Not past due |
|
|
1 734 081 |
566 937 |
1 021 |
2 302 039 |
|
|
299 090 |
5 740 |
304 830 |
30.9% |
|
Past due, of which: |
|
|
3 115 011 |
2 518 269 |
5 544 |
5 638 824 |
|
|
180 147 |
2 725 |
182 872 |
69.1% |
|
up to 1 month |
|
|
20 344 |
217 608 |
165 |
238 117 |
|
|
96 |
740 |
836 |
2.8% |
|
between 1 month and 3 months |
|
|
61 275 |
206 094 |
109 |
267 478 |
|
|
79 |
198 |
277 |
3.2% |
|
between 3 months and 1 year |
|
|
144 222 |
390 908 |
77 |
535 207 |
|
|
1 142 |
622 |
1 764 |
6.4% |
|
between 1 year and 5 years |
|
|
474 816 |
958 885 |
957 |
1 434 658 |
|
|
177 115 |
557 |
177 672 |
19.1% |
|
above 5 years |
|
|
2 414 354 |
744 774 |
4 236 |
3 163 364 |
|
|
1 715 |
608 |
2 323 |
37.6% |
|
Total |
|
|
|
4 849 092 |
3 085 206 |
6 565 |
7 940 863 |
|
|
479 237 |
8 465 |
487 702 |
100.0% |
|
|
31.12.2019 |
|||||||||||
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT OF ON-BALANCE EXPOSURES |
NOMINAL AMOUNT OF OFF-BALANCE EXPOSURES |
% PORT-FOLIO |
|||||||||||
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 (lifetime ecl - CREDIT-IMPAIRED) |
PURCHASED OR ORIGINATED CREDIT-IMPAIRED (POCI) |
TOTAL |
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 (lifetime ecl - CREDIT-IMPAIRED) |
TOTAL |
|||||
individual assessment |
group assessment |
individual assessment |
group assessment |
||||||||||
IMPAIRED EXPOSURES |
|||||||||||||
Not past due |
|
|
1 347 338 |
291 298 |
5 530 |
1 644 166 |
|
|
296 433 |
7 496 |
303 929 |
23.7% |
|
Past due, of which: |
|
|
3 488 870 |
2 503 709 |
4 519 |
5 997 098 |
|
|
264 860 |
3 531 |
268 391 |
76.3% |
|
up to 1 month |
|
|
42 311 |
218 805 |
251 |
261 367 |
|
|
268 |
661 |
929 |
3.2% |
|
between 1 month and 3 months |
|
|
21 585 |
229 278 |
125 |
250 988 |
|
|
21 |
656 |
677 |
3.1% |
|
between 3 months and 1 year |
|
|
95 247 |
412 750 |
288 |
508 285 |
|
|
119 558 |
779 |
120 337 |
7.7% |
|
between 1 year and 5 years |
|
|
742 582 |
833 330 |
797 |
1 576 709 |
|
|
143 313 |
1 155 |
144 468 |
20.9% |
|
above 5 years |
|
|
2 587 145 |
809 546 |
3 058 |
3 399 749 |
|
|
1 700 |
280 |
1 980 |
41.4% |
|
Total |
|
|
|
4 836 208 |
2 795 007 |
10 049 |
7 641 264 |
|
|
561 293 |
11 027 |
572 320 |
100.0% |
Client/transaction rating and credit risk decision-making level
Decision-making level connected with transaction approval is directly dependent upon the client’s rating.
Decision-making entitlement limits are associated with the position held, determined in accordance with the Bank’s organizational structure. The limits are determined taking the following matters into consideration:
the Bank’s total exposure to a client, including the amount of the requested transaction,
type of a client,
commitments of persons and entities associated with the client.
Validation of rating models
The internal validation of models and risk parameter assessments is focused on the quality assessment of risk models and the accuracy and stability of parameter assessments, applied by the Bank. Validation is carried out at the level of each risk model, although the Bank may apply several models for each class of exposures.
Moreover, the internal audit unit is obligated to review the Bank’s rating systems and their functionality at least once a year. In particular, the internal audit unit reviews the scope of operations of credit division and estimations of risk parameters.
Division of loans and advances to customers for covered and not covered by internal rating models
31.12.2020 |
|||
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
impairment Allowance |
NET CARRYING AMOUNT |
|
Exposures with no impairment |
127 555 093 |
(1 531 193) |
126 023 900 |
Rated portfolio for individual client segment |
73 218 197 |
(709 889) |
72 508 308 |
Mortgage loans |
61 938 937 |
(321 496) |
61 617 441 |
Consumer loans |
11 082 284 |
(382 770) |
10 699 514 |
Limits |
196 976 |
(5 623) |
191 353 |
Rated portfolio for corporate client segment |
29 432 962 |
(271 956) |
29 161 006 |
Corporates |
26 694 402 |
(222 752) |
26 471 650 |
SMEs |
2 738 560 |
(49 204) |
2 689 356 |
Rated portfolio for local government units segment |
1 594 320 |
(1 912) |
1 592 408 |
Specialized lending exposures |
5 782 555 |
(83 970) |
5 698 585 |
Exposures not covered by the rating model |
17 527 059 |
(463 466) |
17 063 593 |
Impaired exposures |
7 940 863 |
(5 424 804) |
2 516 059 |
Total loans and advances to customers subject to impairment (*) |
135 495 956 |
(6 955 997) |
128 539 959 |
(*) Loans and advances to customers measured at amortised cost and measured at fair value through other comprehensive income.
Division of loans and advances to customers for covered and not covered by internal rating models
PORTFOLIO |
31.12.2019 |
||
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
impairment Allowance |
NET CARRYING AMOUNT |
|
Exposures with no impairment |
130 068 599 |
(1 019 496) |
129 049 103 |
Rated portfolio for individual client segment |
70 959 898 |
(593 592) |
70 366 306 |
Mortgage loans |
58 790 875 |
(268 208) |
58 522 667 |
Consumer loans |
11 928 263 |
(317 714) |
11 610 549 |
Limits |
240 760 |
(7 670) |
233 090 |
Rated portfolio for corporate client segment |
28 976 751 |
(174 901) |
28 801 850 |
Corporates |
25 580 710 |
(131 751) |
25 448 959 |
SMEs |
3 396 041 |
(43 150) |
3 352 891 |
Rated portfolio for local government units segment |
1 919 375 |
(2 114) |
1 917 261 |
Specialized lending exposures |
5 790 547 |
(46 102) |
5 744 445 |
Exposures not covered by the rating model |
22 422 028 |
(202 787) |
22 219 241 |
Impaired exposures |
7 641 264 |
(5 257 622) |
2 383 642 |
Total loans and advances to customers subject to impairment (*) |
137 709 863 |
(6 277 118) |
131 432 745 |
(*) Loans and advances to customers measured at amortised cost and measured at fair value through other comprehensive income.
Division of off-balance sheet exposures to customers (loan commitments and financial guarantee contracts) for covered and not covered by internal rating models
PORTFOLIO |
31.12.2020 |
|
NOMINAL AMOUNT |
impairment Allowance |
|
Exposures with no impairment |
68 456 970 |
(268 371) |
Rated portfolio for individual client segment |
2 139 590 |
(5 189) |
Mortgage loans |
1 355 411 |
(3 050) |
Consumer loans |
312 |
(132) |
Limits |
783 867 |
(2 007) |
Rated portfolio for corporate client segment |
33 130 326 |
(111 257) |
Corporates |
31 702 132 |
(107 711) |
SMEs |
1 428 194 |
(3 546) |
Rated portfolio for local government units segment |
462 895 |
(23) |
Specialized lending exposures |
735 302 |
(582) |
Exposures not covered by the rating model |
31 988 857 |
(151 320) |
Impaired exposures |
487 702 |
(191 960) |
Total off- balance sheet exposures to customers |
68 944 672 |
(460 331) |
Division of off-balance sheet exposures to customers (loan commitments and financial guarantee contracts) for covered and not covered by internal rating models
PORTFOLIO |
31.12.2019 |
|
NOMINAL AMOUNT |
impairment Allowance |
|
Exposures with no impairment |
55 417 678 |
(134 755) |
Rated portfolio for individual client segment |
2 235 122 |
(5 490) |
Mortgage loans |
1 440 042 |
(3 236) |
Consumer loans |
707 |
(45) |
Limits |
794 373 |
(2 209) |
Rated portfolio for corporate client segment |
28 157 171 |
(64 217) |
Corporates |
26 889 016 |
(62 282) |
SMEs |
1 268 155 |
(1 935) |
Rated portfolio for local government units segment |
336 404 |
(37) |
Specialized lending exposures |
1 441 548 |
(1 805) |
Exposures not covered by the rating model |
23 247 433 |
(63 206) |
Impaired exposures |
572 320 |
(186 387) |
Total off- balance sheet exposures to customers |
55 989 998 |
(321 142) |
Classification of loans and advances to banks according to Fitch ratings
CARRYING AMOUNT |
%PORTFOLIO |
||||||
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 (lifetime ecl - CREDIT-IMPAIRED) |
PURCHASED OR ORIGINATED CREDIT-IMPAIRED (POCI) |
TOTAL |
|||
individual assessment |
group assessment |
||||||
LOANS AND ADVANCES TO BANKS MEASURED AT AMORTISED COST |
|||||||
AA+ to AA- |
6 304 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
6 304 |
0.2% |
A+ to A- |
1 494 902 |
168 |
- |
82 |
- |
1 495 152 |
51.2% |
BBB+ to BBB- |
727 883 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
727 883 |
24.9% |
BB+ to BB- |
14 035 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
14 035 |
0.5% |
B+ do B- |
150 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
150 |
0.0% |
No rating |
677 806 |
- |
- |
4 |
- |
677 810 |
23.2% |
Total gross carrying amount |
2 921 080 |
168 |
- |
86 |
- |
2 921 334 |
100.0% |
Impairment allowance |
(3 491) |
- |
- |
(4) |
- |
(3 495) |
|
Total net carrying amount |
2 917 589 |
168 |
- |
82 |
- |
2 917 839 |
|
Classification of loans and advances to banks according to Fitch ratings
31.12.2019 |
CARRYING AMOUNT |
%PORTFOLIO |
|||||
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 (lifetime ecl - CREDIT-IMPAIRED) |
PURCHASED OR ORIGINATED CREDIT-IMPAIRED (POCI) |
TOTAL |
|||
individual assessment |
group assessment |
||||||
LOANS AND ADVANCES TO BANKS MEASURED AT AMORTISED COST |
|||||||
AA+ to AA- |
22 413 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
22 413 |
1.0% |
A+ to A- |
899 921 |
288 |
- |
95 |
- |
900 304 |
40.1% |
BBB+ to BBB- |
748 786 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
748 786 |
33.3% |
BB+ to BB- |
8 384 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
8 384 |
0.4% |
B+ do B- |
65 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
65 |
0.0% |
No rating |
566 848 |
3 |
- |
1 |
- |
566 852 |
25.2% |
Total gross carrying amount |
2 246 417 |
291 |
- |
96 |
- |
2 246 804 |
100.0% |
Impairment allowance |
(2 895) |
- |
- |
(1) |
- |
(2 896) |
|
Total net carrying amount |
2 243 522 |
291 |
- |
95 |
- |
2 243 908 |
|
Classification of exposures to debt securities according to Fitch ratings
CARRYING AMOUNT |
%PORTFOLIO |
||||||
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 (lifetime ecl - |
PURCHASED OR ORIGINATED CREDIT-IMPAIRED |
TOTAL |
|||
individual assessment |
group assessment |
||||||
DEBT SECURITIES Measured at amortised cost |
|||||||
AAA |
1 253 925 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 253 925 |
4.5% |
A+ to A- |
20 798 125 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
20 798 125 |
75.3% |
BBB+ do BBB- |
41 891 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
41 891 |
0.2% |
No rating |
5 469 231 |
38 434 |
32 971 |
- |
|
5 540 636 |
20.0% |
Gross carrying amount |
27 563 172 |
38 434 |
32 971 |
- |
- |
27 634 577 |
100.0% |
Impairment allowance |
(41 944) |
(582) |
(32 971) |
- |
5 |
(75 492) |
|
Carrying amount |
27 521 228 |
37 852 |
- |
- |
5 |
27 559 085 |
|
DEBT SECURITIES Measured at fair value through other comprehensive income |
|||||||
AAA |
4 752 614 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
4 752 614 |
10.7% |
A+ to A- |
25 415 015 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
25 415 015 |
57.0% |
BBB+ do BBB- |
2 188 464 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2 188 464 |
4.9% |
BB+ do BB- |
36 542 |
|
|
|
|
36 542 |
0.1% |
No rating |
12 069 142 |
144 385 |
- |
- |
- |
12 213 527 |
27.3% |
Carrying amount |
44 461 777 |
144 385 |
- |
- |
- |
44 606 162 |
100.0% |
Impairment allowance (*) |
(72 240) |
(3 102) |
- |
- |
- |
(75 342) |
|
DEBT SECURITIES HELD FOR TRADING |
|||||||
AAA |
|
|
|
|
|
707 |
0.0% |
A+ to A- |
|
|
|
|
|
1 113 330 |
69.2% |
BBB+ to BBB- |
|
|
|
|
|
39 599 |
2.5% |
No rating |
|
|
|
|
|
454 308 |
28.3% |
Carrying amount |
|
|
|
|
|
1 607 944 |
100.0% |
(*) The impairment allowance for debt securities measured at fair value through other comprehensive income is included in the ‘Revaluation reserve’
item and does not reduce the carrying amount.
Classification of exposures to debt securities according to Fitch ratings
31.12.2019 |
CARRYING AMOUNT |
%PORTFOLIO |
|||||
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 (lifetime ecl - |
PURCHASED OR ORIGINATED CREDIT-IMPAIRED |
TOTAL |
|||
individual assessment |
group assessment |
||||||
DEBT SECURITIES Measured at amortised cost |
|||||||
A+ to A- |
8 955 963 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
8 955 963 |
61.2% |
BBB+ do BBB- |
234 218 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
234 218 |
1.6% |
No rating |
5 078 450 |
331 816 |
32 370 |
- |
- |
5 442 636 |
37.2% |
Gross carrying amount |
14 268 631 |
331 816 |
32 370 |
- |
- |
14 632 817 |
100.0% |
Impairment allowance |
(25 661) |
(16 955) |
(32 370) |
- |
- |
(74 986) |
|
Carrying amount |
14 242 970 |
314 861 |
- |
- |
- |
14 557 831 |
|
DEBT SECURITIES Measured at fair value through other comprehensive income |
|||||||
AAA |
3 632 368 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
3 632 368 |
11.7% |
A+ to A- |
18 898 077 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
18 898 077 |
61.0% |
BBB+ do BBB- |
2 044 168 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2 044 168 |
6.6% |
BB+ do BB- |
83 026 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
83 026 |
0.3% |
No rating |
6 294 181 |
12 860 |
- |
- |
- |
6 307 041 |
20.4% |
Carrying amount |
30 951 820 |
12 860 |
- |
- |
- |
30 964 680 |
100.0% |
Impairment allowance (*) |
(32 425) |
(671) |
- |
- |
- |
(33 096) |
|
DEBT SECURITIES HELD FOR TRADING |
|||||||
A+ to A- |
|
|
|
|
|
1 142 873 |
89.3% |
BBB+ to BBB- |
|
|
|
|
|
111 474 |
8.7% |
No rating |
|
|
|
|
|
25 148 |
2.0% |
Carrying amount |
|
|
|
|
|
1 279 495 |
100.0% |
(*) The impairment allowance for debt securities measured at fair value through other comprehensive income is included in the ‘Revaluation reserve’
item and does not reduce the carrying amount.
Classification of exposures to derivative financial instruments according to Fitch ratings
DERIVATIVES HELD FOR TRANDING |
HEDGING DERIVATIVES |
TOTAL |
%PORTFOLIO |
||||||
BANks |
OTHER |
Non-financial entities |
BANks |
OTHER FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS |
Non-financial entities |
||||
AAA |
769 483 |
2 541 241 |
- |
20 734 |
752 993 |
- |
4 084 451 |
72.6% |
|
AA+ to AA- |
46 151 |
3 041 |
- |
514 |
- |
- |
49 706 |
0.9% |
|
A+ to A- |
107 019 |
- |
- |
4 348 |
- |
- |
111 367 |
2.0% |
|
BBB+ to BBB- |
231 943 |
- |
188 340 |
474 |
- |
- |
420 757 |
7.5% |
|
BB+ to BB- |
4 157 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
4 157 |
0.1% |
|
B+ to B- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
No rating |
95 170 |
191 808 |
663 926 |
- |
- |
- |
950 904 |
16.9% |
|
Total |
1 253 923 |
2 736 090 |
852 266 |
26 070 |
752 993 |
- |
5 621 342 |
100.0% |
|
Classification of exposures to derivative financial instruments according to Fitch ratings
31.12.2019 |
DERIVATIVES HELD FOR TRANDING |
HEDGING DERIVATIVES |
TOTAL |
%PORTFOLIO |
|||||
BANks |
OTHER |
Non-financial entities |
BANks |
OTHER FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS |
Non-financial entities |
||||
AAA |
330 847 |
766 811 |
- |
9 729 |
284 315 |
- |
1 391 702 |
56.5% |
|
AA+ to AA- |
28 540 |
- |
- |
1 725 |
- |
- |
30 265 |
1.2% |
|
A+ to A- |
118 460 |
1 110 |
- |
33 184 |
1 216 |
- |
153 970 |
6.3% |
|
BBB+ to BBB- |
193 502 |
- |
97 825 |
21 641 |
- |
- |
312 968 |
12.7% |
|
BB+ to BB- |
2 348 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2 348 |
0.1% |
|
B+ to B- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
No rating |
113 009 |
110 426 |
323 111 |
25 398 |
- |
- |
571 944 |
23.2% |
|
Total |
786 706 |
878 347 |
420 936 |
91 677 |
285 531 |
- |
2 463 197 |
100.0% |
|
The description of the model for impairment allowance
The Bank has recognized impairment allowance in accordance with the IRFS 9. IFRS 9 assumes the calculation of impairment losses based on expected credit losses and taking into account forecasts and expected future economic conditions in the context of credit risk exposure assessment.
Expected credit loss model
Expected credit loss model applies to financial assets classified, in accordance with the IFRS 9, as financial assets at amortized cost or at fair value through other comprehensive income, with the exception of equity instruments.
Expected credit loss model in accordance with IFRS 9 is based on the allocation of exposure to one of the three stages, depending on credit quality changes compared to the initial recognition of assets in the accounting records. How to calculate the impairment loss depends on the stage.
STAGE |
CLASSIFICATION CRITERION TO THE STAGE |
THE METHOD OF CALCULATING THE IMPAIRMENT ALLOWANCE |
Stage 1 |
Exposures for which no significant increase in credit risk has been identified since the initial recognition until the balance sheet date and no impairment was identified |
12-month expected credit losses |
Stage 2 |
Exposures for which a significant increase in credit risk has been identified since the initial recognition until the balance sheet date and no impairment was identified |
Lifetime expected credit losses |
Stage 3 |
Exposures for which impairment has been identified |
In addition, financial assets that were classified as POCI at the time of initial recognition are treated as POCI (i.e. purchased or originated credit-impaired) in all subsequent periods until they are derecognised. This rule applies even if, in the meantime, the asset has been healed. In other words, assets once recognized as POCI remain in this status regardless of future changes in estimates of their cash flows.
In the case of instruments with the POCI status, life-time expected credit losses are recognized throughout the lifetime of these instruments.
Calculation of expected credit losses
For the purpose of calculating the credit loss in accordance with IFRS 9, the Bank compares the cash flows that it should receive pursuant to the agreement with the borrower and the flows estimated by the Bank that it expects to receive. The difference is discounted by the original effective interest rate.
Expected credit losses are determined in the contractual maturity period with the exception of products meeting the criteria of IFRS 9 para. 5.5.20, for which the Bank determines the expected losses in the period in which it is exposed to credit risk (i.e. in the economic maturity).
Calculation of expected credit losses in a lifetime horizon requires the application of multi-annual risk parameters.
Methodology for calculating group parameters - PD, RR and EAD.
Multi-annual PD parameters are an assessment of the probability of a default event in the next annual intervals in the lifetime. The PD long-term curve for a given exposure depends on the current value of the 12M PD parameter (and the appropriate rating class) determined based on the internal PD models of the Bank. In the estimation, the Bank:
a) estimates unbiased PD parameters without taking into account additional margins of conservatism (IFRS 9, paragraph 5.5.17 (a)),
b) takes into account current and forecasted macroeconomic conditions (IFRS 9, paragraph 5.5.17 (c)).
The calculation of expected recovery rates (RR) is based on the ‘pool’ model, in which, within homogeneous groups, average monthly recoveries are calculated conditionally against the months since default (MSD). Homogeneous groups of accounts were separated on the basis of the following characteristics:
the type of borrower,
product type,
ranges of the LTV parameter (for mortgages and housing loans) or credit amount (for chosen products).
As part of defined homogeneous groups, average monthly recovery rates are calculated, which consist of repayments and recoveries resulting from both the secured part and the unsecured exposure, weighted by the value of outstanding capital observed at the beginning of a given MSD.
For products for which a repayment schedule is available, the Bank sets the exposure value at the moment of default (EAD, Exposure at Default) and principal at the moment of default (PAD, Principal at Default) in the lifetime (ie for future repayments) based on contractual payment schedules and taking into account the following effects:
the effect of arrears on principal and interest installments related to the expected non-payment of the last installments prior to the occurrence of the default,
the effect of arrears of payments (principal and interest) on the date of calculation of the provision,
the effect of settlement of the EIR adjustment over time.
For products for which a repayment schedule is not available, the Bank sets the long-term EAD and PAD using the CCF (Credit Conversion Factor) and parameters. The CCF_1Y parameter, which estimates the percentage utilization of the remaining part of the limit in the period of 12 months before the expected moment of the default event, is used to determine the expected value of PAD and EAD parameters in the 12M period from the reference date. The CCF_2Y parameter is used to determine the expected value of PAD and EAD parameters from 12M after the reference date to the maturity date of the account.
For exposures for which it is not possible to determine risk parameters based on internal models, the Bank adopts an approach based on using parameters from other portfolios with similar characteristics.
The models and parameters used to calculate impairment allowance are periodically validated.
The table below shows results of the sensitivity analyses of ECL in established changes of PD and RR/LGD parameters, separately for individual and statistical valuated portfolio (portfolio level valuation). For portfolio valuation the growth and decline scenarios for PD and recovery rate (1-LGD) correction are presented, by 1% and 5% vs. values used to expected credit loss calculation at 31 December 2020. For exposures individually valuated sensitivity estimation is presented as impact of decrease by 10% in recovery rate from collaterals in workout scenario.
DELTA PARAMETER |
SCENARIO |
||
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS |
INDIVIDUAL ANALYSIS |
||
PD CHANGE |
RECOVERY RATE CHANGE (1-LGD) |
DEBT COLLECTION CHANGE |
|
-10.0% |
na |
na |
58 |
-5.0% |
(68) |
264 |
na |
-1.0% |
(14) |
53 |
na |
1.0% |
16 |
(53) |
na |
5.0% |
71 |
(263) |
na |
The low credit risk criterion
According to par. 5.5.10 IFRS 9 exposures that are considered as low risk credit exposures at the reporting date may remain in Stage 1, regardless of the scale of the relative credit deterioration from the initial recognition. According to par. B.5.5.22 of IFRS 9, the credit risk of a financial instrument is considered low when:
the financial instrument has a low risk of default,
the borrower has a strong capacity to meet its contractual cash flow obligations in the near term,
adverse changes in the economic and business conditions in the long term may, but will not necessarily, reduce the ability of the borrower to fulfil its contractual cash flow obligations.
The Bank applies a low credit risk criterion for three portfolios: exposures to banks, exposures to local government units and exposures to the State Treasury and the National Bank of Poland.
Financial assets with an identified significant increase in credit risk
Financial assets for which at the balance sheet date the Bank will identify a significant increase in credit risk from the initial recognition are classified in Stage 2. The Bank recognizes that for a given asset a significant increase in credit risk has been identified if a quantitative or qualitative criterion is met, in particular if contractual payments are more than 30 days past due, where the occurrence of a given criterion is verified at the exposure level.
Quantitative criteria
Taking into account the requirements of the standard, the Bank defined three basic characteristics of the quantitative model:
the measure on the basis of which the allocation is made to stages,
the significance of the deterioration of the credit quality,
quantification of the level of significant deterioration.
The measure, on the basis of which the allocation to stages is made, was set by the Bank as the ratio of:
current credit risk assessment defined as lifetime PD in the horizon from the reporting date to the maturity date determined on the basis of the characteristics effective as at the reporting date,
the original credit risk assessment defined as lifetime PD in the period from the reporting date to the maturity date determined on the basis of the characteristics applicable as at the date of initial recognition.
The assessment of a significant credit risk deterioration is carried out by comparing the observed value of a relative change in the risk assessment with the theoretical value, which is the threshold above which the Bank considers that a significant deterioration in credit risk occurred.
The allocation threshold at the single exposure level is determined by a statistical model based, among others, on information on the credit risk assessment as of the date of the initial recognition and the time from the date of the initial recognition of the exposure.
Qualitative criteria
As a result of the monitoring process carried out by the Bank, the qualitative criteria for the allocation to Stage 2 are identified, such as:
a delay in repayment over 30 days (30 DPD),
occurrence of forbearance status,
exposure is on the Watchlist.
In addition to the above, for individual monitoring the Bank has defined a number of specific quality criteria for various types of portfolios, such as, inter alia, changes in the internal rating, changes in supervisory classes for selected segments (e.g. specialized financing), warning signals identified in the monitoring system and credit risk management or the results of individual monitoring.
Financial assets with identified impairment
Financial assets for which at the balance sheet date the Bank has identified occurrences of the default event are classified in Stage 3.
In the second half of 2019 the Bank modified the default definition in terms of identifying quantitative trigger. The new definition of default was used both to estimate the respective risk parameters used to estimate the expected credit loss and to classify the exposure to Stage 3. The quantitative trigger occurs when at the aggregation level the number of days in arrears for the amount overdue above the threshold (PLN 100 for retail exposures and PLN 2 000 for non-retail exposures) exceeds 90 days. Daily data is used for current data and some historical data. The introduced changes are the first stage of implementation in the Group of Guidelines EBA /G /2016/07 regarding the application of the definition of default, as specified in art. 178 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013. In the second stage Group will implement changes coming from Guidelines EBA /GL/2016/07 at scope of quality triggers, and in the third stage will adapt new default definition to expected credit loss calculation.
The Bank recognizes that for a given asset a default was identified if at least one of the following occurred:
amount of arrears above the set materiality threshold (PLN 100 for retail exposures and PLN 2 000 for non-retail exposures) for over 90 days,
exposure during the restructuring process,
other qualitative impairment trigger.
For SME and corporate segments, default is identified at the customer level, whereas for the retail segment at the customer/product group level. The criterion of days and amounts of delays is also defined at the level of identification. Similarly, if for any of the contracts under the aggregated group there is a default condition, all contracts in this group are treated as default.
The Bank applies a six-month quarantine period effective from the moment all defaults cease to exist.
Sensitivity analysis regarding the forecast of the macroeconomic situation
Changes in expected credit losses for exposures without impairment presented in the table below were assessed as a difference between expected credit losses calculated for a specific macroeconomic scenario and expected credit losses calculated taking into account all macroeconomic scenarios weighed with the probability of their implementation (in accordance with IFRS 9).
Macroeconomic scenarios include forecasts of macroeconomic factors influencing the level of expected credit losses and are prepared by the Macroeconomic Research Office on a quarterly basis. The forecasts take into account the following factors: GDP growth, registered unemployment rate and 3-month WIBOR in 3 scenarios: baseline (the most probable), optimistic (assuming positive changes in factors in subsequent years against the baseline scenario) and pessimistic (assuming negative changes in factors in the following years against the baseline scenario).
31.12.2020 |
BASLINE SCENARIO |
OPTIMISTIC SCENARIO |
PESSIMISTIC SCENARIO |
Changes in expected credit losses for exposures without impairment (Stages 1 and 2) assuming 100% implementation of the scenario |
(22 497) |
16 398 |
134 046 |
31.12.2019 |
BASLINE SCENARIO |
OPTIMISTIC SCENARIO |
PESSIMISTIC SCENARIO |
Changes in expected credit losses for exposures without impairment (Stages 1 and 2) assuming 100% implementation of the scenario |
(5 527) |
(10 182) |
59 053 |
Changes in the methodology of calculation and expected credit losses coming from COVID-19
Due to COVID-19 pandemic, Bank identifies the risk of economic disruption associated with a withhold or limited activities in some sectors, distortion in supply chain, unavailability of employees, employment reduction, consumer behavior changes, slowdown of the economy of Poland’s trading partners and others directly or indirectly impacted by activities related to COVID-19 pandemic. In the Bank’s assessment these can lead to a significant deterioration of customers financial situation, however this deterioration maybe spread in time. In order to limit these risks the Bank has implemented a variety of mitigation measures and invested in supporting their customers, these include:
Increased monitoring of the portfolio with particular focus on increased risk industries,
Strengthening of measures used to limit credit risk, in particular legal aspects of secure claims both during financing and monitoring,
Verification of procedures in the area of financing particular business lines and adjusting them to the ongoing situation,
Granting loans guaranteed by BGK (Bank Gospodarstwa Krajowego) with guarantees up to 80 % of the total exposure,
Delay of installment payments upon request for a period of maximum 6 months,
Delay of application of penalties resulting from contractual clauses.
Detailed information on aid schemes (their characteristics and scale of use) are presented below (Moratoria implemented in the 2020 due to COVID-19).
Rapid spread of the COVID-19 pandemic ongoing 3 quarters and an unprecedented scale of remedies taken so far by the Polish government and banking sector in the scope of pandemic range limitation and stimulation of the economy, implicate very high uncertainty of future economic perspective and impact on the Bank’s credit portfolio. Due to lack of similar historical experience, the forecasting of future, which is the basis in the calculation of expected credit losses, in this situation is subject to additional degree of uncertainty and require some major expert assumptions. The Bank’s approach in this area and selected credit risk quantitative data are presented below.
In its approach, the Bank aimed to adequately reflect the potential future deterioration in the credit risk quality in the expected credit losses for stage 1 and 2 and appropriate coverage ratio of nonperforming loans (stage 3) because of possible difficulty in the credit debt recovery (collection) in the present situation. In the current phase of downturn caused by the COVID-19 epidemic, increase in impairment allowances in the Bank results mainly from forecasts of changes in the credit portfolio quality, taken into account in the calculation of expected credit losses according to IFRS9 requirements, and not from its actual its evolution. So far the Bank has observed only moderate increase in the default rate limited to certain client segments, (share of NPL remained on the stable level in range: 5.0%-5.4% throughout the year).
Banks expectations of macroeconomic situation
Starting point in the calculation of expected credit losses is the Bank’s expectations of macroeconomic situation which assume improvement of macroeconomic situation in 2021 after 2020 economic slowdown. GDP growth forecast is 4.5% year over year in 2021. It is assumed that the unemployment rate will stabilize on the level of 6.0%. Simultaneously, due to expiry of aid programs, Bank assumes delayed deterioration of credit portfolio quality caused by economic disturbance in 2020.
Observed deterioration of macroeconomic situation reflects changes in credit risk parameters (PD - probability of default, LGD - loss given default), which are used in the calculation of expected credit losses, based on historical data analysis and taking into account expert judgment which is necessary, because of uniqueness current situation. Based on historical analysis of changes in credit portfolio quality and economic parameters the most comparable period to the present is 1 quarter 2008 -1 quarter 2009 (the culmination of financial crisis when observed decrease of GDP growth was from 6.3% to 0.4%, which is comparable decrease to the one observed in 2020). Relative changes in default rate observed at that time in the Group are translated into changes in PD used in the calculation of expected credit losses, by imposing them on the projection of risk parameters estimated before epidemic outbreak.
Additional expert judgement include specificity of actual situation in 2020 (to a certain extent greater scale of slowdown in 2020 and unheard so far governments and national institutions support which postpones deterioration of credit portfolio quality ). As a result, average deterioration in PD parameter is about 50% in relation to output level projections assumed at the beginning (before pandemic outbreak) for retail portfolio and about 30% for the other portfolios. Regarding LGD parameter, the deterioration in recovery rate was reflected in individual analysis for nonperforming loans and additional assumption for statistical valuated loans. The lock-down in the economy caused by the epidemic would result in recovery delay an average time for a four of months (the duration time of the most important restriction on functioning of the economy), additionally the value of mortgage collaterals etc. will fall in accordance with reestimation on the mortgage market observed during the year.
Approach presented above is applied for all three scenarios used in expected credit loss calculation: baseline, downside (probability of materialization is 20%) and upside scenario (probability of materialization is 10%). Described estimations, with regard to character of current situation, are characterized by a significant level of uncertainty and will be revised in the subsequent periods.
Identification of significant increase in credit risk and stage allocation
The identification process of significant credit risk increase methods did not change. If increase in credit risk is significant then the loan is reclassified to stage 2. The Bank use consistently methods taking into consideration current situation, especially in case of credit payment holidays and other actions taken to mitigate the effects of COVID-19 pandemic. The Bank’s methodology is consistent with regulatory guidelines in terms of current conditions as a result of COVID-19 (e.g. EBA/GL/2020/02 Guidelines on legislative and non-legislative moratoria on loan repayments applied in the light of the COVID-19 crisis). Granting payment holidays on credit loans or other measures which mitigate the effects of pandemic do not automatically reclassify exposure to stage 2. But such reclassification take place if other, additional factors show that debtor’s troubles are observed and indicate an increase in credit risk. Additionally, in the scope of binding procedures Bank was made review and reclassification of the most exposed industry (high risk industry) at scope of negative effects of COVID-19 pandemic. Next the Bank was made detail analysis of current situation for corporate clients operating in high risk industry and reclassify to stage 2 or 3 the exposures for which significant increase of credit risk was identified. However, for clients using the statutory holidays Bank conducted reclassification to stage 3 on the product group level, due to client’s declaration about significant source of profit or job loss.
Estimated impact of COVID-19 on credit risk costs.
Impairment losses in 2020 for the Bank is equal PLN 1 549 million. The Bank asses that essential amount of this value is COVID-19 impact. Below components of this impact:
1. Increase in costs of risk in stage 1 and stage 2 resulting from deterioration in portfolio credit risk parameters PD and LGD (PLN 482 million),
2. Increase in costs of risk in stage 3 from new default for statutory credit holidays (PLN 53 million),related directly with COVID-19 pandemic.
Below item are tightly connected with outbreak of epidemic but partial materialization also would be observed without epidemic outbreak:
1. increase in costs of risk in stage 2 due to industry review and reclassifications to stage 2 due to similar activities (PLN 128 million),
2. Increase in coverage ratio for nonperforming loans as a result of decrease in future recovery rate (decrease in expected collection of credit debt) (PLN 314 million ),
In above cases it is not possible to conclude if the higher provision level is due only to COVID-19 pandemic or also situation which would exists despite of the epidemic.
The tables below present the changes in impairment allowances and gross carrying amount of financial assets not measured at fair value through profit or loss by class of financial assets:
|
LOANS AND ADVANCES TO BANKS AND CENTRAL BANKS MEASURED AT AMORTISED COST (*) |
||||
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 |
TOTAL |
||
individual assessment |
group assessment |
||||
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
4 348 373 |
291 |
- |
96 |
4 348 760 |
Transfer to Stage 1 |
23 |
(21) |
- |
(2) |
- |
Transfer to Stage 2 |
(34) |
45 |
- |
(11) |
- |
Transfer to Stage 3 |
(6) |
(16) |
- |
22 |
- |
New / purchased / granted financial assets |
1 850 547 |
- |
- |
- |
1 850 547 |
Financial assets derecognised, other than write-offs (repayments) |
(3 188 349) |
(96) |
- |
(27) |
(3 188 472) |
Financial assets written off (**) |
- |
- |
- |
(2) |
(2) |
Other, in this changes resulting from exchange rates |
60 723 |
(35) |
- |
10 |
60 698 |
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
3 071 277 |
168 |
- |
86 |
3 071 531 |
IMPAIRMENT ALLOWANCE |
|
|
|
|
|
IMPAIRMENT ALLOWANCE |
3 069 |
- |
- |
1 |
3 070 |
Transfer to Stage 1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Transfer to Stage 2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Transfer to Stage 3 |
(2) |
- |
- |
2 |
- |
New / purchased / granted financial assets |
1 294 |
- |
- |
- |
1 294 |
Financial assets derecognised, other than write-offs (repayments) |
(713) |
(54) |
- |
(23) |
(790) |
Financial assets written off (**) |
- |
- |
- |
(2) |
(2) |
Changes in level of credit risk (excluding the transfers between the Stages) |
(50) |
- |
- |
4 |
(46) |
Other, in this changes resulting from exchange rates |
(94) |
54 |
- |
22 |
(18) |
IMPAIRMENT ALLOWANCE |
3 504 |
- |
- |
4 |
3 508 |
(*) Receivables from the Central Bank include a current account and deposits.
(**) Including the value of contractual interest subject to partial write-off in the amount of PLN 2 thousand.
|
LOANS AND ADVANCES TO BANKS AND CENTRAL BANKS MEASURED AT AMORTISED COST (*) |
||||
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 |
TOTAL |
||
individual assessment |
group assessment |
||||
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
12 299 883 |
614 |
8 987 |
108 |
12 309 592 |
Transfer to Stage 1 |
96 |
(95) |
- |
(1) |
- |
Transfer to Stage 2 |
(68) |
74 |
- |
(6) |
- |
Transfer to Stage 3 |
(9) |
(23) |
- |
32 |
- |
New / purchased / granted financial assets |
2 044 641 |
- |
- |
- |
2 044 641 |
Financial assets derecognised, other than write-offs (repayments) |
(9 993 899) |
(236) |
- |
(46) |
(9 994 181) |
Other, in this changes resulting from exchange rates |
(2 271) |
(43) |
(8 987) |
9 |
(11 292) |
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
4 348 373 |
291 |
- |
96 |
4 348 760 |
IMPAIRMENT ALLOWANCE |
|
|
|
|
|
IMPAIRMENT ALLOWANCE |
2 356 |
- |
8 987 |
- |
11 343 |
Transfer to Stage 1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Transfer to Stage 2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Transfer to Stage 3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
New / purchased / granted financial assets |
1 840 |
- |
- |
- |
1 840 |
Financial assets derecognised, other than write-offs (repayments) |
(881) |
(85) |
- |
(20) |
(986) |
Changes in level of credit risk (excluding the transfers between the Stages) |
(121) |
- |
- |
10 |
(111) |
Other, in this changes resulting from exchange rates |
(125) |
85 |
(8 987) |
11 |
(9 016) |
IMPAIRMENT ALLOWANCE |
3 069 |
- |
- |
1 |
3 070 |
(*) Receivables from the Central Bank include a current account and deposits.
TOTAL |
LOANS AND ADVANCES TO CUSTOMERS MEASURED AT AMORTISED COST |
LOANS AND ADVANCES TO CUSTOMERS MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE THROUGH OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
|||||||
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 |
PURCHASED OR ORIGINATED CREDIT-IMPAIRED (POCI) |
Total |
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
Total |
||
individual assessment |
group assessment |
||||||||
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
109 352 812 |
19 170 005 |
4 836 208 |
2 795 007 |
10 049 |
136 164 081 |
937 162 |
608 620 |
1 545 782 |
Transfer to Stage 1 |
3 490 248 |
(3 457 333) |
(220) |
(32 695) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Transfer to Stage 2 |
(12 162 367) |
12 338 589 |
(13 748) |
(162 474) |
- |
- |
(183 753) |
183 753 |
- |
Transfer to Stage 3 |
(1 113 306) |
(598 618) |
744 205 |
967 719 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
New / purchased / granted financial assets |
28 136 800 |
- |
- |
- |
1 001 |
28 137 801 |
100 000 |
- |
100 000 |
Financial assets derecognised, other than write-offs (repayments) |
(27 434 056) |
(2 921 962) |
(299 563) |
(354 277) |
(5 550) |
(31 015 408) |
(127 701) |
(51 141) |
(178 842) |
Financial assets written off (*) |
- |
- |
(642 807) |
(216 263) |
(867) |
(859 937) |
- |
- |
- |
Modifications not resulting in derecognition |
(6 892) |
(1 312) |
18 |
(3 061) |
- |
(11 247) |
- |
- |
- |
Other, in this changes resulting from exchange rates |
929 050 |
244 717 |
224 999 |
91 250 |
1 932 |
1 491 948 |
57 420 |
64 358 |
121 778 |
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
101 192 289 |
24 774 086 |
4 849 092 |
3 085 206 |
6 565 |
133 907 238 |
783 128 |
805 590 |
1 588 718 |
IMPAIRMENT ALLOWANCE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
315 839 |
703 006 |
3 332 521 |
1 923 480 |
2 272 |
6 277 118 |
4 954 |
17 402 |
22 356 |
|
Transfer to Stage 1 |
144 213 |
(133 700) |
(184) |
(10 329) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Transfer to Stage 2 |
(60 349) |
115 369 |
(2 802) |
(52 218) |
- |
- |
(960) |
960 |
- |
Transfer to Stage 3 |
(110 167) |
(110 031) |
42 882 |
177 316 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
New / purchased / granted financial assets |
124 001 |
- |
- |
- |
793 |
124 794 |
331 |
- |
331 |
Financial assets derecognised, other than write-offs (repayments) |
(41 839) |
(26 771) |
(42 637) |
(31 964) |
(465) |
(143 676) |
(1 102) |
- |
(1 102) |
Financial assets written off (*) |
- |
- |
(625 079) |
(216 263) |
(867) |
(842 209) |
- |
- |
- |
Changes in level of credit risk (excluding the transfers between the Stages) |
(12 216) |
581 691 |
568 136 |
246 411 |
(1 415) |
1 382 607 |
1 894 |
2 788 |
4 682 |
Other, in this changes resulting from exchange rates |
26 437 |
15 710 |
176 671 |
(64 622) |
3 168 |
157 364 |
343 |
1 658 |
2 001 |
IMPAIRMENT ALLOWANCE |
385 919 |
1 145 274 |
3 449 508 |
1 971 811 |
3 486 |
6 955 998 |
5 460 |
22 808 |
28 268 |
(*) Including the value of contractual interest subject to partial write-off in the amount of PLN 199 301 thousand.
(**) The impairment allowance for loans and advances to customers measured at fair value through other comprehensive income is included in the Revaluation reserve’ item and does not reduce the carrying amount of the loan.
(***) Including the provision for legal risk regarding foreign currency mortgage loans in the amount of PLN 329 655 thousand.
The total value of undiscounted expected credit losses at the time of initial recognition of financial assets purchased or originated credit impaired in the period ended 31 December 2020 amounted to PLN 1 400 thousand (as at 31 December 2019 – PLN 3 249 thousand).
TOTAL |
LOANS AND ADVANCES TO CUSTOMERS MEASURED AT AMORTISED COST |
LOANS AND ADVANCES TO CUSTOMERS MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE THROUGH OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
|||||||
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 |
PURCHASED OR ORIGINATED CREDIT-IMPAIRED (POCI) |
Total |
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
Total |
||
individual assessment |
group assessment |
||||||||
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
99 001 708 |
20 019 456 |
4 816 470 |
2 540 327 |
54 922 |
126 432 883 |
1 696 888 |
- |
1 696 888 |
Transfer to Stage 1 |
4 524 073 |
(4 504 629) |
(2 028) |
(17 416) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Transfer to Stage 2 |
(6 888 696) |
7 003 804 |
(90) |
(115 018) |
- |
- |
(623 665) |
623 665 |
- |
Transfer to Stage 3 |
(725 383) |
(706 620) |
512 052 |
919 951 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
New / purchased / granted financial assets |
37 697 546 |
- |
- |
- |
5 145 |
37 702 691 |
571 101 |
- |
571 101 |
Financial assets derecognised, other than write-offs (repayments) |
(24 059 040) |
(2 771 006) |
(356 264) |
(325 966) |
(49 677) |
(27 561 953) |
(706 447) |
(15 977) |
(722 424) |
Financial assets written off (*) |
- |
- |
(311 111) |
(270 429) |
(126) |
(581 666) |
- |
- |
- |
Modifications not resulting in derecognition |
(2 223) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(2 223) |
- |
- |
- |
Other, in this changes resulting from exchange rates |
(195 173) |
129 000 |
177 179 |
63 558 |
(215) |
174 349 |
(715) |
932 |
217 |
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
109 352 812 |
19 170 005 |
4 836 208 |
2 795 007 |
10 049 |
136 164 081 |
937 162 |
608 620 |
1 545 782 |
IMPAIRMENT ALLOWANCE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IMPAIRMENT ALLOWANCE |
375 911 |
656 689 |
3 196 748 |
1 801 503 |
52 435 |
6 083 286 |
16 723 |
- |
16 723 |
Transfer to Stage 1 |
131 217 |
(123 407) |
(566) |
(7 244) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Transfer to Stage 2 |
(36 721) |
84 771 |
(608) |
(47 442) |
- |
- |
(7 955) |
7 955 |
- |
Transfer to Stage 3 |
(120 047) |
(188 508) |
36 889 |
271 666 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
New / purchased / granted financial assets |
144 647 |
- |
- |
- |
2 783 |
147 430 |
2 307 |
- |
2 307 |
Financial assets derecognised, other than write-offs (repayments) |
(65 324) |
(33 564) |
(43 350) |
(53 096) |
(5 551) |
(200 885) |
(3 484) |
- |
(3 484) |
Financial assets written off (*) |
- |
- |
(311 111) |
(270 429) |
(126) |
(581 666) |
- |
- |
- |
Changes in level of credit risk (excluding the transfers between the Stages) |
(130 710) |
296 320 |
241 300 |
201 291 |
(9 775) |
598 426 |
(2 404) |
9 431 |
7 027 |
Other, in this changes resulting from exchange rates |
16 866 |
10 705 |
213 219 |
27 231 |
(37 494) |
230 527 |
(233) |
16 |
(217) |
IMPAIRMENT ALLOWANCE |
315 839 |
703 006 |
3 332 521 |
1 923 480 |
2 272 |
6 277 118 |
4 954 |
17 402 |
22 356 |
(*) Including the value of contractual interest subject to partial write-off in the amount of PLN 291 269 thousand.
(**) The impairment allowance for loans and advances to customers measured at fair value through other comprehensive income is included in the Revaluation reserve’ item and does not reduce the carrying amount of the loan.
(***) Including the provision for legal risk regarding foreign currency mortgage loans in the amount of PLN 27 712 thousand.
The total value of undiscounted expected credit losses at the time of initial recognition of financial assets purchased or originated credit impaired in the period ended 31 December 2020 amounted to PLN 1 400 thousand (as at 31 December 2019 – PLN 3 249 thousand).
CORPORATE |
LOANS AND ADVANCES TO CUSTOMERS MEASURED AT AMORTISED COST |
LOANS AND ADVANCES TO CUSTOMERS MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE THROUGH OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
|||||||
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 |
PURCHASED OR ORIGINATED CREDIT-IMPAIRED (POCI) |
Total |
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
Total |
||
individual assessment |
group assessment |
||||||||
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
47 951 914 |
4 143 731 |
4 627 824 |
537 988 |
5 235 |
57 266 692 |
937 162 |
608 620 |
1 545 782 |
Transfer to Stage 1 |
1 596 124 |
(1 591 503) |
(204) |
(4 417) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Transfer to Stage 2 |
(8 047 705) |
8 063 327 |
(12 892) |
(2 730) |
- |
- |
(183 753) |
183 753 |
- |
Transfer to Stage 3 |
(627 395) |
(144 290) |
730 787 |
40 898 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
New / purchased / granted financial assets |
16 777 995 |
- |
- |
- |
20 |
16 778 015 |
100 000 |
- |
100 000 |
Financial assets derecognised, other than write-offs (repayments) |
(19 492 180) |
(1 082 368) |
(297 598) |
(47 324) |
(4 425) |
(20 923 895) |
(127 701) |
(51 141) |
(178 842) |
Financial assets written off |
- |
- |
(635 288) |
(53 941) |
(3) |
(689 232) |
- |
- |
- |
Modifications not resulting in derecognition |
(2 135) |
(44) |
- |
1 |
- |
(2 178) |
- |
- |
- |
Other, in this changes resulting from exchange rates |
926 693 |
22 777 |
218 250 |
21 550 |
2 220 |
1 191 490 |
57 420 |
64 358 |
121 778 |
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
39 083 311 |
9 411 630 |
4 630 879 |
492 025 |
3 047 |
783 128 |
805 590 |
1 588 718 |
|
IMPAIRMENT ALLOWANCE(*) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IMPAIRMENT ALLOWANCE |
206 646 |
99 126 |
3 157 920 |
497 134 |
(369) |
3 960 457 |
4 954 |
17 402 |
22 356 |
Transfer to Stage 1 |
40 729 |
(37 606) |
(181) |
(2 942) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Transfer to Stage 2 |
(54 325) |
59 125 |
(2 764) |
(2 036) |
- |
- |
(960) |
960 |
- |
Transfer to Stage 3 |
(28 205) |
(9 722) |
41 037 |
(3 110) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
New / purchased / granted financial assets |
77 639 |
- |
- |
- |
200 |
77 839 |
331 |
- |
331 |
Financial assets derecognised, other than write-offs (repayments) |
(34 787) |
(8 022) |
(42 411) |
(9 290) |
(377) |
(94 887) |
(1 102) |
- |
(1 102) |
Financial assets written off |
- |
- |
(617 560) |
(53 941) |
(3) |
(671 504) |
- |
- |
- |
Changes in level of credit risk (excluding the transfers between the Stages) |
23 023 |
137 225 |
557 879 |
27 971 |
(540) |
745 558 |
1 894 |
2 788 |
4 682 |
Other, in this changes resulting from exchange rates |
18 950 |
2 779 |
172 232 |
2 185 |
2 657 |
198 803 |
343 |
1 658 |
2 001 |
IMPAIRMENT ALLOWANCE |
249 670 |
242 905 |
3 266 152 |
455 971 |
1 568 |
4 216 266 |
5 460 |
22 808 |
28 268 |
(*) The impairment allowance for loans and advances to customers measured at fair value through other comprehensive income is included in the Revaluation reserve’ item and does not reduce the carrying amount of the loan.
CORPORATE |
LOANS AND ADVANCES TO CUSTOMERS MEASURED AT AMORTISED COST |
LOANS AND ADVANCES TO CUSTOMERS MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE THROUGH OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
|||||||
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 |
PURCHASED OR ORIGINATED CREDIT-IMPAIRED (POCI) |
Total |
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
Total |
||
individual assessment |
group assessment |
||||||||
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
43 630 908 |
3 961 789 |
4 604 095 |
538 135 |
3 735 |
52 738 662 |
1 696 888 |
- |
1 696 888 |
Transfer to Stage 1 |
1 624 007 |
(1 619 837) |
(2 028) |
(2 142) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Transfer to Stage 2 |
(2 945 965) |
2 948 704 |
(90) |
(2 649) |
- |
- |
(623 665) |
623 665 |
- |
Transfer to Stage 3 |
(409 017) |
(247 737) |
508 571 |
148 183 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
New / purchased / granted financial assets |
22 586 033 |
- |
- |
- |
4 752 |
22 590 785 |
571 101 |
- |
571 101 |
Financial assets derecognised, other than write-offs (repayments) |
(16 381 254) |
(924 054) |
(347 662) |
(52 263) |
( 2719) |
(17 707 952) |
(706 447) |
(15 977) |
(722 424) |
Financial assets written off |
- |
- |
(304 100) |
(81 659) |
(28) |
(385 787) |
- |
- |
- |
Modifications not resulting in derecognition |
(609) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(609) |
- |
- |
- |
Other, in this changes resulting from exchange rates |
(152 189) |
24 866 |
169 038 |
(9 617) |
(505) |
31 593 |
(715) |
932 |
217 |
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
47 951 914 |
4 143 731 |
4 627 824 |
537 988 |
5 235 |
57 266 692 |
937 162 |
608 620 |
1 545 782 |
IMPAIRMENT ALLOWANCE(*) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IMPAIRMENT ALLOWANCE |
243 240 |
96 295 |
3 024 931 |
469 848 |
3 066 |
3 837 380 |
16 723 |
- |
16 723 |
Transfer to Stage 1 |
33 634 |
(31 777) |
(566) |
(1 291) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Transfer to Stage 2 |
(28 733) |
31 663 |
(608) |
(2 322) |
- |
- |
(7 955) |
7 955 |
- |
Transfer to Stage 3 |
(31 088) |
(34 085) |
35 675 |
29 498 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
New / purchased / granted financial assets |
79 821 |
- |
- |
- |
2 217 |
82 038 |
2 307 |
- |
2 307 |
Financial assets derecognised, other than write-offs (repayments) |
(48 962) |
(37 223) |
(43 229) |
(21 100) |
299 |
(150 215) |
(3 484) |
- |
(3 484) |
Financial assets written off |
- |
- |
(304 100) |
(81 659) |
(28) |
(385 787) |
- |
- |
- |
Changes in level of credit risk (excluding the transfers between the Stages) |
(48 138) |
74 189 |
233 384 |
67 739 |
(443) |
326 731 |
(2 404) |
9 431 |
7 027 |
Other, in this changes resulting from exchange rates |
6 872 |
64 |
212 433 |
36 421 |
(5 480) |
250 310 |
(233) |
16 |
(217) |
IMPAIRMENT ALLOWANCE |
206 646 |
99 126 |
3 157 920 |
497 134 |
(369) |
3 960 457 |
4 954 |
17 402 |
22 356 |
(*) The impairment allowance for loans and advances to customers measured at fair value through other comprehensive income is included in the Revaluation reserve’ item and does not reduce the carrying amount of the loan.
MORTGAGE LOANS TO INDIVIDUAL CLIENTS |
LOANS AND ADVANCES TO CUSTOMERS MEASURED AT AMORTISED COST |
|||||
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 |
PURCHASED OR ORIGINATED CREDIT-IMPAIRED (POCI) |
Total |
||
individual assessment |
group assessment |
|||||
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
47 284 003 |
12 690 965 |
59 623 |
738 917 |
150 |
60 773 658 |
Transfer to Stage 1 |
1 721 139 |
(1 704 556) |
- |
(16 583) |
- |
- |
Transfer to Stage 2 |
(2 877 549) |
2 999 787 |
(855) |
(121 383) |
- |
- |
Transfer to Stage 3 |
(194 119) |
(248 174) |
12 696 |
429 597 |
- |
- |
New / purchased / granted financial assets |
8 054 247 |
- |
- |
- |
548 |
8 054 795 |
Financial assets derecognised, other than write-offs (repayments) |
(3 828 280) |
(1 189 003) |
(1 741) |
(76 833) |
(167) |
(5 096 024) |
Financial assets written off |
- |
- |
(5 989) |
(11 518) |
- |
(17 507) |
Modifications not resulting in derecognition |
(2 681) |
(548) |
18 |
(1 023) |
- |
(4 234) |
Other, in this changes resulting from exchange rates |
48 343 |
207 109 |
3 794 |
17 434 |
(404) |
276 276 |
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
50 205 103 |
12 755 580 |
67 546 |
958 608 |
127 |
63 986 964 |
IMPAIRMENT ALLOWANCE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IMPAIRMENT ALLOWANCE |
20 553 |
276 139 |
37 952 |
286 939 |
(15) |
621 568 |
Transfer to Stage 1 |
37 669 |
(36 210) |
- |
(1 459) |
- |
- |
Transfer to Stage 2 |
(478) |
29 332 |
(38) |
(28 816) |
- |
- |
Transfer to Stage 3 |
(8 499) |
(26 153) |
1 468 |
33 184 |
- |
- |
New / purchased / granted financial assets |
4 485 |
- |
- |
- |
280 |
4 765 |
Financial assets derecognised, other than write-offs (repayments) |
(511) |
(5 793) |
(226) |
(8 663) |
(10) |
(15 203) |
Financial assets written off |
- |
- |
(5 989) |
(11 518) |
- |
(17 507) |
Changes in level of credit risk (excluding the transfers between the Stages) |
(34 815) |
50 207 |
8 772 |
72 844 |
(158) |
96 850 |
Other, in this changes resulting from exchange rates |
1 712 |
6 107 |
2 395 |
4 993 |
(110) |
15 097 |
IMPAIRMENT ALLOWANCE |
20 116 |
293 629 |
44 334 |
347 504 |
(13) |
705 570 |
MORTGAGE LOANS TO INDIVIDUAL CLIENTS |
LOANS AND ADVANCES TO CUSTOMERS MEASURED AT AMORTISED COST |
|||||
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 |
PURCHASED OR ORIGINATED CREDIT-IMPAIRED (POCI) |
Total |
||
individual assessment |
group assessment |
|||||
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
41 026 819 |
14 046 350 |
55 231 |
661 942 |
921 |
55 791 263 |
Transfer to Stage 1 |
2 766 635 |
(2 758 978) |
- |
(7 657) |
- |
- |
Transfer to Stage 2 |
(2 731 405) |
2 821 646 |
- |
(90 241) |
- |
- |
Transfer to Stage 3 |
(55 723) |
(199 257) |
3 448 |
251 532 |
- |
- |
New / purchased / granted financial assets |
9 351 642 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
9 351 642 |
Financial assets derecognised, other than write-offs (repayments) |
(3 080 410) |
(1 295 323) |
(3 289) |
(73 204) |
(804) |
(4 453 030) |
Financial assets written off |
- |
- |
- |
(20 276) |
- |
(20 276) |
Modifications not resulting in derecognition |
(1 117) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(1 117) |
Other, in this changes resulting from exchange rates |
7 562 |
76 527 |
4 233 |
16 821 |
33 |
105 176 |
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
47 284 003 |
12 690 965 |
59 623 |
738 917 |
150 |
60 773 658 |
IMPAIRMENT ALLOWANCE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IMPAIRMENT ALLOWANCE |
14 821 |
246 842 |
25 152 |
294 335 |
772 |
581 922 |
Transfer to Stage 1 |
60 700 |
(59 298) |
- |
(1 402) |
- |
- |
Transfer to Stage 2 |
(412) |
31 025 |
- |
(30 613) |
- |
- |
Transfer to Stage 3 |
(7 997) |
(31 377) |
1 200 |
38 174 |
- |
- |
New / purchased / granted financial assets |
5 565 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
5 565 |
Financial assets derecognised, other than write-offs (repayments) |
(284) |
20 928 |
(120) |
(11 293) |
(38) |
9 193 |
Financial assets written off |
- |
- |
- |
(20 276) |
- |
(20 276) |
Changes in level of credit risk (excluding the transfers between the Stages) |
(52 686) |
64 210 |
8 766 |
1 839 |
(425) |
21 704 |
Other, in this changes resulting from exchange rates |
846 |
3 809 |
2 954 |
16 175 |
(324) |
23 460 |
IMPAIRMENT ALLOWANCE |
20 553 |
276 139 |
37 952 |
286 939 |
(15) |
621 568 |
Other LOANS and Advance TO INDIVIDUAL CLIENTS |
LOANS AND ADVANCES TO CUSTOMERS MEASURED AT AMORTISED COST |
|||||
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 |
PURCHASED OR ORIGINATED CREDIT-IMPAIRED (POCI) |
Total |
||
individual assessment |
group assessment |
|||||
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
11 419 405 |
2 239 287 |
36 722 |
1 518 099 |
4 661 |
15 218 174 |
Transfer to Stage 1 |
169 974 |
(158 262) |
(17) |
(11 695) |
- |
- |
Transfer to Stage 2 |
(1 178 443) |
1 216 803 |
- |
(38 360) |
- |
- |
Transfer to Stage 3 |
(291 792) |
(206 154) |
723 |
497 223 |
- |
- |
New / purchased / granted financial assets |
3 196 989 |
- |
- |
- |
434 |
3 197 423 |
Financial assets derecognised, other than write-offs (repayments) |
(3 393 436) |
(637 382) |
(226) |
(230 122) |
(958) |
(4 262 124) |
Financial assets written off |
- |
- |
(1 436) |
(150 803) |
(864) |
(153 103) |
Modifications not resulting in derecognition |
(2 076) |
(720) |
- |
(2 039) |
- |
(4 835) |
Other, in this changes resulting from exchange rates |
(51 977) |
14 831 |
2 862 |
52 262 |
114 |
18 092 |
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
9 868 644 |
2 468 403 |
38 628 |
1 634 565 |
3 387 |
14 013 627 |
IMPAIRMENT ALLOWANCE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IMPAIRMENT ALLOWANCE |
85 375 |
323 562 |
24 612 |
1 139 407 |
2 655 |
1 575 611 |
Transfer to Stage 1 |
65 748 |
(59 817) |
(4) |
(5 927) |
- |
- |
Transfer to Stage 2 |
(4 847) |
26 212 |
- |
(21 365) |
- |
- |
Transfer to Stage 3 |
(73 463) |
(74 156) |
377 |
147 242 |
- |
- |
New / purchased / granted financial assets |
41 555 |
- |
- |
- |
312 |
41 867 |
Financial assets derecognised, other than write-offs (repayments) |
(6 398) |
(12 955) |
- |
(14 011) |
(78) |
(33 442) |
Financial assets written off |
- |
- |
(1 436) |
(150 803) |
(864) |
(153 103) |
Changes in level of credit risk (excluding the transfers between the Stages ) |
(212) |
392 575 |
1 486 |
140 725 |
(717) |
533 857 |
Other, in this changes resulting from exchange rates |
5 467 |
6 822 |
1 951 |
(66 930) |
623 |
(52 067) |
IMPAIRMENT ALLOWANCE |
113 225 |
602 243 |
26 986 |
1 168 338 |
1 931 |
1 912 723 |
Other LOANS and advance TO INDIVIDUAL CLIENTS |
LOANS AND ADVANCES TO CUSTOMERS MEASURED AT AMORTISED COST |
|||||
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 |
PURCHASED OR ORIGINATED CREDIT-IMPAIRED (POCI) |
Total |
||
individual assessment |
group assessment |
|||||
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
11 136 693 |
1 969 625 |
40 924 |
1 340 248 |
50 267 |
14 537 757 |
Transfer to Stage 1 |
121 622 |
(114 005) |
- |
(7 617) |
- |
- |
Transfer to Stage 2 |
(1 143 515) |
1 165 643 |
- |
(22 128) |
- |
- |
Transfer to Stage 3 |
(260 643) |
(259 626) |
33 |
520 236 |
- |
- |
New / purchased / granted financial assets |
5 523 050 |
- |
- |
- |
393 |
5 523 443 |
Financial assets derecognised, other than write-offs (repayments) |
(3 852 896) |
(536 466) |
(1 129) |
(200 498) |
(46 154) |
(4 637 143) |
Financial assets written off |
- |
- |
(6 902) |
(168 493) |
(99) |
(175 494) |
Modifications not resulting in derecognition |
(497) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(497) |
Other, in this changes resulting from exchange rates |
(104 409) |
14 116 |
3 796 |
56 351 |
254 |
(29 892) |
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
11 419 405 |
2 239 287 |
36 722 |
1 518 099 |
4 661 |
15 218 174 |
IMPAIRMENT ALLOWANCE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IMPAIRMENT ALLOWANCE |
113 267 |
313 013 |
30 447 |
1 037 320 |
48 596 |
1 542 643 |
Transfer to Stage 1 |
36 744 |
(32 193) |
- |
(4 551) |
- |
- |
Transfer to Stage 2 |
(6 756) |
21 263 |
- |
(14 507) |
- |
- |
Transfer to Stage 3 |
(80 961) |
(123 046) |
13 |
203 994 |
- |
- |
New / purchased / granted financial assets |
58 436 |
- |
- |
- |
566 |
59 002 |
Financial assets derecognised, other than write-offs (repayments) |
(15 922) |
(17 240) |
- |
(20 701) |
(5 812) |
(59 675) |
Financial assets written off |
- |
- |
(6 902) |
(168 493) |
(99) |
(175 494) |
Changes in level of credit risk (excluding the transfers between the Stages ) |
(28 500) |
155 061 |
(851) |
131 711 |
(8 907) |
248 514 |
Other, in this changes resulting from exchange rates |
9 067 |
6 704 |
1 905 |
(25 366) |
(31 689) |
(39 379) |
IMPAIRMENT ALLOWANCE |
85 375 |
323 562 |
24 612 |
1 139 407 |
2 655 |
1 575 611 |
|
DEBT SECURITIES MEASURED AT AMORTISED COST |
DEBT SECURITIES MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE THROUGH OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
||||||
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 |
PURCHASED OR ORIGINATED CREDIT-IMPAIRED (POCI |
Total |
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
Total |
|
individual assessment |
||||||||
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
14 268 631 |
331 816 |
32 370 |
- |
14 632 817 |
30 951 820 |
12 860 |
30 964 680 |
Transfer to Stage 1 |
298 600 |
(298 600) |
- |
- |
- |
11 799 |
(11 799) |
- |
Transfer to Stage 2 |
(38 434) |
38 434 |
- |
- |
- |
(144 385) |
144 385 |
- |
Transfer to Stage 3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
New / purchased / granted financial assets |
20 398 512 |
- |
- |
- |
20 398 512 |
356 783 532 |
- |
356 783 532 |
Financial assets derecognised, other than write-offs (repayments) |
(7 679 491) |
(33 191) |
- |
- |
(7 712 682) |
(344 082 025) |
(1 376) |
(344 083 401) |
Modifications not resulting in derecognition |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Other, in this changes resulting from exchange rates |
315 355 |
(26) |
601 |
- |
315 930 |
941 036 |
315 |
941 351 |
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
27 563 173 |
38 433 |
32 971 |
- |
27 634 577 |
44 461 777 |
144 385 |
44 606 162 |
IMPAIRMENT ALLOWANCE (*) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IMPAIRMENT ALLOWANCE |
25 661 |
16 955 |
32 370 |
- |
74 986 |
32 425 |
671 |
33 096 |
Transfer to Stage 1 |
15 961 |
(15 961) |
- |
- |
- |
671 |
(671) |
- |
Transfer to Stage 2 |
(171) |
171 |
- |
- |
- |
(3 102) |
3 102 |
- |
Transfer to Stage 3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
New / purchased / granted financial assets |
15 529 |
- |
- |
- |
15 529 |
29 843 |
- |
29 843 |
Financial assets derecognised, other than write-offs (repayments) |
(9 682) |
(694) |
- |
- |
(10 376) |
(4 777) |
- |
(4 777) |
Changes in level of credit risk (excluding the transfers between the Stages) |
(5 783) |
111 |
- |
(5) |
(5 677) |
17 181 |
- |
17 181 |
Other, in this changes resulting from exchange rates |
429 |
- |
601 |
- |
1 030 |
(1) |
- |
(1) |
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
41 944 |
582 |
32 971 |
(5) |
75 492 |
72 240 |
3 102 |
75 342 |
(*) The impairment allowance for debt securities measured at fair value through other comprehensive income is included in the ‘Revaluation reserve’ item and does not reduce the carrying amount of the securities
|
DEBT SECURITIES MEASURED AT AMORTISED COST |
DEBT SECURITIES MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE THROUGH OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
||||||
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 |
PURCHASED OR ORIGINATED CREDIT-IMPAIRED (POCI |
Total |
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
Total |
|
individual assessment |
||||||||
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
11 158 109 |
- |
31 547 |
|
11 189 656 |
26 904 574 |
- |
26 904 574 |
Transfer to Stage 1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Transfer to Stage 2 |
(331 816) |
331 816 |
- |
- |
- |
(12 860) |
12 860 |
- |
Transfer to Stage 3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
New / purchased / granted financial assets |
8 234 245 |
- |
- |
|
8 234 245 |
135 290 310 |
- |
135 290 310 |
Financial assets derecognised, other than write-offs (repayments) |
(4 964 041) |
- |
- |
- |
(4 964 041) |
(131 970 590) |
- |
(131 970 590) |
Other, in this changes resulting from exchange rates |
172 134 |
- |
823 |
- |
172 957 |
740 386 |
- |
740 386 |
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
14 268 631 |
331 816 |
32 370 |
|
14 632 817 |
30 951 820 |
12 860 |
30 964 680 |
IMPAIRMENT ALLOWANCE (*) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IMPAIRMENT ALLOWANCE |
27 742 |
- |
31 547 |
|
59 289 |
28 207 |
- |
28 207 |
Transfer to Stage 1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Transfer to Stage 2 |
(9 448) |
9 448 |
- |
- |
- |
(388) |
388 |
- |
Transfer to Stage 3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
New / purchased / granted financial assets |
4 470 |
- |
- |
- |
4 470 |
10 398 |
- |
10 398 |
Financial assets derecognised, other than write-offs (repayments) |
(3 090) |
- |
- |
- |
(3 090) |
(6 824) |
- |
(6 824) |
Changes in level of credit risk (excluding the transfers between the Stages) |
6 053 |
7 506 |
- |
- |
13 559 |
1 030 |
283 |
1 313 |
Other, in this changes resulting from exchange rates |
(66) |
1 |
823 |
- |
758 |
2 |
- |
2 |
GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
25 661 |
16 955 |
32 370 |
- |
74 986 |
32 425 |
671 |
33 096 |
(*) The impairment allowance for debt securities measured at fair value through other comprehensive income is included in the ‘Revaluation reserve’ item
and does not reduce the carrying amount of the securities
Moratoria implemented in the 2020 due to COVID-19
In the 2020, due to COVID-19, the Group introduced the following loan repayment programs:
1) moratoria developed at the initiative of the Group, (non-statutory moratoria)).: i.e .:
for customers who are consumers within the meaning of Art. 221 of the Civil Code, the Group introduced the possibility of suspending the repayment of principal and interest installments for a period of up to 3 months or a prolongation consisting in suspending the payment of up to 3 principal installments with a simultaneous extension of the loan period,
for enterprises, the Group introduced the possibility of suspending principal or principal and interest installments for a period of 3 to 6 months and simplified extensions of credit limits.
Using the above-mentioned moratoria by clients depended on the timely servicing of loan repayments and the assessment of its financial situation.
2) moratoria developed by the Group in accordance with the EBA Guidelines, (non-statutory moratoria) i.e .:
On 29 May 2020 the Polish Financial Supervision Authority notified the European Banking Authority of the position of banks developed under the patronage of the Polish Bank Association on the EBA/GL/2020/02 Guidelines on legislative and non-legislative moratoria on loan repayments applied in the light of the COVID-19 crisis, which was introduced by the Group for loan agreements concluded before 13 March 2020 on the following terms:
for individual clients, micro and small entrepreneurs, the Group introduced the option to defer repayments of principal or principal and interest installments for a period of up to 6 months indicated by the client (regardless of the number of applications submitted by a given client). The condition for using the above-mentioned moratorium is the timely service of the loan by an individual customer and having credit worthiness, taking into account COVID-19 (in the case of entrepreneurs),
for medium-sized enterprises (with a turnover of up to EUR 50 million), the Group introduced the possibility of deferring the repayments of principal or principal and interest installments, in accordance with the client's request, for the period indicated by the client, amounting to a maximum of 6 months (principal installments) and 3 months (principal and interest installments), provided that the client has credit worthiness at the end of 2019, and for large enterprises (with a turnover of over EUR 50 million), the Group introduced the possibility of deferring the repayment of principal installments in accordance with the client's request, for the period indicated by the client, amounting to a maximum of 6 months, provided the customer has credit worthiness at the end of 2019.
3) suspension of the performance of the contract under the provisions of Act of 2 March 2020 on special solutions related to the prevention, countermeasure and combating of COVID-19, other infectious diseases and emergencies caused by them, (non-statutory moratoria):i.e.:
are available to customers who, as consumers, lost their job or other main source of income after 13 March 2020,
during the period of suspension of the performance of the contract, the customer is not obliged to make payments under the contract, including loan installments, except for insurance fees related to these contracts, and no interest is accrued.
Pursuant to the Act, the program is valid until the state of epidemic threat or epidemic state is in force (Article 31f of the Act).
All the above-mentioned moratoria were assessed by the Group in terms of meeting the modification criteria as defined in IFRS 9 in accordance with the principles defined in the Group's accounting policies. Given the nature of the above-mentioned moratoria, they were insignificant modifications in line with the policies adopted by the Group. Therefore, in relation to the loans covered by the above-mentioned moratoria, the Group each time determined the result on insignificant modifications.
As at 31 December 2020, the gross carrying amount of the loan portfolio covered by the above-mentioned moratoria amounted to PLN 14 606 million (69 902 units), and the negative result on insignificant modifications recognised in the 2020 related to these moratoria amounted to PLN 7.4 million and was recognized in the net interest income
All the above-mentioned moratoria were assessed by the Bank in terms of meeting the modification criteria as defined in IFRS 9 in accordance with the principles defined in the Bank's accounting policies. Given the nature of the above-mentioned moratoria, they were insignificant modifications in line with the policies adopted by the Bank. Therefore, in relation to the loans covered by the above-mentioned moratoria, the Bank each time determined the result on insignificant modifications.
As at 31 December 2020, the gross carrying amount of the loan portfolio covered by the above-mentioned moratoria amounted to PLN 12 697 million (59 185 units), and the negative result on insignificant modifications recognised in the 2020 related to these moratoria amounted to PLN 7.4 million and was recognized in the net interest income.
Additionally, the Bank signed the series of portfolio guarantee agreements with Bank Gospodarstwa Krajowego (‘BGK’), limiting the effects of COVID-19. The most important of them are:
1) De minimis guarantees
The annex to the existing agreement was signed on 19 March 2020 and introduced:
increasing the guarantee to 80% of the loan principal,
extension of the loan period to 39 months,
reduction of the commission for the guarantee to PLN 0.
The guarantees are intended for working capital loans in PLN for the micro, small and medium-sized enterprises sector. The maximum amount of the guarantee is PLN 3.5 million. Guarantees for the above the rules may be granted until 31 December 2020. The guarantee may be granted for a new loan, renewal or increase in the loan amount.
2) Agreement under the Liquidity Guarantee Fund (‘LGF’)
The contract was signed on 10 April 2020 and introduced guarantees with the following parameters:
guarantees for medium and large companies,
for working capital loans up to PLN 250 million,
the guarantee covers 80% of the loan principal,
warranty period up to 27 months,
commission for the guarantee from 0.25% to 1.15%, depending on the size of the enterprise and the length of the loan.
The term of both lines was extended until June 30, 2021, and in the case of de minimis guarantees, the guarantee amount was increased to EUR 1.5 million, and its duration to 75 months (working capital loans) and 120 months (investment loans).
Guarantees for the above-mentioned parameters can be granted until 31 December 2020. The guarantee may be granted for new credits and renewals. As at 31 December 2020, the gross carrying amount of the loan portfolio covered by the above-mentioned guarantees amounted to PLN 3 252 million (4 530 units).
Bank’s exposure to credit risk
The maximum credit risk exposure
The table below presents the maximum credit risk exposure for statement of financial position and off-balance sheet positions as at the reporting date.
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
|
Due from Central Bank |
150 185 |
2 101 782 |
Loans and advances from banks and from customers |
131 644 798 |
133 919 292 |
Financial assets held for trading |
1 613 337 |
1 279 495 |
Derivative financial instruments (held for trading) |
4 842 279 |
2 085 989 |
Hedging instruments |
779 063 |
377 208 |
Investment securities |
72 657 423 |
45 873 297 |
Other assets (*) |
856 331 |
3 307 570 |
Balance sheet exposure (**) |
212 543 416 |
188 944 633 |
Obligations to grant loans |
44 980 725 |
37 338 574 |
Other contingent liabilities |
31 463 281 |
22 042 849 |
Off-balance sheet exposure |
76 444 006 |
59 381 423 |
Total |
288 987 422 |
248 326 056 |
(*) Includes the following items of the statement of financial position: ‘Investments in subsidiaries’, ‘Investments in associates’ and part of ‘Other assets’(Accrued income, Interbank and interbranch settlements, Card settlements, Other debtor).
(**) Balance sheet exposure is equal to the carrying amount presented in the statement of financial position.
Credit risk mitigation methods
Bank has established specific policies with regard to collateral accepted to secure loans and guarantees. This policy is reflected under internal rules and regulations, which are based on supervision rules, specified in Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms.
The most frequently used types of collateral for credits and loans, accepted in compliance with the relevant policy of Bank are as follows
COLLATERAL |
COLLATERAL VALUATION PRINCIPLES |
mortgages |
|
commercial |
Collateral value is defined as the fair market value endorsed by a real estate expert. Other evidenced sources of valuation are acceptable, e.g. binding purchase offer, value dependent on the stage of tendering procedure, etc. |
residential |
|
registered pledge/ assignment: |
|
inventories |
The value is defined basing on well evidenced sources e.g. amount derived from pledge agreement, amount disclosed in last financial statements, insurance policy, stock exchange quotations, the value disclosed through foreclosure procedure supported with evidence e.g. prepared by bailiff/receiver. |
machines and appliances |
The value is defined as expert appraisal or present value determined based on other, sound sources, such as current purchase offer, register of debtor’s non-current assets, value evidenced by bailiff or court receiver, etc. |
vehicles |
The value is defined based on available tables (e.g. from insurance companies) proving the car value depending on its producer, age, initial price, or other reliable sources e.g. value stated in the insurance policy. |
other |
The value is defined upon individually. The valuation should result from reliable sources. |
securities and cash |
The value is defined upon individually estimated fair market value. Recovery rate shall be assessed prudently reflecting the securities price volatility. |
transfer of receivables |
|
from clients with investment rating assigned by independent rating agency or by internal rating system of the Bank |
The value is defined upon individually assessed claims’ amount. |
from other counterparties |
The value is defined upon individually assessed claim’s amount. |
Guaranties/sureties (incl. rafts)/accession to debt |
|
from banks and the State Treasury |
Up to the guaranteed amount. |
from other counterparties enjoying good financial standing, particularly when confirmed by investment rating, assigned by an independent rating agency or by the internal rating system of the Bank |
The value is defined upon individually assessed claim’s amount. |
from other counterparties |
Individually assessed fair market value. |
The financial effect of pledged collaterals for exposure portfolio with recognized impairment defined individually amounts to PLN 665 564 thousand as at 31 December 2020 (PLN 872 980 thousand as at 31 December 2019). The level of required impairment allowances for the portfolio would increase by this amount, if the discounted cash flows from collateral were not taken into account during estimation.
The Bank analyzes the concentration within LtV levels (the ratio of debt to the value of collateral), which is particularly important in the case of mortgage loans to individual clients. The structure of mortgage loans to individual clients according to the LtV level is presented below:
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 |
PURCHASED OR ORIGINATED CREDIT-IMPAIRED (POCI) |
TOTAL |
||
LTV LEVEL |
individual assessment |
group assessment |
||||
MORTGAGE LOANS TO INDIVIDUAL CLIENTS – GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
||||||
0% < LtV <= 50% |
13 658 642 |
6 236 212 |
25 610 |
355 700 |
50 |
20 276 214 |
50% < LtV <= 70% |
18 156 080 |
3 733 130 |
19 007 |
354 809 |
- |
22 263 026 |
70% < LtV <= 90% |
6 892 166 |
1 081 684 |
3 363 |
74 045 |
- |
8 051 258 |
90% < LtV <= 100% |
1 825 918 |
207 727 |
3 332 |
19 222 |
- |
2 056 199 |
100% < LtV |
201 785 |
27 316 |
6 122 |
2 350 |
- |
237 573 |
Total |
40 734 591 |
11 286 069 |
57 434 |
806 126 |
50 |
52 884 270 |
31.12.2019 |
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 |
PURCHASED OR ORIGINATED CREDIT-IMPAIRED (POCI) |
TOTAL |
|
LTV LEVEL |
individual assessment |
group assessment |
||||
MORTGAGE LOANS TO INDIVIDUAL CLIENTS – GROSS CARRYING AMOUNT |
||||||
0% < LtV <= 50% |
9 796 025 |
5 426 020 |
12 180 |
259 660 |
- |
15 493 885 |
50% < LtV <= 70% |
17 068 730 |
4 017 582 |
21 810 |
271 399 |
- |
21 379 521 |
70% < LtV <= 90% |
10 799 352 |
1 780 327 |
5 655 |
115 232 |
- |
12 700 566 |
90% < LtV <= 100% |
142 346 |
33 663 |
397 |
3 740 |
- |
180 146 |
100% < LtV |
76 365 |
18 720 |
13 591 |
3 684 |
- |
112 360 |
Total |
37 882 818 |
11 276 312 |
53 633 |
653 715 |
- |
49 866 478 |
Credit risk concentration
According to valid regulations the total exposure of the Bank to single borrower or a group of borrowers related by capital or management may not exceed 25% of the Bank’s own funds. In 2020 the maximum exposure limits set in the valid regulations were not exceeded.
a) Breakdown by individual entities
EXPOSURE TO 10 LARGERST CLIENTS OF THE Bank as at 31 December 2020 |
% SHARE OF PORTFOLIO |
Client 1 |
0.9% |
Client 2 |
0.9% |
Client 3 |
0.7% |
Client 4 |
0.7% |
Client 5 |
0.7% |
Client 6 |
0.6% |
Client 7 |
0.6% |
Client 8 |
0.5% |
Client 9 |
0.4% |
Client 10 |
0.4% |
Total |
6.4% |
EXPOSURE TO 10 LARGERST CLIENTS OF THE BankP as at 31 December 2019 |
% SHARE OF PORTFOLIO |
Client 1 |
1.1% |
Client 2 |
1.1% |
Client 3 |
0.8% |
Client 4 |
0.7% |
Client 5 |
0.6% |
Client 6 |
0.6% |
Client 7 |
0.6% |
Client 8 |
0.6% |
Client 9 |
0.4% |
Client 10 |
0.4% |
Total |
6.9% |
b) Concentration by capital groups
EXPOSURE TO 5 LARGEST CAPITAL GROUPS SERVICED BY THE Bank as at 31 December 2020 |
% SHARE OF PORTFOLIO |
Group 1 |
1.2% |
Group 2 |
1.0% |
Group 3 |
0.9% |
Group 4 |
0.8% |
Group 5 |
0.8% |
Total |
4.7% |
EXPOSURE TO 5 LARGEST CAPITAL GROUPS SERVICED BY THE Bank as at 31 December 2019 |
% SHARE OF PORTFOLIO |
Group 1 |
1.3% |
Group 2 |
1.1% |
Group 3 |
0.9% |
Group 4 |
0.9% |
Group 5 |
0.8% |
Total |
5.0% |
c) Breakdown by industrial sectors.
In order to mitigate credit risk associated with excessive sector concentration the Bank sets up a system for shaping the sectoral structure of credit exposure. Every year within Credit Policy the Bank defines sector limits for particular sectors of economy. These limits are subject to ongoing monitoring. The system applies to credit exposure in particular types of business activity according to the classification based on the Polish Classification of Economic Activities (Polska Klasyfikacja Działalności – PKD).
Concentration limits are set based on the Bank’s current credit exposure and risk assessment of each sector. Periodic monitoring of the Bank’s exposure allows for ongoing identification of the sectors in which the concentration of sector risk may be too excessive. In such cases, an analysis of the economic situation of the sector is performed including both the current and forecast trends and an assessment of quality of the current exposure to that sector. These measures enable the Bank to formulate the activities to reduce sector concentration risk and ongoing adaptation of the Bank’s Credit Policy to a changing environment.
The table below presents the structure of exposures by sectors
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
|
Agriculture, forestry and fishing |
0.6% |
0.7% |
Mining and quarrying |
0.9% |
1.2% |
Manufacturing |
18.6% |
19.1% |
Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply |
5.8% |
7.5% |
Water supply |
2.3% |
2.4% |
Construction |
4.5% |
4.3% |
Wholesale and retail trade |
12.3% |
14.6% |
Transport and storage |
4.4% |
5.1% |
Accommodation and food service activities |
2.6% |
2.6% |
Information and communication |
2.2% |
2.0% |
Financial and insurance activities |
20.8% |
16.0% |
Real estate activities |
9.8% |
11.5% |
Professional, scientific and technical activities |
7.1% |
3.2% |
Administrative and support service activities |
1.2% |
1.4% |
Public administration and defence, compulsory social security |
5.1% |
6.2% |
Education |
0.2% |
0.2% |
Human health services and social work activities |
0.6% |
0.7% |
Arts, entertainment and recreation |
0.9% |
1.1% |
Others |
0.1% |
0.2% |
Total |
100.0% |
100.0% |
Financial assets subject to modification
The table below presents information about financial assets that were subject to a modification that didn’t result in derecognition and for which, prior to modification, an impairment loss on expected credit losses was calculated as a loan loss over the lifetime of the exposure.
|
2020 |
2019 |
FINANCIAL ASSETS WHICH WERE SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION IN THE PERIOD |
|
|
Carrying amount according to the amortised cost before modification |
3 087 270 |
16 662 |
Net modification gain or loss |
(3 785) |
(373) |
FINANCIAL ASSETS WHICH WERE SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION SINCE INITIAL RECOGNITION |
|
|
Gross carrying amount of financial assets for which the loss allowance has changed during the reporting period from lifetime expected credit losses to an amount equal to 12-month expected credit losses |
438 407 |
12 286 |
Forborne exposures are debt contracts in respect of which forbearance measures have been extended and in the result of the, so called, rejection test (verification whether an impairment has been identified or a past due date greater than or equal to 30 days in the last 90 days), have been finally classified as performing Forborne exposures or non-performing Forborne exposures. Forbearance measures occur in situations in which the borrower is considered to be unable to meet the terms and conditions, including problems with debt service, of the contract due to financial difficulties. Based on these difficulties, the Bank decides to modify the terms and conditions of the contract to allow the borrower sufficient ability to service the debt. Modification of the terms and conditions of the contract may include i.e. the reduction of the interest rate, principal, accrued interest or the rescheduling of the dates of payment of principal or interests.
The Bank determines the list of the forbearance measures, including in particular:
the extension of initial maturity (due) date (in case of additional appendix to the contract) or signing a restructuring contract (in case of full past-due debt), in particular as a result of constant reduction of installments amount,
the modification of the contract’s terms or conditions which results in lower interests and/or principal payments to eliminate the past-due debt,
the refinancing by the other loan in the Bank.
The classification as forborne exposure shall be discontinued when all the following conditions are met:
the contract is considered as a performing exposure,
a minimum 2 year probation period has passed from the date the forborne exposure was considered as performing,
none of the exposures to the debtor is at least 30 days past-due at the end of the probation period of forborne exposure.
If conditions, referred above, are not fullfiled at the end of the probation period, exposures are classified respectively as performing or non-performing forborne exposures in the probation period untill all these conditions are met. The fullfilment of the conditions is assesed at least on a quarterly basis.
Exposure is classified as forbearance only if the modification of the contractual terms is related to the financial difficulties of the borrower.
The forbearance agreements are monitored for fulfillment of contractual provisions. Dedicated units of the Bank manage the agreements with identified forbearance measures and monitor such agreements on an on-going basis.
The decision to apply the forbearance measure is undertaken by the authorized Unit within the credit application process.
The accounting policies in respect to the evaluation and the provisioning of the forborne exposures generally follow the principles in line with the provisions of IFRS 9.
The Bank also identifies the assets’ significant credit risk increase for which the forbearance measures have been applied for the purpose of the process of impairment allowance recognition according to IFRS 9.
In the case of granting loan holidays or other mitigating measures for the COVID-19 pandemic, the Bank applies an approach consistent with regulatory guidelines in this regard. Granting loan holidays or other mitigation measures against the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic does not automatically identify forborne exposures.
Share of forborne exposures in the Bank’s loan portfolio
|
31.12.2020 |
|||||
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 |
PURCHASED OR ORIGINATED CREDIT-IMPAIRED (POCI) |
TOTAL |
||
individual assessment |
group assessment |
|||||
Loans and advances measured at amortised cost, including: |
113 125 147 |
24 803 762 |
1 667 995 |
1 205 241 |
23 596 |
140 825 741 |
Forborne exposures gross |
1 066 433 |
392 180 |
2 391 141 |
635 583 |
1 201 |
4 486 538 |
Loss allowance |
(2 207) |
(34 871) |
(1 797 164) |
(325 652) |
(219) |
(2 160 113) |
Forborne exposures net |
1 064 226 |
357 309 |
593 977 |
309 931 |
982 |
2 326 425 |
Loans and advances measured at fair value through other comprehensive income, including: |
783 128 |
805 590 |
- |
- |
- |
1 588 718 |
Forborne exposures |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Loss allowance (*) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Loans and advances measured at fair value through profit or loss, including: |
|
|
|
|
|
187 001 |
Forborne exposures |
|
|
|
|
|
1 068 |
|
31.12.2019 |
|||||
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 |
PURCHASED OR ORIGINATED CREDIT-IMPAIRED (POCI) |
TOTAL |
||
individual assessment |
group assessment |
|||||
Loans and advances measured at amortised cost, including: |
109 036 973 |
18 466 999 |
1 503 687 |
871 527 |
7 777 |
129 886 963 |
Forborne exposures gross |
347 639 |
112 208 |
2 261 037 |
485 121 |
577 |
3 206 582 |
Loss allowance |
(2 938) |
(11 647) |
(1 389 932) |
(264 347) |
(258) |
(1 669 122) |
Forborne exposures net |
344 701 |
100 561 |
871 105 |
220 774 |
319 |
1 537 460 |
Loans and advances measured at fair value through other comprehensive income, including: |
937 162 |
608 620 |
- |
- |
- |
1 545 782 |
Forborne exposures |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Loss allowance (*) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Loans and advances measured at fair value through profit or loss, including: |
|
|
|
|
|
242 639 |
Forborne exposures |
|
|
|
|
|
998 |
(*) The impairment allowance for loans and advances to customers measured at fair value through other comprehensive income is included in the
‘Revaluation reserve’ item and does not reduce the carrying amount of the loan.
The quality analysis of forborne exposures broken down by delays in repayment
|
31.12.2020 |
||||||
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 |
PURCHASED OR ORIGINATED CREDIT-IMPAIRED (POCI) |
TOTAL |
|||
individual |
group assessment |
||||||
FORBORNE EXPOSURES MEASURED AT AMORTISED COST (*) |
|
|
|
|
|||
Gross carrying amount, of which: |
1 066 433 |
392 180 |
2 391 141 |
635 583 |
1 201 |
4 486 538 |
|
not past due |
1 063 459 |
300 210 |
853 092 |
241 024 |
823 |
2 458 608 |
|
up to 1 month |
2 974 |
71 528 |
15 343 |
96 740 |
154 |
186 739 |
|
between 1 month and 3 months |
- |
20 235 |
17 710 |
72 203 |
86 |
110 234 |
|
between 3 months and 1 year |
- |
207 |
52 758 |
86 607 |
12 |
139 584 |
|
between 1 year and 5 years |
- |
- |
298 698 |
107 344 |
89 |
406 131 |
|
above 5 years |
- |
- |
1 153 540 |
31 665 |
37 |
1 185 242 |
|
Impairment allowances, of which: |
(2 207) |
(34 871) |
(1 797 164) |
(325 652) |
(219) |
(2 160 113) |
|
not past due |
(2 138) |
(19 305) |
(492 436) |
(82 782) |
(180) |
(596 841) |
|
up to 1 month |
(69) |
(11 065) |
(9 063) |
(40 476) |
114 |
(60 559) |
|
between 1 month and 3 months |
- |
(4 469) |
(5 260) |
(34 131) |
(58) |
(43 918) |
|
between 3 months and 1 year |
- |
(32) |
(40 774) |
(51 818) |
(8) |
(92 632) |
|
between 1 year and 5 years |
- |
- |
(210 651) |
(85 227) |
(50) |
(295 928) |
|
above 5 years |
- |
- |
(1 038 980) |
(31 218) |
(37) |
(1 070 235) |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Carrying amount, of which: |
|
|
|
|
|
1 068 |
|
not past due |
|
|
|
|
|
142 |
|
up to 1 month |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
between 1 month and 3 months |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
between 3 months and 1 year |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
between 1 year and 5 years |
|
|
|
|
|
919 |
|
above 5 years |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
The quality analysis of forborne exposures broken down by delays in repayment
|
31.12.2019 |
||||||
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 |
PURCHASED OR ORIGINATED CREDIT-IMPAIRED (POCI) |
TOTAL |
|||
individual |
group assessment |
||||||
FORBORNE EXPOSURES MEASURED AT AMORTISED COST (*) |
|
|
|
|
|||
Gross carrying amount, of which: |
347 639 |
112 208 |
2 261 037 |
485 121 |
577 |
3 206 582 |
|
not past due |
347 404 |
76 919 |
645 538 |
165 042 |
289 |
1 235 192 |
|
up to 1 month |
235 |
27 931 |
17 246 |
81 371 |
13 |
126 796 |
|
between 1 month and 3 months |
- |
7 358 |
17 456 |
50 415 |
48 |
75 277 |
|
between 3 months and 1 year |
- |
- |
64 456 |
56 824 |
125 |
121 405 |
|
between 1 year and 5 years |
- |
- |
266 867 |
105 206 |
39 |
372 112 |
|
above 5 years |
- |
- |
1 249 474 |
26 263 |
63 |
1 275 800 |
|
Impairment allowances, of which: |
(2 938) |
(11 647) |
(1 389 932) |
(264 347) |
(258) |
(1 669 122) |
|
not past due |
(2 922) |
(5 725) |
(177 133) |
(59 176) |
(119) |
(245 075) |
|
up to 1 month |
(16) |
(4 044) |
(7 745) |
(33 496) |
77 |
(45 224) |
|
between 1 month and 3 months |
- |
(1 878) |
(8 210) |
(26 054) |
8 |
(36 134) |
|
between 3 months and 1 year |
- |
- |
(25 678) |
(37 245) |
(122) |
(63 045) |
|
between 1 year and 5 years |
- |
- |
(172 198) |
(82 750) |
(39) |
(254 987) |
|
above 5 years |
- |
- |
(998 968) |
(25 626) |
(63) |
(1 024 657) |
|
FORBORNE EXPOSURES MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE THROUGH PROFIT OR LOSS |
|
|
|
||||
Carrying amount, of which: |
|
|
|
|
|
998 |
|
not past due |
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
up to 1 month |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
between 1 month and 3 months |
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
between 3 months and 1 year |
|
|
|
|
|
152 |
|
between 1 year and 5 years |
|
|
|
|
|
745 |
|
above 5 years |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Changes in net carrying amount of forborne exposures
2020 |
2019 |
|
Carrying amount at the beginning |
1 538 458 |
1 890 607 |
Amount of exposures recognized in the period |
1 606 852 |
142 285 |
Amount of exposures derecognized in the period |
(376 017) |
(282 404) |
Changes in impairment allowances |
(410 824) |
8 580 |
Other changes |
(30 976) |
(220 610) |
Carrying amount at the end |
2 327 493 |
1 538 458 |
Interest income |
122 448 |
83 599 |
Forborne exposures by type of forbearance activity
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
|
2 327 493 |
1 538 458 |
|
Carrying amount |
2 327 493 |
1 538 458 |
Forborne exposures by product type
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
|
Mortgage loans |
1 636 640 |
1 065 076 |
Current accounts |
46 863 |
55 722 |
Operating loans |
60 119 |
89 084 |
Investment loans |
213 822 |
230 342 |
Cash loans |
350 761 |
76 279 |
Other loans and advances |
19 288 |
21 955 |
Carrying amount |
2 327 493 |
1 538 458 |
Forborne exposures by industrial sectors
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
|
Corporates: |
589 948 |
1 195 674 |
Real estate activities |
236 548 |
775 249 |
Manufacturing |
59 328 |
78 079 |
Wholesale and retail trade |
49 984 |
101 848 |
Accommodation and food service activities |
85 468 |
49 460 |
Construction |
54 071 |
99 478 |
Professional, scientific and technical activities |
60 459 |
51 248 |
Transportation and storage |
10 898 |
3 538 |
Agriculture, forestry and fishing |
18 106 |
18 402 |
Other sectors |
15 086 |
18 372 |
Individuals |
1 737 545 |
342 784 |
Carrying amount |
2 327 493 |
1 538 458 |
Forborne exposures by geographical structure
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
|
Poland |
2 326 456 |
1 537 432 |
Other countries |
1 037 |
1 026 |
Carrying amount |
2 327 493 |
1 538 458 |
Issues related to the legal risk related to FX mortgage loans in CHF
1) Portfolio characteristics
Bank Pekao S.A. has not granted loans in CHF to the public since 2003. Almost the entire current portfolio of loans in CHF for individuals was taken over by Bank Pekao S.A. in the process of partial division of Bank BPH S.A. (loans granted before August 2006).
As at 31 December 31 2020, the Bank had a portfolio of foreign currency mortgage loans in CHF with a total gross carrying amount of PLN 2 660 million (i.e. CHF 623.8 million) compared to PLN 2 753 million (i.e. CHF 702.1 million) as at 31 December 31 2019.
The tables below present the structure and quality of the CHF loan portfolio for individuals:.
|
31.12.20120 |
|||||
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 |
PURCHASED OR ORIGINATED CREDIT-IMPAIRED (POCI) |
TOTAL |
||
individual assessment |
group assessment |
|||||
Gross carrying amount, of which: |
2 602 |
2 438 951 |
34 705 |
183 547 |
- |
2 659 805 |
denominated in CHF |
2 602 |
2 433 395 |
34 705 |
182 953 |
- |
2 653 655 |
indexed to CHF |
- |
5 556 |
- |
594 |
- |
6 150 |
Impairment allowances, of which: (*) |
(1) |
(353 883) |
(23 976) |
(91 229) |
- |
(469 089) |
denominated in CHF |
(1) |
(353 845) |
(23 976) |
(91 033) |
- |
(468 855) |
indexed to CHF |
- |
(38) |
- |
(196) |
- |
(234) |
Carrying amount, of which: |
2 601 |
2 085 068 |
10 729 |
92 318 |
- |
2 190 716 |
denominated in CHF |
2 601 |
2 079 550 |
10 729 |
91 920 |
- |
2 184 800 |
indexed to CHF |
- |
5 518 |
- |
398 |
- |
5 916 |
(*) Including the provision for legal risk regarding foreign currency mortgage loans in the amount of PLN 329 655 thousand.
31.12.2019 |
||||||
STAGE 1 |
STAGE 2 |
STAGE 3 |
PURCHASED OR ORIGINATED CREDIT-IMPAIRED (POCI) |
TOTAL |
||
individual assessment |
group assessment |
|||||
Gross carrying amount, of which: |
3 372 |
2 555 642 |
30 843 |
163 352 |
- |
2 753 209 |
denominated in CHF |
3 372 |
2 546 227 |
30 843 |
162 541 |
- |
2 742 983 |
indexed to CHF |
- |
9 415 |
- |
811 |
- |
10 226 |
Impairment allowances, of which: |
(3) |
(55 939) |
(20 053) |
(79 988) |
- |
(155 983) |
denominated in CHF |
(3) |
(55 882) |
(20 053) |
(79 680) |
- |
(155 618) |
indexed to CHF |
- |
(57) |
- |
(308) |
- |
(365) |
Carrying amount, of which: |
3 369 |
2 499 703 |
10 790 |
83 364 |
- |
2 597 226 |
denominated in CHF |
3 369 |
2 490 345 |
10 790 |
82 861 |
- |
2 587 365 |
indexed to CHF |
- |
9 358 |
- |
503 |
- |
9 861 |
(*) Including the provision for legal risk regarding foreign currency mortgage loans in the amount of PLN 27 712 thousand.
Moreover, the portfolio of granted and repaid foreign currency loans in CHF amounted to CHF 1 287 million as at 31 December 1 2020, compared to CHF 1 198 million as at 31 December 2019.
As of 31 December 2020 the average LTV for CHF loans to individuals granted by the Bank amounted to 37.1%(39.1% as at 31 December 2019), with an average LTV for the whole portfolio of mortgage loans of 55.5% (57.7% as at 31 December 2019).
2) Court proceedings related to foreign currency mortgage loans in CHF
On 3 October 2019, the Court of Justice of the European Union (hereinafter the ‘CJEU’) issued a ruling on a CHF-indexed loan granted by another bank, in which it interpreted the provisions of Council Directive 93/13 / EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer loans based on the CHF indexed loan agreement. The CJEU indicated the consequences of recognizing the possible abusiveness of conversion clauses by the domestic court, without examining the possible abusiveness of contractual provisions at all. The CJEU did not prejudge that in the event that a domestic court finds possible abusiveness, the court should automatically declare the entire contract invalid. The assessment in this respect remains to be decided by the national court, but the CJEU has not ruled out the possibility of filling the gap resulting from the abusive nature of conversion clauses by means of domestic regulatons.
The ruling of the CJEU constitutes general guidelines for Polish courts. Final decisions made by Polish courts are made on the basis of EU regulations interpreted in accordance with the CJEU judgment, taking into account the provisions of domestic law and the analysis of the individual circumstances of each case. At the same time, it is difficult to talk about a formed line of jurisprudence in cases of mortgage loans in CHF, which is often confirmed by mutually exclusive judgments of common courts, as well as legal inquiries to the CJEU and the Supreme Court to resolve doubts. In particular, attention should be paid to the application submitted on 29 January, 2021 by the First President of the Supreme Court to the full composition of the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court to resolve legal issues related to FX mortgage loans in CHF, relating in particular to the following aspects:
1) whether the abusive provisions relating to the method of determining the currency rate in an indexed or denominated loan agreement can be replaced by provisions of civil or customary law,
2) if it is impossible to establish a binding exchange rate for a foreign currency in a denominated loan agreement, the agreement may bind the parties in the remaining scope,
3) if it is impossible to establish a binding exchange rate for a foreign currency in the loan agreement, the agreement may bind the parties in the remaining scope,
4) whether the balance theory or the theory of two conditions will apply in the event of cancellation of the loan agreement,
5) which is the moment to start the limitation period in the event that the bank makes a claim against the borrower for the repayment of the loan,
6) whether it is possible for banks and borrowers to receive remuneration for using the funds.
In the Bank's opinion, the ruling of the Supreme Court expected in March 2021 on the above issues may have a significant impact on the further shaping of the line of judicial decisions in this regard. At the same time, there are discussions in the banking sector in Poland regarding the implementation of possible systemic solutions for FX mortgage loans in CHF, i.e. in accordance with the proposal of the Chairman of the Polish Financial Supervision Authority of 8 December, 2020, clients would be able to convert a foreign currency mortgage into a PLN loan, as if the borrower had a loan in PLN from the beginning of the loan, the interest rate of which would be based on 3M WIBOR with a margin adequate to historical levels (depending on time moment the loan was granted).
As at 31 December 31 2020, 515 individual court cases were pending against the Bank regarding FX mortgage loans in CHF, which were granted in previous years, with the total value of the claim in the amount of PLN 126 million (as at 31 December 2019, the number of cases was 158, and the corresponding value of the dispute is PLN 43.7 million). The main cause of the dispute, as indicated by the plaintiffs, concerns the questioning of the provisions of the loan agreement with regard to the Bank's application of conversion rates and results in claims regarding the partial or complete invalidity of the loan agreements. As at 31 December 2020, the Bank received 33 unfavorable court judgments in cases brought by borrowers, including 3 final judgments declaring the invalidity of the loan agreement and 10 favorable court judgments, including 2 final judgments dismissing the claim to declare the loan agreement invalid and an action for payment in connection with the invalidity of the loan agreement (31 December 2019: 2 unfavorable court judgments - no final judgments stating the invalidity of the loan agreement and 3 favorable non-final judgments dismissing the claim for payment).
3) Provision related to foreign currency mortgage loans in CHF - assumptions and calculation methodology
Taking into account the increase in the number of disputes to which the Bank is a party, as well as the increase in the number of claims related to FX mortgage loans in CHF observed in the entire banking sector, along with the increasingly unfavorable tendency in the jurisprudence, the Bank has revised the estimation of the provision for the above-mentioned legal risk related to contracts for FX mortgage loans in CHF in the total amount of PLN 410 million as at 31 December 2020 (PLN 46.7 million as at 31 December 2019).
The above amount includes the provision for individual pending litigation to which the Bank is a party and the portfolio provision for other CHF mortgage loan agreements, which are subject to legal risk related to the nature of these agreements.
For the purposes of estimating the provision, the Bank assesses the probability of the impact of the legal risk relating to FX mortgage loans in CHF on future expected cash flows from credit exposures and on the probability of cash outflow.
With regard to existing court cases, the Bank assesses the probability of losing a dispute and the probability of a specific court judgment (depending on what the lawsuit concerns). As at 31 December 2020, the Bank estimated the provision in this respect in the total amount of PLN 69 million (PLN 14.2 million as at 31 December 2019).
With regard to the portfolio provision, as at 31 December 2020, the Bank based its calculations on 3 possible scenarios in order to best account for the various possible solutions related to FX mortgage contracts in CHF, which are currently being analyzed in the banking sector, in the portfolio provision estimation. In the previous periods, the Bank used one scenario.
The Bank decided to introduce the scenario method due to the significant changes observed in the banking market during 2020, in particular related to significant increases in disputes, the ever-increasing complexity of legal problems and the various sectoral solutions in the area of CHF mortgage loans.
The calculation of the provision performed by the Bank as at 31 December 2020 was based on the following equivalent scenarios:
1) the baseline scenario - the bank assumes that around 6% of foreign currency borrowers (with both active and repaid loans) have filed or will file lawsuits against the Bank within a 3-year horizon regarding the questioning of the loan agreement and estimates the probability of losing court cases, as well as the possible consequences financial in the event of losing a court case, accepting as possible decisions:
• invalidation of the entire agreement for a foreign currency mortgage loan in CHF as a result of recognizing the indexation clause as illegal,
• recognition that the clauses contained in the loan agreement constitute prohibited contractual provisions resulting in the determination of the loan balance in PLN and the interest rate on the loan based on the LIBOR rate, the so-called ‘Defrancation’,
• recognizing the valorization clause as abusive and replacing the Bank's exchange rate table in its content with the average exchange rate of the National Bank of Poland,
• dismissal of the claim.
In the baseline scenario as at 31 December 2020, the Bank took into account its own and the history of lawsuits observed in the market, and used the opinion of an external law firm to determine the probability of losing the disputes and the probabilities of possible solutions. As at 31 December 2020, the Bank estimates that the probability of losing the dispute is 80% (which is an increase by 10 pp compared to the assumptions in this respect as at 31 December 2019).
An additional element of the estimates in the baseline scenario is the probability distribution of a possible dispute resolution, which is associated with a specific loss level. The Bank attributes the largest share in the possible settlement scenarios, amounting to 70% (35% at the end of 2019), to the cancellation of the loan agreement).
2) settlement scenario - legal disputes regarding currency loan agreements in CHF will be possible, but clients will use them to a much lesser extent than in the base scenario, as most of them (around 75-80%) will use the option of settlements with the Bank based on solutions discussed in the banking sector, as proposed by the Chairman of the Polish Financial Supervision Authority. In the settlement scenario, the financial consequences for the Bank are equal to the sum of the differences between the current balance of the FX mortgage loan in CHF and the balance of the hypothetical loan in PLN, based on the WIBOR rate increased by the margin of the loan granted at the same time and for the same period as the loan in CHF and repaid by the borrower in accordance with the repayments made on the CHF loan. With the current market parameters and assuming that all borrowers for whom the conversion of the loan into PLN would be beneficial as proposed by the Chairman of the Polish Financial Supervision Authority would have entered into an appropriate settlement with the Bank, the Bank's loss on this account would be PLN 350-400 million.
3) negative scenario - in the event of a negative resolution of the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court in the full bench, and in connection with this resolution of unfavorable jurisprudence and common courts regarding FX mortgage loans in CHF, the number of possible claims will be nearly three times higher in the future than assumed in the scenario base, with a simultaneous greater probability both with regard to unfavorable court judgments in principle (increase to the level of 95%), and their decisions in the form of annulment of the entire agreement for a CHF mortgage loan (95% of decisions).
Taking into account the short history of data on the scale of lawsuits (in particular in the field of final judgments), the significant level of complexity of various legal aspects that may occur in relation to these loan agreements, and, as a result, the unshaped direction of possible court decisions, the estimates of the above provision required by the Bank of many expert assumptions based on professional judgment.
Subsequent rulings, and above all the expected resolution of the full composition of the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court and possible sectoral solutions that will appear on the Polish market with regard to FX mortgage loans in CHF, may have an impact on the amount of the provision determined by the Bank and cause the need to change individual assumptions made in calculations, in particular in terms of weights of individual scenarios, the probability of unfavorable solutions or the possible number of lawsuits. In connection with the above uncertainty, it is possible that the amount of the provision will change in the future.
The Bank performed a sensitivity analysis in relation to the significant assumptions of the provision calculation, where a change in the level of individual parameters would have the following impact on the amount of the provision for the legal risk of FX mortgage loans in CHF.
Impact on the provision level in the event of changes to the assumptions in the base scenario (with other elements of the calculation unchanged):
PARAMETER |
SCENARIO |
IMPACT ON THE PROVISION LEVEL |
Number of lawsuits |
+20% |
29 859 |
-20% |
(29 859) |
|
Probability of failure |
+10 p.p. |
21 333 |
|
- 10 p.p. |
(21 333) |
Probability of a contract invalidity scenario |
+10 p.p. |
6 432 |
- 10 p.p. |
(6 432) |
4) Provision related to foreign currency mortgage loans in CHF - accounting treatment and presentation
As indicated in the section of the financial statements concerning accounting policies, the Bank recognizes that the legal risk affects the expected cash flows from the credit exposure and the amount of the provision is the difference between the expected cash flows from a given exposure and the contractual flows as defined in IFRS 9.
Therefore, with regard to currency exposures of mortgage loans in CHF unpaid as at 31 December 2020, the Bank adopts the approach that the amount of the provision for credit exposures outstanding as at 31 December 2020 (including existing and possible future claims) is recognized in ‘Impairment allowances on loan receivables’ (in correspondence with the item ‘Net impairment allowance’) up to the amount of credit exposure. Thus, the Bank recognizes that with regard to the CHF portfolio, there has been a significant increase in credit risk since the initial recognition date and classifies these loans to Basket 2.
In the case of part of the provision relating to repaid foreign currency mortgage loans in CHF (including existing and possible future lawsuits), or when the amount of the provision exceeds the net carrying amount of the credit exposure, the provision amount is recorded as ‘Provisions’ in correspondence with ‘Other operating expenses’.
Following the above principles, as at 31 December 2020, the Bank allocated the total amount of the provision in the amount of PLN 410 million as follows:
1. PLN 329.7 million for current and future disputes regarding balance sheet exposures, recognized as an element of impairment losses on credit receivables in correspondence with ‘Net impairment allowance’ (PLN 27.7 million as at 31 December 2019),
2. PLN 80.3 million for current and future legal disputes regarding repaid exposures, recognized as provisions in correspondence with ‘Other operating expenses’ (PLN 19.0 million as at 31 December 2019).
A summary of the recognition of the provision for legal risk related to FX mortgage loans in CHF in the statement of financial position and profit and loss is presented in the tables below.
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION |
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
Impairment allowances for loan exposures, in this: |
329 655 |
27 712 |
Individual provisions
|
58 859 |
11 164 |
Portfolio provisions |
270 796 |
16 548 |
Provisions for litigation and claims, in this: |
80 325 |
18 990 |
Individual provisions
|
10 127 |
3 020 |
Portfolio provisions |
70 198 |
15 970 |
Total |
409 980 |
46 702 |
INCOME STATEMENT |
2020 |
2019 |
Net allowances for expected credit losses |
(301 943) |
(27 712) |
Other operating expenses |
(61 335) |
(18 990) |
Total |
(363 278) |
(46 702) |
Offsetting financial assets and financial liabilities
The disclosures in the tables below include financial assets and financial liabilities that are subject to an enforceable master netting agreements or similar agreements, irrespective of whether they are offset in the statement of financial position.
The netting agreements concluded by the Bank are:
ISDA agreements and similar master netting agreements on derivatives,
GMRA agreements on repo and reverse-repo transactions.
The netting agreements do not meet the criteria for offsetting in the statement of financial position. This is because they create for the parties to the agreement a right of set-off of recognized amounts that is enforceable only following an event of default, insolvency or bankruptcy of the one of the counterparty. At the balance, day there were no cases of offsetting financial assets and financial liabilities for these netting agreements.
The Bank receives and gives collateral in the form of cash and marketable securities in respect of the derivatives transactions.
Such collateral is subject to standard industry terms. The collateral in the form of cash stems from an ISDA Credit Support Annex (CSA).
Financial assets and financial liabilities subject to enforceable master netting agreements and similar agreements and which may be potentially offset in the statement of financial position.
carrying amount of FINANCIAL ASSETS presented in the statement of financial position |
AMOUNT of potential offsetting |
net amount |
||
financial instruments (including received collateral in the form of securities) |
cash collateral received |
|||
financial assets |
||||
Derivatives |
5 449 810 |
(4 439 645) |
(326 395) |
683 769 |
TOTAL |
5 449 810 |
(4 439 645) |
(326 395) |
683 769 |
31.12.2019 |
carrying amount of FINANCIAL LIABILITIES presented in the statement of financial position |
AMOUNT of potential offsetting |
net amount |
|
financial instruments (including pledged collateral in the form of securities) |
cash collateral pledged |
|||
financial LIABILITIES |
||||
Derivatives |
5 641 933 |
(4 450 897) |
(813 049) |
377 988 |
TOTAL |
5 641 933 |
(4 450 897) |
(813 049) |
377 988 |
31.12.2019 |
carrying amount of FINANCIAL ASSETS presented in the statement of financial position |
AMOUNT of potential offsetting |
net amount |
|
financial instruments (including received collateral in the form of securities) |
cash collateral received |
|||
financial assets |
||||
Derivatives |
2 412 367 |
(1 850 010) |
(310 724) |
251 633 |
TOTAL |
2 412 367 |
(1 850 010) |
(310 724) |
251 633 |
carrying amount of FINANCIAL LIABILITIES presented in the statement of financial position |
AMOUNT of potential offsetting |
net amount |
||
financial instruments (including pledged collateral in the form of securities) |
cash collateral pledged |
|||
financial LIABILITIES |
||||
Derivatives |
2 589 498 |
(1 882 641) |
(613 100) |
93 757 |
TOTAL |
2 589 498 |
(1 882 641) |
(613 100) |
93 757 |
The carrying amount of financial assets and financial liabilities disclosed in the above tables have been measured in the statement of financial position on the fair value base.
Reconciliation of the carrying amount of financial assets and financial liabilities subject to enforceable master netting agreements and similar agreements to the amounts presented in the statement of financial position.
NET carrying amount |
item in statement of financial position |
carrying amount in statement of financial position |
carrying amount of transactions not in scope of offsetting disclosures |
note |
|
financial assets |
|||||
Derivatives |
4 670 747 |
Derivative financial instruments |
4 842 279 |
171 532 |
24 |
779 063 |
Hedging instruments |
779 063 |
- |
26 |
|
financial LIABILITIES |
|||||
Derivatives |
4 568 974 |
Derivative financial instruments |
4 636 116 |
67 142 |
24 |
1 072 959 |
Hedging instruments |
1 072 959 |
- |
26 |
31.12.2019 |
NET carrying amount |
item in statement of financial position |
carrying amount in statement of financial position |
carrying amount of transactions not in scope of offsetting disclosures |
note |
financial assets |
|||||
Derivatives |
2 035 159 |
Derivative financial instruments (held for trading) |
2 085 989 |
50 830 |
24 |
377 208 |
Hedging instruments |
377 208 |
- |
26 |
|
financial LIABILITIES |
|||||
Derivatives |
1 974 733 |
Derivative financial instruments (held for trading) |
2 040 368 |
65 635 |
24 |
614 765 |
Hedging instruments |
614 765 |
- |
26 |
The Bank is exposed in its operations to market risk and other types of risk caused by changing market risk parameters.
Market risk is the risk of deteriorating financial result or capital of the Bank resulting from market changes. The main factors of market risk are as follows:
interest rates,
foreign exchange rates,
stock prices,
commodity prices.
The Bank established a market risk management system, providing structural, organizational and methodological frames for the purpose of shaping the structure of balance and off-balance items to assure the achievement of strategic goals.
The main objective of market risk management is to optimize financial results so as to assure the implementation of financial goals of the Bank while keeping the exposure to market risk within the risk appetite defined through risk limits approved by the Management Board and the Supervisory Board.
The organization of the market risk management process is based on a three-tier control system, established in compliance with the best international banking practices and recommendations from banking supervision. The process of market risk management and procedures regulating it have been developed taking into consideration the split into trading and banking books.
Market risk of the trading book
The Bank’s management of market risk of the trading book aims at optimizing the financial results and assuring the highest possible quality of customer service in reference to the market accessibility (market making) while staying within the limits of risk approved by the Management Board and the Supervisory Board.
The main tool for market risk of the trading book measurement is Value at Risk model (VaR). This value corresponds to the level of a one-day loss, which will be exceeded with the probability not greater than 1%. VaR value is calculated with historical simulation method based on 2 years of historical observations of market risk factors’ dynamics. The set of factors used when calculating VaR consists of all significant market factors that are taken into account for valuation of financial instruments, excluding specific credit risk of an issuer and counterparty. Estimating the impact of changes in market factors on the present value of a given portfolio is performed under the full revaluation (which is a difference between the value of the portfolio after the adjustments in market parameters’ levels by historically observed changes of the parameters and the present value of the portfolio). For such a set of probable changes in the portfolio value (distribution), VaR is defined to be equal to 1% quantile.
The model is subject to continuous, statistical verification by comparing the VaR values to actual and revaluated performance figures. Results of analyses carried out in 2020 and 2019 confirmed the adequacy of the model applied.
The table below presents the market risk exposure of the trading portfolio of the Bank measured by Value at Risk as at 31 December 2020 and 31 December 2019.
|
31.12.2020 |
MINIMUM VALUE |
AVERAGE VALUE |
MAXIMUM VALUE |
foreign exchange risk |
23 |
6 |
67 |
1 153 |
interest rate risk |
2 578 |
859 |
2 028 |
6 419 |
Trading portfolio |
3 020 |
844 |
2 071 |
6 863 |
|
31.12.2019 |
MINIMUM VALUE |
AVERAGE VALUE |
MAXIMUM VALUE |
foreign exchange risk |
237 |
6 |
190 |
1 161 |
interest rate risk |
1 098 |
873 |
1 386 |
2 055 |
Trading portfolio |
1 100 |
874 |
1 447 |
2 581 |
Interest rate risk of the banking book
In managing the interest rate risk of the banking book the Bank aims at hedging the economic value of capital and achieving the planned interest result within the accepted limits. The financial position of the Bank in relation to changing interest rates is monitored through the interest rate gap (repricing gap), duration analysis, sensitivity analysis, stress testing and VaR. The interest rate risk of the banking book measurement is generally carried out on a monthly basis.
The cycle of several significant cuts of the NBP interest rates in response to the developing pandemic COVID-19 had an important impact on the level of the Bank’s exposure to interest rate risk and on the amount of realized interest income in the 2020. In order to hedge current accounts, the Bank continues the implementation of the hedging strategy by concluding IRS transactions and purchasing fixed rate bonds.
The table below presents the sensitivity levels of the contractual interest income (NII) to the interest rate change by 100 b.p. and of economic value of the Bank’s equity (EVE) to the interest rate change by 200 b.p. (standard regulatory shock excluding the risk profile of own funds) for the end of December 2020 and December 2019.
sensitivity in % |
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
NII |
(6.13) |
(6.94) |
EVE |
(7.04) |
(2.94) |
Currency risk management is performed simultaneously for the trading and the banking book. The objective of currency risk management is to maintain the currency profile of statement of financial position and off-balance items within the internal limits.
The tables below present the Bank’s foreign currency risk profile measured by Value at Risk and currency position.
Value at Risk
VALUE AT RISK |
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
Currencies total (*) |
242 |
122 |
(*) VaR presented in ‘Currencies total’ is VaR for the whole portfolio, and includes correlations among currencies.
Currency exposure
Balance sheet operations |
off-balance sheet operations derivetives |
net position |
|||
Assets |
Liabilities |
LONG PoSITION |
SHORT PoSITION |
||
EUR |
24 216 874 |
18 927 452 |
26 661 391 |
32 081 060 |
(130 247) |
USD |
9 270 686 |
9 623 831 |
11 066 970 |
10 678 559 |
35 266 |
CHF |
2 670 755 |
649 867 |
2 730 324 |
4 755 311 |
(4 099) |
SEK |
140 628 |
68 185 |
67 506 |
139 623 |
326 |
CAD |
17 125 |
55 492 |
43 007 |
4 380 |
260 |
CZK |
56 995 |
17 554 |
650 361 |
689 607 |
195 |
DKK |
82 206 |
16 849 |
57 989 |
123 156 |
190 |
GBP |
392 429 |
1 106 959 |
2 126 362 |
1 411 961 |
(129) |
NOK |
516 555 |
66 514 |
207 543 |
657 470 |
114 |
CNY |
25 253 |
16 707 |
356 180 |
364 812 |
(86) |
Other currencies |
44 312 |
95 914 |
380 329 |
327 595 |
1 132 |
TOTAL |
37 433 818 |
30 645 324 |
44 347 962 |
51 233 534 |
(97 078) |
31.12.2019 |
Balance sheet operations |
off-balance sheet operations derivetives |
net position |
||
Assets |
Liabilities |
LONG PoSITION |
SHORT PoSITION |
||
EUR |
23 018 008 |
19 107 106 |
14 770 726 |
18 597 989 |
83 639 |
USD |
5 108 516 |
8 431 987 |
12 363 822 |
9 006 351 |
34 000 |
CHF |
2 715 419 |
614 002 |
2 968 114 |
5 069 893 |
(362) |
GBP |
445 661 |
969 948 |
748 318 |
224 240 |
(209) |
HUF |
16 353 |
113 221 |
112 481 |
15 541 |
72 |
NOK |
303 790 |
68 356 |
10 677 |
245 964 |
147 |
CZK |
99 210 |
34 910 |
198 046 |
262 370 |
(24) |
SEK |
97 899 |
69 352 |
60 956 |
89 485 |
18 |
Other currencies |
157 176 |
184 642 |
378 101 |
349 701 |
934 |
TOTAL |
31 962 032 |
29 593 524 |
31 611 241 |
33 861 534 |
118 215 |
The objective of liquidity risk management is to:
ensure and maintain the Bank’s solvency with respect to current and future payables taking into account the cost of acquiring liquidity and return on the Bank’s equity,
prevent the occurrance of crisis situations, and
provide solutions necessary to survive a crisis situation when such circumstances occur.
The Bank has centralized liquidity risk management system covering current liquidity management and first level control performed by the responsible functions, the second level control carried out by a dedicated unit responsible for risk management and independent audit
Managing the Bank's liquidity is carried out in intraday, short-term and long-term horizon. Analysing of intraday liquidity concerns flows realized during the day, through a short-term liquidity analysis is understood liquidity measurement system which refers to the time horizon shorter than one year, long-term analysis covers period above one year. Due to the specific tools and techniques used for liquidity risk management, the Bank manages current and medium-term liquidity together with short-term liquidity.
The liquidity control is performing as a continuous process of determining and analysing the levels of various indicators and measures related to intraday, short-term and long-term liquidity. Monitoring frequency is matched to the specific liquidity aspect – e.g. daily for short-term liquidity, monthly for long-term liquidity. Liquidity ratios and measures are subject to a formal limiting process. The limits’ utilisation is regularly monitored and presented to the Management of the Bank and subsidiaries. In case of exceeding, escalation process is running as to inform decision-makers and ultimately to restore the liquidity risk exposures to acceptable levels.
Scenario-based stress analyses, conducted on a monthly basis, constitute an integral part of the Bank’s liquidity monitoring process. Within the scope of these analyses the Bank’s liquidity is assessed under the conditions of crisis which is caused by financial markets or is caused by internal factors, specific to the Bank.
Managing the liquidity, the Bank pays special attention to the liquidity in foreign currencies through monitoring, limiting and controlling the liquidity individually for each currency, as well as monitoring demand for the current and future currency liquidity and in case of identification of such need the Bank hedges using currency swaps. It is also monitored the potential influence on the liquidity of placing required collateral deposits for derivative transaction.
In order to define the principles of contingency liquidity management, Bank prepared ‘Contingency Liquidity Policy’ approved by the Management Board, which defines the contingency procedures in the event of crisis situations. This policy involves daily monitoring of the system and specific early-warning indicators for the Bank and the Bank as well as three levels of liquidity risk states depending on the level of early-warning indicators, the Bank’s, the Bank’s and market situation. It also defines the sources for covering the expected outflows from the Bank. This document sets the procedures for monitoring the liquidity states, emergency action procedures, task forces dedicated for restoring the Bank’s liquidity and the Management's responsibilities for taking necessary decisions to restore the required liquidity level.
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic expansion at the end of the first quarter of 2020, which indirectly contributed to the financial market turbulences, the Bank introduced the lowest liquidity contingency state - the state of attention, characterized by an increased frequency of management liquidity monitoring. After 2 months, the state of attention was suspended due to very high and stable liquidity. The liquidity situation of the Bank remains fully stable at the moment and liquidity measures and ratios remain at high and safe level.
Below are presented basic quantitative information concerning the Bank's liquidity at the end of 2020 year in comparison to the end of 2019. They cover the structure of financial liabilities by contractual maturity, supervisory measures of long-term liquidity and Liquidity Coverage Ratio (‘LCR’) adjusted liquidity gap and financial flows from derivative transactions.’
Structure of financial liabilities by contractual maturity
UP TO |
BETWEEN |
BETWEEN |
BETWEEN |
OVER |
TOTAL |
|
BALANCE SHEET LIABILITIES (*) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts due to banks (**) (***) |
3 754 186 |
49 391 |
249 949 |
483 646 |
664 706 |
5 201 878 |
Amounts due to customers (***) |
164 620 173 |
5 847 338 |
7 433 844 |
303 779 |
160 512 |
178 365 646 |
Lease liabilities |
14 954 |
17 785 |
77 258 |
149 850 |
394 738 |
654 585 |
Debt securities issued |
175 085 |
193 350 |
155 724 |
- |
- |
524 159 |
Subordinated liabilities |
- |
- |
44 138 |
214 649 |
3 001 796 |
3 260 583 |
Financial liabilities held for trading |
- |
- |
14 209 |
279 152 |
449 443 |
742 804 |
Total |
168 564 398 |
6 107 864 |
7 975 122 |
1 431 076 |
4 671 195 |
188 749 655 |
OFF-BALANCE SHEET COMMITMENTS (*) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-balance sheet commitments Financial liabilities granted |
45 095 123 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
45 095 123 |
Off-balance sheet commitments Guarantees liabilities granted |
26 963 296 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
26 963 296 |
Total |
72 058 419 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
72 058 419 |
UP TO |
BETWEEN |
BETWEEN |
BETWEEN |
OVER |
TOTAL |
|
BALANCE SHEET LIABILITIES (*) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 661 130 |
48 552 |
171 899 |
613 258 |
603 447 |
3 098 286 |
|
Amounts due to customers (***) |
123 471 043 |
12 590 259 |
20 906 526 |
546 046 |
940 818 |
158 454 692 |
Lease liabilities |
13 510 |
15 892 |
69 629 |
207 820 |
370 330 |
677 181 |
Debt securities issued |
95 843 |
519 113 |
946 599 |
55 890 |
- |
1 617 445 |
Subordinated liabilities |
- |
- |
82 067 |
321 949 |
3 121 594 |
3 525 610 |
Financial liabilities held for trading |
74 115 |
- |
12 087 |
42 114 |
56 483 |
184 799 |
Total |
125 315 641 |
13 173 816 |
22 188 807 |
1 787 077 |
5 092 672 |
167 558 013 |
OFF-BALANCE SHEET COMMITMENTS (*) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-balance sheet commitments Financial liabilities granted |
37 235 632 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
37 235 632 |
Off-balance sheet commitments Guarantees liabilities granted |
21 792 826 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
21 792 826 |
Total |
59 028 458 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
59 028 458 |
(*) Exposure amounts from balance liabilities, financing-related off-balance sheet commitments granted and guarantee liabilities granted have been allocated to earliest tenors, for which an outflow of assets from the Bank is possible based on contracts entered into by the Bank. However, outflows expected by the Bank are actually significantly lower than those indicated by the specification presented above. The above is a consequence of considerable diversification of amounts due to customers and stages of life of individual contracts. Risk monitoring and management in relation to the outflow of assets are provided by the Bank on continuous basis. The Bank estimates also more probable flows that are reflected in Tables ‘Adjusted liquidity gap’.
(**) Including Central Bank.
(***) Without leasing liabilities.
Regulatory liquidity long-term norms and LCR (*)
Supervisory Liquidty norms |
limit |
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
|
M3 |
Own funds to non-liquid assets cover ratio |
1 |
8.45 |
7.63 |
M4 (**) |
Own funds and stable external funds to non-liquid and limited liquidity assets cover ratio |
1 |
1.38 |
1.18 |
LCR |
Liquidity coverage ratio |
1 |
2.34 |
1.46 |
(*) The values of regulatory liquidity norms have been determined in accordance with the principles set out by Resolution 386/2008 of UKNF of 17 December 2008 and the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 of 10 October 2014 to supplement Regulation No. 575/2013 of the European Parliament and the Council with regard to liquidity coverage requirement for credit institutions.
(**) Ratio at the separate level.
Adjusted liquidity gap
The adjusted liquidity gaps presented below include, inter alia, the adjustments concerning the stability of core deposits and their maturities, adjustments of flows from granted off-balance sheet commitments arising from financing, guarantees and from assets without contractual repayment schedules. On top of that, included are also the adjusted flows stemming from the security portfolio and flows resulting from earlier repayment of mortgage loans portfolio. These are the main elements differentiating the adjusted gaps from unadjusted ones. Moreover, the gaps are of static nature, i.e. they do not take into consideration the impact of changes of balance sheet and off-balance sheet items volume (i.e. new deposits).
Adjusted liquidity gap
UP TO 1 MONTH |
BETWEEN |
BETWEEN |
BETWEEN |
OVER |
TOTAL |
|
Balance sheet assets |
66 669 376 |
5 103 139 |
25 313 566 |
66 859 460 |
58 435 455 |
222 380 996 |
Balance sheet liabilities |
17 672 273 |
8 803 973 |
24 148 925 |
32 262 001 |
139 493 824 |
222 380 996 |
Off-balance sheet assets/liabilities (net) |
(9 876 652) |
22 925 |
2 970 600 |
2 282 755 |
3 910 122 |
(690 250) |
Periodic gap |
39 120 451 |
(3 677 909) |
4 135 241 |
36 880 214 |
(77 148 247) |
(690 250) |
Cumulated gap |
- |
35 442 542 |
39 577 783 |
76 457 997 |
(690 250) |
- |
UP TO 1 MONTH |
BETWEEN |
BETWEEN |
BETWEEN |
OVER |
TOTAL |
|
Balance sheet assets |
37 289 235 |
5 749 275 |
27 614 844 |
62 970 209 |
61 026 429 |
194 649 992 |
Balance sheet liabilities |
10 571 118 |
8 483 214 |
20 603 246 |
15 503 903 |
139 488 511 |
194 649 992 |
Off-balance sheet assets/liabilities (net) |
(6 432 613) |
(1 061 775) |
1 149 837 |
2 998 797 |
3 038 425 |
(307 329) |
Periodic gap |
20 285 504 |
(3 795 714) |
8 161 435 |
50 465 103 |
(75 423 657) |
(307 329) |
Cumulated gap |
- |
16 489 790 |
24 651 225 |
75 116 328 |
(307 329) |
- |
Off-balance derivative transactions
The following are the liabilities and financial cash flows associated with off-balance sheet derivative transactions, settled, respectively in net and gross amounts.
Off-balance sheet derivative transactions settled by the Bank in net amounts include:
Interest Rate Swaps (IRS),
Forward Rate Agreements (FRA),
Foreign currency options,
Interest rate options (Cap/Floor),
Transactions based on equity securities and stock indexes,
Transactions based on commodities and precious metals.
Off-balance sheet derivative transactions settled by the Bank in gross amounts include:
Cross-Currency Interest Rate Swaps (CIRS),
Foreign currency forward contracts,
Foreign currency swaps (FX-Swap),
Forward contracts based on securities.
Liabilities from off-balance transactions on derivatives recognized in net amounts
UP TO |
BETWEEN |
BETWEEN |
BETWEEN |
OVER |
TOTAL |
|
31.12.2020 |
76 233 |
109 865 |
361 910 |
2 660 573 |
1 247 169 |
4 455 750 |
31.12.2019 |
48 242 |
92 083 |
204 441 |
980 160 |
593 030 |
1 917 956 |
Flows related to off-balance derivative transactions settled in gross amounts
UP TO |
BETWEEN |
BETWEEN |
BETWEEN |
OVER |
TOTAL |
|
31.12.2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inflows |
38 071 279 |
11 920 843 |
14 911 803 |
11 339 567 |
978 285 |
77 221 777 |
Outflows |
38 157 524 |
11 983 706 |
14 957 181 |
11 651 246 |
1 187 983 |
77 937 640 |
31.12.2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inflows |
20 678 287 |
7 002 569 |
14 517 278 |
11 933 202 |
1 501 027 |
55 632 363 |
Outflows |
20 715 278 |
6 980 073 |
14 520 523 |
12 023 733 |
1 707 454 |
55 947 061 |
Operational risk management is based on internal procedures that are consistent with the law requirements, resolutions, recommendations and guidelines of the supervisor. Operational risk management includes identification, assessment, monitoring, preventing and reporting.
Identification and assessment of operational risk is based on an analysis of internal factors and external factors that may have a significant impact on the achievement of the objectives of the Bank. The main tools used in identifying and assessing operational risk are: internal operational events, external operational events, key risk indicators, scenario analysis and self-assessment of operational risk.
Monitoring activities are conducted on three levels of defence: risk management in operational activity of the Bank (all employees), risk management control (Integrated Risk Management Department) and internal audit (Internal Audit Department). Preventing operational risk includes definition of operational risk limits and the obligation to initiate mitigation actions in case they are exceeded, the system of internal control, business continuity plans and insurance coverage.
Operational risk reporting system enables the assessment of the Bank's exposure to operational risk and the effective management of this risk, and also plays a fundamental role in the process of informing the Supervisory Board, the Management Board and executives of the Bank's exposure to operational risk. It is based in particular on the quarterly reports on operational risk control that include, among others: profile of operational risk, loss limit utilization, analysis of trends in the relevant categories of operational risk, potential losses, information on key indicators of operational risk and operational risk capital requirement.
The Supervisory Board, the Management Board and the Operational Risk Committee are involved in operational risk management. The Integrated Risk Management Department coordinates the process of operational risk management. All employees of the Bank and selected specialized units are responsible in their areas for operational risk management, due to diversified character of this risk which requires professional knowledge.
In order to ensure compliance of the operational risk management system with regulatory requirements, at least once a year verification of the operational risk management system is carried out.
The capital management process applied by the Bank has been adopted for the following purposes:
ensuring the safe and secure functioning by maintaining the balance between the capacity to undertake risk (limited by own funds), and the risk levels generated,
maintenance of capital for covering risk above the minimum stated levels in order to assure further business operations, taking into consideration the possible, future changes in capital requirements and to safeguard the interests of shareholders,
maintenance of the optimal capital structure in order to maintain the desired quality of risk coverage capital,
creation of value to shareholders by the best possible utilization of the Bank funds.
The Bank has put in place a formalized process of capital management and monitoring, established within the scope of Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process - ICAAP process. The Finance Division under the Chief Financial Officer is responsible for functioning of the capital management process in the Bank. The ultimate responsibility for capital management is allocated to the Management Board of the Bank, supported by the Assets, Liabilities and Risk Management Committee, which approves the capital management process. The Supervisory Board supervises the capital management system, in particular approves the capital management strategy. The Capital Management Strategy defines the objectives and general rules of the management and monitoring of the Bank’s capital adequacy, such as the guidelines concerning risk coverage sources, preferred structure of capital for risk coverage, long-term capital targets, capital limits system and sources of additional capital under contingency situations.
The Bank has also implemented the Capital Contingency Policy which establishes rules and obligations in the event of crisis appearance or further development that would significantly reduce capitalization level of the Bank. The policy defines the principles of supervision including split of responsibilities for the purpose of early and consistent management in case of crisis situation development.
The capital adequacy of the Bank is controlled by the Assets, Liabilities and Risk Management Committee and Management Board of Bank. Periodic reports on the scale and direction of changes of the capital ratios together with indication of potential threats are prepared for the Supervisory Board, Management Board and for the Assets, Liabilities and Risk Management Committee. The level of basic types of risks is monitored according to the external limits of the banking supervision and the internal limits of the Bank. Analyses and evaluations of directions of business activities development are performed assessing the compliance with capital requirements. Forecasting and monitoring of risk weighted assets, own funds and capital ratios constitute an integral part of the planning and budgeting process, including stress tests.
The Bank also has a capital allocation process in place, with an aim of guaranteeing the shareholders a safe and effective return on invested capital. On one hand, the process requires capital allocations to products/clients/business lines, which guarantee profits adequate to the risks taken, while on the other hand taking into consideration the cost of capital associated with the business decisions taken. Risk-related efficiency ratios are used in the analyses of income generated compared against the risk taken as well as for the optimization of capital usage for different types of operations.
Regulatory capital requirements
Calculations of the regulatory capital requirements were performed based on Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council (EU) No 575/2013 of June 26, 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012, together with further amendments, in particular Regulation (EU) 2019/876 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2019 amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 as regards the leverage ratio, the net stable funding ratio, requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities, counterparty credit risk, market risk, exposures to central counterparties, exposures to collective investment undertakings, large exposures, reporting and disclosure requirements, as well as Commission Implementing Regulations or Delegated Regulations (EU) (CRR Regulation).
According to law, Bank is required to maintain minimal values of capital ratios resulting from Pillar 1 level (Regulation 575/2013), capital requirement of Pillar 2 resulting from The Banking Act and combined buffer requirement resulting from Act on macro-prudential supervision.
Minimal value of capital ratios on Pillar 1 level are:
Total capital ratio (TCR) in amount of 8%,
Tier 1 capital ratio (T1) in amount of 6%,
Common Equity Tier I capital ratio (CET 1) in amount of 4.5%.
Bank does not have any Capital requirement of Pillar 2.
Combined buffer requirement, as at 31 December 2020 consists of:
Capital conservation buffer in amount of 2.5%,
Countercyclical capital buffer in amount of 0.0% (countercyclical capital buffer was calculated as of 31.12.2019 at the level 0.0029%),
Other systemically important institution buffer in amount of 0.75%,
Systemic risk buffer in amount of 0.00% (according to the Regulation of the Minister of Finance, the systemic risk buffer was abolished on 19 March 2020. The buffer value applicable until that date was 3% of the total risk exposure amount for all exposures located only in the territory of the Republic of Poland).
In total, Bank is required to maintain:
Total capital ratio (TCR) in amount of 11.25%,
Capital ratio Tier 1 (T1) in amount of 9.25%,
Common Equity Tier (CET 1) in amount of 7.75%.
As at 31 December 2020 total capital ratio of the Bank amounted at 20.8% (as at 31 December 2019 – 18.7%).
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
|
CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS |
|
|
Credit risk |
9 219 587 |
9 257 816 |
Market risk |
99 495 |
87 707 |
Counterparty risk including CVA |
173 728 |
119 741 |
Operational risk |
597 848 |
443 575 |
Total capital requirement |
10 090 658 |
9 908 839 |
OWN FUNDS |
|
|
Common Equity Tier 1 capital |
23 447 481 |
20 448 802 |
Capital Tier 1 |
2 750 000 |
2 750 000 |
Own funds for total capital ratio |
26 197 481 |
23 198 802 |
OWN FUNDS REQUIREMENTS |
|
|
Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio (%) |
18.6% |
16.5% |
Total capital ratio (%) |
20.8% |
18.7% |
Total capital ratio at the end of 2020 compared with the end of 2019 increased by 2.1 p.p.
Total capital requirement increased by 1.8%, mainly due to higher operational risk capital requirement resulting mainly from increase of provisions on loans denominated in foreign currencies.
As of 31 December 2020 Common Equity Tier 1 capital was higher by 14.7% as compared to 31 December 2019. Increase in own funds for total capital ratio calculation by 12.9% resulted from retention Bank’s entire net profit for year 2019 to Tier 1 capital after the General Meeting of Shareholders in accordance with the recommendation of the KNF regarding the retention of the entire profit and retention of 25% of the Bank's net profit for the first half of 2020 after the approval of the KNF.
For the purpose of capital requirement calculation the Bank uses:
Standardised Approach for credit risk capital requirement calculation,
Financial Collateral Comprehensive Method for credit risk mitigation,
Mark-to-Market Method for counterparty credit risk capital requirement calculation,
Standardised Approach for capital requirement calculation of specific risk and duration-based calculation for general risk of debt instruments,
Standardised Approach for capital requirement calculation of general and specific risk of equity instruments,
Standardised Approach for capital requirement calculation for pre-funded contributions to the default fund of a qualifying central counterparty,
Standardised Approach for foreign-exchange risk capital requirement calculation,
Simplified approach for commodities risk capital requirement calculation,
Standardised Approach for capital requirements for credit risk valuation adjustment risk,
Advanced Measurement Approach for operational risk measurement in case of Bank (however, at a level not lower than 50% of the capital requirement calculated using the Standardised Approach and Standardised Approach for Bank’s subsidiaries.
Own funds
The Bank defines components of own funds in line with the binding law, particularly with Regulation No 575/2013 and The Banking Act of 29 August 1997 with further amendments.
The Bank’s own funds consist of Common Equity Tier 1 capital. Additional Tier 1 capital and Tier 2 capital.
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
|
OWN FUNDS |
|
|
Capital |
24 647 371 |
22 526 788 |
Component of the capital not included into own funds, in which: |
(974 994) |
(2 064 215) |
Current year net profit |
(1 126 424) |
(2 247 467) |
Current year net profit included in own funds after KNF approval |
151 430 |
183 252 |
Regulatory adjustments, in which: |
(224 896) |
(13 771) |
Intangible assets |
(642 656) |
(676 946) |
Cash flow hedges |
(480 718) |
(102 678) |
Adjustments mitigating impact of IFRS introduction in transitional period |
959 039 |
805 540 |
Additional value adjustments due to prudent calculation |
(60 561) |
(39 687) |
Common Equity Tier 1 capital |
23 447 481 |
20 448 802 |
Tier 2 capital |
2 750 000 |
2 750 000 |
Own funds for total capital ratio |
26 197 481 |
23 198 802 |
Components of capital not included into own funds:
current year net profit – net profit of current reporting period, verified by statutory auditor responsible for auditing
of the Bank’s accounts reduced by all foreseeable charge and dividend, can be included into Common Equity Tier 1 capital only with the permission of KNF. As at 31 of December 2020, the amount of 151 430 thousand PLN from the prudently consolidated net profit of the Bank for the first half of 2020 was included in Common Equity Tier 1 capital.
Regulatory adjustments:
intangible assets (after deduction of related deferred tax liabilities) decrease Common Equity Tier 1 capital, accordingto Article 36 of CRR Regulation. This amount includes the deduction of software assets classified as intangible assets for accounting purposes, in line with Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/2176 of 12 November 2020 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) No 241/2014 as regards the deduction of software assets from Common Equity Tier 1 items,
reserves related to gains or losses on cash flow hedges of financial instruments that are not valued at fair value, including projected cash flows are excluded from the accumulated other comprehensive income, according to Article 33(a) of CRR Regulation,
adjustments in transitional period resulting from introduction of IFRS 9,
additional value adjustments due to prudent valuation are created for every asset measured at fair value, according to Article 34 of CRR Regulation.
Internal capital adequacy assessment
To assess the internal capital adequacy of the Bank, the Bank applies methods designed internally.
The Bank takes the following risks into consideration:
credit risk,
operational risk,
market risk,
liquidity
risk,
real estate risk,
macroeconomic risk,
business risk (including strategic risk),
compliance risk,
reputational risk,
model risk,
excessive leverage risk,
bancassurance risk,
financial investment risk.
For each risk deemed material, the Bank develops and applies adequate risk assessment and measurement methods. The Bank applies the following risk assessment methods:
qualitative assessment – applied in case of risks which are difficult to measure (compliance, reputational and bancassurance risks) with potencial capital coverage in other risks areas,
assessment by estimation of capital buffer, for risks that are not easily quantifiable however some aggregate assessment of their impact is possible (model risk and macroeconomic risk),
quantitative assessment – applied for risks which can be measured with the use of economic capital (other risk types apart from liquidity risk and excessive leverage risk) or based on other risk-specific measures (liquidity risk and excessive leverage risk).
Generally, preferred methods of measuring risks and determining the resulting capital requirements are Value at Risk models, based on assumptions derived from the Bank’s risk appetite. The models are developed in compliance with the best market practices and regulatory requirements and supplemented with stress tests and/or scenario analyses. In case of risk types for which such methodologies have not been finally developed or implemented, the Bank uses regulatory models supplemented with stress tests or simplified measurement methods.
Determination of capital buffer which covers the risk of changes in macroeconomic conditions is made on the basis of an analysis of the impact of the economic slowdown scenario on economic capital over the forecast horizon, with the impact of changes in interest rates on net interest income and changes in the valuation of portfolios classified as measured at fair value through other comprehensive income.
Model risk is estimated using results of model validation and scenario analyses making it possible to evaluate the impact of potential model inconsistencies on its output. Based on the aggregated output, the model risk capital buffer is determined.
The procedure of estimating capital needs starts with the calculation of economic capital, separately for each material quantifiable risk identified by the Bank. Next, economic capital figures for individual risks are aggregated. Then, the amount is increased by the capital buffer for model and macroeconomic risks. The sum of economic capital and the capital buffer constitutes the internal capital of the Bank.
Financial instruments that are measured at fair value in the separate statement of financial position of the Bank
The measurement of fair value of financial instruments, for which market values from active markets are available, is based on market quotations of a given instrument (mark-to-market).
The measurement of fair value of Over-the-counter (‘OTC’) derivatives and instruments with limited liquidity (i.e. for which no market quotations are available), is made on the basis of other instruments quotations on active markets by replication thereof using a number of valuation techniques, including the estimation of present value of future cash flows(mark-to-model).
As of 31 December 2020 and 31 December 2019, the Bank classified the financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value into the following hierarchy of three categories based on the following hierarchy:
Level 1: mark-to-market, applies to securities quoted on active markets,
Level 2: mark-to-model valuation with model parameterization, based on quotations from active markets for given type of instrument, applies to illiquid government, municipal, corporate and central bank debt securities, linear and non-linear derivative instruments of interest rate markets (including forward transactions on debt securities), equity, commodity and foreign currency exchange markets, except for those cases that meet the criteria of Level 3,
Level 3: mark-to-model valuation with partial model parameterization, based on estimated risk factors, applicable to loans and advances, corporate and municipal debt securities and for linear and non-linear derivative instruments of interest rate, equity, commodity and foreign currency exchange markets for which unobservable parameters (e.g. credit risk factors) are recognized as significant.
The measurement at fair value is performed directly by an organizational unit within Risk Management Division, independent of front-office units. The methodology of fair value measurement, including the changes of its parameterization, is subject to approval of Assets and Liabilities Committee (ALCO). The adequacy of measurement methods is subject to on-going analysis and periodical reviews in the framework of model risk management. The same Risk Management Division unit performs the assessment of adequacy and significance of risk factors and assignment of valuation models to appropriate method class, according to established hierarchy of classification.
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value in breakdown by fair value hierarchy levels
level 1 |
level 2 |
level 3 |
Total |
|
14 211 836 |
26 853 336 |
13 043 564 |
54 108 736 |
|
Financial assets held for trading |
938 452 |
629 783 |
45 102 |
1 613 337 |
Derivative financial instruments, including: |
- |
4 840 567 |
1 712 |
4 842 279 |
Banks |
- |
1 252 211 |
1 712 |
1 253 923 |
Customers |
- |
3 588 356 |
- |
3 588 356 |
Hedging instruments, including: |
- |
779 063 |
- |
779 063 |
Banks |
- |
26 070 |
- |
26 070 |
Customers |
- |
752 993 |
- |
752 993 |
Securities measured at fair value through other comprehensive income |
13 273 384 |
20 603 923 |
11 060 545 |
44 937 852 |
Securities measured at fair value through profit or loss |
- |
- |
160 486 |
160 486 |
Loans and advances to customers measured at fair value through other comprehensive income |
- |
- |
187 001 |
187 001 |
Loans and advances to customers measured at fair value through profit or loss |
- |
- |
1 588 718 |
1 588 718 |
Liabilities: |
742 804 |
5 709 075 |
- |
6 451 879 |
Financial liabilities held for trading |
742 804 |
- |
- |
742 804 |
Derivative financial instruments, including: |
- |
4 636 116 |
- |
4 636 116 |
Banks |
- |
1 230 815 |
- |
1 230 815 |
Customers |
- |
3 405 301 |
- |
3 405 301 |
Hedging instruments, including: |
- |
1 072 959 |
- |
1 072 959 |
Banks |
- |
995 230 |
- |
995 230 |
Customers |
- |
77 729 |
- |
77 729 |
level 1 |
level 2 |
level 3 |
Total |
|
Assets: |
15 467 463 |
12 376 755 |
9 002 361 |
36 846 579 |
Financial assets held for trading |
1 123 003 |
148 321 |
8 171 |
1 279 495 |
Derivative financial instruments, including: |
- |
2 082 947 |
3 042 |
2 085 989 |
Banks |
- |
783 664 |
3 042 |
786 706 |
Customers |
- |
1 299 283 |
- |
1 299 283 |
Hedging instruments, including: |
- |
377 208 |
- |
377 208 |
Banks |
- |
91 677 |
- |
91 677 |
Customers |
- |
285 531 |
- |
285 531 |
Securities measured at fair value through other comprehensive income |
14 344 460 |
9 768 279 |
7 077 273 |
31 190 012 |
Securities measured at fair value through profit or loss |
- |
- |
125 454 |
125 454 |
Loans and advances to customers measured at fair value through other comprehensive income |
- |
- |
1 545 782 |
1 545 782 |
Loans and advances to customers measured at fair value through profit or loss |
- |
- |
242 639 |
242 639 |
Liabilities: |
184 799 |
2 655 133 |
- |
2 839 932 |
Financial liabilities held for trading |
184 799 |
- |
- |
184 799 |
Derivative financial instruments, including: |
- |
2 040 368 |
- |
2 040 368 |
Banks |
- |
713 693 |
- |
713 693 |
Customers |
- |
1 326 675 |
- |
1 326 675 |
Hedging instruments, including: |
- |
614 765 |
- |
614 765 |
Banks |
- |
566 163 |
- |
566 163 |
Customers |
- |
48 602 |
- |
48 602 |
Change in fair value of financial assets measured at fair value according to Level 3 by the Bank
financial assets held for trading |
derivative FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (assets) |
Loans and advances to customers measured at fair valuethrough other comprehensive income |
Loans and advances to customers measured at fair value through profit or loss |
Securities measured at fair value through profit or loss |
Securities measured at fair value through other comprehensive income |
|
8 171 |
3 042 |
1 545 782 |
242 639 |
125 454 |
7 077 273 |
|
Increases, including: |
5 617 622 |
- |
146 092 |
652 |
36 159 |
17 667 218 |
Reclassification |
28 947 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
42 937 |
Transactions made in 2020 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Acquisition/Granting |
5 584 669 |
- |
99 437 |
604 |
- |
17 345 323 |
Settlement/Redemption |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Gains on financial instruments |
4 006 |
- |
46 653 |
48 |
36 159 |
278 958 |
recognized in the income statement |
4 006 |
- |
32 560 |
48 |
36 159 |
258 424 |
recognized in revaluation reserves |
- |
- |
14 093 |
- |
- |
20 534 |
Decreases, including: |
(5 580 691) |
(1 330) |
(103 154) |
( 56 290) |
(1 127) |
(13 683 946) |
Reclassification |
(136) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(194 800) |
Settlement/Redemption |
(1 953 741) |
- |
(52 324) |
(56 290) |
- |
(513 030) |
Sale/Repayment |
(3 626 800) |
- |
(50 830) |
- |
- |
(12 944 895) |
Losses on financial instruments |
(14) |
(1 330) |
- |
- |
(1 127) |
(31 221) |
recognized in the income statement |
(14) |
(1 330) |
- |
- |
(1 127) |
(76) |
recognized in revaluation reserves |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(31 145) |
Closing balance |
45 102 |
1 712 |
1 588 718 |
187 001 |
160 486 |
11 060 545 |
Unrealized income from financial instruments held in portfolio |
2 315 |
(1 330) |
10 712 |
(82) |
- |
117 510 |
Income statement: |
2 315 |
(1 330) |
(3 304) |
(82) |
- |
34 704 |
net interest income |
14 |
- |
1 708 |
557 |
- |
55 590 |
net allowances for expected credit losses |
- |
- |
(5 012) |
- |
- |
(20 886) |
result on financial assets and liabilities held for trading |
2 301 |
(1 330) |
|
(639) |
- |
- |
Other comprehensive income |
- |
- |
14 016 |
- |
- |
82 806 |
Change in fair value of financial assets measured at fair value according to Level 3 by the Bank
financial assets held for trading |
derivative FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (assets) |
Loans and advances to customers measured at fair valuethrough other comprehensive income |
Loans and advances to customers measured at fair value through profit or loss |
Securities measured at fair value through profit or loss |
Securities measured at fair value through other comprehensive income |
|
Opening balance |
99 001 |
1 230 |
1 696 888 |
302 630 |
65 408 |
7 111 833 |
Increases, including: |
- |
1 486 |
- |
- |
- |
544 884 |
Reclassification |
- |
1 486 |
- |
- |
- |
544 884 |
Transactions made in 2019 |
628 919 |
- |
166 522 |
- |
- |
1 212 241 |
Acquisition/Granting |
- |
363 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Gains on financial instruments |
1 115 |
1 183 |
51 853 |
- |
60 046 |
228 295 |
recognized in the income statement |
1 115 |
1 183 |
34 347 |
- |
60 046 |
181 369 |
recognized in revaluation reserves |
- |
- |
17 506 |
- |
- |
46 926 |
Decreases, including: |
(720 864) |
(1 220) |
(369 481) |
(59 991) |
- |
(2 019 980) |
Reclassification |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(83 209) |
Settlement/Redemption |
(131 455) |
- |
(55 795) |
(58 649) |
- |
(366 767) |
Sale/Repayment |
(589 388) |
- |
(313 686) |
- |
- |
(1 552 779) |
Losses on financial instruments |
(21) |
(1 220) |
- |
(1 342) |
- |
(17 225) |
recognized in the income statement |
(21) |
(1 220) |
- |
(1 342) |
- |
(1 399) |
recognized in revaluation reserves |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
(15 826) |
Closing balance |
8 171 |
3 042 |
1 545 782 |
242 639 |
125 454 |
7 077 273 |
Unrealized income from financial instruments held in portfolio at the end of the period, recognized in: |
20 |
1 183 |
9 071 |
(3 393) |
- |
66 197 |
Income statement: |
20 |
1 183 |
(6 920) |
(3 393) |
- |
32 071 |
net interest income |
13 |
- |
968 |
138 |
- |
35 952 |
net allowances for expected credit losses |
- |
- |
(7 888) |
|
- |
(3 881) |
result on financial assets and liabilities held for trading |
7 |
1 183 |
- |
(3 531) |
- |
- |
Other comprehensive income |
- |
- |
15 991 |
- |
- |
34 126 |
Transfers of instruments between fair value hierarchy levels are based on changes in availability of active market quotations as at the end of the reporting periods.
Due to COVID-19 pandemic developing at the end of March 2020, which indirectly contributed to the turmoil in financial markets, a significant decrease in liquidity was observed in many market segments, in particular in the corporate and municipal securities segments. As a result, some securities classified to Level 1 or Level 2 were reclassified to lower hierarchy levels
In the period from 1 January to 31 December 2020 the following transfers of financial instruments between the levels of the fair value hierarchy were made:
from Level 3 to Level 2: corporate bonds which were valued based on information on the prices of comparable financial instruments, corporate and municipal bonds with immaterial impact of the estimated credit parameters on the valuation and capital market derivative instruments for which impact of the unobservable factor (correlation) on the valuation was immaterial,
from Level 2 to Level 3: municipal and corporate bonds, for which impact of estimated credit parameters was material, government bonds with material impact of estimated spread to benchmark bond and capital market derivative instruments with material impact of the estimated factor (correlation) on the valuation,
from Level 1 to Level 2: sovereign bonds which was valued based on the prices of comparable financial instruments,
from Level 2 to Level 1: sovereign bonds that were valued with active market prices.
The impact of estimated parameters on measurement of financial instruments for which the Bank applies fair value valuation according to Level 3 as at 31 December 2020 and as at 31 December 2019 is as follows.
FINANCIAL Asset/LIABILITY |
Fair value |
VALUation Technique |
unobservable factor |
alternative factor range (weighted average) |
IMPACT on FAIR VALUE |
|
POSITIVE SCENARIO |
NEGATIVE SCENARIO |
|||||
Corporate and municipal debt securities |
10 799 404 |
Discounted cash flow |
Credit spread |
0.20%-1.02% |
131 754 |
(142 002) |
Government bonds |
28 116 |
Discounted cash flow |
Spread to benchmarking bond |
0.04%-0.71% |
1 878 |
(1 878) |
Derivatives |
1 712 |
Black Scholes Model |
Correlation |
0-1 |
17 |
(1 099) |
Loans and advances measured |
187 001 |
Discounted cash flow |
Credit spread |
0.30%-1.19% |
3 735 |
(3 641) |
Loans and advances measured at fair value through other comprehensive income |
1 588 718 |
Discounted cash flow |
Credit spread |
2.34%-3.24% |
19 426 |
(19 141) |
FINANCIAL ASSET |
FAIR VALUE |
PARAMETR |
SCENARIO |
IMPACT ON FAIR VALUE |
|
POSITIVE SCENARIO |
NEGATIVE SCENARIO |
||||
Equity instruments mandatorily measured at fair value through profit or loss |
160 486 |
Conversion discount |
+10% / -10% |
8 911 |
(17 831) |
Equity instrument in entity providing credit information designated for measurement at fair value through other comprehensive income |
239 617 |
Discount rate |
+1% / -1% |
47 508 |
(33 966) |
FINANCIAL Asset/LIABILITY |
Fair value |
VALUation Technique |
unobservable factor |
alternative factor range (weighted average) |
IMPACT on FAIR VALUE |
|
POSITIVE SCENARIO |
NEGATIVE SCENARIO |
|||||
Corporate and municipal debt securities |
6 890 342 |
Discounted cash flow |
Credit spread |
0.37% - 0.95% |
68 220 |
(83 460) |
Derivatives |
3 042 |
Black Scholes Model |
Correlation |
0 -1 |
410 |
(8) |
Loans and advances measured |
242 639 |
Discounted cash flow |
Credit spread |
1.40%-2.11% |
3 260 |
(3 416) |
Loans and advances measured at fair value through other comprehensive income |
1 545 782 |
Discounted cash flow |
Credit spread |
2.59%-3.30% |
15 522 |
(15 304) |
FINANCIAL ASSET |
FAIR VALUE |
PARAMETR |
SCENARIO |
IMPACT ON FAIR VALUE |
|
POSITIVE SCENARIO |
NEGATIVE SCENARIO |
||||
Equity instruments mandatorily measured at fair value through profit or loss |
125 454 |
Conversion discount |
+10% / -10% |
15 682 |
(15 682) |
Equity instrument in entity providing credit information designated for measurement at fair value through other comprehensive income |
176 965 |
Discount rate |
+1% / -1% |
19 905 |
(16 250) |
Financial instruments that are not measured at fair value in the separate statement of financial position of the Bank
The Bank also holds financial instruments which are not presented at fair value in the financial statements. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
As of 31 December 2020 and 31 December 2019, the Bank classified the financial assets and liabilities not measured at fair value in the separate statement of financial position into the following three categories based on the valuation level:
Level 1: mark-to-market, applies to government securities quoted on the liquid market and cash,
Level 2: mark-to-model valuation with model parameterization, based on quotations from active markets for given type of instrument, applies to interbank deposits, own issues, illiquid government, municipal, corporate and central bank debt securities,
Level 3: mark-to-model valuation with partial model parameterization, based on estimated risk factors, is applicable to corporate and municipal debt securities and loans and deposits for which the applied credit risk factor (an unobservable parameter) is recognized significant.
In case of certain groups of financial assets, recognized at the amount to be received with impairment considered, the fair value was assumed to be equal to carrying amount. The above applies in particular to cash and other financial assets and liabilities.
In the case of loans for which no quoted market values are available, the fair values presented are generally estimated using valuation techniques taking into consideration the assumption, that at the moment when the loan is granted its fair value is equal to its carrying amount. Fair value of non-impaired loans is equal to the sum of future expected cash flows, discounted at the balance sheet date, less expected credit loss. The discount rate is defined as the appropriate market risk-free rate plus the liquidity risk margin and current sales margin for the given loan products group. The margin is computed on loans granted broken down by loan product groups and maturity.
For the purpose of the fair value of foreign currency loans estimation, the margin on PLN loans adjusted by the cross-currency basis swap quotes and FX-Swap is used. The fair value of impaired loans is defined as equal to the sum of expected recoveries, discounted with the use of effective interest rate, since the average expected recovery values take the element of credit risk fully into consideration. In case of loans without repayment schedule (loans in current account, overdrafts and credit cards), the fair value was assumed as equal to the carrying amount.
Since no quoted market prices are available for deposits, their fair values have been generally estimated using valuation techniques with the assumption that the fair value of a deposit at the moment of its receipt is equal to its carrying amount. The fair value of term deposits is equal to the sum of future expected cash flows, discounted at the relevant balance sheet date. The cash flow discount rate is defined as the relevant market risk-free rate, increased by the sales margin. The margin is computed on deposits acquired during last three months broken down by deposit product groups and maturity. In case of short term deposits (current deposits, overnights, saving accounts), the fair value was assumed as equal to the carrying amount.
The fair value of deposits and loans, apart from mortgage loans denominated in PLN and CHF for which prepayment model is used, is calculated based on contractual cash flows.
The mark-to-model valuation of own issue debt instruments is based on the method of discounting the future cash flows. Variable cash flows are estimated based upon rates adopted for specific markets (depending upon issue specifications). Both the fixed and implied cash flows are discounted using interbank money market rates.
Assets and liabilities not measured at fair value in the financial statement in breakdown by fair value hierarchy levels
31.12.2020 |
carrying amount |
fair value |
of which: |
||
level 1 |
level 2 |
level 3 |
|||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from Central Bank |
4 456 272 |
4 456 230 |
4 306 089 |
150 141 |
- |
Loans and advance to banks |
2 917 839 |
2 914 802 |
- |
1 455 460 |
1 459 342 |
Loans and advances to customers measured at amortised cost |
126 951 240 |
126 140 716 |
- |
280 627 |
125 860 089 |
Debt securities measured at amortised cost |
27 559 085 |
28 610 710 |
19 803 027 |
4 410 186 |
4 397 497 |
Other Assets |
895 326 |
895 326 |
- |
- |
895 326 |
Total Assets |
162 779 762 |
163 017 784 |
24 109 116 |
6 296 414 |
132 612 254 |
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts due to Central Bank |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Amounts due to other banks |
5 225 544 |
5 240 842 |
- |
2 475 559 |
2 765 283 |
Amounts due to customers |
178 827 283 |
177 998 857 |
- |
- |
177 998 857 |
Debt securities issued |
523 305 |
523 940 |
- |
523 940 |
- |
Subordinated liabilities |
2 757 876 |
2 761 026 |
- |
2 761 026 |
- |
Other liabilities |
2 585 508 |
2 585 508 |
- |
- |
2 585 508 |
Total Liabilities |
189 919 516 |
189 110 173 |
- |
5 760 525 |
183 349 648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.12.2019 |
carrying amount |
fair value |
of which: |
||
level 1 |
level 2 |
level 3 |
|||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from Central Bank |
5 138 758 |
5 138 145 |
3 036 363 |
2 101 782 |
- |
Loans and advance to banks |
2 243 908 |
2 246 223 |
- |
1 038 859 |
1 207 364 |
Loans and advances to customers measured |
129 886 963 |
131 260 959 |
- |
502 344 |
130 758 615 |
Debt securities measured at amortised cost |
14 557 831 |
14 885 744 |
9 102 253 |
1 068 286 |
4 715 205 |
Other Assets |
973 058 |
973 058 |
- |
- |
973 058 |
Total Assets |
152 800 518 |
154 504 129 |
12 138 616 |
4 711 271 |
137 654 242 |
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts due to Central Bank |
4 550 |
4 602 |
- |
- |
4 602 |
Amounts due to other banks |
3 043 969 |
3 083 744 |
- |
678 799 |
2 404 945 |
Amounts due to customers |
158 543 950 |
158 779 955 |
- |
379 787 |
158 400 168 |
Debt securities issued |
1 604 344 |
1 602 985 |
- |
1 602 985 |
- |
Subordinated liabilities |
2 764 493 |
2 766 289 |
- |
2 766 289 |
- |
Other liabilities |
2 379 871 |
2 379 871 |
- |
- |
2 379 871 |
Total Liabilities |
168 336 627 |
168 612 844 |
- |
5 427 860 |
163 184 984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Custody activities are performed by virtue of a permit, issued by the Polish Financial Supervision Authority. The Bank’s clients include a number of domestic and foreign financial institutions, banks offering custody and investment services, insurance companies, investment and pension funds, as well as non-financial institutions. The Bank provides custody services, including, inter alia, the settlement of transactions effected on domestic and international markets, custody of clients’ assets, running of securities accounts, valuation of assets and services related to dividend and interest payments. The Bank also performs the activities of investment and pension funds depository and providing services as an issue agent.
As at 31 December 2020 the Bank maintained 8 076 securities accounts and omnibus accounts (in comparison to 7 954 accounts as at 31 December 2019).
Bank provides access to a wide range of the capital market services and products offered by the separated organizational unit of the Bank – Biuro Maklerskie Pekao (BM Pekao), designed to sell capital market products.
In 2020, works on the consolidation of brokerage activities in the Group continued. In the first half of 2020, BM Pekao took over a part of the Pekao Investment Banking S.A. that is responsible for brokerage activities. As a result of the consolidation process, Pekao Investment Banking S.A. brokerage clients became clients of BM Pekao.
Work is currently focused on the operational merger of the consolidated entities. After completion of the process, the implemented project will strengthen the Group's market position by building a strong, integrated center of investment and capital competences.
The task of BM Pekao is to provide the highest quality brokerage services as part of the offer of Bank Pekao S.A. Comprehensive brokerage serviecese on the capital market provides investors, in particular individual clients of Bank Pekao S.A., with the opportunity to invest in financial instruments of various specificities that are listed on the regulated market and in the alternative trading system, organized by the Warsaw Stock Exchange. in Warsaw and BondSpot S.A. (e.g. in shares, treasury and corporate bonds, derivatives - futures and options; ETFs, certificates, warrants), as well as on specific foreign markets in all available customer service channel (using the Internet, mobile devices, telephone and in the form of direct service provided by Customer Advisors in the facility).
At the end of 2020, BM Pekao operated a total of 196.4 thousand. investment accounts servicing 140.9 thousand accounts with active access to services via remote channels. Direct service was carried out within a nationwide network covering the total 368 brokerage services spots .
In 2020, BM Pekao acted as the Offeror for four issues of PZU FIZ Akord Closed-end Investment Funds and one issue of mortgage covered bonds issued by Pekao Bank Hipoteczny S.A.
BM Pekao, as part of cooperation with Pekao Investment Banking S.A., and then after its acquisition, took part in thirteen calls for the sale of shares and provided its services in the compulsory buyout of listed companies shares (North Coast, Ceramika Nowa Gala, MZN Property), purchase of own shares of the company CPD SA and SPO (Second Public Offering) of MLP Group shares.
Moreover, it provides services for Structured Certificates of external issuers and offers Open-End Funds units of selected investment fund companies.
In order to meet the expectations of customers, BM Pekao has introduced a new service to its offer - keeping the Register of Shareholders. It was a response to the recent amendments to the Code of Commercial Companies and certain other acts.
BM Pekao is a member of the Warsaw Stock Exchange (GPW) and a direct participant of the polish national Depository for Securities (KDPW).
BM Pekao is compliant with the principles of the Code of Good Practice for Brokerage Houses guaranteeing comprehensive service in compliance with the highest ethical standards and norms. BM Pekao also actively participates in works on the development of the capital market in Poland.
Information about the financial instruments of the clients held on securities accounts or stored in a form of document
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
|||
QUANTITY (PCS) |
VALUE |
QUANTITY (PCS) |
VALUE |
|
Clients’ financial instruments |
|
|
|
|
Held on securities accounts |
3 316 548 278 |
3 316 548 278 |
2 599 565 898 |
27 209 243 |
Equity securities and rights to such financial assets |
3 313 122 211 |
3 313 122 211 |
2 570 184 410 |
25 103 445 |
Debt instruments and rights to such financial assets |
3 426 067 |
3 426 067 |
29 381 488 |
2 105 798 |
Stored in a form of document |
4 505 665 042 |
4 505 665 042 |
690 909 626 |
5 668 875 |
Equity securities and rights to such financial assets |
4 505 665 042 |
4 505 665 042 |
690 909 626 |
5 668 875 |
Debt instruments and rights to such financial assets |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Customers’ cash on brokerage accounts
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
|
Deposited on cash accounts in brokerage house and paid for securities bought in IPO or on the primary market |
1 929 647 |
919 969 |
Other customers’ cash |
12 215 |
13 372 |
Total |
1 941 862 |
933 341 |
Settlements due to unsettled transactions
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
|
Liabilities from executed transactions |
11 648 |
3 091 |
Settlements with the National Depository of Securities S.A. (KDPW), KDPW_CCP S.A. and other stock exchange clearing houses
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
|
Receivables from margin deposits |
59 642 |
30 378 |
Other receivables |
7 034 |
- |
Total receivables |
66 676 |
30 378 |
Liabilities from margin deposit |
- |
740 |
Other liabilities |
1 150 |
- |
Total Liabilities |
1 150 |
740 |
|
2020 |
|
||
FINANCIAL ASSETS MEASURED AT AMORTISED COST |
FINANCIAL ASSETS DESIGNATED AT FAIR VALUE THROUGH OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
FINANCIAL ASSETS MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE THROUGH PROFIT OR LOSS |
TOTAL |
|
Interest income calculated using the effective interest method |
4 703 919 |
630 634 |
- |
5 334 553 |
Loans and advances |
4 278 889 |
36 444 |
- |
4 315 333 |
Interbank placements |
12 694 |
- |
- |
12 694 |
Reverse repo transactions |
10 498 |
- |
- |
10 498 |
Investment securities |
401 838 |
594 190 |
- |
996 028 |
Other interest income related to financial assets measured at fair value through profit or loss |
- |
- |
241 674 |
241 674 |
Loans and other receivables from customers |
- |
- |
2 127 |
2 127 |
Hedging derivatives |
- |
- |
230 423 |
230 423 |
Financial assets held for trading |
- |
- |
9 124 |
9 124 |
Total |
4 703 919 |
630 634 |
241 674 |
5 576 227 |
|
2019 |
|
||
FINANCIAL ASSETS MEASURED AT AMORTISED COST |
FINANCIAL ASSETS DESIGNATED AT FAIR VALUE THROUGH OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
FINANCIAL ASSETS MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE THROUGH PROFIT OR LOSS |
TOTAL |
|
Interest income calculated using the effective interest method |
5 513 813 |
644 069 |
- |
6 157 882 |
Loans and advances |
5 083 796 |
40 127 |
- |
5 123 923 |
Interbank placements |
46 086 |
- |
- |
46 086 |
Reverse repo transactions |
39 129 |
- |
- |
39 129 |
Investment securities |
344 802 |
603 942 |
- |
948 744 |
Other interest income related to financial assets measured at fair value through profit or loss |
- |
- |
262 420 |
262 420 |
Loans and other receivables from customers |
- |
- |
6 316 |
6 316 |
Hedging derivatives |
- |
- |
235 250 |
235 250 |
Financial assets held for trading |
- |
- |
20 854 |
20 854 |
Total |
5 513 813 |
644 069 |
262 420 |
6 420 302 |
|
2020 |
2019 |
Deposits from customers |
(431 218) |
(924 788) |
Interbank deposits |
(8 535) |
(20 768) |
Repo transactions |
(6 994) |
(40 310) |
Loans and advances received |
(2 620) |
(2 305) |
Leasing |
(11 718) |
(16 568) |
Debt securities |
(86 701) |
(105 941) |
Total |
(547 786) |
(1 110 680) |
The amounts shown above contain interest expense relating to the financial liabilities measured at amortised cost.
|
2020 |
2019 |
Accounts maintenance, payment orders and cash transactions |
606 150 |
635 820 |
Payment cards |
584 131 |
610 518 |
Loans and advances |
348 648 |
391 547 |
Margin on foreign exchange transactions with clients |
527 917 |
491 758 |
Service and sell investment and insurance products |
151 955 |
143 762 |
Securities operations |
93 823 |
19 671 |
Custody activity |
64 810 |
58 530 |
Guarantees, letters of credit and similar transactions |
68 498 |
63 918 |
Other |
73 675 |
38 130 |
2 519 607 |
2 453 654 |
Fee and commission expense
|
2020 |
2019 |
(323 852) |
(264 275) |
|
Money orders and transfers |
(21 580) |
(23 343) |
Securities and derivatives operations |
(43 810) |
(26 131) |
Acquisition services |
(42 417) |
(32 945) |
Custody activity |
(19 970) |
(15 996) |
Accounts maintenance |
(4 621) |
(4 792) |
Other |
(7 539) |
(5 899) |
(463 789) |
(373 381) |
Fee and commission income and expense (other than the amounts included in determining the effective interest rate) arising from financial assets and financial liabilities that are not at fair value through profit or loss.
|
2020 |
2019 |
Subsidiaries |
210 407 |
269 154 |
Issuers of securities measured at fair value through profit or loss |
787 |
1 023 |
Issuers of equity instruments designated at fair value through other comprehensive income |
25 486 |
21 250 |
Total |
236 680 |
291 427 |
|
2020 |
2019 |
Gains (losses) on loans and advances to customers measured mandatorily at fair value through profit or loss |
(175) |
(3 485) |
Gains (losses) on securities measured mandatorily at fair value through profit or loss |
36 159 |
59 263 |
Foreign currency exchange result |
(29 220) |
(35 079) |
Gains (losses) on derivatives |
106 743 |
87 185 |
Gains (losses) on securities held for trading |
44 678 |
20 516 |
Total |
158 185 |
128 400 |
Realized gains
|
2020 |
2019 |
Financial assets measured at amortised cost |
18 702 |
19 154 |
Financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income |
48 221 |
62 318 |
Financial liabilities not measured at fair value through profit or loss |
1 |
- |
Total |
66 924 |
81 472 |
Realized losses
|
2020 |
2019 |
Financial assets measured at amortised cost |
(4 196) |
(9 793) |
Financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income |
(2 027) |
(281) |
Financial liabilities not measured at fair value through profit or loss |
(158) |
(445) |
Total |
(6 381) |
(10 519) |
Net realized profit |
60 543 |
70 953 |
2020 |
2019 |
|
Loans and other financial assets measured at amortized cost (*) (**) |
(1 062 240) |
(518 002) |
Debt securities measured at amortized cost |
524 |
(14 939) |
Loans measured at fair value through other comprehensive income |
(3 911) |
(5 850) |
Debt securities measured at fair value through other comprehensive income |
(42 247) |
(4 887) |
Off-balance sheet commitments |
(139 680) |
(52 717) |
Legal risk regarding foreign currency mortgage loans |
(301 943) |
(27 712) |
Total |
(1 549 497) |
(624 107) |
(*) Item includes impairment losses on loans and advances to banks.
(**) In 2020 the Bank sold loans with a total debt of PLN 229.2 million. The realized gross result on the transaction was PLN 23.1 million. In 2019 the Bank sold loans with a total debt of PLN 663.1 million. The realized gross result on the transaction was PLN 40.9 million.
Other operating income
|
2020 |
2019 |
Gains on disposal of property, plant and equipment |
710 |
19 707 |
Premises rental income, terminals and IT equipment |
30 814 |
21 470 |
Compensation, recoveries, penalty fees and fines received |
14 261 |
19 832 |
Miscellaneous income |
10 017 |
19 449 |
Recovery of debt collection costs |
8 876 |
15 800 |
Other |
2 838 |
1 811 |
Total |
67 516 |
98 069 |
Other operating expenses
|
2020 |
2019 |
|
Provision for liabilities disputable and other provisions(*) |
(28 757) |
(48 604) |
|
Provision for legal risk regarding foreign currency mortgage loans |
(61 335) |
(18 990) |
|
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets |
(10 225) |
(2 734) |
|
Card transactions monitoring costs |
(7 971) |
(6 814) |
|
Sundry expenses |
(3 823) |
(5 144) |
|
Costs of litigation and claims |
(3 390) |
(2 809) |
|
Impairment allowance on fixed assets, litigations and other assets |
(3 634) |
(312) |
|
Compensation, penalty fees and fines |
(612) |
(415) |
|
Other |
(10 799) |
(4 253) |
|
Total |
(130 546) |
(90 075) |
|
|
|
|
|
(*) the item also includes the provision for commission reimbursements on previously repaid consumer loans
|
2020 |
2019 |
Wages and salaries |
(1 530 716) |
(1 532 141) |
Insurance and other charges related to employees |
(260 347) |
(277 926) |
Share-based payments expenses |
(13 173) |
(13 190) |
Total |
(1 804 236) |
(1 823 257) |
Other administrative expenses
|
2020 |
2019 |
General expenses |
(842 795) |
(867 150) |
Taxes and charges |
(29 881) |
(28 101) |
Bank Guarantee Fund fee |
(378 503) |
(452 141) |
Financial supervision authority fee (KNF) |
(17 882) |
(24 210) |
Tax on certain financial institutions |
(660 590) |
(591 403) |
Total |
(1 929 651) |
(1 963 005) |
|
|
Total administrative expenses |
(3 733 887) |
(3 786 262) |
From 1 January 2017 new rules for making contributions to Bank Guarantee Fund (hereinafter ’BGF’), defined in the Act of 10 June 2016 on Bank Guarantee Fund, deposit guarantee schemes and resolution of banks (hereinafter ‘BGF Act’), have to be applied.
|
2020 |
2019 |
Property, plant and equipment |
(286 376) |
(277 525) |
Investment property |
- |
(219) |
Intangible assets |
(209 657) |
(183 124) |
Total |
(496 033) |
(460 868) |
2020 |
2019 |
|
Impairment allowances for equity investments |
847 |
- |
Total gains (losses) from subsidiaries and associates |
847 |
- |
The below additional information notes present the Bank gross profit’s.
Reconciliation between tax calculated by applying the current tax rate to accounting profit and the actual tax charge presented in the separate income statement.
2020 |
2019 |
|
Profit before income tax |
1 697 220 |
3 015 766 |
Tax charge according to applicable tax rate |
322 472 |
572 996 |
Permanent differences: |
248 324 |
195 303 |
Non taxable income |
(46 282) |
(59 735) |
Non tax deductible costs including: |
293 226 |
256 188 |
Bank Guarantee fund fee |
71 916 |
85 907 |
Banking tax |
125 512 |
112 367 |
Other non tax deductible costs |
95 798 |
57 914 |
Impact of other tax rates applied in accordance with art.19.1.2 of CIT Act |
- |
- |
Impact of utilized tax losses |
48 |
82 |
Other |
1 332 |
(1 232) |
Effective income tax charge on gross profit |
570 796 |
768 299 |
The applied tax rate of 19% is the corporate income tax rate binding in Poland.
The basic components of income tax charge presented in the income statement and equity
|
2020 |
2019 |
income statement |
|
|
Current tax |
(966 855) |
(741 983) |
Current tax charge in the income statement |
(967 155) |
(741 228) |
Adjustments related to the current tax from previous years |
987 |
(305) |
Other taxes (e.g. withholding tax) |
(687) |
(450) |
Deferred tax |
396 059 |
(26 316) |
Occurrence and reversal of temporary differences |
396 059 |
(26 316) |
Tax charge in the separate income statement |
(570 796) |
(768 299) |
Equity |
|
|
Deferred tax |
(235 725) |
(37 085) |
Income and costs disclosed in other comprehensive income: |
|
|
revaluation of financial instruments - cash flows hedges |
(88 676) |
(14 292) |
fair value revaluation through other comprehensive income |
(132 284) |
(24 717) |
Tax on items that are or may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss |
(220 960) |
(39 009) |
Tax charge on items that will never be reclassified to profit or loss |
(14 765) |
1 924 |
fair value revaluation through other comprehensive income –equity securities |
(16 735) |
1 418 |
remeasurements the defined benefit liabilities |
1 970 |
506 |
Total charge |
(806 521) |
(805 384) |
|
|
Changes in temporary differences in 2020 |
|||||||||
OPENING BALANCE |
CHANGES RECOGNIZED IN |
CHANGES RESULTING FROM CHANGES IN THE SCOPE OF CONSOLIDATION AND OTHER |
OPENING BALANCE |
||||||||
TOTAL DEFERRED TAX |
IN THE INCOME STATEMENT |
IN EQUITY |
THE INCOME STATEMENT |
EQUITY |
THE INCOME STATEMENT |
EQUITY |
TOTAL DEFERRED TAX |
IN THE INCOME STATEMENT |
IN EQUITY |
||
DEFFERED TAX LIABILITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued income – securities |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Accrued income – loans |
119 529 |
119 529 |
- |
(17 091) |
- |
- |
- |
102 438 |
102 438 |
- |
|
Change in revaluation of financial assets |
343 782 |
241 106 |
102 676 |
(62 590) |
237 696 |
- |
- |
518 888 |
178 516 |
340 372 |
|
Accelerated depreciation |
105 428 |
105 428 |
- |
20 497 |
- |
(2 310) |
- |
123 615 |
123 615 |
- |
|
Investment relief |
4 424 |
4 424 |
- |
(330) |
- |
- |
- |
4 094 |
4 094 |
- |
|
Paid intermediation costs |
159 685 |
159 685 |
- |
16 525 |
- |
- |
- |
176 210 |
176 210 |
- |
|
Other |
2 330 |
2 330 |
- |
(2 330) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Gross deferred tax liability |
735 178 |
632 502 |
102 676 |
(45 319) |
237 696 |
(2 310) |
- |
925 245 |
584 873 |
340 372 |
|
DEFFERED TAX ASSET |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses - securities |
86 686 |
86 686 |
- |
180 080 |
- |
- |
- |
266 766 |
266 766 |
- |
|
Accrued expenses - deposits and loans |
36 431 |
36 431 |
- |
(26 292) |
- |
- |
- |
10 139 |
10139 |
- |
|
Downward revaluation of financial assets |
312 705 |
312 705 |
- |
23 353 |
- |
- |
- |
336 058 |
336 058 |
- |
|
Income received to be amortized over time from loans and current accounts |
322 533 |
322 533 |
- |
(13 106) |
- |
- |
- |
309 427 |
309 427 |
- |
|
Loan provisions charges |
604 050 |
604 050 |
- |
152 592 |
- |
- |
- |
756 642 |
756 642 |
- |
|
Personnel related provisions |
117 080 |
99 619 |
17 461 |
(212) |
1 971 |
213 |
- |
119 052 |
99 620 |
19 432 |
|
Accruals |
21 973 |
21 973 |
- |
91 |
- |
5 |
- |
22 069 |
22 069 |
- |
|
Previous year losses |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Other |
10 836 |
10 836 |
- |
34 235 |
- |
- |
- |
45 071 |
45 071 |
- |
|
Gross deferred tax assets |
1 512 294 |
1 494 833 |
17 461 |
350 741 |
1 971 |
218 |
- |
1 865 224 |
1 845 792 |
19 432 |
|
Deferred tax charge |
X |
X |
X |
396 060 |
(235 725) |
2 528 |
- |
X |
X |
X |
|
Net deferred tax assets |
777 116 |
862 331 |
(85 215) |
X |
X |
X |
X |
939 979 |
1 260 919 |
(320 940) |
|
Net deferred tax liability |
- |
- |
- |
X |
X |
X |
X |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
Changes in temporary differences in 2019 |
||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
OPENING BALANCE |
CHANGES RECOGNIZED IN |
CHANGES RESULTING FROM CHANGES IN THE SCOPE OF CONSOLIDATION AND OTHER |
OPENING BALANCE |
||||||||
TOTAL DEFERRED TAX |
IN THE INCOME STATEMENT |
IN EQUITY |
THE INCOME STATEMENT |
EQUITY |
THE INCOME STATEMENT |
EQUITY |
TOTAL DEFERRED TAX |
IN THE INCOME STATEMENT |
IN EQUITY |
||
DEFFERED TAX LIABILITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued income – securities |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Accrued income – loans |
131 927 |
131 927 |
- |
(12 398) |
- |
- |
- |
119 529 |
119 529 |
- |
|
Change in revaluation of financial assets |
239 503 |
174 259 |
65 244 |
66 646 |
37 631 |
201 |
(199) |
343 782 |
241 106 |
102 676 |
|
Accelerated depreciation |
114 951 |
114 951 |
- |
(9 523) |
- |
- |
- |
105 428 |
105 428 |
- |
|
Investment relief |
3 833 |
3 833 |
- |
591 |
- |
- |
- |
4 424 |
4 424 |
- |
|
Paid intermediation costs |
132 387 |
132 387 |
- |
27 298 |
- |
- |
- |
159 685 |
159 685 |
- |
|
Other |
2 466 |
2 466 |
- |
(420) |
- |
284 |
- |
2 330 |
2 330 |
- |
|
Gross deferred tax liability |
625 067 |
559 823 |
65 244 |
72 194 |
37 631 |
485 |
(199) |
735 178 |
632 502 |
102 676 |
|
DEFFERED TAX ASSET |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses - securities |
5 873 |
5 873 |
- |
80 813 |
- |
- |
- |
86 686 |
86 686 |
- |
|
Accrued expenses - deposits and loans |
35 836 |
35 836 |
- |
595 |
- |
- |
- |
36 431 |
36 431 |
- |
|
Downward revaluation of financial assets |
397 681 |
397 681 |
- |
(84 976) |
- |
- |
- |
312 705 |
312 705 |
- |
|
Income received to be amortized over time from loans and current accounts |
286 669 |
286 669 |
- |
35 864 |
- |
- |
- |
322 533 |
322 533 |
- |
|
Loan provisions charges |
594 811 |
594 811 |
- |
9 384 |
- |
(145) |
- |
604 050 |
604 050 |
- |
|
Personnel related provisions |
114 301 |
97 346 |
16 955 |
2 273 |
546 |
- |
(40) |
117 080 |
99 619 |
17 461 |
|
Accruals |
20 495 |
20 495 |
- |
1 478 |
- |
- |
- |
21 973 |
21 973 |
- |
|
Previous year losses |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Other |
10 389 |
10 389 |
- |
447 |
- |
- |
- |
10 836 |
10 836 |
- |
|
Gross deferred tax assets |
1 466 055 |
1 449 100 |
16 955 |
45 878 |
546 |
(145) |
(40) |
1 512 294 |
1 494 833 |
17 461 |
|
Deferred tax charge |
X |
X |
X |
(26 316) |
(37 085) |
(630) |
159 |
X |
X |
X |
|
Net deferred tax assets |
840 988 |
889 277 |
(48 289) |
X |
X |
X |
X |
777 116 |
862 331 |
(85 215) |
|
Net deferred tax liability |
- |
- |
- |
X |
X |
X |
X |
- |
- |
- |
|
In the opinion of the Bank the deferred tax asset in the amount of PLN 939 979 thousand reported as at 31 December 2020 is sustainable in total amount. The analysis was performed based on the past results of the company and assumed results in the future periods. The analysis assumed the five years’ time horizon.
As at 31 December 2020 and 31 December 2019, there were no temporary differences related to investmentsin subsidiaries and associates, for which deferred tax liability was not created as a result of meeting the conditions of controlling the terms of temporary differences’ reversing and being probable that these differences will not reversein foreseeable future.
As at 31 December 2020 and 31 December 2019, there were no temporary differences, unused tax losses and unused tax relieves which were not included in the deferred tax assets.
Basic earnings per share
Basic earnings per share are calculated by dividing the net profit attributable to equity holders of the Bank by the weighted average number of the ordinary shares outstanding during the period.
|
2020 |
2019 |
Net profit |
1 126 424 |
2 247 467 |
Weighted average number of ordinary shares in the period |
262 470 034 |
262 470 034 |
Earnings per share (in PLN per share) |
4.29 |
8.56 |
Diluted earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share are calculated by dividing the net profit attributable to equity holders of the Bank by the weighted average number of the ordinary shares outstanding during the given period adjusted for all potential dilution of ordinary shares.
As at 31 December 2020 there were no diluting instruments in the form of convertible bonds in the Bank.
|
2020 |
2019 |
Net profit |
1 126 424 |
2 247 467 |
Weighted average number of ordinary shares in the period |
262 470 034 |
262 470 034 |
Weighted average number of ordinary shares for the purpose of calculation of diluted earnings per share |
262 470 034 |
262 470 034 |
Diluted earnings per share (in PLN per share) |
4.29 |
8.56 |
The Management Board of Bank Pekao S.A. adopted the position of the Polish Financial Supervision Authority regarding the suspension by Bank Pekao S.A. dividend payments in the first half of 2021
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
|
Cash |
4 306 088 |
3 036 976 |
Current account at Central Bank |
150 197 |
2 101 956 |
Other |
- |
- |
Gross carrying amount |
4 456 285 |
5 138 932 |
Impairment allowances |
(13) |
(174) |
Net carrying amount |
4 456 272 |
5 138 758 |
AMOUNTS DUE TO CENTRAL BANK |
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
Term deposits |
- |
4 550 |
Amounts due to Central Bank |
- |
4 550 |
Receivables and liabilities to the Central Bank are measured at amortized cost.
Cash and balances with Central Bank by currency
Assets |
LIABILITIES |
|
PLN |
2 079 581 |
- |
EUR |
1 106 970 |
- |
USD |
556 922 |
- |
GBP |
185 317 |
- |
CHF |
100 412 |
- |
NOK |
258 502 |
- |
Other currencies |
168 568 |
- |
Total |
4 456 272 |
- |
Assets |
LIABILITIES |
|
PLN |
3 759 446 |
4 550 |
EUR |
806 786 |
- |
USD |
242 253 |
- |
GBP |
101 235 |
- |
CHF |
78 726 |
- |
NOK |
53 804 |
- |
Other currencies |
96 508 |
- |
Total |
5 138 758 |
4 550 |
|
|
|
Bank is required to held on current account in the Central Bank the average monthly balance comply with the mandatory reserve declaration.
As at 31 December 2020 the interest rate of funds held on the mandatory reserve account is at 0.1 % (as at 31 December 2019 - 0.5%).
Loans and advances to banks by product type
|
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
Current accounts |
561 002 |
618 837 |
Interbank placements |
179 332 |
200 843 |
Loans and advances |
86 007 |
172 583 |
Cash collaterals |
1 176 927 |
733 090 |
Reverse repo transactions |
719 015 |
219 153 |
Cash in transit |
199 051 |
302 298 |
Total gross amount |
2 921 334 |
2 246 804 |
Impairment allowances |
(3 495) |
(2 896) |
Total net amount |
2 917 839 |
2 243 908 |
Loans and advances to banks are measured at amortised cost.
Loans and advances to banks by contractual maturity
|
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
Loans and advances to banks, including: |
|
|
up to 1 month |
2 840 435 |
2 080 342 |
between 1 and 3 months |
614 |
3 037 |
between 3 months and 1 year |
278 |
83 041 |
between 1 and 5 years |
79 618 |
78 005 |
over 5 years |
16 |
81 |
past due |
373 |
2 298 |
Total gross amount |
2 921 334 |
2 246 804 |
Impairment allowances |
(3 495) |
(2 896) |
Total net amount |
2 917 839 |
2 243 908 |
Loans and advances to banks by currency
|
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
PLN |
1 127 778 |
787 958 |
EUR |
1 363 657 |
980 977 |
GBP |
5 103 |
164 928 |
USD |
257 719 |
80 993 |
HUF |
1 217 |
53 159 |
CZK |
2 756 |
50 945 |
Other currencies |
159 609 |
124 948 |
Total |
2 917 839 |
2 243 908 |
Financial assets and liabilities held for trading by product type
|
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
Financial assets |
|
|
Debt securities |
1 607 944 |
1 279 495 |
Equity securities |
5 393 |
- |
Total financial assets |
1 613 337 |
1 279 495 |
Financial liabilities |
|
|
Debt securities |
742 804 |
184 799 |
Total financial liabilities |
742 804 |
184 799 |
Financial assets and liabilities held for trading are measured at fair value through profit or loss.
Debt securities held for trading
|
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
Financial assets |
|
|
Debt securities issued by central governments |
976 025 |
1 131 734 |
T- bills |
100 |
- |
T- bonds |
975 925 |
1 131 734 |
Debt securities issued by banks |
172 165 |
13 974 |
Debt securities issued by business entities |
459 754 |
133 787 |
Total financial assets |
1 607 944 |
1 279 495 |
Financial liabilities |
|
|
Debt securities issued by central governments |
742 804 |
184 799 |
T- bonds |
742 804 |
184 799 |
Total financial liabilities |
742 804 |
184 799 |
Equity securities held for trading
|
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
Shares |
5 393 |
- |
Total |
5 393 |
- |
Debt securities held for trading by maturity
|
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
Financial assets |
|
|
Debt securities, including: |
|
|
up to 1 month |
17 524 |
21 |
between 1 and 3 months |
11 050 |
100 922 |
between 3 months and 1 year |
504 590 |
27 093 |
between 1 and 5 years |
651 791 |
1 121 806 |
over 5 years |
422 989 |
29 653 |
unspecified term |
- |
- |
Total financial assets |
1 607 944 |
1 279 495 |
Financial liabilities |
|
|
Debt securities, including: |
|
|
up to 1 month |
- |
74 115 |
between 1 and 3 months |
- |
- |
between 3 months and 1 year |
14 209 |
12 087 |
between 1 and 5 years |
279 152 |
42 114 |
over 5 years |
449 443 |
56 483 |
Total financial liabilities |
742 804 |
184 799 |
Debt securities held for trading by currency
|
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
Financial assets |
|
|
PLN |
1 448 931 |
1 264 654 |
EUR |
148 543 |
12 735 |
USD |
10 470 |
2 106 |
Total financial assets |
1 607 944 |
1 279 495 |
Financial liabilities |
|
|
PLN |
742 804 |
184 799 |
Total financial liabilities |
742 804 |
184 799 |
Derivative financial instruments at the Bank
In its operations the Bank uses different financial derivatives that are offered to the clients and are used for managing risks involved in the Bank’s business. The majority of derivatives at the Bak include over-the-counter contracts. Regulated stock exchange contracts (mainly futures) represent a small part of those derivatives.
Derivative foreign exchange transactions include the obligation to buy or sell foreign and domestic currency assets. Forward foreign exchange transactions are based on the foreign exchange rates, specified on the transaction date for a predefined future date. These transactions are valued using the discounted cash flow model. Cash flows are discounted according to zero-coupon yield curves, relevant for a given market.
Foreign exchange swaps are a combination of a swap of specific currencies as at spot date and of reverse a transaction as at forward date with foreign exchange rates specified in advance on transaction date. Transactions of such type are settled by an exchange of assets. These transactions are valued using the discounted cash flow model. Cash flows are discounted according to zero-coupon yield curves relevant for a given market.
Foreign exchange options with delivery are defined as contracts, where one of the parties, i.e. the option buyer, purchases from the other party, referred to as the option writer, at a so-called premium price the right without the obligation to buy (call option) or to sell (put option), at a specified point of time in the future or during a specified time range a foreign currency amount specified in the contract at the exchange rate set during the conclusion of the option agreement.
In case of options settled in net amounts, upon acquisition of the rights, the buyer receives an amount of money equal to the product of notional and difference between spot ad strike price.
Barrier option with one barrier is a type of option where exercise of the option depends on the underlying crossing or reaching a given barrier level. A barrier may be reached starting from lower (‘UP’) or from higher (‘DOWN’) level of the underlying instrument. ‘IN’ options start their lives worthless and only become active when a predetermined knock-in barrier price is breached. ‘OUT’ options start their lives active and become null and void when a certain knock-out barrier price is breached.
Foreign exchange options are priced using the Garman-Kohlhagen valuation model (and in case of barrier and Asian options using the so-called expanded Garman-Kohlhagen model). Parameters of the model based on market quotations of plain-vanilla at-the-money options and market spreads for out-of-the-money and in-the-money options (volatility smile) for standard maturities.
Derivatives related to interest rates enable the Bank and its customers to transfer, modify or limit interest rate risk.
In the case of Interest Rate Swaps (IRS), counterparties exchange between each other the flows of interest payments, accrued on the nominal amount identified in the contract. These transactions are valued using the discounted cash flow model. Floating (implied) cash flows are estimated on base of respective IRS rates. Floating and fixed cash flows are discounted by relevant zero-coupon yield curves.
Forward Rate Agreements (FRA) involve both parties undertaking to pay interest on a predefined nominal amount for a specified period starting in the future and charged according to the interest rate determined on the day of the agreement The parties settle the transaction on value date using the reference rate as a discount rate in the processof discounting the difference between the FRA rate (forward rate as at transaction date) and the reference rate. These transactions are valued using the discounted cash flow model.
Cross currency IRS involves both parties swapping capital and interest flows in different currencies in a specified period. These transactions are valued using the discounted cash flow model. Valuation of Basis Swap transactions (cross currency IRS with floating coupon) takes into account market quotations of basis spread (Basis swap spread).
In the case of forward transactions on securities, counterparties agree to buy or sell specified securities on a forward date for a payment fixed on the date of transaction. Such transactions are measured based upon the valuation of the security (mark-to-market or mark-to-model) and valuation of the related payment (method of discounting cash flows by money market rate).
Interest rate options (cap/floor) are contracts where one of the parties, the option buyer, purchases from the other party, the option writer, at a so-called premium price, the right without the obligation to borrow (cap) or lend (floor) at specified points of time in the future (independently) amounts specified in the contract at the interest rate set during the conclusion of the option. Contracts are net-settled (without fund location) at agreed time. Transactions of this type are valued using the Normal model (Bachelier model). The model is parameterized based upon market quotations of options as at standard quoted maturities.
Interest rate futures transactions refer to standardized forward contracts purchased on the stock market. Futures contracts are measured based upon quotations available directly from stock exchanges.
Commodity swap contracts are obligations to net settlement equivalent to the execution of a commodity buy or sell transaction at the settlement price according to determination rules set at the trade inception. Commodity instruments are valued with the discounted cash flows method, which includes commodity prices term structure.
Asian commodity options are contracts with the right to buy or sell a certain amount of commodity on a expiry date at the specified price, where settlement price is based on an average level established on the basis of a series of commodity price observations in the period preceding the maturity date of the option. Commodity options are valued with the Black-Scholes model that includes moment matching of commodity price distribution for the arithmetic average.
Derivative financial instruments embedded in other instruments
The Bank uses derivatives financial instruments embedded in complex financial instruments, i.e. such as including both a derivative and base agreement, which results in part of the cash flows of the combined instrument changing similarly to cash flows of an independent derivative. Derivatives embedded in other instruments cause part or all cash flows resulting from the base agreement to be modified as per a specific interest rate, price of a security, foreign exchange rate, price index or interest rate index.
The Bank has deposits and certificates of deposits on offer which include embedded derivatives. As the nature of such instrument is not strictly associated with the nature of the deposit agreement, the embedded instrument is separated and classified into the portfolio held-for-trading. The valuation of such instrument is recognized in the income statement. Embedded instruments include simple options (plain vanilla) and exotic options for single stocks, commodities, indices and other market indices, including interest rate indices, foreign exchange rates and their related baskets.
All embedded options are immediately closed back-to-back on the interbank market.
Currency options embedded in deposits are valued as other currency options.
Exotic options embedded in deposits as well as their close positions are valued using the Monte-Carlo simulation technique assuming Geometric Brownian Motion model of risk factors. Model parameters are determined first of all on the basis
of quoted options and futures contracts and in their absence based on statistical measures of the underlying instrument dynamic.
Risk involved in financial derivatives
Market risk and credit risk are the basic types of risk, associated with derivatives.
At the beginning, financial derivatives usually have a small market value or no market value at all. It is a consequence of the fact that derivatives require no initial net investments, or require a very small net investment compared to other types of contracts, which display a similar reaction to changing market conditions.
Derivatives gain positive or negative value as a result of change in specific interest rates, prices of securities, prices of commodities, currency exchange rates, price index, credit standing or credit index or another market parameter. In case of such changes, the derivatives held become more or less advantageous than instruments with the same residual maturities, available at that moment on the market.
Credit risk related to derivative contracts is a potential cost of concluding a new contract on the original terms and conditions if the other party to the original contract fails to meet its obligations. In order to assess the potential cost of replacement the Bank uses the same method as for credit risk assessment. In order to control its credit risk levels the Bank performs assessments of other contract parties using the same methods as for credit decisions.
The following tables present nominal amounts of financial derivatives and fair values of such derivatives. Nominal amounts of certain financial instruments are used for comparison with balance sheet instruments but need not necessarily indicate what the future cash flow amounts will be or what the current fair value of such instruments is and therefore do not reflect the Bank’s credit or price risk level.
Fair value of trading derivatives
assets |
liabilities |
|
Interest rate transactions |
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps (IRS) |
4 071 770 |
4 027 296 |
Forward Rate Agreements (FRA) |
605 |
586 |
Options |
6 580 |
2 171 |
Other |
831 |
847 |
Foreign currency and gold transactions |
|
|
Cross-Currency Interest Rate Swaps (CIRS) |
119 417 |
70 622 |
Currency Forward Agreements |
257 942 |
272 972 |
Currency Swaps (FX-Swap) |
193 335 |
83 919 |
Options for currency and gold |
60 286 |
51 295 |
Transactions based on equity securities and stock indexes |
|
|
Options |
1 712 |
1 712 |
Other |
- |
- |
Transactions based on commodities and precious metals |
|
|
Options |
56 268 |
52 659 |
Other |
73 533 |
72 037 |
Total |
4 842 279 |
4 636 116 |
assets |
liabilities |
|
Interest rate transactions |
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps (IRS) |
1 644 621 |
1 604 186 |
Forward Rate Agreements (FRA) |
284 |
3 |
Options |
8 463 |
2 003 |
Other |
39 |
61 |
Foreign currency and gold transactions |
|
|
Cross-Currency Interest Rate Swaps (CIRS) |
81 369 |
53 546 |
Currency Forward Agreements |
153 950 |
157 608 |
Currency Swaps (FX-Swap) |
80 285 |
109 509 |
Options for currency and for gold |
73 950 |
72 799 |
Transactions based on equity securities and stock indexes |
|
|
Options |
3 084 |
3 076 |
Other |
- |
- |
Transactions based on commodities and precious metals |
|
|
Options |
25 646 |
23 523 |
Other |
14 298 |
14 054 |
Total |
2 085 989 |
2 040 368 |
Derivative financial instruments are measured at fair value through profit or loss.
Nominal value of trading derivatives
31.12.2020 |
Contractual maturity |
TOTAL |
||||
UP TO |
BETWEEN |
BETWEEN |
BETWEEN |
OVER |
||
Interest rate transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps (IRS) |
6 229 830 |
6 453 283 |
42 292 408 |
127 220 509 |
37 376 497 |
219 572 527 |
Forward Rate Agreements (FRA) |
1 031 000 |
1 753 000 |
1 176 000 |
- |
- |
3 960 000 |
Options |
50 |
- |
890 564 |
2 624 532 |
411 412 |
3 926 558 |
Other |
521 532 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
521 532 |
Foreign currency transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
Cross-Currency Interest Rate Swaps (CIRS) - currency bought |
- |
1 154 252 |
107 754 |
6 282 193 |
126 650 |
7 670 849 |
Cross-Currency Interest Rate Swaps (CIRS) - currency sold |
- |
1 120 300 |
100 000 |
6 302 003 |
124 435 |
7 646 738 |
Currency Forward Agreements - currency bought |
20 057 578 |
4 787 788 |
7 798 255 |
3 227 169 |
26 674 |
35 897 464 |
Currency Forward Agreements - currency sold |
20 064 674 |
4 827 371 |
7 798 762 |
3 255 715 |
27 372 |
35 973 894 |
Currency Swaps (FX-Swap) – currency bought |
12 399 025 |
2 411 504 |
2 192 868 |
352 650 |
- |
17 356 047 |
Currency Swaps (FX-Swap) – currency sold |
12 360 053 |
2 374 534 |
2 152 112 |
352 817 |
- |
17 239 516 |
Options bought |
1 055 018 |
1 066 559 |
2 603 360 |
1 481 808 |
- |
6 206 745 |
Options sold |
1 010 973 |
1 119 281 |
2 585 226 |
1 471 468 |
- |
6 186 948 |
Transactions based on equity securities and stock indexes |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
Options |
8 458 |
- |
49 972 |
- |
- |
58 430 |
Other |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Transactions based on commodities and precious metals |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
Options |
96 027 |
269 477 |
1 456 207 |
183 711 |
- |
2 005 422 |
Other |
267 298 |
354 872 |
436 902 |
168 570 |
- |
1 227 642 |
Total |
75 101 516 |
27 692 221 |
71 640 390 |
152 923 145 |
38 093 040 |
365 450 312 |
Nominal value of trading derivatives
31.12.2019 |
Contractual maturity |
TOTAL |
||||
UP TO |
BETWEEN |
BETWEEN |
BETWEEN |
OVER |
||
Interest rate transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps (IRS) |
2 995 055 |
12 029 328 |
59 733 223 |
91 708 769 |
30 547 721 |
197 014 096 |
Forward Rate Agreements (FRA) |
550 000 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
550 000 |
Options |
- |
252 278 |
2 216 992 |
2 595 213 |
294 715 |
5 359 198 |
Other |
78 340 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
78 340 |
Foreign currency transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cross-Currency Interest Rate Swaps (CIRS) - currency bought |
- |
1 013 584 |
1 242 697 |
6 215 984 |
166 666 |
8 638 931 |
Cross-Currency Interest Rate Swaps (CIRS) - currency sold |
- |
1 016 622 |
1 227 952 |
6 191 523 |
166 383 |
8 602 480 |
Currency Forward Agreements - currency bought |
5 107 200 |
2 854 577 |
6 417 509 |
4 360 671 |
- |
18 739 957 |
Currency Forward Agreements - currency sold |
5 114 742 |
2 850 759 |
6 427 955 |
4 378 171 |
- |
18 771 627 |
Currency Swaps (FX-Swap) – currency bought |
13 821 068 |
1 703 894 |
3 999 958 |
598 423 |
- |
20 123 343 |
Currency Swaps (FX-Swap) – currency sold |
13 836 643 |
1 711 052 |
4 028 472 |
591 352 |
- |
20 167 519 |
Options bought |
1 241 286 |
1 109 559 |
5 131 752 |
2 596 963 |
- |
10 079 560 |
Options sold |
1 247 505 |
1 363 199 |
4 886 284 |
2 600 452 |
- |
10 097 440 |
Transactions based on equity securities and stock indexes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
- |
- |
52 245 |
58 518 |
- |
110 763 |
Other |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Transactions based on commodities and precious metals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
120 372 |
387 365 |
1 154 744 |
670 370 |
- |
2 332 851 |
Other |
150 827 |
226 004 |
180 367 |
22 895 |
- |
580 093 |
Total |
44 263 038 |
26 518 221 |
96 700 150 |
122 589 304 |
31 175 485 |
321 246 198 |
Loans and advances to customers by product type
|
31.12.2020 |
|||
|
AMORTISED COST |
FAIR VALUE THROUGH OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
FAIR VALUE THROUGH PROFIT OR LOSS |
TOTAL |
Mortgage loans |
73 636 275 |
867 948 |
15 902 |
74 520 125 |
Current accounts |
9 409 954 |
- |
- |
9 409 954 |
Operating loans |
10 912 352 |
443 778 |
19 285 |
11 375 415 |
Investment loans |
21 801 214 |
276 992 |
20 339 |
22 098 545 |
Cash loans |
13 618 453 |
- |
- |
13 618 453 |
Payment cards receivables |
1 013 454 |
- |
- |
1 013 454 |
Factoring |
2 103 256 |
- |
- |
2 103 256 |
Other loans and advances |
982 335 |
- |
131 475 |
1 113 810 |
Reverse repo transactions |
280 620 |
- |
- |
280 620 |
Cash in transit |
149 325 |
- |
- |
149 325 |
Gross carrying amount |
133 907 238 |
1 588 718 |
187 001 |
135 682 957 |
Impairment allowances (*) (**) |
(6 955 998) |
- |
- |
(6 955 998) |
Carrying amount |
126 951 240 |
1 588 718 |
187 001 |
128 726 959 |
(*) The impairment allowance for loans and advances to customers measured at fair value through other comprehensive income in the amount of PLN 28 268 thousand is included in the ‘Revaluation reserve’ item and does not reduce the carrying amount of the loan.
(**) Including the provision for legal risk regarding foreign currency mortgage loans in the amount of PLN 329 655 thousand.
|
31.12.2019 |
|||
|
AMORTISED COST |
FAIR VALUE THROUGH OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
FAIR VALUE THROUGH PROFIT OR LOSS |
TOTAL |
Mortgage loans |
68 557 662 |
972 945 |
21 600 |
69 552 207 |
Current accounts |
12 224 536 |
- |
- |
12 224 536 |
Operating loans |
15 075 523 |
404 374 |
22 518 |
15 502 415 |
Investment loans |
20 562 225 |
168 463 |
57 226 |
20 787 914 |
Cash loans |
14 674 372 |
- |
- |
14 674 372 |
Payment cards receivables |
1 113 077 |
- |
- |
1 113 077 |
Factoring |
2 582 870 |
- |
- |
2 582 870 |
Other loans and advances |
837 126 |
- |
141 295 |
978 421 |
Reverse repo transactions |
502 300 |
- |
- |
502 300 |
Cash in transit |
34 390 |
- |
- |
34 390 |
Gross carrying amount |
136 164 081 |
1 545 782 |
242 639 |
137 952 502 |
Impairment allowances (*) |
(6 277 118) |
- |
- |
(6 277 118) |
Carrying amount |
129 886 963 |
1 545 782 |
242 639 |
131 675 384 |
(*) The impairment allowance for loans and advances to customers measured at fair value through other comprehensive income in the amount of PLN 22 356 thousand is included in the ‘Revaluation reserve’ item and does not reduce the carrying amount of the loan.
(**) Including the provision for legal risk regarding foreign currency mortgage loans in the amount of PLN 27 712 thousand.
Loans and advances to customers by customer type
|
31.12.2020 |
|||||
AMORTISED COST |
FAIR VALUE THROUGH OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (*) |
FAIR VALUE THROUGH PROFIT OR LOSS |
TOTAL |
|||
Gross carrying amount |
Impairment allowances (**) |
carrying amount |
||||
Corporate |
53 620 892 |
(4 216 266) |
49 404 626 |
1 588 718 |
32 234 |
51 025 578 |
Individuals |
78 000 591 |
(2 618 293) |
75 382 298 |
- |
131 474 |
75 513 772 |
Budget entities |
2 285 755 |
(121 439) |
2 164 316 |
- |
23 293 |
2 187 609 |
Loans and advances to customers |
133 907 238 |
(6 955 998) |
126 951 240 |
1 588 718 |
187 001 |
128 726 959 |
(*) The impairment allowance for loans and advances to customers measured at fair value through other comprehensive income in the amount of PLN 28 268 thousand is included in the ‘Revaluation reserve’ item and does not reduce the carrying amount of the loan.
(**) Including the provision for legal risk regarding foreign currency mortgage loans in the amount of PLN 329 655 thousand.
|
31.12.2019 |
|||||
AMORTISED COST |
FAIR VALUE THROUGH OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (*) |
FAIR VALUE THROUGH PROFIT OR LOSS |
TOTAL |
|||
Gross carrying amount |
Impairment allowances (**) |
carrying amount |
||||
Corporate |
57 266 692 |
(3 960 457) |
53 306 235 |
1 545 782 |
44 128 |
54 896 145 |
Individuals |
75 991 832 |
(2 197 179) |
73 794 653 |
- |
141 296 |
73 935 949 |
Budget entities |
2 905 557 |
(119 482) |
2 786 075 |
- |
57 215 |
2 843 290 |
Loans and advances to customers |
136 164 081 |
(6 277 118) |
129 886 963 |
1 545 782 |
242 639 |
131 675 384 |
(*) The impairment allowance for loans and advances to customers measured at fair value through other comprehensive income in the amount ofPLN 22 356 thousand is included in the ‘Revaluation reserve’ item and does not reduce the carrying amount of the loan.
(**) Including the provision for legal risk regarding foreign currency mortgage loans in the amount of PLN 27 712 thousand.
Loans and advances to customers by contractual maturity
|
31.12.2020 |
|||
|
AMORTISED COST |
FAIR VALUE THROUGH OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
FAIR VALUE THROUGH PROFIT OR LOSS |
TOTAL |
Loans and advances to customers, including: |
|
|
|
|
up to 1 month |
13 794 544 |
- |
2 155 |
13 796 699 |
between 1 and 3 months |
3 257 693 |
- |
6 254 |
3 263 947 |
between 3 months and 1 year |
12 815 005 |
51 305 |
21 812 |
12 888 122 |
between 1 and 5 years |
44 952 702 |
340 029 |
119 240 |
45 411 971 |
over 5 years |
54 918 634 |
1 197 384 |
33 778 |
56 149 796 |
past due |
4 168 660 |
- |
3 762 |
4 172 422 |
Gross carrying amount |
133 907 238 |
1 588 718 |
187 001 |
135 682 957 |
Impairment allowances (*) (**) |
(6 955 998) |
- |
- |
(6 955 998) |
Carrying amount |
126 951 240 |
1 588 718 |
187 001 |
128 726 959 |
(*) The impairment allowance for loans and advances to customers measured at fair value through through other comprehensive income in the amount of PLN 28 268 thousand is included in the ‘Revaluation reserve’ item and does not reduce the carrying amount of the loan.
(**) Including the provision for legal risk regarding foreign currency mortgage loans in the amount of PLN 329 655 thousand.
|
31.12.2019 |
|||
|
AMORTISED COST |
FAIR VALUE THROUGH OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
FAIR VALUE THROUGH PROFIT OR LOSS |
TOTAL |
Loans and advances to customers, including: |
|
|
|
|
up to 1 month |
16 067 547 |
- |
2 395 |
16 069 942 |
between 1 and 3 months |
4 324 282 |
- |
14 669 |
4 338 951 |
between 3 months and 1 year |
13 524 297 |
51 859 |
50 043 |
13 626 199 |
between 1 and 5 years |
42 093 945 |
350 768 |
130 095 |
42 574 808 |
over 5 years |
55 634 329 |
1 143 155 |
43 567 |
56 821 051 |
past due |
4 519 681 |
- |
1 870 |
4 521 551 |
Gross carrying amount |
136 164 081 |
1 545 782 |
242 639 |
137 952 502 |
Impairment allowances (*) |
(6 277 118) |
- |
- |
(6 277 118) |
Carrying amount |
129 886 963 |
1 545 782 |
242 639 |
131 675 384 |
(*) The impairment allowance for loans and advances to customers measured at fair value through through other comprehensive income in the amount of PLN 22 356 thousand is included in the ‘Revaluation reserve’ item and does not reduce the carrying amount of the loan.
(**) Including the provision for legal risk regarding foreign currency mortgage loans in the amount of PLN 27 712 thousand.
Loans and advances to customers by currency
|
31.12.2020 |
|||
|
AMORTISED COST |
FAIR VALUE THROUGH OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
FAIR VALUE THROUGH PROFIT OR LOSS |
TOTAL |
PLN |
104 923 972 |
150 819 |
187 001 |
105 261 792 |
CHF |
2 521 858 |
- |
- |
2 521 858 |
EUR |
17 439 173 |
1 437 899 |
- |
18 877 072 |
USD |
1 530 157 |
- |
- |
1 530 157 |
Other currencies |
536 080 |
- |
- |
536 080 |
Total |
126 951 240 |
1 588 718 |
187 001 |
128 726 959 |
|
31.12.2019 |
|||
|
AMORTISED COST |
FAIR VALUE THROUGH OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
FAIR VALUE THROUGH PROFIT OR LOSS |
TOTAL |
PLN |
108 998 763 |
50 124 |
242 639 |
109 291 526 |
CHF |
2 600 631 |
- |
- |
2 600 631 |
EUR |
16 497 283 |
1 495 658 |
- |
17 992 941 |
USD |
1 313 033 |
- |
- |
1 313 033 |
Other currencies |
477 253 |
- |
- |
477 253 |
Total |
129 886 963 |
1 545 782 |
242 639 |
131 675 384 |
As of 31 December 2020 the Bank applies fair value hedge accounting and cash flow hedge accounting:
FVH - fair value hedge accounting:
Interest rate swaps (IRS) designated to hedge debt securities denominated in PLN, EUR and USD (hereafter: FVH IRS bonds),
CFH - cash flow hedge accounting:
Interest rate swaps (IRS) designated to hedge floating rate loans and securities denominated in PLN (hereafter: CFH IRS loans/bonds),
Interest rate swaps (IRS) designated to hedge deposits denominated in PLN and EUR, which economically reflect long-term variable-rate liability (hereafter: CFH IRS deposits),
cross-currency interest rate swaps (basis swap) designated to hedge floating rate loans denominated in CHF and liabilities denominated in PLN, which economically reflect long-term variable-rate liability (hereafter: CFH CIRS deposits/loans),
FX-Swaps designated to hedge floating rate loans denominated in EUR and current and term deposits denominated in USD (two hedging relationships, jointly hereafter: CFH FX-Swap deposits/loans).
Impact of the IBOR reform on hedge accounting
In relation to the amendments to IAS 39 and IFRS 9 published on 16 January 2020 (described in the accounting policy - Note 4.9), the Bank took advantage of the possibility of early adoption of the above-mentioned amendments to IAS 39 and IFRS 9 concerning the impact of the interest rate benchmark reform on hedge accounting (Interbank Offer Rate - ‘IBOR reform’).
As part of the established hedging relationships, the Bank identifies the following interest rate benchmarks: WIBOR, EURIBOR, LIBOR CHF, LIBOR USD. As of the reporting date, these benchmarks rates are quoted and available each day and resulting cash flows are exchanged with its counterparties as usual.
In the case of WIBOR and EURIBOR the Bank assessed that, there is currently no uncertainty about the timing or amounts of cash flows arising from the IBOR reform. Both indicators have been reformed and are being developed by Administrators authorized under the European Union Benchmark Regulation (BMR Regulation). The Bank not anticipate changing the hedged risk to a different benchmarks.
For LIBOR CHF and LIBOR USD, the established hedging relationships extend beyond the anticipated cessation dates for both benchmarks, i.e. December 31, 2021 for CHF LIBOR and June 20, 2023 for USD LIBOR. The bank expects that these benchmarks will be replaced by new benchmarks: CHF LIBOR by the SARON (Swiss Averaged Rate Overnight) administered by the SIX Swiss Exchange and LIBOR USD by the SOFR (Secured Overnight Financing Rate) administered by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, but there is uncertainty about the timing and amounts of cash flows for the new rates. Such uncertainty may impact the assessment of: the effectiveness of the relationship and the high probability of the hedged item. For the purposes of these assessments, the Bank assumes that the hedged interest rates benchmarks on which the cash flows of the hedged item and / or the hedging instrument are based will not be altered as a result of IBOR reform.
Below is the list of hedging relationships and the nominal amounts of hedging instruments designated thereto, which may be affected by the reform of the LIBOR interest rate benchmarks as at 31 December 2020:
CFH CIRS deposits / loans (CHF 613 million transactions based on CHF LIBOR)
FVH IRS bonds (USD 173 million transactions based on USD LIBOR)
The bank has developed an action plan in case of significant changes or the discontinuation of the benchmark. One of the activities of the above-mentioned plan is to introduce appropriate clauses in contracts with counterparties. Regarding the hedging instruments, the Bank actively cooperates with counterparties in order to implement rules of conduct in line with the ISDA methodology (ISDA Fallbacks Protocol).
Fair value hedge accounting
The Bank applies fair value hedge accounting for fixed coupon debt securities denominated in PLN, EUR and USD, hedged with interest rate swap (IRS) transactions in the same currencies. The Bank hedges component of interest rate risk related to the fair value changes of the hedged item resulting exclusively from the volatility of market interest rates (WIBOR, EURIBOR, LIBOR USD). The IRS transactions receive floating-rate flows, and pay fixed-rate flows. In the past, hedged risk component accounted for a significant portion of changes in fair value of the hedged item.
The approach of the Bank to market risk managemant, including interest rate risk, is presented in Note 6.3. Details regarding exposure of the Bank to interest rate risk is disclosed in Note 5.3.
The use of derivative instruments to hedge the exposure to changes in interest rates generates counterparty credit risk of derivative transactions. The Bank mitigates this risk by requiring the counterparties to post collateral deposits and by settling derivative transactions through Central Counterparty Clearing Houses (CCPs) whch apply a number of mechanisms allowing systemic reduction of the risk of default on obligations under concluded transactions.
The Bank applies fair value hedge accounting to a hedging relationship if it is justified to expect that the hedge will be highly effective in achieving offsetting fair value changes attributable to the hedged risk in the future and if assessment of hedge effectiveness indicates high effectiveness in all financial reporting periods for which the hedge was designated.
According to the approach of the Bank, hedge ratio is determined as ratio of fair value of the hedged item to fair value of the hedging instrument. A hedging relationship is considered effective if all of the following criteria are met:
high effectiveness of the hedge can be expected on the basis of comparison of critical terms of the hedged item and the hedging instrument,
in each reporting period, hedge ratio is within 80% - 125% range or relation of inefficiency amount to nominal value of the hedged item is less or equal than the threshold specified in documentation of the hedging relationship, where inefficiency amount is calculated as the sum of cumulative fair value changes of the hedged item and the hedging instrument,
in each reporting period, simulation of hedge ratio in assumed evoluation of market reference rates scenarios is within 80% - 125% range.
As regards fair value hedge relationships, the main sources of ineffectiveness are:
impact of the counterparty credit risk and own credit risk of the Bank on the fair value of the hedging transactions (IRS), which is not reflected in the fair value of the hedged item,
differences in maturities of the interest rate swaps and debt securities,
differences in coupon amounts generated by the hedged item and hedging instruments.
The tables below present interest rate swaps which are used by the Bank as instruments hedging interest rate risk in fair value hedge accounting as of 31 December 2020 and 31 December 2019.
Nominal values and interest rates of hedging derivatives - fair value hedge
|
CONTRACTUAL MATURITY |
TOTAL |
|||||||
UP To |
Between |
between 3 MoNths |
Between 1 tO |
over |
|||||
Hedging relationship |
Currency |
|
|||||||
FVH IRS bonds |
PLN |
Nominal value |
- |
280 000 |
- |
- |
200 000 |
480 000 |
|
Average fixed interest rate (%) |
- |
0.3 |
- |
- |
0.3 |
0.3 |
|||
EUR |
Nominal value |
- |
- |
346 110 |
309 192 |
680 683 |
1 335 985 |
||
Average fixed interest rate (%) |
- |
- |
-0.1 |
0.8 |
-0.2 |
0.1. |
|||
USD |
Nominal value |
- |
- |
- |
630 509 |
112 752 |
743 261 |
||
Average fixed interest rate (%) |
- |
- |
- |
2.0 |
0.2 |
1.8 |
|||
Total nominal value |
- |
280 000 |
346 110 |
939 701 |
993 435 |
2 559 246 |
|||
Nominal values and interest rates of hedging derivatives - fair value hedge
31.12.2019 |
|
CONTRACTUAL MATURITY |
TOTAL |
||||||
UP To |
Between |
between 3 MoNths |
Between 1 tO |
over |
|||||
Hedging relationship |
Currency |
|
|||||||
FVH IRS bonds |
PLN |
Nominal value |
- |
- |
- |
280 000 |
200 000 |
480 000 |
|
Average fixed interest rate (%) |
- |
- |
- |
1.8 |
1.8 |
1.8 |
|||
EUR |
Nominal value |
- |
- |
470 564 |
604 707 |
628 129 |
1 703 400 |
||
Average fixed interest rate (%) |
- |
- |
1.2 |
0.4 |
-0.1 |
0.4 |
|||
USD |
Nominal value |
- |
- |
- |
637 102 |
113 931 |
751 033 |
||
Average fixed interest rate (%) |
- |
- |
- |
3.7 |
2.0 |
3.5 |
|||
Total nominal value |
- |
- |
470 564 |
1 521 809 |
942 060 |
2 934 433 |
|||
Impact of fair value hedge (interest rate risk hedging) on balance sheet and financial result
31.12.2020 |
FVH IRS bonds – IRS hedging debt securities measured at: |
total |
|
amortised cost |
faiR value throught other comprehensive income |
||
Hedging instruments |
|
|
|
Nominal value |
200 000 |
2 359 246 |
2 559 246 |
Carrying amount – assets |
- |
- |
- |
Carrying amount – liabilities |
26 944 |
171 136 |
198 080 |
Hedging instruments |
Hedging instruments |
Hedging instruments |
|
Amount of changes in fair value of the hedging instrument in the reporting period used for estimating hedge inefficiency |
(11 384) |
(34 162) |
(45 546) |
Amount of hedge ineffectiveness recognized in the income statement ‘Result on fair value hedge accounting’. |
(179) |
(668) |
(847) |
Hedged item |
|
|
|
Carrying amount – assets |
225 471 |
2 595 811 |
2 821 282 |
Accumulated amount of the adjustment to the fair value of the hedged item included in the carrying amount of the hedged item recognized in the balance sheet - assets |
25 494 |
187 793 |
213 287 |
Balance sheet item in which hedged item is reported |
Hedging instruments |
Hedging instruments |
Hedging instruments |
Change in the value of hedged item used for estimating hedge inefficiency in the reporting period |
11 205 |
33 496 |
44 701 |
Accumulated amount of the adjustment to the fair value of the hedged item remaining in the balance sheet for those hedged items for which adjustments of the balance sheet item for adjustment to fair value has been discontinued |
- |
- |
- |
Impact of fair value hedge (interest rate risk hedging) on balance sheet and financial result
31.12.2019 |
FVH IRS bonds – IRS hedging debt securities measured at: |
total |
|
amortised cost |
faiR value throught other comprehensive income |
||
Hedging instruments |
|
|
|
Nominal value |
200 000 |
2 734 433 |
2 934 433 |
Carrying amount – assets |
- |
637 |
637 |
Carrying amount – liabilities |
15 469 |
145 897 |
161 366 |
Balance sheet item in which hedging instrument is reported |
Hedging instruments |
Hedging instruments |
Hedging instruments |
Amount of changes in fair value of the hedging instrument in the reporting period used for estimating hedge inefficiency |
(5 871) |
(37 241) |
(43 112) |
Amount of hedge ineffectiveness recognized in the income statement ‘Result on fair value hedge accounting’. |
(282) |
(1 384) |
( 1 666) |
Hedged item |
|
|
|
Carrying amount – assets |
214 291 |
2 973 347 |
3 187 638 |
Accumulated amount of the adjustment to the fair value of the hedged item included in the carrying amount of the hedged item recognized in the balance sheet - assets |
14 288 |
174 946 |
189 234 |
Balance sheet item in which hedged item is reported |
Hedging instruments |
Hedging instruments |
Hedging instruments |
Change in the value of hedged item used for estimating hedge inefficiency in the reporting period |
5 588 |
35 858 |
41 446 |
Accumulated amount of the adjustment to the fair value of the hedged item remaining in the balance sheet for those hedged items for which adjustments of the balance sheet item for adjustment to fair value has been discontinued |
- |
- |
- |
Cash flow hedge accounting
The Bank applies:
cross-currency interest rate swaps (basis swap) to hedge exposure to interest rate risk related to volatility of market reference rates (WIBOR, LIBOR CHF) and exposure to currency risk. Portfolios of variable-rate loans denominated in CHF and deposits in PLN (which economically reflects to long-term variable-rate liability) are hedged items in this hedging relationship. CIRS transactions are decomposed into the part hedging the portfolio of assets and the part hedging the portfolio of liabilities,
interest rate swaps (IRS) to hedge the exposure to interest rate risk related to the volatility of market reference rates (WIBOR), generated by portfolios of variable-rate loans denominated in PLN,
currency swap (FX-Swap) to hedge the exposure to interest rate risk related to the volatility of market reference rates (EURIBOR, LIBOR USD), and the exposure to the currency risk, generated by both, portfolios of variable-rate of loans denominated in EUR and portfolios of term and negotiable deposits in USD,
interest rate swaps (IRS) to hedge the exposure to interest rate risk related to the volatility of market reference rates (WIBOR, EURIBOR), generated by portfolio of deposits denominated in PLN and EUR, which economically reflect a long-term, variable-rate liability.
In perion form 1 January 2019 the Bank established new hedging relationship (FX-Swap), analogous to the existing one in terms of both hedging instruments and underlying position, but covering the currency risk only.
The new relationship is to replace the existing one: while all FX-Swaps designated to hedge accounting after 31 March 2019 have supplied the new hedge, the previous relationship expired in February 2020.
Approach of the Bank to hedging interest rate risk through cash flow hedge accounting is the same as the approach applied in the fair value hedge accounting as described above, i.e. only the component of interest rate risk related exclusively to volatility of market reference rates (in the case of cash flows hedge: WIBOR, EURIBOR, LIBOR USD, LIBOR CHF) is hedged.
Approach of the Bank to market risk management, including interest rate risk and currency risk, is presented in Note 5.3. Details regarding the Bank’s interest rate risk and currency risk exposure are disclosed in Note 5.3.
As in the case of the fair value hedge, using derivative instruments to hedge the exposure to interest rate risk and currency risk generates counterparty credit risk of the derivative transactions, which is not compensated by the hedged item. The Bank manages this risk in a way similar to fair value hedge.
The Bank applies cash flow hedge accounting to a hedging relationship if it is justified to expect that the hedge will be highly effective in achieving offsetting cash flow changes attributable to the hedged risk in the future and if assessment of hedge effectiveness indicates high effectiveness in all financial reporting periods for which the hedge was designated. The assessment is conducted using hypothetical derivative method
According to the approach of the Bank, a hedging relationship is considered effective if all of the following criteria are met:
correlation coefficient between market reference rate of hedged items and market reference rate of hedging instrument is high,
forecasted interest flows generated by hedged items are not lower than forecasted interest flows generated by hedging instruments,
in each reporting period, ratio of the fair value of the hedged item to the fair value of the hedging instrument is within 80% - 125% range or relation of inefficiency amount to nominal value of the hedged item is less or equal to the threshold specified in documentation of the hedging relationship, where inefficiency amount is calculated as the sum of cumulative fair value changes of the hedged item and the hedging instrument,
in each reporting period, ratio of fair value changes of the hedged item to the hedging instrument due to parallel fall or rise in yield curves by 100 basis point is within 80% - 125% range.
In the case of hedging interest rate and currency risk of portfolios of loans and deposits, the manner of managing these portfolios was adopted allowing for regular inclusion of new transactions in the hedging relationship and exclusion of transactions from the hedging relationship as a result of repayment or classification to non-performing category. As a result, the exposure of these portfolios to interest rate and currency risk is constantly changing. Because of frequent changes to term structure of the portfolio, the Bank dynamically assigns the hedged items and allows for matching of hedging instruments to these changes.
As regards cash flow hedge relationships, the main sources of ineffectiveness are:
impact of counterparty and the Bank’s own credit risk on the fair value of the hedging instruments, i.e. interest rate swap (IRS), cross-currency interest rate swap (basis swap), currency swap (FX swap) which is not reflected in the fair value of the hedged item,
differences in repricing frequency of the hedging instruments and and hedged loans and deposits.
Nominal values of hedging derivatives – cash flow hedge
31.12.2020 |
|
CONTRACTUAL MATURITY |
TOTAL |
|||||
UP To |
Between |
between |
Between |
over |
||||
Hedging relationship |
Currency |
|
||||||
CHF IRS loans |
PLN |
Nominal value |
- |
- |
- |
12 337 000 |
3 355 000 |
15 692 000 |
Average fixed interest rate (%) |
- |
- |
- |
1.9 |
0.8 |
1.7 |
||
CFH IRS deposits |
PLN |
Nominal value |
- |
- |
85 000 |
168 000 |
266 000 |
519 000 |
Average fixed interest rate (%) |
- |
- |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.7 |
0.5 |
||
EUR |
Nominal value |
- |
- |
636 289 |
- |
- |
636 289 |
|
Average fixed interest rate (%) |
- |
- |
-0.5 |
- |
- |
-0.5 |
||
CFH CIRS deposits/ loans |
CHF/PLN |
Nominal value |
- |
- |
546 987 |
2 298 255 |
1 861 138 |
4 706 380 |
Average fixed interest rate (%) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
Average fixed interest rate CHF/PLN |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
CFH FX Swap deposits/loans |
EUR/PLN |
Nominal value |
7 054 492 |
5 810 711 |
6 190 792 |
920 010 |
- |
19 976 005 |
Average fixed interest rate EUR/PLN |
4.5 |
4.5 |
4.6 |
4.6 |
- |
4.5 |
||
USD/PLN |
Nominal value |
644 600 |
- |
263 008 |
- |
- |
907 608 |
|
Average fixed interest rate EUSD/PLN |
3.7 |
- |
3.8 |
- |
- |
3.7 |
||
EUR/USD |
Nominal value |
3 126 850 |
1 418 089 |
2 718 445 |
- |
- |
7 263 384 |
|
Average fixed interest rate EUR/USD |
1.2 |
1.2 |
1.2 |
- |
- |
1.2 |
||
Total nominal value |
10 825 942 |
7 228 800 |
10 440 521 |
15 723 265 |
5 482 138 |
49 700 666 |
Nominal values of hedging derivatives – cash flow hedge
31.12.2019 |
|
CONTRACTUAL MATURITY |
TOTAL |
|||||
UP To |
Between |
between |
Between |
over |
||||
Hedging relationship |
Currency |
|
||||||
CHF IRS loans |
PLN |
Nominal value |
600 000 |
- |
1 400 000 |
7 000 000 |
3 200 000 |
12 200 000 |
Average fixed interest rate (%) |
3.9 |
- |
3.6 |
2.3 |
2.0 |
2.4 |
||
CFH IRS deposits |
PLN |
Nominal value |
- |
- |
47 000 |
215 000 |
289 000 |
551 000 |
Average fixed interest rate (%) |
- |
- |
1.8 |
1.8 |
1.9 |
1.8 |
||
EUR |
Nominal value |
- |
- |
28 106 |
624 296 |
- |
652 402 |
|
Average fixed interest rate (%) |
- |
- |
(0.4) |
(0.4) |
- |
(0.4) |
||
CFH CIRS deposits/ loans |
CHF/PLN |
Nominal value |
- |
- |
519 141 |
1 620 811 |
2 875 432 |
5 015 384 |
Average fixed interest rate (%) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
Average fixed interest rate CHF/PLN |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
CFH FX Swap deposits/loans |
EUR/PLN |
Nominal value |
1 581 919 |
2 452 959 |
2 635 470 |
- |
- |
6 670 348 |
Average fixed interest rate EUR/PLN |
4.3 |
4.4 |
4.4 |
- |
- |
4.4 |
||
USD/PLN |
Nominal value |
193 193 |
- |
1 151 106 |
- |
- |
1 344 299 |
|
Average fixed interest rate EUSD/PLN |
3.9 |
- |
3.9 |
- |
- |
3.9 |
||
EUR/USD |
Nominal value |
1 660 461 |
379 194 |
1 387 541 |
- |
- |
3 427 196 |
|
Average fixed interest rate EUR/USD |
1.1 |
1.1 |
1.2 |
- |
- |
1.1 |
||
Total nominal value |
4 035 573 |
2 832 153 |
7 168 364 |
9 460 107 |
6 364 432 |
29 860 629 |
Impact of cash of hedge on balance sheet and financial result
HEDGE IN RELATIONSHIP as at 31.12.2020 |
|
INTEREST RATE RISK |
INTEREST RATE RISK / CURRENCY RISK |
||
|
CFH IRS loans |
CFH IRS deposits |
CFH CIRS deposits/ loans |
CFH FX Swap deposits/loans |
|
Hedging instruments |
|||||
Nominal value |
15 692 000 |
1 155 289 |
4 706 380 |
28 146 997 |
|
Carrying amount – assets |
766 961 |
6 765 |
- |
5 337 |
|
Carrying amount – liabilities |
2 085 |
47 829 |
561 308 |
263 657 |
|
Balance sheet item in which hedging instrument is reported |
Hedging instruments |
Hedging instruments |
Hedging instruments |
Hedging instruments |
|
Change in the fair value of the hedging instrument used for estimating hedge ineffectiveness |
475 586 |
(14 395) |
14 303 |
(1 080) |
|
Gains or losses resulting from hedging, recognized in other comprehensive income |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Amount of hedge ineffectiveness recognized in the income statement in item ‘Result on financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value through profit or loss’ |
7 742 |
- |
- |
4 |
|
Amount transferred from the revaluation reserves due to cash flow hedge accounting to the income statement as a reclassification adjustment |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Income statement item in which reclassification adjustment is reported |
Result on financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value through profit or loss |
Result on financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value through profit or loss |
Result on financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value through profit or loss |
Result on financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value through profit or loss |
|
Hedged item |
|||||
Amount of change in the fair value of a hypothetical derivative representing the hedged item used for estimating the hedge ineffectiveness in the reporting period |
(466 966) |
14 395 |
(16 776) |
1 077 |
|
Revaluation reserve due to cash flow hedge accounting for relationships for which hedge accounting will be continued after the end of the reporting period |
668 822 |
(36 727) |
(39 329) |
713 |
|
Revaluation reserve due to cash flow hedge accounting for relationships for which hedge accounting is no longer applied |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Impact of cash of hedge on balance sheet and financial result
HEDGE IN RELATIONSHIP as at 31.12.2019 |
|
INTEREST RATE RISK |
INTEREST RATE RISK / CURRENCY RISK |
||
|
CFH IRS loans |
CFH IRS deposits |
CFH CIRS deposits/ loans |
CFH FX Swap deposits/loans |
|
Hedging instruments |
|||||
Nominal value |
12 200 000 |
1 203 402 |
5 015 384 |
11 441 843 |
|
Carrying amount – assets |
290 699 |
2 708 |
- |
83 164 |
|
Carrying amount – liabilities |
8 247 |
28 699 |
391 365 |
25 088 |
|
Balance sheet item in which hedging instrument is reported |
Hedging instruments |
Hedging instruments |
Hedging |
Hedging |
|
Change in the fair value of the hedging instrument used for estimating hedge ineffectiveness |
49 328 |
(10 521) |
32 807 |
2 226 |
|
Gains or losses resulting from hedging, recognized in other comprehensive income |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Amount of hedge ineffectiveness recognized in the income statement in item ‘Result on financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value through profit or loss’ |
(1 265) |
- |
(2) |
(6) |
|
Amount transferred from the revaluation reserves due to cash flow hedge accounting to the income statement as a reclassification adjustment |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Income statement item in which reclassification adjustment is reported |
Result on financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value through profit or loss |
Result on financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value through profit or loss |
Result on financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value through profit or loss |
Result on financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value through profit or loss |
|
Hedged item |
|||||
Amount of change in the fair value of a hypothetical derivative representing the hedged item used for estimating the hedge ineffectiveness in the reporting period |
(50 455) |
10 521 |
(48 923) |
(2 248) |
|
Revaluation reserve due to cash flow hedge accounting for relationships for which hedge accounting will be continued after the end of the reporting period |
200 961 |
(22 346) |
(53 646) |
1 794 |
|
Revaluation reserve due to cash flow hedge accounting for relationships for which hedge accounting is no longer applied |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Changes in the revaluation reserve from the valuation of hedging derivatives in cash flow hedge accounting
|
2020 |
2019 |
Opening balance |
126 763 |
51 540 |
INTEREST RATE RISK |
|
|
Gains or losses resulting from hedging, recognized in other comprehensive income during the reporting period |
453 480 |
40 216 |
Part of the loss transferred to the income statement due to the lack of expectation of materialization of the hedged item |
- |
- |
INTEREST RATE RISK/CURRENCY RISK |
|
|
Gains or losses resulting from hedging, recognized in other comprehensive income during the reporting period |
13 236 |
35 007 |
Part of the loss transferred to the income statement due to the lack of expectation of materialization of the hedged item |
|
- |
Closing balance |
593 479 |
126 763 |
|
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
Debt securities measured at amortised cost |
27 559 085 |
14 557 831 |
Debt securities measured at fair value through other comprehensive income |
44 606 162 |
30 964 680 |
Equity instruments designated for measurement at fair value through other comprehensive income |
331 690 |
225 332 |
Equity instruments mandatorily measured at fair value through profit or loss |
160 486 |
125 454 |
Total |
72 657 423 |
45 873 297 |
Debt securities measured at amortised cost
|
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
Debt securities issued by central governments |
19 759 086 |
8 880 617 |
T-bills |
808 649 |
- |
T-bonds |
18 950 437 |
8 880 617 |
Debt securities issued by central banks |
74 678 |
64 262 |
Debt securities issued by banks |
2 229 516 |
- |
Debt securities issued by business entities |
2 334 813 |
2 416 388 |
Debt securities issued by local governments |
3 160 992 |
3 196 564 |
Total |
27 559 085 |
14 557 831 |
including impairment of assets |
(75 492) |
(74 986) |
Debt securities measured at fair value through other comprehensive income
|
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
Debt securities issued by central governments |
21 247 521 |
18 525 465 |
T-bills |
1 737 500 |
- |
T-bonds |
19 260 041 |
18 275 855 |
Other |
249 980 |
249 610 |
Debt securities issued by central banks |
1 000 000 |
3 000 508 |
Debt securities issued by banks |
9 238 452 |
3 768 345 |
Debt securities issued by business entities |
10 491 102 |
2 732 829 |
Debt securities issued by local governments |
2 629 087 |
2 937 533 |
Total |
44 606 162 |
30 964 680 |
including impairment of assets (*) |
(75 342) |
(33 096) |
(*) The impairment allowance for debt securities measured at fair value through other comprehensive income is included in the ‘Revaluation reserve’item and does not reduce the carrying amount.
Equity instruments designated for measurement at fair value through other comprehensive income.
The portfolio of equity instruments designated for measurement at fair value through other comprehensive income includes the investments that the Bank considers as strategic.
|
fair value |
Dividends recognized in 2020 |
Entity X from construction sector |
50 701 |
- |
Entity Y from construction sector |
2 862 |
- |
Entity Z from construction sector |
15 162 |
- |
Entity providing credit information |
239 618 |
24 104 |
Infrastructure entity of Polish banking sector |
18 977 |
1 382 |
Intermediary in transactions among financial entities |
4 370 |
- |
Total |
331 690 |
25 486 |
|
fair value |
Dividends recognized in 2019 |
Entity X from construction sector |
29 371 |
- |
Entity Y from construction sector |
859 |
- |
Entity providing credit information |
176 965 |
20 155 |
Infrastructure entity of Polish banking sector |
14 327 |
1 095 |
Intermediary in transactions among financial entities |
3 810 |
- |
Total |
225 332 |
21 250 |
In 2020 and 2019 the Bank did not sell any investments in equity instruments designated for measurement at fair value through other comprehensive income.
Equity instruments mandatorily measured at fair value through profit or loss
|
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
Shares |
160 486 |
125 454 |
Total |
160 486 |
125 454 |
Investment debt securities according to contractual maturity
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
|
Debt securities, including: |
|
|
up to 1 month |
2 232 610 |
3 719 821 |
between 1 and 3 months |
3 836 873 |
66 038 |
between 3 months and 1 year |
11 205 324 |
3 725 987 |
between 1 and 5 years |
35 157 849 |
25 751 347 |
over 5 years |
19 732 591 |
12 259 318 |
Total |
72 165 247 |
45 522 511 |
Investment debt securities by currency
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
|
PLN |
63 316 781 |
39 458 491 |
EUR |
2 270 092 |
2 831 292 |
USD |
6 578 374 |
3 232 728 |
Total |
72 165 247 |
45 522 511 |
As at 31 December 2020 non-current assets classified as held for sale are identified non-current assets meeting requirements of IFRS 5 ‘Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations’:
real estate,
other property, plant and equipment
investments.
In December 2020, the Bank signed a preliminary agreement to sell 100% of shares in Dom Inwestycyjny Xelion Sp. z o.o. In connection with the planned sale, the Bank presented these shares as held for sale in these financial statements.
.Assets held for sale
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
14 619 |
17 175 |
Investment in associated |
21 119 |
- |
Total assets |
35 738 |
17 175 |
The changes in the balance of assets held for sale
2020 |
2019 |
|
Opening balance |
17 175 |
11 550 |
Increases including: |
21 119 |
50 127 |
transfer from property, plant and equipment |
- |
39 314 |
transfer from investment properties |
- |
10 813 |
Transfer of shares of Dom Inwestycyjny Xelion Sp. z o.o. |
21 119 |
- |
other |
- |
- |
Decreases including: |
(2 556) |
(44 502) |
transfer to property, plant and equipment |
- |
(290) |
- |
(43 560) |
|
other |
(2 556) |
(652) |
Closing balance |
35 738 |
17 175 |
The effect of disposal of other assets
2020 |
2019 |
|
Sales revenues |
- |
53 709 |
Net carrying amount of disposed assets (including sale costs) |
- |
(43 560) |
Profit/loss on sale before income tax |
- |
10 149 |
Condensed information about subsidiaries as at 31 December 2020 (*)
name of entity |
location |
activities |
assets |
liabilities |
revenues |
net profit |
% of shares |
carrying AMOUNT of shares |
Pekao Investment Banking S.A. |
Warsaw |
Brokerage services |
248 901 |
3 369 |
21 653 |
172 |
100.00 |
274 334 |
Pekao Faktoring Sp. z o.o. |
Lublin |
Factoring |
4 773 706 |
4 696 535 |
102 431 |
25 822 |
100.00 |
50 268 |
Pekao Fundusz Kapitałowy Sp. z o.o. |
Warsaw |
Business consulting |
52 967 |
62 |
211 |
53 |
100.00 |
.51 380 |
Pekao Financial Services Sp. z o.o. |
Warsaw |
Transferable agent |
48 632 |
14 855 |
65 030 |
3 452 |
66.50 |
4 500 |
Pekao Leasing Sp. z o.o. |
Warsaw |
Lease services |
8 615 417 |
8 130 972 |
255 981 |
31 498 |
100.00 |
278 798 |
Centrum Kart S.A. |
Warsaw |
Additional financial services |
130 434 |
94 155 |
41 |
4 225 |
100.00 |
17 592 |
Pekao Bank Hipoteczny S.A. |
Warsaw |
Banking services |
2 776 442 |
2 508 605 |
70 371 |
(12 385) |
100.00 |
233 823 |
Pekao Property S.A. (in liquidation) |
Warsaw |
Real estate development services |
25 993 |
237 |
78 |
(338) |
100.00 |
25 756 |
Pekao Direct Sp. z o.o.( ex. Centrum Bankowości Bezpośredniej Sp. z o.o.) |
Cracow |
Call-center services |
28 422 |
12 038 |
26 872 |
2 281 |
100.00 |
547 |
Pekao Investment Management S.A. (**) |
Warsaw |
Holding |
319 740 |
41 788 |
283 303 |
103 823 |
100.00 |
605 794 |
Dom Inwestycyjny Xelion |
Warsaw |
Financial intermediation |
120 015 |
82 647 |
44 731 |
903 |
100.00 |
- |
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 542 792 |
Condensed information about subsidiaries as at 31 December 2019 (*)
name of entity |
location |
activities |
assets |
liabilities |
revenues |
net profit |
% of shares |
carrying AMOUNT of shares |
Pekao Investment Banking S.A. |
Warsaw |
Brokerage services |
259 700 |
25 089 |
23 680 |
(19 044) |
100.00 |
274 334 |
Pekao Faktoring Sp. z o.o. |
Lublin |
Factoring |
3 646 244 |
3 575 650 |
87 288 |
19 245 |
100.00 |
50 268 |
Pekao Fundusz Kapitałowy Sp. z o.o. |
Warsaw |
Business consulting |
52 929 |
77 |
549 |
384 |
100.00 |
51 380 |
Pekao Powszechne Towarzystwo Emerytalne S.A. (in liquidation) |
Warsaw |
Pension funds management |
63 486 |
354 |
728 |
743 |
100.00 |
61 834 |
Pekao Financial Services Sp. z o.o. |
Warsaw |
Transferable agent |
51 274 |
16 235 |
53 796 |
4 687 |
66.50 |
4 500 |
Pekao Leasing Sp. z o.o. |
Warsaw |
Lease services |
7 603 344 |
7 069 708 |
261 067 |
83 529 |
100.00 |
278 798 |
Centrum Kart S.A. |
Warsaw |
Additional financial services |
45 017 |
12 905 |
164 |
589 |
100.00 |
17 592 |
Pekao Bank Hipoteczny S.A. |
Warsaw |
Banking services |
2 546 926 |
2 265 881 |
81 186 |
(37 702) |
100.00 |
233 823 |
Pekao Property S.A. (in liquidation) |
Warsaw |
Real estate development services |
26 249 |
155 |
220 |
(102) |
100.00 |
26 460 |
Pekao Direct Sp. z o.o.( ex. Centrum Bankowości Bezpośredniej Sp. z o.o.) |
Cracow |
Call-center services |
26 455 |
12 045 |
27 261 |
2 219 |
100.00 |
547 |
Pekao Investment Management S.A. (**) |
Warsaw |
Holding |
311 932 |
30 044 |
327 321 |
126 019 |
100.00 |
605 794 |
Dom Inwestycyjny Xelion |
Warsaw |
Financial intermediation |
71 908 |
35 443 |
41 251 |
549 |
100.00 |
21 119 |
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 626 449 |
(*) Data available at the date of financial statements.
(**) Consolidated data together a company of Pekao TFI SA.
Changes in investment into subsidiaries
|
2020 |
2019 |
1 626 449 |
1 682 756 |
|
Increases, including: |
- |
25 |
Transfer of a part assets and liabilities CDM S.A to CBB Sp. z o.o. |
- |
25 |
Decreases, including |
(83 657) |
(56 332) |
przejęcie przez Bank spółki CDM S.A. |
- |
(56 332) |
transfer of shares in Dom Inwestycyjny Xelion Sp. z o.o. to ‘Assets held for sale’ |
(21 119) |
- |
liquidation of Pekao Powszechne Towarzystwo Emerytalne S.A. (in liquidation) |
(61 834) |
- |
changes of impairment allowances |
(704) |
- |
Closing balance |
1 542 792 |
1 626 449 |
The structure of investments in subsidiaries
|
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
Investment in subsidiaries, including: |
|
|
233 823 |
233 823 |
|
other financial institutions |
1 231 833 |
1 314 786 |
non-financial institutions |
77 136 |
77 840 |
Total |
1 542 792 |
1 626 449 |
Information about associates as at 31 December 2020
LOCATION |
ACTIVITIES |
ASSETS |
LIABILITIES |
REVENUES |
NET PROFIT/LOSS |
% OF SHARES |
carrying amount OF SHARES |
||
CPF Management |
Tortola, British Virgin Islands |
Advisory services– currently does not provide its services |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Information about associates as at 31 December 2019 (*)
NAME OF ENTITY |
LOCATION |
ACTIVITIES |
ASSETS |
LIABILITIES |
REVENUES |
NET PROFIT/LOSS |
% OF SHARES |
carrying amount OF SHARES |
|
CPF Management |
Tortola, British Virgin Islands |
Advisory services– currently does not provide its services |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
40.00 |
- |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
In 2020, CPF Management Inc. was removed from the companies register and dissolved.
As at 31 December 2020 and 31 December 2019, the Bank did not have the investment in entities under common control.
|
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
1 086 720 |
687 142 |
|
research and development expenditures |
1 276 |
- |
licenses and patents |
738 613 |
445 205 |
other |
4 121 |
5 240 |
assets under construction |
342 710 |
236 697 |
Goodwill |
52 635 |
52 635 |
Total |
1 139 355 |
739 777 |
goodwill that was transferred to Bank Pekao S.A. on integration with Bank BPH S.A. It represents the goodwill recognized upon acquisition of Pierwszy Komercyjny Bank S.A. in Lublin (‘PKBL’) by Bank BPH S.A. and relates to those branches of the PKBL which were transferred to Bank Pekao S.A. as a result of integration with Bank BPH S.A. It is determined the smallest identifiable cash-generating units (‘CGU’), to which the goodwill has been allocated in the amount of PLN 51 675 thousand,
goodwill recognized upon acquisition of Spółdzielcza Kasa Oszczędnościowo – Kredytowa im. Mikołaja Kopernika by Bank Pekao S.A. It is determined the smallest identifiable cash-generating units (‘CGU’), to which the goodwill has been allocated in the amount of PLN 960 thousand,
In respect to the goodwill, the impairment tests are performed annually, irrespective of whether there is any indication that it may be impaired.
The impairment tests are performed by comparing the carrying amount of the CGU, including the goodwill, with the recoverable amount of the CGU. The recoverable amount is estimated on the basis of value in use of the CGU. The value in use is the present, estimated value of the future cash flows for the period of 5 years, taking into account the residual value of the CGU. The residual value of the CGU is calculated based on an extrapolation of cash flows projections beyond the forecast period using the growth rate presented in the table below. The forecasts of the future cash flows are based on the assumptions included the budget for 2020 and financial plan for 2021-2025. To discount the future cash flows, it is applied the discount rates, which includes the risk-free rate and the risk premium.
The growth rates and discount rates used in the impairment tests for goodwill are as follows.
|
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
||
GROWTH RATE |
DISCOUNT RATE |
GROWTH RATE |
DISCOUNT RATE |
|
PKBL |
2.50% |
7.96% |
2.50% |
8.41% |
|
|
|
|
|
The impairment tests performed as at 31 December 2020 showed the surplus of the recoverable amount over the carrying amount of the CGU, and therefore no CGU impairments were recognized.
Sensitivity analysis
Estimating the recoverable amount is a complex process and requires the use of subjective assumptions. Relatively small changes in key assumptions may have a significant effect on the measurement of the recoverable amount.
The table below presents the surplus of recoverable amounts over the carrying amounts under the current assumptions and the maximum discount rates at which the carrying amounts and recoverable amounts of each CGU are equalized.
|
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
||
SURPLUS |
MARGINAL VALUE OF THE DISCOUNT RATE |
SURPLUS |
MARGINAL VALUE OF THE DISCOUNT RATE |
|
PKBL |
35 369 |
8.88% |
123 073 |
13.76% |
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in ‘Intangibles assets’ in the course of the reporting period
Research and development costs |
Licenses and patents |
other |
assets under construction |
goodwill |
total |
|
Gross value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance |
72 455 |
2 743 555 |
36 284 |
236 697 |
52 635 |
3 141 626 |
Increases including: |
1 276 |
504 489 |
1 080 |
554 396 |
- |
1 061 241 |
acquisitions |
- |
- |
- |
553 965 |
- |
553 965 |
transfer from investments outlays |
- |
447 352 |
1 031 |
- |
- |
448 383 |
the work carried out on their own |
- |
41 282 |
- |
- |
- |
41 282 |
other |
1 276 |
15 855 |
49 |
431 |
- |
17 611 |
Decreases, including: |
- |
(17 684) |
(482) |
(448 383) |
- |
(466 549) |
liquidation |
- |
(17 684) |
(482) |
- |
- |
(18 166) |
sale |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
transfer from investments outlays |
- |
- |
- |
(448 383) |
- |
(448 383) |
other |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Closing balance |
73 731 |
3 230 360 |
36 882 |
342 710 |
52 635 |
3 736 318 |
ACCUMULATED Amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance |
72 455 |
2 298 350 |
31 044 |
- |
- |
2 401 849 |
Amortization |
- |
207 458 |
2 199 |
- |
- |
209 657 |
Liquidation |
- |
(17 684) |
(482) |
- |
- |
(18 166) |
Sale |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Other |
- |
3 623 |
- |
- |
- |
3 623 |
Closing balance |
72 455 |
2 491 747 |
32 761 |
- |
- |
2 596 963 |
impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Closing balance |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
net value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance |
- |
445 205 |
5 240 |
236 697 |
52 635 |
739 777 |
Closing balance |
1 276 |
738 613 |
4 121 |
342 710 |
52 635 |
1 139 355 |
Changes in ‘Intangibles assets’ in the course of the reporting period
2019 |
Research and development costs |
Licenses and patents |
other |
assets under construction |
goodwill |
total |
Gross value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance |
72 455 |
2 543 875 |
34 556 |
146 326 |
52 635 |
2 849 847 |
Increases including: |
- |
214 173 |
1 803 |
282 260 |
- |
498 236 |
acquisitions |
- |
- |
- |
253 681 |
- |
253 681 |
transfer from investments outlays |
- |
- |
919 |
478 |
- |
1 397 |
the work carried out on their own |
- |
23 925 |
20 |
- |
- |
23 945 |
other |
- |
188 100 |
864 |
- |
- |
188 964 |
Decreases, including: |
- |
2 148 |
- |
28 101 |
- |
30 249 |
liquidation |
- |
(14 493) |
(75) |
(191 889) |
- |
(206 457) |
sale |
- |
(13 574) |
(75) |
- |
- |
(13 649) |
transfer from investments outlays |
- |
(919) |
- |
(2 925) |
- |
(3 844) |
other |
- |
- |
- |
(188 964) |
- |
(188 964) |
Closing balance |
72 455 |
2 743 555 |
36 284 |
236 697 |
52 635 |
3 141 626 |
ACCUMULATED Amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance |
72 452 |
2 115 108 |
29 122 |
- |
- |
2 216 682 |
Amortization |
3 |
181 144 |
1 977 |
- |
- |
183 124 |
Liquidation |
- |
(13 574) |
(75) |
- |
- |
(13 649) |
Sale |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Business combination |
- |
15 672 |
20 |
- |
- |
15 692 |
Closing balance |
72 455 |
2 298 350 |
31 044 |
- |
- |
2 401 849 |
impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Closing balance |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
net value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance |
3 |
428 767 |
5 434 |
146 326 |
52 635 |
633 165 |
Closing balance |
- |
445 205 |
5 240 |
236 697 |
52 635 |
739 777 |
In the period from 1 January to 31 December 2020 the Bank acquired intangible assets in the amount of PLN 552 904 thousand (in 2019 – PLN 253 681 thousand).
In the period from 1 January to 31 December 2020 and in 2019 there have been no intangible assets whose title is restricted and pledged as security for liabilities.
Contractual commitments
As at 31 December 2020 the contractual commitments for the acquisition of intangible assets amounted to PLN 115 409 thousand, whereas as at 31 December 2019 – PLN 174 945thousand.
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
|
1 707 692 |
1 667 277 |
|
land and buildings |
1 221 945 |
1 282 742 |
machinery and equipment |
360 786 |
267 508 |
transport vehicles |
17 322 |
26 130 |
other |
107 639 |
90 897 |
Non-current assets under construction and prepayments |
126 943 |
175 101 |
Total |
1 834 635 |
1 842 378 |
Changes in ‘Property, plant and equipment’ in the course of the reporting period
lands and buildings |
machinery and equipment |
means of transportation |
other |
Non-current assets under construction and prepayments |
total |
|
Gross value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance |
2 763 579 |
1 385 011 |
80 499 |
458 233 |
175 101 |
4 862 423 |
Increases, including: |
96 979 |
202 108 |
24 831 |
38 112 |
230 956 |
592 986 |
acquisitions |
2 813 |
- |
- |
- |
230 956 |
233 769 |
other |
36 901 |
20 000 |
23 202 |
- |
- |
80 103 |
business combination |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
transfer from non-current assets under |
57 265 |
182 108 |
1 629 |
38 112 |
- |
279 114 |
Decreases, including: |
(15 425) |
(127 852) |
(22 241) |
(14 003) |
(279 114) |
(458 635) |
liquidation and sale |
(13 335) |
(102 796) |
(465) |
(10 329) |
- |
(126 925) |
transfer to non-current assets held for sale |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
other |
(2 090) |
(25 056) |
(21 776) |
(3 674) |
- |
(52 596) |
transfer from non-current assets under |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(279 114) |
(279 114) |
Closing balance |
2 845 133 |
1 459 267 |
83 089 |
482 342 |
126 943 |
4 996 774 |
Accumulated Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance |
1 474 974 |
1 114 982 |
54 369 |
367 251 |
- |
3 011 576 |
Increases, including: |
149 822 |
107 782 |
33 501 |
21 021 |
- |
312 126 |
depreciation |
149 822 |
107 782 |
11 549 |
17 223 |
- |
286 376 |
other |
- |
- |
21 952 |
3 798 |
- |
25 750 |
business combination |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Decreases, including: |
(8 023) |
(126 015) |
(22 103) |
(13 654) |
- |
(169 795) |
liquidation and sale |
(8 023) |
(99 784) |
(323) |
(10 034) |
- |
(118 164) |
transfer to non-current assets held for sale |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
other |
- |
(26 231) |
(21 780) |
(3 620) |
- |
(51 631) |
Closing balance |
1 616 773 |
1 096 749 |
65 767 |
374 618 |
- |
3 153 907 |
impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance |
5 863 |
2 521 |
- |
85 |
- |
8 469 |
Increases |
1 164 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 164 |
Decreases |
(612) |
(789) |
- |
- |
- |
(1 401) |
Closing balance |
6 415 |
1 732 |
- |
85 |
- |
8 232 |
net value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance |
1 282 742 |
267 508 |
26 130 |
90 897 |
175 101 |
1 842 378 |
Closing balance |
1 221 945 |
360 786 |
17 322 |
107 639 |
126 943 |
1 834 635 |
Changes in ‘Property, plant and equipment’ in the course of the reporting period
2019 |
lands and buildings |
machinery and equipment |
means of transportation |
other |
Non-current assets under construction and prepayments |
total |
Gross value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance |
2 261 495 |
1 276 648 |
74 073 |
455 340 |
141 667 |
4 209 223 |
Impact of IFRS 16 Application |
496 852 |
75 415 |
- |
- |
- |
572 267 |
Opening balance with impact of IFRS 16 |
2 758 347 |
1 352 063 |
74 073 |
455 340 |
141 667 |
4 781 490 |
Increases, including: |
115 598 |
117 420 |
7 906 |
41 765 |
205 044 |
487 733 |
acquisitions |
- |
- |
- |
- |
204 823 |
204 823 |
other |
13 992 |
3 451 |
7 165 |
71 |
- |
24 679 |
business combination |
63 077 |
17 252 |
741 |
5 335 |
221 |
86 626 |
transfer from non-current assets under |
38 529 |
96 717 |
- |
36 359 |
- |
171 605 |
Decreases, including: |
(110 366) |
(84 472) |
(1 480) |
(38 872) |
(171 610) |
(406 800) |
liquidation and sale |
(44 015) |
(65 465) |
(1 480) |
(38 774) |
- |
(149 734) |
transfer to non-current assets held for sale |
(66 351) |
(18 940) |
- |
(98) |
- |
(85 389) |
other |
- |
(67) |
- |
- |
(5) |
(72) |
transfer from non-current assets under |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(171 605) |
(171 605) |
Closing balance |
2 763 579 |
1 385 011 |
80 499 |
458 233 |
175 101 |
4 862 423 |
Accumulated Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance |
1 332 755 |
1 060 834 |
40 489 |
383 930 |
- |
2 818 008 |
Increases, including: |
205 846 |
136 774 |
15 052 |
19 981 |
- |
377 653 |
depreciation |
157 946 |
87 471 |
14 708 |
14 756 |
- |
274 881 |
other |
47 |
35 887 |
- |
66 |
- |
36 000 |
business combination |
47 853 |
13 416 |
344 |
5 159 |
- |
66 772 |
Decreases, including: |
(63 627) |
(82 626) |
(1 172) |
(36 660) |
- |
(184 085) |
liquidation and sale |
(34 994) |
(64 862) |
(1 172) |
(36 567) |
- |
(137 595) |
transfer to non-current assets held for sale |
(28 518) |
(17 464) |
- |
(93) |
- |
(46 075) |
other |
(115) |
(300) |
- |
- |
- |
(415) |
Closing balance |
1 474 974 |
1 114 982 |
54 369 |
367 251 |
- |
3 011 576 |
impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance |
4 328 |
2 598 |
- |
86 |
- |
7 012 |
Increases |
2 662 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2 662 |
Decreases |
(1 127) |
(77) |
- |
(1) |
- |
(1 205) |
Closing balance |
5 863 |
2 521 |
- |
85 |
- |
8 469 |
net value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance |
924 412 |
213 216 |
33 584 |
71 324 |
141 667 |
1 384 203 |
Closing balance |
1 282 742 |
267 508 |
26 130 |
90 897 |
175 101 |
1 842 378 |
In the period from 1 January to 31 December 2020 the Bank acquired property, plant and equipment in the amount of PLN 233 769 thousand (in 2019 - PLN 204 823 thousand), while the value of property, plant and equipment sold amounted to PLN 925 thousand (in 2019 - PLN 8 542 thousand).
The amount of compensations received from third parties for impairment of loss of property, plant and equipment items recognized in the income statement for 2020 stood at PLN 1 813 thousand (in 2019 - PLN 2 671 thousand).
In the period from 1 January to 31 December 2020 and in 2019 there have been no property, plant and equipment whose title is restricted and pledged as security for liabilities.
Contractual commitments
As at 31 December 2020 the contractual commitments for the acquisition of property, plant and equipment amounted to PLN 45 043 thousand (as at 31 December 2019 – PLN 39 481 thousand).
The Bank values investment property using the historical cost model.
The rights to sell the investment property and the rights to transfer related revenues and profits are not a subject to limitations.
Changes in ‘Investment property’ in the course of the reporting period
2020 |
2019 |
|
|
|
|
Opening balance |
- |
18 818 |
Increases, including: |
- |
- |
acquisitions |
- |
- |
other |
- |
- |
Decreases, including: |
- |
(18 818) |
sale of real estate |
- |
- |
transfer to non-current assets held for sale |
- |
(18 615) |
transfer to property plant and equipment |
- |
(203) |
other |
- |
- |
Closing balance |
- |
- |
accumulated depreciation |
|
|
Opening balance |
- |
7 631 |
Increases, including: |
- |
219 |
depreciation for the period |
- |
219 |
transfer from property plant and equipment |
- |
- |
other |
- |
(7 850) |
Decreases, including: |
- |
- |
sale of real estate |
- |
(7 802) |
transfer to non-current assets held for sale |
- |
(48) |
transfer to property plant and equipment |
- |
- |
other |
- |
- |
Closing balance |
- |
- |
IMPAIRMENT |
|
|
Opening balance |
- |
- |
Increases, including: |
- |
- |
impairment charges |
- |
(19) |
Decreases, including: |
- |
- |
sale of real estate |
- |
- |
transfer to non-current assets held for sale |
- |
- |
transfer to property plant and equipment |
- |
- |
other |
- |
(19) |
Closing balance |
- |
- |
net value |
|
|
Opening balance |
- |
11 168 |
Closing balance |
- |
- |
The following amounts of revenues and costs associated with investment properties have been recognized in the income statement
|
2020 |
2019 |
Rental revenues from investment properties |
2 041 |
2 216 |
Direct operating expenses associated with investment properties (including repair and maintenance costs) which generated rental revenues during the reporting period |
(528) |
(541) |
Direct operating expenses associated with investment properties (including repair and maintenance costs) which did not generate rental revenues during the reporting period |
- |
- |
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
|
38 995 |
31 589 |
|
Accrued income |
216 471 |
173 110 |
Interbank and interbranch settlements |
4 002 |
16 465 |
Other debtors |
114 965 |
85 834 |
Card settlements |
520 893 |
666 060 |
Total |
895 326 |
973 058 |
Prepaid expenses represent expenditures, which will be amortized against income statement in the forthcoming reporting periods.
type of transaction |
Security |
carrying value of assets pledged as security for liabilities |
nominaL value of assets pledged as security for liabilities |
value of liabilities subject to Security |
Repo transactions |
bonds |
742 928 |
699 155 |
742 491 |
Coverage of Fund for protection |
bonds |
704 821 |
660 000 |
- |
Coverage of payment commitments to the guarantee fund for the Bank Guarantee Fund |
bonds |
145 331 |
140 000 |
130 265 |
Coverage of payment commitments to the resolution fund for the Bank Guarantee Fund |
bonds |
304 186 |
290 000 |
265 370 |
Lombard and technical loan |
bonds |
5 852 305 |
5 628 888 |
- |
Other loans |
bonds |
361 456 |
349 400 |
302 880 |
Coverage of the Guarantee Fund for the Settlement of Stock Exchange Transactions to Central Securities Depository (KDPW) |
cash deposits |
43 034 |
43 034 |
- |
Derivatives |
bonds |
34 389 |
33 128 |
11 252 |
Uncommitted Collateralized Intraday Technical Overdraft Facility Agreement |
bonds |
42 345 |
32 304 |
- |
type of transaction |
Security |
carrying value of assets pledged as security for liabilities |
nominaL value of assets pledged as security for liabilities |
value of liabilities subject to Security |
Repo transactions |
bonds |
597 540 |
584 833 |
598 241 |
Coverage of Fund for protection |
bonds |
652 929 |
615 000 |
- |
Coverage of payment commitments to the guarantee fund for the Bank Guarantee Fund |
bonds |
82 529 |
81 000 |
79 123 |
Coverage of payment commitments to the resolution fund for the Bank Guarantee Fund |
bonds |
237 583 |
230 000 |
206 998 |
Lombard and technical loan |
bonds |
5 758 095 |
5 548 332 |
- |
Other loans |
bonds |
373 537 |
360 100 |
314 430 |
Coverage of the Guarantee Fund for the Settlement of Stock Exchange Transactions to Central Securities Depository (KDPW) |
cash deposits |
30 378 |
30 378 |
- |
Derivatives |
bonds |
54 461 |
53 452 |
32 631 |
The freeze on securities is a consequence of:
in case of Repo and Sell-buy-back transactions – binding money market standards for such transactions,
in case of freeze to the benefit of BFG – binding provisions of the Law on Banking Guaranty Fund BFG,
in case of lombard and technical loans – policy and standards, applied by the National Bank of Poland NBP,
in case of other loans, deposits and derivatives – terms and conditions of the agreement, entered between BankPekao S.A. and its clients,
in case of freeze to the benefit of KDPW – with the status of the clearing member for brokerage transactions.
Amounts due to other banks by product type
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
|
1 239 659 |
725 260 |
|
Interbank deposits and other liabilities |
2 070 855 |
691 719 |
Loans and advances received |
1 292 792 |
1 381 474 |
Repo transactions |
589 928 |
218 449 |
Cash in transit |
32 175 |
26 466 |
Lease liabilities |
135 |
601 |
Total |
5 225 544 |
3 043 969 |
Amounts due to other banks are measured at amortised cost.
Amounts due to other banks by currency
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
|
4 119 485 |
1 541 687 |
|
CHF |
153 146 |
192 684 |
EUR |
927 109 |
1 258 007 |
USD |
18 085 |
20 908 |
Other currencies |
7 719 |
30 683 |
Total |
5 225 544 |
3 043 969 |
Amounts due to customers by entity and product type
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
|
59 918 474 |
54 719 433 |
|
current accounts |
56 639 155 |
42 366 012 |
term deposits and other liabilities |
3 279 319 |
12 353 421 |
Amounts due to budget entities, including: |
12 281 660 |
10 915 849 |
current accounts |
12 109 189 |
10 526 619 |
term deposits and other liabilities |
172 471 |
389 230 |
Amounts due to individuals, including: |
105 776 434 |
91 874 677 |
current accounts |
88 796 952 |
56 987 681 |
term deposits and other liabilities |
16 979 482 |
34 886 996 |
Repo transactions |
152 563 |
379 792 |
Cash in transit |
299 842 |
240 407 |
Lease liabilities |
398 310 |
414 512 |
Total |
178 827 283 |
158 544 670 |
Amounts due to customers are measured at amortised cost.
Amounts due to customers by currency
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
|
150 281 053 |
131 101 655 |
|
CHF |
496 394 |
420 985 |
EUR |
17 299 290 |
17 349 999 |
USD |
9 319 532 |
8 265 919 |
Other currencies |
1 431 014 |
1 406 112 |
Total |
178 827 283 |
158 544 670 |
Debt securities issued by type
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
|
523 305 |
1 604 344 |
|
Total |
523 305 |
1 604 344 |
Amounts debt securities issued are measured at amortised cost.
The Bank redeems its own debt securities issued on a timely basis.
Debt securities issued by currency
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
|
516 596 |
1 579 558 |
|
USD |
6 709 |
24 786 |
Total |
523 305 |
1 604 344 |
On 30 October 2017, the Bank issued 10 years subordinated bonds with a total nominal value of PLN 1.25 billion. The funds from the issue were designated – after receiving the approval of the Polish Financial Supervision Authority on 21 December 2017 – to increase the Bank's supplementary capital, pursuant to art. 127 para. 2 point 2 of the Banking Law and art. 63 of Regulation No. 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms. The bonds were introduced to trading on the ASO Catalyst market.
On 15 October 2018, the Bank issued 10 years subordinated bonds with a total nominal value of PLN 0.55 billion. The funds from the issue were designated – after receiving the approval of the Polish Financial Supervision Authority on 16 November 2018 – to increase the Bank's supplementary capital, pursuant to art. 127 para. 2 point 2 of the Banking Law and art. 63 of Regulation No. 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms. The bonds were introduced to trading on the ASO Catalyst market.
On 15 October 2018, the Bank issued 15 years subordinated bonds with a total nominal value of PLN 0.20 billion. The funds from the issue were designated – after receiving the approval of the Polish Financial Supervision Authority on 18 October 2018 – to increase the Bank's supplementary capital, pursuant to art. 127 para. 2 point 2 of the Banking Law and art. 63 of Regulation No. 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms. The bonds were introduced to trading on the ASO Catalyst market.
On 4 June 2019, the Bank issued 12 years subordinated bonds with a total nominal value of PLN 0.35 billion. The funds from the issue were designated – after receiving the approval of the Polish Financial Supervision Authority on 8 July 2019 – to increase the Bank's supplementary capital, pursuant to art. 127 para. 2 point 2 of the Banking Law and art. 63 of Regulation No. 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms. The bonds were introduced to trading on the ASO Catalyst market.
On 4 December 2019, the Bank issued 12 years subordinated bonds with a total nominal value of PLN 0.40 billion. The funds from the issue were designated – after receiving the approval of the Polish Financial Supervision Authority on 10 December 2019 – to increase the Bank's supplementary capital, pursuant to art. 127 para. 2 point 2 of the Banking Law and art. 63 of Regulation No. 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms. The bonds were introduced to trading on the ASO Catalyst market.
Subordinated liabilities by type
TYPE Of transaction |
NOMINAL AMOUNT |
CURRENCY |
INTEREST RATE |
ISSUE DATE |
MATURITY DATE |
SPECIAL TERMS |
BALANCE SHEET VALUE AS AT 31.12.2020 |
Subordinated bonds |
1 250 000 |
PLN |
variable, |
30.10.2017 |
29.10.2027 |
Call option giving the Bank the right of early redemption within 5 years from the issue date, subject to the approval of the PFSA |
1 253 762 |
Subordinated bonds |
550 000 |
PLN |
variable, |
15.10.2018 |
16.10.2028 |
Call option giving the Bank the right of early redemption within 5 years from the issue date, subject to the approval of the PFSA |
552 116 |
Subordinated bonds |
200 000 |
PLN |
variable, |
15.10.2018 |
14.10.2033 |
Call option giving the Bank the right of early redemption within 10 years from the issue date, subject to the approval of the PFSA |
200 876 |
Subordinated bonds |
350 000 |
PLN |
variable, |
04.06.2019 |
04.06.2031 |
Call option giving the Bank the right of early redemption within 12 years from the issue date, subject to the approval of the PFSA |
350 524 |
Subordinated bonds |
400 000 |
PLN |
variable, |
04.12.2019 |
04.06.2031 |
Call option giving the Bank the right of early redemption within 12 years from the issue date, subject to the approval of the PFSA |
400 598 |
TOTAL |
2 750 000 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 757 876 |
TYPE Of transaction |
NOMINAL AMOUNT |
CURRENCY |
INTEREST RATE |
ISSUE DATE |
MATURITY DATE |
SPECIAL TERMS |
BALANCE SHEET VALUE AS AT 31.12.2019 |
Subordinated bonds |
1 250 000 |
PLN |
variable, |
30.10.2017 |
29.10.2027 |
Call option giving the Bank the right of early redemption within 5 years from the issue date, subject to the approval of the PFSA |
1 257 025 |
Subordinated bonds |
550 000 |
PLN |
variable, |
15.10.2018 |
16.10.2028 |
Call option giving the Bank the right of early redemption within 5 years from the issue date, subject to the approval of the PFSA |
553 926 |
Subordinated bonds |
200 000 |
PLN |
variable, |
15.10.2018 |
14.10.2033 |
Call option giving the Bank the right of early redemption within 10 years from the issue date, subject to the approval of the PFSA |
201 534 |
Subordinated bonds |
350 000 |
PLN |
variable, |
04.06.2019 |
04.06.2031 |
Call option giving the Bank the right of early redemption within 12 years from the issue date, subject to the approval of the PFSA |
350 937 |
Subordinated bonds |
400 000 |
PLN |
variable, |
04.12.2019 |
04.06.2031 |
Call option giving the Bank the right of early redemption within 12 years from the issue date, subject to the approval of the PFSA |
401 071 |
TOTAL |
2 750 000 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 764 493 |
Changes in provisions in the reporting period
provisions for litigation and claims (*) |
Restructuring provision |
Provisons for defined benefit Plans |
provisions for undrawn credit facilities and guarantees issued |
Other |
total |
|
Opening balance |
99 335 |
18 954 |
285 987 |
324 288 |
44 493 |
773 057 |
Provision charges/revaluation |
99 130 |
144 430 |
22 969 |
299 645 |
13 173 |
579 347 |
Provision utilization |
(17 744) |
(82 306) |
(29 584) |
- |
(10 965) |
(140 599) |
Provision releases |
(9 039) |
- |
- |
(159 965) |
- |
(169 004) |
Foreign currency exchange differences |
(164) |
- |
- |
4 263 |
- |
4 099 |
Other changes |
(4 718) |
- |
10 599 |
- |
- |
5 881 |
Closing balance |
166 800 |
81 078 |
289 971 |
468 231 |
46 701 |
1 052 781 |
Short term |
32 644 |
81 078 |
24 302 |
65 578 |
- |
203 602 |
134 156 |
- |
265 669 |
402 653 |
46 701 |
849 179 |
(*) Including the provision for legal risk regarding foreign currency mortgage loans in CHF in the amount of PLN 80 325 thousand and a provision for early repayments of consumer loans in the amount of PLN 19 661 thousand as at 31 December 2019.
2019 |
provisions for litigation and claims (*) |
Restructuring provision |
Provisons for defined benefit Plans |
provisions for undrawn credit facilities and guarantees issued |
Other |
total |
Opening balance |
53 988 |
- |
284 634 |
271 609 |
44 729 |
654 960 |
Provision charges/revaluation |
72 346 |
85 000 |
23 063 |
223 079 |
13 190 |
416 678 |
Provision utilization |
(22 433) |
(66 046) |
(25 310) |
- |
(14 204) |
(127 993) |
Provision releases |
(4 752) |
- |
- |
(170 363) |
- |
(175 115) |
Foreign currency exchange differences |
- |
- |
- |
(37) |
- |
(37) |
Other changes |
186 |
- |
3 600 |
- |
778 |
4 564 |
Closing balance |
99 335 |
18 954 |
285 987 |
324 288 |
44 493 |
773 057 |
Short term |
28 970 |
18 954 |
142 |
44 509 |
- |
92 575 |
Long term |
70 365 |
- |
285 845 |
279 779 |
44 493 |
680 482 |
(*) Including the provision for legal risk regarding foreign currency mortgage loans in CHF in the amount of PLN 18 990 thousand and a provision for earlyrepayments of consumer loans in the amount of PLN 26 279 thousand as at 31 December 2019.
Provisions for litigation and claims
Provisions for litigation and claims include court, administrative and other legal proceedings. Provisions for litigation and claims were estimated in the amount of expected outflow of resources embodying economic benefits.
Provisions for litigation and claims also include the part of total provision created for legal risk related to foreign currency mortgage loans in CHF, in part relating to exposures already repaid (fully or partially). Details about the above provisions are presented in Note 4.6 and 5.2 of these separate financial statements.
An issue related to the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union regarding consumer credit agreements
On 11 September 2019, the Court of Justice of the European Union (hereinafter the ,CJEU,) issued a judgment in Case
C-383/18 concerning preliminary questions regarding the consumer's right to reduce the total cost of loan in the event of early repayment of consumer loan.
The Bank analyzed the legal risk resulting from the above judgment and in accordance with IAS 37 ‘Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets,’ assessed the probability of cash outflow as a refund of commission in connection with early repayment of loans made by borrowers before the abovementioned judgment of the CJEU.
For the purpose of estimating the aforementioned provision, the Bank performed an analysis of data on early repayment of loans and complaints. As a result of the above, the Bank has determined a matrix of probability of repayment depending on the amount of commission to be repaid and the period when the earlier repayment was made.
As at 31 December 2020 the provision regarding early repayment of consumer loans made before the judgment of the CJEU (i.e. before 11 September 2019) amounts to PLN 19.7 ( as at 31 December 2019f PLN 26.3 million).
The estimates required the Bank to adopt expert assumptions and are associated with uncertainty. The Bank monitors the validity of all assumptions adopted in the process of creating the above provision on an ongoing basis.
In relation to the above, the Bank conducted a sensitivity analysis in relation to significant provisioning parameters, where a change in the level of these parameters would have the following impact on the amount of the provision:
PARAMETER |
SCENARIO |
IMPACT ON THE LEVEL OF PROVISION |
Change in the number of complaints |
+10% |
+2.0 |
-10% |
-2.0 |
|
Change in average refund amount |
+10% |
+2.0 |
-10% |
-2.0 |
In the case of early repayment of loans made by borrowers after the judgment of the CJEU (i.e. after 11 September 2019), the Bank automatically reduces the borrower's total cost of loan and returns the funds to the customer.
In addition, with respect to balance sheet exposures as at 31 December 2020, the Bank estimated possible future prepayments of these exposures. In accordance with the above, the Bank recognized the amount of PLN 10 million in ‘Other liabilities’ (as at 31 December 2019 - PLN 9.5 million).
Restructuring provision
The Management Board of Bank Pekao S.A. informed that on 20 February 2020, in accordance with the Act of 13 March 2003 on special rules of terminating employment contracts for reasons not attributable to the employees (Journal of Laws, 2018, item 1969), adopted a resolution on the intended collective redundancies and the start of the consultation procedure for collective redundancies.
The intention of the Bank’s Management Board is to terminate employment contracts with up to 1 200 employees and amend terms and conditions of employment with up to 1 350 employees in the period from 13 March 2020 to 31 October 2020, whereby the Bank may take a unilateral decision to extend the process by no more than 5 months.
The Bank estimated all the costs of termination of employment contracts and amendment of terms and conditions
of employment the Bank’s employees related to the collective redundancies, as well as of restructuring of branches network for the amount of PLN 144.4 million and the restructuring provision in this amount was created in the Bank's accounting books.
Saldo rezerwy restrukturyzacyjnej na dzień 31 grudnia 2020 roku dotyczy wypłat realizowanych w roku 2021.
Provisions for defined benefits plans
Provisions for defined benefits plans consist of provisions for retirement benefits and death-in-service benefits.The present value of such obligations is measured by an independent actuary using the projected unit credit method.
Other provisions include in particular provisions for other employee benefits.
|
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
Deferred income |
184 317 |
155 357 |
Provisions for holiday leave |
58 515 |
56 413 |
Provisions for other employee-related liabilities |
166 424 |
210 108 |
Provisions for administrative costs |
134 086 |
129 652 |
Other costs to be paid (*) |
68 321 |
74 185 |
Other creditors |
931 298 |
648 542 |
Interbank and interbranch settlements |
708 338 |
744 616 |
Card settlements |
334 209 |
360 998 |
Total |
2 585 508 |
2 379 871 |
Based on internal regulations in respect to remuneration, the employees of the Bank or their families are entitled to defined benefits other than remuneration:
a) retirement benefits,
b) death-in-service benefits.
The present value of such obligations is measured by an independent actuary using the projected unit credit method.
The amount of the retirement benefits and death-in-service benefits is dependent on length of service and amount of remuneration. The expected amount of the benefits is discounted actuarially, taking into account the financial discount rate and the probability of an individual get to the retirement age or die while working respectively. The financial discount rate is determined by reference to market yields at the end of reporting period on government bonds. The probability of an individual get to the retirement age or die while working is determined using the multiple decrement model, taking into consideration the following risks: possibility of dismissal from service, risk of total disability to work and risk of death.
These defined benefit plans expose the Bank to actuarial risk, such as:
interest rate risk – the decrease in market yields on government bonds would increase the defined benefit plans obligations,
remuneration risk – the increase in remuneration of the Bank’s employees would increase the defined benefit plans obligations,
longevity risk – the increase in life expectancy of the Bank’s employees would increase the defined benefit plans obligations.
The principal actuarial assumptions as at 31 December 2020 are as follows:
the discount rate at the level of 1.2% (2.0 % as at 31 December 2019),
the future salary growth rate at the level of 2.5% (2.75 % as at 31 December 2019),
the probable number of leaving employees calculated on the basis of historical data concerning personnel rotation in the Bank,
the mortality adopted in accordance with Life Expectancy Tables for men and women, published the Central Statistical Office, adequately adjusted on the basis of historical data of the Bank.
Reconciliation of the present value of defined benefit plans obligations
The following table presents a reconciliation from the opening balances to closing balances for the present value of defined benefit plans obligations.
2020 |
2019 |
|
Opening balance |
285 987 |
284 634 |
Current service cost |
17 237 |
15 586 |
Interest expense |
5 732 |
7 477 |
Remeasurements of the defined benefit obligations: |
10 371 |
2 848 |
actuarial gains and losses arising from changes in demographic assumptions |
(2 685) |
25 009 |
actuarial gains and losses arising from changes in financial assumptions |
6 693 |
26 347 |
actuarial gains and losses arising from experience adjustments |
6 363 |
(48 508) |
Contributions paid by the employer |
(29 584) |
(25 310) |
Business combination |
228 |
752 |
Closing balance |
289 971 |
285 987 |
Sensitivity analysis
The following table presents how the impact on the defined benefits obligations would have increased (decreased) as a result of a change in the respective actuarial assumptions by one percent.
31.12.2020 |
DEFINED BENEFIT PLANS OBLIGATIONS |
|
1 PERCENT INCREASE |
1 PERCENT DECREASE |
|
Discount rate |
(25 539) |
29 601 |
Future salary growth rate |
28 914 |
(25 487) |
31.12.2019 |
DEFINED BENEFIT PLANS OBLIGATIONS |
|
1 PERCENT INCREASE |
1 PERCENT DECREASE |
|
Discount rate |
(24 367) |
28 198 |
Future salary growth rate |
27 622 |
(24 373) |
Maturity of defined benefit plans obligations
The following table presents the maturity profile of the defined benefit plans obligations
|
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
The weighted average duration of the defined benefit plans obligations (in years) |
9.57 |
9.3 |
System of Variable Remuneration for the Management Team
The system of variable remuneration is addressed to Employees defined in the Bank as persons in managerial positions, who have a significant impact on the risk profile of the Bank and who are key employees for the fulfillment of the Bank’s strategy, risk management and long-term increase of the Bank’s income.
The aim of the system is to support the execution of the Bank’s operational strategy, its risk management and to limit conflict of interests.
Under the system the participant who is a member of the Management Board may receive an individual bonus, while a participant who is not a member of the Management Board may receive a bonus based on the bonus pool approach ensuring comprehensive performance measurement at an individual level, organizational unit and results of the entire Bank as well as risk assessment’ verification of the Participant’s compliant behaviour with respect to law provisions and standards adopted by the Bank.
The compensation consists of cash payment and cash-settled share based payment realized in the form of phantom shares as cash equivalent amounting to the value of granted phantom shares.
During the reporting period ending on 31 December 2020 the Bank had the following share-based payments transactions
|
SYSTEM 2016 (*) |
SYSTEM 2017 (*) |
SYSTEM 2018 (*) |
SYSTEM 2019 (**) |
SYSTEM 2020 (**) |
|||
Transaction type |
Cash-settled share based payments |
|
||||||
Start date of the assessment period |
1 January 2016 |
1 January 2017 |
1 January 2018 |
1 January 2019 |
1 January 2020 |
|||
Program announcement date |
June 2016 |
April 2017 |
April 2018 |
January 2019 |
January 2020 |
|||
Program granting date |
19 April 2017 |
21 June 2018 |
25 July 2019 |
15 July 2020 |
Date of the Supervisory Board meeting at which the 2020 assessment will be made and the bonus will be awarded (and in the case of participants who are not members of the Management Board, the date of the Bank's Management Board meeting at which the bonus pool for 2020 will be launched and the 2020 assessment will be presented) |
|||
Number of instruments granted (pcs) |
127 256 |
43 578 |
168 242 |
145 481 |
To be determined on the date the program is awarded |
|||
Maturity date |
31 July 2022 |
31 July 2023 |
31 July 2024 |
31 July 2024 |
31 July 2025 |
|||
Vesting date for Management Board Members and Executive Vice President |
40% in the year of program granting (settlement after 2 years retention period)
24% after 2 years from program granting date (settlement after
12% after 3 years from program granting date (settlement after
24% after 4 years from program granting date (settlement after |
40% in the year of program granting (settlement after 2 years retention period) 24% after 2 years from program granting date (settlement after 1 year retention period) 12% after 3 years from program granting date (settlement after 1 year retention period) 24% after 4 years from program granting date (settlement after 1 year retention period) |
40% in the year of program granting (settlement after 1 years retention period) 12% after 2 years from program granting date (settlement after 1 year retention period) 24% after 3 years from program granting date (settlement after 1 year retention period) 24% after 4 years from program granting date (settlement after 1 year retention period) |
60% in the year of program granting (settlement after 1 years retention period) 13.3 (3)% after 1 year from program granting date (settlement after 1 year retention period) 13.3 (3)% after 2 years from program granting date (settlement after 1 year retention period) 13.3 (3)% after 3 years from program granting date (settlement after 1 year retention period) |
60% in the year of program granting (settlement after 1 years retention period) 13.3 (3)% after 1 year from program granting date (settlement after 1 year retention period) 13.3 (3)% after 2 years from program granting date (settlement after 1 year retention period) 13.3 (3)% after 3 years from program granting date (settlement after 1 year retention period) |
|||
Vesting date for remaining participants |
60% in the year of program granting (settlement after 2 years retention period)
20% after 2 years from program granting date (settlement after
20% after 3 years from program granting date (settlement after |
60% in the year of program granting (settlement after 2 years retention period)
20% after 2 years from program granting date (settlement after
20% after 3 years from program granting date (settlement after |
60% in the year of program granting (settlement after 2 years retention period) 13.34% after 1 years from program granting date (settlement after 1 year retention period) 13.34% after 2 years from program granting date (settlement after 1 year retention period) 13.32% after 3 years from program granting date (settlement after 1 year retention period) |
60% in the year of program granting (settlement after 2 years retention period) 13.3 (3)% after 1 year from program granting date (settlement after 1 year retention period) 1 13.3 (3)% after 2 years from program granting date (settlement after 1 year retention period) 13.3 (3)% after 3 years from program granting date (settlement after 1 year retention period) |
60% in the year of program granting (settlement after 1 years retention period) 13.3 (3)% after 1 year from program granting date (settlement after 1 year retention period) 13.3 (3)% after 2 years from program granting date (settlement after 1 year retention period) 13.3 (3)% after 3 years from program granting date (settlement after 1 year retention period) |
|||
Vesting conditions |
Risk assessment, Compliance assessment, Continuous employment, Reaching the aim based on financial results of the Bank for a given period |
|||||||
Program settlement |
(*)The participant will receive a cash payment amounting to the number the possessed phantom shares times the arithmetic mean of the Bank’s share prices at the Warsaw Stock Exchange: in case of the settlement made at the dates of instalment after the mandatory retention period, for a month preceding the day of General Meeting approving the financial statements for a given year, in case of settlement made in the voluntary retention period, for 10 working days following the day of release of the financial report in a given quarter, and benefits from acquired phantom shares in the amount equivalent to dividend paid to shareholders in the retention period for shares acquired by the participant. (**) The participant will receive a cash payment amounting to the number the possessed phantom shares times the average closing price of the Bank’s shares at the Warsaw Stock Exchange for 30 calendar days preceding the day of the Supervisory Board meeting, where it evaluates the Bank's financial statements for a given year and benefits from acquired phantom shares in the amount corresponding to the dividend paid to shareholders during the mandatory retention period for shares acquired by the participant. |
|||||||
Since January 2019, the System of Variable Remuneration for the Management Team has been in force, reflecting the provisions of the resolution of the General Meeting of the Bank on adjusting the remuneration of members of the management board to the requirements of the Act on the principles of determining the remuneration of persons managing certain companies.
For the System 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020 the fair value of the program was estimated based upon the Bank’s shares price on the WSE as of the balance sheet date and expected number of phantom shares to which the rights will be acquired.
For the System 2020, as of 31 December 2020 the Bank prepared the program valuation, presuming that the phantom shares were granted on 31 December 2019. This value will be changed at the actual date of granting the program.
The system of variable remuneration realized in the form of phantom shares is a program settled in cash, and therefore its fair value is adjusted on each balance sheet date until the the program settlement, which in case of this program coincides with the vesting date.
The carrying amount of liabilities for cash-settled phantom shares amounted to PLN 46 701 thousand as at 31 December 2020 (as at 31 December 2019 – PLN 44 493 thousand).
The total intrinsic value of liabilities for vested rights to phantom shares amounted to PLN 21 644 thousand as at 31 December 2020 (as at 31 December 2019 – PLN 33 585 thousand).
The remuneration expenses for 2020 relating to the system of variable remuneration in the form of phantom shares amounted to PLN 13 173 thousand (in 2019 - PLN 13 190 thousand).
The table below presents changes in the number of Bank’s phantom shares
2019 |
2019 |
||
Opening balance |
334 346 |
276 564 |
|
Granted during the year |
147 729 |
168 242 |
|
Redeemed during the year |
- |
- |
|
Exercised during the year |
(127 843) |
(110 460) |
|
Terminated during the year |
- |
- |
|
Existing at the period-end |
354 232 |
334 346 |
|
The table above does not present the number of shares granted in respect of System 2020. This number will be determined in 2021 after evaluationl of the financial statements for 2020 by the Supervisory Board. The hypothetical number of shares determined on the basis of the base value of the granted bonus to each of the program participants and arithmetic mean of the Bank’s share price on the WSE in December 2020 amounts to 235 623.
The Bank as a Lessor
As a lessor, the Bank acts in premises rental contracts classified as operating leases.
In 2020, the Bank recognized revenues from the rental of premises, terminals , IT equipment and car leasing in the amount of PLN 29 301 thousand (in 2019 - PLN 19 795 thousand).
The table below presents the maturity analysis of lease payments, presenting the undiscounted lease payments to be received after the balance sheet date.
|
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
Up to 1 year |
4 241 |
2 702 |
Between 1 and 2 years |
1 096 |
917 |
Between 2 and 3 years |
717 |
709 |
Between 3 and 4 years |
422 |
613 |
Between 4 and 5 years |
121 |
486 |
Over 5 years |
85 |
4 515 |
Total |
6 682 |
9 942 |
The Bank as Lessee
As a lessee, the Bank acts in building and IT infrastructure lease contracts.
Information on lease contracts in which the Bank acts as a lessee is presented below. Right-of-use assets
LANDS AND BUILDINGS |
MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT |
means of transport |
total |
|
Opening balance |
410 348 |
- |
26 100 |
436 448 |
Depreciation |
(107 050) |
- |
(11 485) |
(118 535) |
Additions to right-of-use assets |
59 619 |
- |
2 180 |
61 799 |
Lease change |
30 382 |
- |
- |
30 382 |
Derecognition of right-of-use assets |
(4 802) |
- |
(186) |
(4 988) |
Closing balance |
388 497 |
- |
16 609 |
405 106 |
2019 |
LANDS AND BUILDINGS |
MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT |
means of transport |
total |
Opening balance |
496 852 |
75 415 |
33 584 |
605 851 |
Depreciation |
(100 015) |
(18 854) |
(9 813) |
(128 682) |
Additions to right-of-use assets |
30 755 |
- |
2 329 |
33 084 |
Lease change |
2 385 |
- |
- |
2 385 |
Derecognition of right-of-use assets |
(19 629) |
(56 561) |
- |
(76 190) |
Closing balance |
410 348 |
- |
26 100 |
436 448 |
Lease liabilities
|
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
Amounts due to other banks |
135 |
601 |
Amounts due to customers |
398 310 |
414 512 |
Total |
398 445 |
415 113 |
Amounts recognized in income statement
LEASES UNDER IFRS 16 |
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
Interest expense on lease liabilities |
(11 718) |
(16 568) |
Expenses relating to short-term leases presented in ‘Other administrative expenses’ |
(1 801) |
(8 092) |
Expenses relating to leases of low-value assets, excluding short-termleases of low-value assets presented in ‘Other administrative expenses’ |
(384) |
(91) |
Amounts recognized in cash flow statement
In 2020, total cash outflow for leases amounted to PLN -117 936 thousand (as at 31 December 2019 – PLN 207 315 thousand) .
Court cases
As of 31 December 2020 the following court cases for payment are pending with involvement of the Bank, that are important in view of the value of the object of litigation:
1) in the group of liabilities (against the Bank):
brought by a legal person – lawsuit for payment by virtue of improper performance of an agreement, value of the object of litigation EUR 17 521 646 (which as of 30 September 2020 at mid NBP rate was equivalent to PLN 79 316 987.11), litigation initiation date – 19 July 2018, on 27 May 2019 the Arbitration Court at the Polish Chamber of Commerce passed a sentence dismissing the suit in its entirety, the sentence is legally valid but the plaintiff lodged a complaint with a court of general jurisdiction and demand the sentence to be repealed, in the present factual and legal circumstances the Bank assesses the funds outflow risk as possible,
brought by the receiver for a joint stock company in liquidation bankruptcy – lawsuit for payment of compensation for a damage incurred as a result of the Bank’s demanding immediate payment of the amounts due in virtue of payment of the price from the credit receivables transfer agreement and conducting debt enforcement collection of the portion of the price remaining for payment by a court enforcement officer, value of the object of litigation PLN 57 450 130 litigation initiation date – 30 April 2015, in the present factual and legal circumstances the Bank assesses the funds outflow risk as possible,
brought by a natural person – lawsuit for payment by the Bank of an amount charged by virtue of settlement of financial future or forward transactions, value of the object of litigation PLN 38 916 555.18, litigation initiation date – 2 October 2016, on 6 May 2019 the Regional Court in Warsaw issued a sentence ordering the Bank to pay the amount PLN 3 392 349.18 and as to the remainder the Court dismissed the suit, the sentence is not legally valid, the Bank and the plaintiff appealed against the judgment. In the present factual and legal circumstances regarding the amount awarded by the Circuit Court the Bank assesses the funds outflow risk as probable and in the remaining scope as possible,
brought by a beneficiary of warranty – lawsuit for payment of a claim by virtue of the warranty issued by the Bank, value of the object of litigation PLN 32 750 000 litigation initiation date – 14 January 2014, in the present factual and legal circumstances the Bank assesses the funds outflow risk as minor,
brought by a natural person – lawsuit for payment of damages by the Bank resulting from improper conduct of a Bank entity – former Pekao S.A. Central Brokerage House, the value of the object of litigation is PLN 30 000 000 - the date of the litigation initiation is 16 May 2019. On 7 February 2020 the Regional Court in Warsaw issued a sentence dismissing the suit in its entirety, the sentence is not legally valid. In the present factual and legal circumstances the Bank assesses the funds outflow risk as minor,
2) in the group of receivables (brought by the Bank):
Bank’s main intervention lawsuit against the parties of the main lawsuit – the object of the intervention is the demand for payment by virtue of the assignment of receivables securing Bank’s liabilities, value of the object of litigation is PLN 321 979 666.87, litigation initiation date – 26 October 2018,
Bank’s lawsuit for payment against limited debtor by virtue of mortgage collateralizing repayment of the granted credit, value of the object of litigation PLN 132 877 901, litigation initiation date – 21 January 2016,
Bank’s main intervention lawsuit against the parties of the main lawsuit – the object of the intervention is the demand for payment by virtue of the assignment of receivables securing Bank’s liabilities, value of the object of litigation PLN 119 020 334, litigation initiation date – 26 October 2018,
Bank’s mutual lawsuit for payment of amounts due by virtue of the transfer of receivables, value of the object of litigation PLN 89 977 886, litigation initiation date – 28 February 2013,
Bank’s main intervention lawsuit against the parties of the main lawsuit – the object of the intervention is the demand to execute (pay) the liabilities purchased by the Bank from one of the defendants against the other defendant, value of the object of litigation PLN 67 432 617.21 , litigation initiation date – 23 January 2006.
None of the litigations pending in the four quarter of the year 2020 before the court, authority competent for arbitrary proceedings or a body of public administration posed a threat for financial liquidity of the Bank.
The Bank created provisions for litigations against the Bank entities which, according to the legal opinion, are connected with a risk of the funds outflow resulting from the fulfillment of the obligation. The value of the provisions as at 31 December 2020 is PLN 166 800 thousand (PLN 99 335 thousand as at 31 December 2019).
In addition, as at 31 December 2020 the Bank assessed the legal risk of foreign currency mortgage loans in CHF and created a provision related to this risk. Details are presented in Note 5.2.
Financial commitments granted by entity
|
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
Financial commitments granted to: |
|
|
banks |
966 326 |
669 821 |
customers entities |
43 406 882 |
35 908 132 |
budget entities |
721 915 |
657 679 |
Total |
45 095 123 |
37 235 632 |
Guarantees issued
Guarantees issued by entity
|
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
Issued to banks: |
2 147 420 |
2 368 639 |
guarantees |
1 609 041 |
2 168 540 |
sureties |
494 500 |
153 750 |
confirmed export letters of credit |
43 879 |
46 349 |
Issued customers entities |
23 455 223 |
18 741 322 |
guarantees |
13 590 925 |
12 108 330 |
securities’ underwriting guarantees |
3 013 647 |
2 982 379 |
sureties |
6 850 651 |
3 650 613 |
Issued to budget entities: |
1 360 653 |
682 865 |
guarantees |
35 551 |
29 070 |
securities’ underwriting guarantees |
1 325 102 |
653 795 |
Total |
26 963 296 |
21 792 826 |
Off-balance sheet commitments received
Off-balance sheet commitments received by entity
|
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
Financial received from: |
563 455 |
233 370 |
banks |
563 455 |
233 370 |
customers entities |
- |
- |
budget entities |
- |
- |
Guarantees received from: |
19 815 138 |
17 581 742 |
banks |
8 596 465 |
4 820 053 |
clients entities |
10 112 082 |
11 746 732 |
budget entities |
1 106 591 |
1 014 957 |
Total |
20 378 593 |
17 815 112 |
Moreover, the Bank has the ability to obtain financing from National Bank of Poland secured securities.
CLASS/ISSUE |
TYPE OF SHARES |
NUMBER OF SHARES |
NOMINAL VALUE OF CLASS/ISSUE |
EQUITY COVERAGE |
REGISTRATION DATE |
DIVIDEND RIGHTS (FROM DATE) |
||||
A |
Common bearer stock |
137 650 000 |
137 650 |
fully paid-up |
21.12.1997 |
01.01.1998 |
||||
B |
Common bearer stock |
7 690 000 |
7 690 |
fully paid-up |
06.10.1998 |
01.01.1998 |
||||
C |
Common bearer stock |
10 630 632 |
10 631 |
fully paid-up |
12.12.2000 |
01.01.2000 |
||||
D |
Common bearer stock |
9 777 571 |
9 777 |
fully paid-up |
12.12.2000 |
01.01.2000 |
||||
E |
Common bearer stock |
373 644 |
374 |
fully paid-up |
29.08.2003 |
01.01.2003 |
||||
F |
Common bearer stock |
621 411 |
621 |
fully paid-up |
29.08.2003 |
19.05.2006 |
||||
G |
Common bearer stock |
603 377 |
603 |
fully paid-up |
29.08.2003 |
15.05.2008 |
||||
H |
Common bearer stock |
359 840 |
360 |
fully paid-up |
12.08.2004 |
01.01.2004 |
||||
I |
Common bearer stock |
94 763 559 |
94 764 |
fully paid-up |
29.11.2007 |
01.01.2008 |
||||
Total number of Shares (pcs) |
262 470 034 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total share capital in PLN thousand |
262 470 |
|
|
|
|
|||||
Nominal value per share = PLN 1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Shareholding structure
Change in the number of shares (pcs)
2020 |
ISSUED AND FULLY |
TOTAL |
Opening balance |
262 470 034 |
262 470 034 |
Closing balance |
262 470 034 |
262 470 034 |
2019 |
ISSUED AND FULLY |
TOTAL |
Opening balance |
262 470 034 |
262 470 034 |
Closing balance |
262 470 034 |
262 470 034 |
The table below presents the structure of the Bank’s equity attributable to equity holders of the Bank
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2098 |
|
Share premium |
9 137 221 |
9 137 221 |
General banking risk fund |
1 982 459 |
1 982 459 |
Other reserve capital |
8 852 566 |
8 300 933 |
Revaluation reserves, in this: |
1 368 046 |
363 111 |
remeasurements of the defined benefit liabilities (net of tax) |
(82 841) |
(74 441) |
revaluation of debt financial instruments and loans measured at fair value through other comprehensive income (net of tax) |
766 212 |
202 262 |
revaluation or sale of investments in equity instruments designated at fair value through other comprehensive income (net of tax) |
203 957 |
132 612 |
revaluation of hedging financial instruments (net of tax) |
480 718 |
102 678 |
Other supplementary capital, in this: |
233 127 |
233 127 |
supplementary capital |
189 308 |
189 308 |
bonds convertible into shares - equity component |
28 819 |
28 819 |
fund for brokerage activities |
15 000 |
15 000 |
Other capital and reserves |
21 573 419 |
20 016 851 |
Retained earnings |
1 685 058 |
- |
Net profit for the period |
1 126 424 |
2 247 467 |
Retained earnings and net profit for the period |
2 811 482 |
2 247 467 |
Total |
24 384 901 |
22 264 318 |
The net profit of the Bank for 2019 in the amount of PLN 2 247 467 thousand was distributed in the following way: PLN 562 409 thousand was allocated to reserve capital, and the remaining part of the net profit in the amount of PLN 1 685 058 thousand was left undistributed.
Cash and cash equivalents
|
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
4 456 272 |
5 138 758 |
|
Loans and receivables from banks with maturity up to 3 months |
2 840 077 |
2 081 424 |
Cash and Cash equivalents presented in the cash flow statement |
7 296 349 |
7 220 182 |
Restricted availability cash and cash equivalents as at 31 December 2020 amounted to PLN 150 185 thousand (PLN 2 101 956 thousand as at 31 December 2019).
Changes in liabilities arising from financing activities
BALANCE |
CHANGES FROM FINANCING CASH FLOWS |
NON-CASH CHANGES |
BALANCE |
||
THE EFFECT OF CHANGES IN FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES |
OTHER |
||||
Debt securities issued |
1 604 344 |
(1 080 556) |
436 |
(919) |
523 305 |
Subordinated liabilities |
2 764 493 |
- |
- |
(6 617) |
2 757 876 |
Loans and advances received |
1 381 474 |
(183 301) |
94 914 |
(295) |
1 292 792 |
Lease liabilities |
415 113 |
(113 566) |
- |
96 898 |
398 445 |
Total |
6 165 424 |
(1 377 423) |
95 350 |
89 067 |
4 972 418 |
|
BALANCE |
Impact of IFRS 16 application |
BALANCE AS AT 1 JANUARY 2019 with impact of IFRS 16 |
CHANGES FROM FINANCING CASH FLOWS |
NON-CASH CHANGES |
BALANCE |
|
THE EFFECT OF CHANGES IN FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES |
OTHER |
||||||
Debt securities issued |
1 732 596 |
- |
1 732 596 |
(126 635) |
- |
(1 617) |
1 604 344 |
Subordinated liabilities |
2 012 485 |
- |
2 012 485 |
750 000 |
- |
2 008 |
2 764 493 |
Loans and advances received |
1 354 225 |
- |
1 354 225 |
30 452 |
305 |
(3 508) |
1 381 474 |
Lease liabilities |
38 014 |
536 460 |
574 474 |
(191 131) |
- |
31 770 |
415 113 |
Total |
5 137 320 |
536 460 |
5 673 780 |
462 686 |
305 |
28 653 |
6 165 424 |
The transactions between the Bank and related parties are typical transactions arising from current operating activities conducted by the Bank. Such transactions mainly include loans, deposits, foreign currency transactions and guarantees.
The credit granting process applicable to the Bank’s management and entities related to the Bank
According to the Banking Act, credit transactions with Members of the Bank’s Management Board and Supervisory Board, persons holding managerial positions at the Bank, with the entities related financially or organizationally therewith, shall be effected according to Regulation adopted by the Supervisory Board of the Bank.
The Regulation provides detailed decision-making procedures, applicable to transactions with such persons and entities, also defining the decision-making levels authorized to take decisions. In particular, the transactions with the Members of the Bank’s Management Board or Supervisory Board or with an entity related therewith financially or organizationally, are subject to decisions taken by the Bank’s Management Board and Supervisory Board.
Members of the Bank’s Management Board and entities related therewith financially or organizationally may take advantage of credit products offered by the Bank on standard terms and conditions of the Bank. In particular, the Bank may not offer more advantageous credit interest rates to such persons or entities.
Credit risk assessment is performed using the methodology applied by the Bank, tailored to the client’s segment and type of transaction.
In case of entities related to the Bank, the standard credit procedures are applied, with transaction-related decisions taken exclusively at level of the Bank’s Head Office.
Related party transactions as at 31 December 2020
Name of entity |
Receivables from Loans, advances and placements |
Securities |
Receivables from Revaluation of derivatives |
Other |
Liabilities from Loans and deposits |
liabilities from revaluation of derivatives |
other liabilities |
|
PZU S.A. – the Bank ‘s parent entity |
1 |
- |
911 |
1 414 |
87 519 |
- |
2 044 |
|
Entities of PZU S.A. Group excluding the Bank Pekao S.A. Group entities |
1 |
- |
9 517 |
9 544 |
308 929 |
322 |
2 |
|
Bank Pekao S.A. Group entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pekao Investment Banking S.A. |
- |
- |
- |
- |
236 093 |
- |
- |
|
Pekao Leasing Sp. z o.o. |
257 457 |
1 487 996 |
1 711 |
121 |
24 020 |
8 399 |
- |
|
Pekao Faktoring Sp. z o.o. |
1 389 285 |
771 459 |
- |
181 |
1 470 |
- |
1 049 |
|
Pekao Fundusz Kapitałowy Sp. z o.o. (in liguidation) |
14 |
- |
- |
- |
52 947 |
- |
- |
|
Centrum Kart S.A. |
- |
- |
- |
10 |
29 288 |
- |
7 892 |
|
Pekao Financial Services Sp. z o. o. |
- |
- |
- |
7 |
11 708 |
- |
- |
|
Pekao Bank Hipoteczny S.A. |
342 300 |
332 985 |
28 403 |
- |
180 |
10 527 |
27 |
|
Pekao Property S.A. (in liguidation) |
55 |
- |
- |
6 231 |
25 819 |
- |
- |
|
Pekao Direct Sp. z o.o. |
- |
- |
- |
46 |
15 304 |
- |
7 187 |
|
FPB – Media Sp. z o. o. (in bankruptcy) |
8 971 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Dom Inwestycyjny Xelion Sp. z o.o. |
- |
- |
- |
5 |
80 422 |
- |
- |
|
Pekao Investment Management S.A. |
- |
- |
- |
- |
956 |
- |
- |
|
Pekao TFI S.A. (PIM S.A. subsidiary) |
- |
- |
- |
15 731 |
160 612 |
- |
- |
|
Total of Bank Pekao S.A. Group entieties |
1 998 082 |
2 592 440 |
30 114 |
22 332 |
638 819 |
18 926 |
16 155 |
|
Key management personnel of the Bank Pekao S.A. |
1 640 |
- |
- |
- |
2 943 |
- |
- |
|
Total |
1 999 724 |
2 592 440 |
40 542 |
33 290 |
1 038 210 |
19 248 |
18 201 |
|
Related party transactions as at 31 December 2019
Name of entity |
Receivables from Loans, advances and placements |
Securities |
Receivables from Revaluation of derivatives |
Other |
Liabilities from Loans and deposits |
liabilities from revaluation of derivatives |
other liabilities |
|
PZU S.A. – the Bank ‘s parent entity |
255 |
- |
- |
3 948 |
53 255 |
637 |
- |
|
Entities of PZU S.A. Group excluding the Bank Pekao S.A. Group entities |
10 113 |
- |
763 |
5 247 |
120 539 |
10 647 |
5 |
|
Bank Pekao S.A. Group entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pekao Investment Banking S.A. |
- |
- |
- |
- |
201 551 |
- |
- |
|
Pekao Leasing Sp. z o.o. |
1 299 459 |
2 016 |
135 |
58 |
24 453 |
- |
- |
|
Pekao Faktoring Sp. z o.o. |
2 552 647 |
632 |
- |
31 |
8 770 |
- |
- |
|
Pekao Fundusz Kapitałowy Sp. z o.o. (in liguidation) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
52 910 |
- |
- |
|
Pekao Powszechne Towarzystwo Emerytalne S.A. (in liguidation) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
63 486 |
- |
- |
|
Centrum Kart S.A. |
57 |
- |
- |
197 |
20 422 |
- |
10 700 |
|
Pekao Financial Services Sp. z o. o. |
9 |
- |
- |
5 |
7 831 |
- |
- |
|
Pekao Bank Hipoteczny S.A. |
458 122 |
136 113 |
6 389 |
- |
20 148 |
7 096 |
- |
|
Pekao Property S.A. (in liguidation) |
- |
- |
- |
6 231 |
26 091 |
- |
- |
|
Pekao Direct Sp. z o.o. |
- |
- |
- |
42 |
12 096 |
- |
4 477 |
|
FPB – Media Sp. z o. o. (in bankruptcy) |
8 971 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Dom Inwestycyjny Xelion Sp. z o.o. |
- |
- |
- |
- |
38 859 |
- |
- |
|
Pekao Investment Management S.A. |
- |
- |
- |
- |
100 263 |
- |
- |
|
Pekao TFI S.A. (PIM S.A. subsidiary) |
- |
- |
- |
9 893 |
170 442 |
- |
- |
|
Total of Bank Pekao S.A. Group entieties |
4 319 265 |
138 761 |
6 524 |
16 457 |
747 322 |
7 096 |
15 177 |
|
Key management personnel of the Bank Pekao S.A. |
38 |
- |
- |
- |
9 538 |
- |
- |
|
Total |
4 329 671 |
138 761 |
7 287 |
25 652 |
930 654 |
18 380 |
15 182 |
|
Income and expenses from transactions with related parties for the period from 1 January to 31 December 2020
interest income |
interes expense |
fee and commission |
fee and commissio |
income from |
expenses from |
|
PZU S.A. – the Bank ‘s parent entity |
(1 644) |
(279) |
21 690 |
(231) |
321 |
(2 596) |
Entities of PZU S.A. Group excluding the Bank Pekao S.A. Group entities |
184 |
(445) |
14 055 |
(208) |
2 611 |
(6 692) |
Bank Pekao S.A. Group entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pekao Investment Banking S.A. |
- |
(471) |
163 |
(59) |
80 |
(191) |
Pekao Leasing Sp. z o.o. |
22 066 |
(1 875) |
16 102 |
(22) |
3 644 |
(6 336) |
Pekao Faktoring Sp. z o.o. |
31 797 |
(29) |
5 058 |
- |
432 |
- |
Pekao Powszechne Towarzystwo Emerytalne S.A. (in liguidation)(*) |
- |
(153) |
6 |
- |
21 |
- |
Pekao Fundusz Kapitałowy Sp. z o.o. (in liquidation) |
- |
(210) |
6 |
- |
9 |
- |
Centrum Kart S.A. |
- |
(41) |
1 245 |
- |
10 714 |
(60 122) |
Pekao Financial Services Sp. z o.o. |
- |
(15) |
91 |
- |
75 |
- |
Pekao Bank Hipoteczny S.A. |
5 132 |
(81) |
1 297 |
- |
118 |
(7 869) |
Pekao Direct Sp. z o.o. |
(184) |
- |
26 |
(24 947) |
1 908 |
(47 046) |
Pekao Property S.A. (in liquidation) |
- |
(78) |
6 |
- |
43 |
- |
Dom Inwestycyjny Xelion Sp. z o.o. |
- |
(193) |
133 |
- |
84 |
- |
Pekao Investment Management S.A. |
- |
(345) |
18 |
- |
- |
- |
Pekao TFI S.A. (PIM S.A. subsidiary) |
- |
(739) |
86 671 |
- |
- |
- |
Total of Bank Pekao S.A. Group entities |
58 811 |
(4 230) |
110 822 |
(25 028) |
17 128 |
(121 564) |
Key management personnel of the Bank Pekao S.A. |
4 |
(16) |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
Total |
57 355 |
(4 970) |
146 568 |
(25 467) |
20 060 |
(130 852) |
(*) into day liquidation of the company
Income and expenses from transactions with related parties for the period from 1 January to 31 December 2019
Name of entity |
interest income |
interes expense |
fee and commission |
fee and commissio |
income from |
expenses from |
PZU S.A. – the Bank ‘s parent entity |
654 |
(621) |
7 255 |
(518) |
153 |
(1 605) |
Entities of PZU S.A. Group excluding the Bank Pekao S.A. Group entities |
602 |
(1 579) |
18 419 |
(143) |
1 937 |
(14 983) |
Bank Pekao S.A. Group entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pekao Investment Banking S.A. |
3 |
(1 930) |
159 |
(112) |
75 |
(60) |
Centralny Dom Maklerski Pekao S.A. (*) |
- |
(652) |
828 |
(16) |
2 385 |
(1 962) |
Pekao Leasing Sp. z o.o. |
24 476 |
(4 102) |
14 021 |
(2) |
8 302 |
(492) |
Pekao Faktoring Sp. z o.o. |
35 303 |
(72) |
2 234 |
- |
361 |
- |
Pekao Powszechne Towarzystwo Emerytalne S.A. (in liguidation) |
- |
(637) |
9 |
- |
13 |
- |
Pekao Fundusz Kapitałowy Sp. z o.o. (in liquidation) |
- |
(549) |
4 |
- |
7 |
- |
Centrum Kart S.A. |
- |
(165) |
1 032 |
- |
993 |
(51 405) |
Pekao Financial Services Sp. z o.o. |
- |
(65) |
70 |
- |
66 |
(12) |
Pekao Bank Hipoteczny S.A. |
7 194 |
(285) |
1 840 |
- |
267 |
(16 036) |
Pekao Direct Sp. z o.o. |
- |
(1) |
2 |
(26 035) |
1 732 |
(42 314) |
Pekao Property S.A. (in liquidation) |
- |
(220) |
3 |
- |
37 |
- |
FPB - Media Sp. z o.o. (in bankruptcy) |
69 |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
Dom Inwestycyjny Xelion Sp. z o.o. |
- |
(645) |
66 |
- |
64 |
(21) |
Pekao Investment Management S.A. |
- |
(1 496) |
10 |
- |
- |
- |
Pekao TFI S.A. (PIM S.A. subsidiary) |
- |
(1 619) |
96 388 |
- |
3 |
- |
Total of Bank Pekao S.A. Group entities |
67 045 |
(12 438) |
116 667 |
(26 165) |
14 305 |
(112 302) |
Key management personnel of the Bank Pekao S.A. |
9 |
(41) |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
Total |
68 310 |
(14 679) |
142 342 |
(26 826) |
16 395 |
(128 890) |
(*) Data up to 30 August 2019, i.e. until the date of division of the company
Off-balance sheet financial commitments and guarantees as at 31 December 2020
Name of entity |
GRANTED |
RECEIVED |
||
FINANCIAL |
guarantees |
FINANCIAL |
guarantees |
|
PZU S.A. – the Bank ‘s parent entity |
2 710 |
108 637 |
- |
- |
Entities of PZU S.A. Group excluding the Bank Pekao S.A. Group entities |
1 085 |
103 730 |
- |
- |
Bank Pekao S.A. Group entities |
|
|
|
- |
Subsidiaries |
|
|
|
- |
Pekao Investment Banking S.A. |
104 |
- |
|
- |
Pekao Leasing Sp. z o.o. |
4 391 287 |
9 432 068 |
- |
- |
Pekao Faktoring Sp. z o.o. |
2 626 646 |
3 408 376 |
- |
- |
Centrum Kart S.A. |
39 |
3 000 |
- |
- |
Pekao Financial Services Sp. z o. o. |
65 |
1 295 |
- |
- |
Pekao Bank Hipoteczny S.A. |
414 823 |
500 272 |
- |
- |
Pekao Direct Sp. z o.o. |
60 |
- |
- |
- |
Dom Inwestycyjny Xelion Sp. z o.o. |
4 |
- |
- |
- |
Pekao TFI S.A. (PIM S.A. subsidiary) |
107 |
- |
- |
- |
Total of Bank Pekao S.A. Group entities |
7 433 135 |
13 345 011 |
- |
- |
Key management personnel of the Bank Pekao S.A. |
255 |
- |
- |
- |
Total |
7 437 185 |
13 557 378 |
- |
- |
Off-balance sheet financial commitments and guarantees as at 31 December 2019
Name of entity |
GRANTED |
RECEIVED |
||
FINANCIAL |
guarantees |
FINANCIAL |
guarantees |
|
PZU S.A. – the Bank ‘s parent entity |
2 801 |
15 000 |
- |
- |
Entities of PZU S.A. Group excluding the Bank Pekao S.A. Group entities |
665 |
10 000 |
- |
- |
Bank Pekao S.A. Group entities |
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
Pekao Investment Banking S.A. |
139 |
- |
- |
- |
Pekao Leasing Sp. z o.o. |
2 137 998 |
7 603 412 |
- |
- |
Pekao Faktoring Sp. z o.o. |
936 069 |
1 046 100 |
- |
- |
Centrum Kart S.A. |
43 |
3 000 |
- |
- |
Pekao Financial Services Sp. z o. o. |
65 |
1 103 |
- |
- |
Pekao Bank Hipoteczny S.A. |
292 079 |
500 251 |
- |
- |
Pekao Direct Sp. z o.o. |
66 |
- |
- |
- |
Dom Inwestycyjny Xelion Sp. z o.o. |
5 |
- |
- |
- |
Pekao TFI S.A. (PIM S.A. subsidiary) |
101 |
- |
- |
- |
Total of Bank Pekao S.A. Group entities |
3 366 565 |
9 153 866 |
- |
- |
Key management personnel of the Bank Pekao S.A. |
172 |
- |
- |
- |
Total |
3 370 203 |
9 178 866 |
- |
- |
Transactions with the State Treasury
The Bank's transactions with the State Treasury were mostly related to treasury securities and banking services. These transactions are concluded and settled on terms obtainable by customers who are not related parties.
Remuneration expenses of the Bank’s Management Board and Supervisory Board Members
|
value of benefits |
|
2020 |
2019 |
|
Management Board of the Bank |
|
|
Short-term employee benefits (*) |
11 285 |
12 223 |
Post-employment benefits |
242 |
139 |
Long-term benefits (**) |
897 |
1 370 |
Paid termination benefits |
0 |
3 845 |
Share-based payments (***) |
2 808 |
5 418 |
Total |
15 232 |
22 995 |
Supervisory Board of the Bank |
|
|
Short-term employee benefits (*) |
1 131 |
1 049 |
Total |
1 131 |
1 049 |
(*) Short-term employee benefits include: base salary, bonuses and other benefits due in next 12 months from the date of the balance sheet.
(**) The item ‘Other long-term benefit’ includes: provisions for deferred bonus payments.
(***) The value of share-based payments is a part of Personnel Expenses, recognized according to IFRS 2 during the reporting period in the income statement, representing the settlement of fair value of share options and shares, including phantom shares, granted to the Members of the Bank’s Management Board.
The Bank’s Management Board and Supervisory Board Members did not receive any remuneration from subsidiaries and associates in 2020 and 2019.
The Bank increases its funds by sales transactions with the repurchase promise granted (repo and sell-buy back) at the same price increased by interest.
Securities composing the balance sheet portfolio of the Bank as well as securities with obligation of resale (reverse repo and buy-sell back transactions) may be a subject to repo and sell-buy back transactions.
Securities composing the balance sheet portfolio of the Bank and treated as repo and sell-buy back transactions are not derecognized from the statement of financial position due to the fact that the Bank holds all the benefits and the risk deriving from these assets.
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
|||
fair value of assets |
carrying amount of related liabilities |
fair value of assets |
Carrying amount |
|
Financial assets held for trading |
|
|
|
|
up to 1 month |
455 011 |
454 765 |
218 252 |
218 449 |
Total financial assets held for trading |
455 011 |
454 765 |
218 252 |
218 449 |
Financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
up to 1 month |
287 917 |
287 726 |
379 287 |
379 792 |
Total financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income |
287 917 |
287 726 |
379 287 |
379 792 |
Total |
742 928 |
742 491 |
597 539 |
598 241 |
The Bank purchases financial instruments with the obligations of repurchase or resale (reverse-repo and buy-sell back) at the same price increased by interest.
Securities treated as reverse-repo and buy-sell back transactions are not disclosed at the statement of financial position due to the fact that the Bank do not holds all the advantages of risks and awareness deriving from these assets.
|
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
||
CARRYING AMOUNT OF ASSETS |
FAIR VALUE OF |
CARRYING AMOUNT OF ASSETS |
FAIR VALUE OF |
|
Loans and advances to banks |
|
|
|
|
up to 1 month |
718 957 |
715 774 |
219 146 |
217 141 |
Total loans and advances to bank |
718 957 |
715 774 |
219 146 |
217 141 |
Loans and advances to customers |
|
|
|
|
up to 1 month |
280 537 |
281 930 |
502 262 |
495 610 |
Total loans and advances to customers |
280 537 |
281 930 |
502 262 |
495 610 |
Total |
999 494 |
997 704 |
721 408 |
712 751 |
Financial assets subject to reverse repo and buy-sell back transactions constitute collateral accepted by the Bank, which the Bank has the right to sell or pledge.
|
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
Fair value of assets pledged as collaterals, in this: |
997 704 |
712 751 |
Short sale |
742 804 |
184 799 |
The Social Benefits Fund Act of 4 March 1994 with subsequent amendments introduced the requirement to create a Company’s Social Benefits Fund by all employers employing over 20 employees. The Bank and Group companies employing at least 20 staff have created the ZFŚS Fund and are making periodic charges to the ZFŚS Fund in amounts required by the Act. The basic aim of the ZFŚS Fund is to subsidize social assistance in benefit of the employees, former employees (pensioners and the retired) and entitled members of their families.
The liabilities of the ZFŚS Fund represent the accumulated value of charges made by the Company towards the ZFŚS Fund decreased by the amount of non-returnable expenditures of the ZFŚS Fund.
In the separate statement of financial position, the Bank netted the ZFŚS Fund assets against the ZFŚS Funds value, due to the fact that the assets of the ZFŚS Fund do not represent the assets of the Bank. For this reason the amount pertaining to the ZFŚS Fund in the separate statement of financial position as at 31 December 2020 and 31 December 2019 was zero.
The table below presents the assets according to type and book value, the balance of the Fund and costs related to ZFŚS
|
31.12.2020 |
31.12.2019 |
Loans granted to employees |
25 735 |
26 159 |
Cash at ZFŚS account |
546 |
779 |
ZFŚS assets |
26 281 |
26 938 |
ZFŚS value |
26 281 |
26 938 |
|
2020 |
2019 |
Deductions made to ZFŚS during fiscal period |
27 886 |
23 842 |
Takeover of Idea Bank S.A.
Description of the Transaction
On 30 December 30 2020, the Bank Guarantee Fund (hereinafter ‘BGF’) decided to apply to Idea Bank S.A. the instrument of resolution due to the fulfillment of the following conditions:
1) the bankruptcy of Idea Bank S.A.,
2) there are no premises indicating that possible supervisory actions or actions of Idea Bank S.A. will allow to remove the risk of bankruptcy in due time,
3) initiation of resolution against Idea Bank S.A. was necessary in the public interest understood as the stability of the financial sector.
The resolution instrument applied by the BGF to Idea Bank S.A. consisted in the takeover by the Bank on 3 January 2021 with the effect specified in Art. 176 sec. 1 of the Act of 10 June 2016 on the Bank Guarantee Fund, the deposit guarantee system and forced restructuring (hereinafter the ‘BGF Act’) of Idea Bank SA, covering all its property rights and liabilities as at 31 December 2020 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Transaction’), excluding certain property rights and liabilities indicated in the BGF decision in question, including, inter alia:
1) property rights and liabilities related to actual, legal or tort related to:
a) trading in financial instruments and other activities relating to:
financial instruments issued by GetBack S.A. and related entities of GetBack S.A.,
investment certificates, in particular investment certificates issued by Lartiq (formerly Trigon) [Profit XXII NS FIZ, Profit XXIII, NS FIZ, Profit XXIV NS FIZ] represented by Lartiq TFI S.A. (formerly Trigon TFI S.A.), Universe NS FIZ, Universe 2 NS FIZ and other investment funds represented by Altus TFI S.A.,
b) providing insurance coverage, performing insurance intermediary activities or distribution of life insurances, if they are related to an insurance capital fund (also life insurance, where the insurance company's performance is determined based on specific indices or other base values),
c) providing services as an agent of an investment firm,
d) the activities of Idea Bank S.A., which are not covered by the Bank's statute,
and claims arising from these rights and liabilities, including those covered by civil and administrative proceedings, regardless of the date when they were raised.
2) shares in subsidiaries and associates of Idea Bank S.A.,
3) corporate bonds issued by GetBack S.A.,
hereinafter referred to as ‘Acquired Business’’.
The takeover of the Acquired Business does not have a significant impact on the financial profile of the Bank, in particular on the capital and liquidity parameters of the Bank and the Group.
Transaction Justification
Idea Bank S.A. was a commercial bank offering banking services provided to individual and institutional clients, such as accepting cash deposits payable on demand or on a specified date and keeping accounts of these deposits, granting loans, granting bank guarantees, issuing securities. Idea Bank S.A. The capital adequacy ratio of Idea Bank S.A. according to the last available financial statements prepared as at 30 September 2020 was at the level of 2.51% (compared to 10.5% required by law) and was significantly below the regulatory requirements.
The initiation of the resolution process made it possible to reduce the effects of the bankruptcy risk of Idea Bank S.A., and the negative consequences for the banking sector related to this eventuality.
Price conditions
The takeover of Idea Bank S.A. was not related to the consideration payment by the Bank. As a result of the transaction, the Bank took over the assets and liabilities of Idea Bank S.A., the total estimated fair value of which was negative.
As indicated in the ‘Description of the Transaction’, the Bank did not acquire all the assets of Idea Bank S.A., in particular, the Bank did not take over shares in subsidiaries and associates.
Considering the above, the Bank received support from the BGF in the form of a subsidy in the amount of PLN 193 million in order to cover the difference between the value of the acquired liabilities and the value of the acquired property rights of Idea Bank S.A. The above funds were received by the Bank on 8 January 2021.
As an inseparable element of the entire Transaction, the Bank also received a guarantee from the BGF to cover losses resulting from the risk related to property rights or the entity's liabilities under the restructuring referred to in Art. 112 paragraph. 3 point 1 of the BGF Act (‘Loss Coverage Guarantee’), which includes a loss coverage guarantee resulting from credit risk related to loan exposures (‘CRM Guarantee’) and a loss coverage guarantee (other than losses resulting from credit risk) related to the Acquired Business (‘Guarantee for Residual Risks’).
The takeover involves the takeover of the loan exposures included in the Acquired Business and could result in an increase in the risk-weighted exposure amount (it is calculated by multiplying the exposure amounts and the risk weight resulting from the provisions of the Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council (EU) No. 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 (‘CRR’)). An increase in such risk weighted exposure amounts could affect the Bank's capital requirements.
Therefore, the CRM Guarantee will be used by the Bank as ‘eligible unfunded credit protection’ within the meaning of the CRR. This will allow, in terms of credit risk, to assign a risk weight appropriate to the entity providing protection - BGF, qualified as a public sector entity, to the acquired exposures, in accordance with the Polish Financial Supervision Authority opinion referred to in Art. 116 sec. 4 of CRR. As a consequence of obtaining the opinion referred to in Art. 116 sec. 4 of CRR and after the CRM Guarantee fulfills the remaining conditions for ‘eligible unfunded credit protection’, the exposures covered by the Loss Coverage Guarantee agreement may be treated as exposures to the central government, resulting in a significant reduction of the capital requirement for credit risk on the part of the Bank.
Settlement of the Transaction
Summary of acquired assets and liabilities
The statement of the assets and liabilities of Idea Bank S.A., according to the book values, i.e. not taking into account the adjustments applied for the needs of the Transaction settlement, is as follows as at 31 December 2020:
ITEM NAME |
(UNAUDITED |
Cash and due from Central Bank |
1 099 662 |
Loans and advances to banks |
200 339 |
Derivative financial instruments (held for trading) |
9 044 |
Loans and advances to customers (in this receivables from financial leases) |
12 048 461 |
Investments (placement) securities |
717 929 |
Assets held for sale |
565 |
Intangible assets |
143 825 |
Property, plant and equipment |
36 496 |
Other assets |
139 221 |
TOTAL ASSETS |
14 395 542 |
Amounts due to other banks |
125 484 |
Derivative financial instruments (held for trading) |
155 203 |
Amounts due to customers |
13 513 680 |
Provisions |
8 389 |
Other liabilities |
342 485 |
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
14 145 241 |
(*) data in accordance with the trial balance that the Bank received from BGF on 3 January 2021.
The total estimated fair value of the above assets and liabilities determined by the Bank for the purpose of submitting a binding offer to purchase the Acquired Business was negative and ranged from PLN -110 million to PLN -276 million.
The Bank will settle the Transaction using the principles of International Financial Reporting Standard 3 ‘Business Combinations’ (hereinafter ‘IFRS 3’) based on the financial data relating to the Acquired Business as of 31 December 2020.
The application of IFRS 3 requires, inter alia, carrying out the process of identification and measurement of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities to fair value as at the acquisition date, and recognition and measurement of goodwill or profit on a bargain purchase.
The above process requires collecting and analyzing a very large amount of data and making a number of calculations based on this data in order to determine the fair value of each of the acquired assets and liabilities in a reliable manner.
Taking into account the fact that the Transaction took place on 3 January 2021, the Bank has begun the above process, but was not able to perform the takeover settlement or the provisional settlement of the takeover between the date of taking control and the date of publication of these financial statements.
New definition of default (NDD)
From January 1, 2021, the Bank implemented a new definition of default (NDD) for the purpose of capital adequacy calculation. The new definition is in line with the Guidelines on the application of the definition of default under Article 178 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (EBA/GL/2016/07) and the Regulation of the Minister of Finance, Investment and Development of October 3, 2019 on the materiality level of overdue credit obligations.
If a new definition of default NDD was implemented as of December 31, 2020, its impact on the capital ratios of the Bank would be as follows:
|
31.12.2020 |
CAPITAL RATIOS |
|
Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio (%) |
18.59% |
Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio (%), using the new definition of default |
18.57% |
Total capital ratio (%) |
20.77% |
Total capital ratio (%), using the new definition of default |
20.74% |
24.02.2021 |
|
Leszek Skiba |
|
President of the Management Board |
|
The original Polish document is signed with a qualified electronic signature |
Date |
|
Name/Surname |
|
Position/Function |
|
Signature |
24.02.2021 |
|
Jarosław Fuchs |
|
Vice President of the Management Board |
|
The original Polish document is signed with a qualified electronic signature |
Date |
|
Name/Surname |
|
Position/Function |
|
Signature |
24.02.2021 |
|
Marcin Gadomski |
|
Vice President of the Management Board |
|
The original Polish document is signed with a qualified electronic signature |
Date |
|
Name/Surname |
|
Position/Function |
|
Signature |
24.02.2021 |
|
Krzysztof Kozłowski |
|
Vice President of the Management Board |
|
The original Polish document is signed with a qualified electronic signature |
Date |
|
Name/Surname |
|
Position/Function |
|
Signature |
24.02.2021 |
|
Tomasz Kubiak |
|
Vice President of the Management Board |
|
The original Polish document is signed with a qualified electronic signature |
Date |
|
Name/Surname |
|
Position/Function |
|
Signature |
24.02.2021 |
|
Jerzy Kwieciński |
|
Vice President of the Management Board |
|
The original Polish document is signed with a qualified electronic signature |
Date |
|
Name/Surname |
|
Position/Function |
|
Signature |
24.02.2021 |
|
Błażej Szczecki |
|
Vice President of the Management Board |
|
The original Polish document is signed with a qualified electronic signature |
Date |
|
Name/Surname |
|
Position/Function |
|
Signature |
24.02.2021 |
|
Wojciech Werochowski |
|
Vice President of the Management Board |
|
The original Polish document is signed with a qualified electronic signature |
Date |
|
Name/Surname |
|
Position/Function |
|
Signature |
24.02.2021 |
|
Magdalena Zmitrowicz |
|
Vice President of the Management Board |
|
The original Polish document is signed with a qualified electronic signature |
Date |
|
Name/Surname |
|
Position/Function |
|
Signature |
IFRS – International Financial Reporting Standards – the standards, interpretations and their structure adopted
by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB.)
IAS – International Accounting Standards – previous name of the standards forming part of the current IFRS.
IFRIC – International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee – the committee operating under the International Accounting Standards Board publishing interpretations of IFRS.
CIRS – Currency Interest Rate Swap – the transaction exchange of principal amounts and interest payments in different currencies between two counterparties.
IRS – Interest Rate Swap – the agreement between two counterparties, under which the counterparties pay each other (at specified intervals during the contract life) interest on contractual principal of the contract, charged at a different interest rate.
FRA – Forward Rate Agreement – the contract under which two counterparties fix the interest rate that will apply in the future for a specified amount expressed in currency of the transaction for a predetermined period.
CAP – the financial agreement, which limits the risk borne by lender on a variable interest rate, exposed to the potential loss as a result of increase in interest rates. Cap option is a series of call options on interest rates, in which the issuer guarantees the buyer the compensation of the additional interest costs, that the buyer must pay if the interest rate on loan increases above the fixed interest rate.
FLOOR –the financial agreement, which limits the risk of incurring losses resulting from decrease in interest rates by the lender providing the loan at a variable interest rate. Floor option is a series of put options on interest rates, in which the issuer guarantees the interest to be paid on the loan if the interest rate on the loan decreases below the fixed interest rate.
PD – Probability Default – the parameter used in Internal Ratings-Based Approach which determines the likelihood that the debtor will be unable to meet its obligation. PD is a financial term describing the likelihood of a default over an one year time horizon.
LGD – Loss Given Default – the percentage of loss over the total exposure when bank’s counterparty goes to default.
EAD – Exposure at Default.
EL – Expected Loss.
Life-time ECL – Lifetime Expected Credit Loss.
CCF – Credit Conversion Factor.
VaR – Value at Risk – the risk measure by which the market value of an asset or portfolio may be reduced for a given assumptions, probability and time horizon.
ICAAP – Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process – the process of assessing internal capital adequacy.
FVH – fair value hedge accounting.
LTV – Loan to Value.
CFH – cash flow hedge accounting.