Arctic Paper S.A.
Sustainability report
Arctic Paper S.A. Capital Group disclosure on non-financial information 2020
Persistent sustainability work in a time of uncertainty
Arctic Paper has a longstanding commitment to sustainability. We are committed to creating products and processes that are safe for people, healthy for the environment and successful for our business.
When dealing with uncertainty and volatility, an agile business and strong culture are key factors. Since the outbreak of the pandemic, we have closely monitored the Public Health challenges and set up several measures in place to ensure safety of our staff, our partners and customers.
Even though COVID-19 has challenged us, our efforts for the environment have not stopped. This year, the factory in Munkedal - as the first in the world - received the Cradle to Cradle Certified ™ certificate for all types of paper produced. This certification is an internationally recognized standard for safe, recyclable and circular economy products, and we are taking further steps to obtain this certification for all our plants.
Renewable energy is the foundation for sustainable paper production. In 2020, Arctic Paper Munkedals completed an investment to increase the capacity of a hydroelectric power plant from 2 to 6 MW and obtained a permit to build a biomass heating plant, which will meet up to 80 percent of the plant's energy needs. In Arctic Paper Kostrzyn, Poland, a pilot investment in photovoltaic cells is underway, while the mill in Grycksbo is already supplied with renewable energy from the existing pellet heating plant.
The paper industry is undergoing rapid change and the role of pulp and paper is broadened, especially in the global trend of replacing plastic packaging. The pandemic has made health a priority and to meet changing needs, Arctic Paper continuously strives to develop new and innovative grades and products.
Thanks to extensive efforts, 2020 turned out better than expected and I am proud of the steps Arctic Paper has taken to a sustainable economy during the year. Together, we will continue to develop our business and create value with customer-driven innovation that drives the transition to a circular economy.
Michał Jarczyński CEO, Arctic Paper S.A.
Arctic Paper S.A. is a leading European producer of high-quality graphic paper listed on the stock exchanges in Warsaw (Giełda Papierów Wartościowych – GPW) and Stockholm (NASDAQ). We produce numerous types of uncoated and coated wood-free paper, as well as wood-containing uncoated paper for printing houses, paper distributors, book and magazine publishing houses, advertising industry and packaging producers.
As of 31 December 2020, Arctic Paper employs about 1,200 people. Our business activities are based on the operations of three mills:
The Paper Mill in Kostrzyn nad Odrą (Poland)
The mill has a production capacity of about 315,000 tonnes of paper per year and mainly produces uncoated wood-free paper for printing books, brochures and forms, and for producing envelopes and other paper products.
The Paper Mill in Munkedal (Sweden)
The mill has a production capacity of about 160,000 tonnes per year and mainly produces fine uncoated wood-free paper, used primarily for printing books and high-quality brochures.
The Paper Mill in Grycksbo (Sweden)
The mill has a production capacity of about 220,000 tonnes per year and produces coated wood-free paper used for printing maps, books, magazines, posters and advertising materials.
We manage sales organisations across Europe, which support our activities and contacts with customers. The company is registered in Kostrzyn nad Odra (Poland) with a branch in Gothenburg (Sweden).
Arctic Paper S.A is also a majority owner (in possession of 51.0 % of the shares by the 31 December 2020) of the Rottneros group. Rottneros is a pulp producing company, registered on the Nasdaq stock exchange in Stockholm. The Pulp mills owned and operated by Rottneros are located in Sweden and have aggregate production capacities of about 440,000 tonnes of pulp annually. Arctic Paper S.A. has financial control over Rottneros, as it holds the majority of shares, yet operational control belongs to Rottneros including responsibility for the company’s performance and sustainability matters. For 2020, the data for Rottneros is not available in the format reported by Arctic Paper S.A., but sustainability impact and performance will be reported in the separate report of the subsidiary.
Arctic Paper is a company based on Swedish roots.
We have been manufacturing paper with craft and dedication since 1740. Today we run some of the most eco-friendly mills worldwide and are constantly improving our sourcing, production, sale processes and energy management.
Our reputation in the high-quality graphic paper market is built on a long tradition of outstanding works with the help of our brands executed by the most demanding customers who value the proven quality of our products.
We are clear, open-minded and follow a long-term plan in the way we act, think and appear. We are sensitive towards nature and positive towards the future. We protect natural resources and constantly create a sound balance between people, production and regions. We run our business in a stable, long-term and trustworthy manner. We are a forerunner in the protection of nature and the development of new products for core markets as well as for new markets and segments. We offer distinctive products and services built on inventiveness and reliable quality, crafted for the most demanding creative ideas and new technologies.
We are one of the leading European producers of premium graphic paper products and services for the most demanding creatives and technologies valuing freshness as well as the superior, reliable and eco-friendly quality of our paper brands.
We are known for new solutions and products and the continuous extension of our product ranges in-step with the latest developments within printing technology.
The graphical paper market consists of two segments: wood-free fine paper and wood-based paper, both divided into the sub-segments uncoated and coated paper. Our mills in Munkedal and Kostrzyn produce uncoated wood-free and wood-based paper, while the mill in Grycksbo produces coated wood-free paper.
Key Brands:
Uncoated wood-free paper, in particular:
High-quality graphic paper with a very smooth surface, used for various kinds of advertising and marketing materials. It is produced under the Munken brand
Bulky book paper, produced under the Munken brand, used primarily for printing books
White offset paper, produced and distributed primarily under the Amber brand. It’s one of the most versatile types of paper.
Uncoated wood-based paper, in particular:
Premium bulky book paper, produced and distributed under the Munken brand, specially developed for colour- and monochrome-printing of books.
Coated wood-free paper, in particular:
Manufactured under the G and Arctic brands, used primarily for printing books, magazines, catalogues, maps and personalised direct mail correspondence.
Kraft paper:
During 2020 kraft paper portfolio manufactured in Munkedal and Kostrzyn has established on chosen markets and segments. The combined offer from the two mills is covering a grammage range from 38 g/m2 to 150 g/m2 in two shades. Kraft paper is also offered in wet strength version which is more suitable for production of shopping bags and other applications where there is a risk that the paper will be exposed to water.
Our brands and circular economy
Full product range of Munken papers produced by Arctic Paper Munkedal and Amber Graphic and Munken Kraft produced by Arctic Paper Kostrzyn were awarded a Silver Material Health Certificate by the Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute
The Cradle to Cradle Certified™ Material Health Assessment Methodology is a contextual assessment based on chemical hazard identification and qualitative exposure considerations during a product’s manufacture, use, and end-of-use. It means that products are made using chemicals that are as safe as possible for humans and the environment by leading designers and product.
Our brands and art industry
At Arctic Paper, we learn from students and students learn from working with us. The Munken Agenda is an annual unique design project, that started in 1996 For over a decade, Arctic Paper has collaborated with different European Design Universities creating an artistic platform for exchanging our passion for providing high-quality products with an eco-friendly and sustainable footprint with creativity and conceptual ideas of artists and designers. For 2019, the creative idea and concept for the Agenda were created by five graphic design students from NABA (Nuova Accademia Belle Arti) in Milan, Italy. Munken Agenda is perceived as an interesting design reference by art directors, designers and agencies around Europe and the world. In 2019, the concept was created by graphic design students from École Estienne in Paris, France followed by Universities in London, England in 2020.
Below we present information about our business model – key inputs and outputs, as well as business activities and results.
Arctic Paper’s key focus is sustainable development in all areas where our business activities have a significant impact. This means that we aim to create value for shareholders, but not at the expense of opportunities for future generations.
Our three key sustainability aspects – the Environment, People and Business Operations – have been chosen based on a materiality assessment that was carried out in 2017. To identify areas where Arctic Paper can have a significant impact, we engaged with both external and internal stakeholders, making use of both survey data and interviews. We constantly review and validate internally the list of material aspects, from which we arrived at our materiality mix. The materiality mix continues to be the basis of Arctic Paper's sustainability work and reporting structure.
At the end of 2020, we have invited our main stakeholders including our employees, customers, suppliers and other external partners to participate in CSR Survey and to share their opinion and recommendations regarding our future CSR activities and areas of engagement. Their opinions help us to decide which aspects of our responsibility should be our priority for the future. We will deeply investigate and analyze the results of the survey and feedback from our stakeholders.
The results of the stakeholder survey and management valuation of sustainability factors is shown in condensed form in the materiality matrix below.
|
Basis for selection |
Approach to stakeholder engagement |
Key Topics |
Arctic Paper response |
Customers |
Main source of value creation |
Direct contact through sales organisations Direct contact through trial printing of new products Indirect contact through merchants |
Product functionality and development Environmental impact of production and ways of improving its efficiency Product certification Compliance with laws and regulations Meeting sustainability goals while offering competitive prices |
Transparent presentation of environmental performance, such as in the EMAS-report Using pulp manufactured from suppliers certified by FSC® or PEFC™ |
Employees |
Key capital for our ability to produce and sell our products |
Appraisals Employee surveys Regular contact with labour unions |
Environmental impact of production and ways of improving its efficiency Initiatives to improve the wellbeing of employees Health and safety |
Mill-specific action plans for health and safety Training programmes Remuneration routines |
Suppliers |
Significant impact on our production capabilities |
Close contact with major suppliers in order to keep them informed about our needs and demands If needed, corrective actions |
Responsible approach towards our supply chain Business ethics |
Audit of a major pulp supplier using a detailed form Following the Arctic Paper Code of Conduct for suppliers |
Authorities |
Compliance with legal obligations |
Direct contact through reporting Cooperation within sectoral organisations |
Compliance with legal requirements Minimising the negative impact of business operations |
Transparent reporting, both for financial and non-financial performance Active participation in sectoral initiatives |
Shareholders |
Expectations of return on investments |
Shareholder meeting
|
Support for Arctic Paper’s sustainability work Potential business risks related to sustainability issues |
Transparent reporting, both for financial and non-financial performance |
In 2015, the United Nations published a comprehensive list of 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). As sustainability is deeply integrated into the daily operations of Arctic Paper, we decided to match the material themes described above with SDGs. We have identified six SDGs that we find are the most relevant to our operations and to which Arctic Paper can best contribute.
Arctic Paper’s approach to corporate responsibility is centred on the sustainability of operations, in particular concerning the mills. We have therefore established a set of key business performance indicators, which are periodically measured and reported to management. These indicators allow us to better understand our impact on the environment and our employees, as well as better understand our business operations. Following this assessment, we can react accordingly.
In 2021, Arctic Paper is going to review main key business performance and set new targets for longer time perspective.
Environment & Climate |
Energy consumption: Total net energy consumption (MWh/tonne of paper) We are committed to improving the energy efficiency of our operations. Investments in this area will have a positive effect on the environment, due to decreased emissions of pollutants, and on our financial performance. |
Business performance indicator |
Target 2022 |
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
2017 |
2016 |
Total net energy consumption* (MWh/tonnes of paper) |
2,2 |
2,2 |
2,3 |
2,4 |
2,3 |
2,4 |
Whereof from internal energy production based on renewable sources** MWh/tonnes of paper |
0,8 |
0,16
|
0,4 |
- |
- |
- |
Tonnes of paper produced |
695,000 |
587,364 |
601,564 |
639,073 |
658,645 |
654,821 |
*Energy sold to external partners not included. Target of 2022 and figures for 2016 - 2020 are recalculated by including purchased heat.
**Biomass and hydropower
Environment & Business operations |
Value chain: % of pulp suppliers who are FSC® and/or PEFC™ certified We are aware of the fact that the environmental integrity of our business relies in part on our suppliers. As we source pulp for our production from a number of suppliers, we expect them to share our values with respect to environmental sustainability. Our aim is to be sourced by responsible and sustainable pulp suppliers who possess FSC® and/or PEFC™ certifications |
Business performance indicator |
Target 2022 |
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
2017 |
2016 |
Share of pulp suppliers who are FSC® and/or PEFC™ certified |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
People |
Injuries per million work hours We have a systematic approach to safety. We train our employees on an annual basis and ensure that our management is well-equipped to handle safety emergencies. When systematic problems are identified during the production process, targeted continuous action plans are put into place. In addition, we have trained rescue teams at all of our mills. We are committed to minimising the number of light and heavy accidents at our workplaces. There was a small decrease of accidents during 2020 and compared to previous year. |
Business performance indicator |
Target 2022 |
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
2017 |
2016 |
Lost time injuries per million work hours |
<4 |
6,3 |
7,8 |
8,5 |
8,0 |
8,4 |
Business operations |
Value of complaints as share of annual turnover |
Business performance indicator |
Target 2022 |
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
2017 |
2016 |
|||
Value of complaints as share (%) of sales revenue |
0,50 |
0,48 |
0,47 |
0,58 |
0,61 |
0,58 |
|||
Sales revenue (in MPLN) |
- |
2,016 |
2,309 |
2,293 |
2,247 |
2,296 |
|||
|
|
|
|
In order to sustainably create value over the short and long-term, we need to periodically identify, analyse and mitigate the risks facing our organisation. In our business model we have to take into consideration a number of risks, dependencies and opportunities in the whole value chain from raw material to transportation of our products to the customers. Increasingly important is to value the risks and opportunities related to climate. Since 2019 we have expanded our report by reporting CO2 emissions not only from our own mills but also from our major suppliers of raw materials, energy and transportation companies. We have also described the potential risks connected to climate change. Climate change also offers an opportunity for our company in that we can be part of the solution by offering products manufactured from renewable sources that can substitute for products based on fossil-fuel sources.
In 2020 COVID-19 pandemic became a major public health emergency and creates a new kind of global risk factor for the business environment around the world. Everyone needs to assess and manage the risks of COVID-19, and in particular, businesses should consider the risks to their employees and contractors. As an employer, Arctic Paper also has a legal responsibility to protect our employees from risk to their health and safety. We also need to make the effort to assess and manage the risks of COVID-19 as a possible serious threat to our daily business operations which may have a significant impact on the financial condition of the Arctic Paper Group currently and in the future.
Our principal risks are explained in the table below, together with an overview of actions taken to mitigate them. More detailed information with regards to specific mitigation plans can be found in later sections of the report, categorised by theme.
|
Risk |
Implications |
Mitigating actions taken |
Environment and climate |
Not meeting national or EU-wide legal requirements with regards to environmental standards |
Fines from authorities Reputational damage Possible personal responsibility Disruptions in operations |
Careful monitoring of environmental standards and indicators Early reaction system to changes in regulation Introducing efficiency-improving technologies |
Unintentional damage to the environment |
Careful monitoring of environmental standards and indicators Compliance with regulations and procedures |
||
Climate change can have an impact on the physical conditions for production |
Disruptions in operations due to: Drought Flooding Landslide Malfunction in electrical equipment Reputational damage Raw material sourcing Energy sourcing
|
Reducing water consumption Increasing water by-pass capacity Improving drainage Plans for supply allocation Increasing of cooling capacity for sensitive electric equipment Allocation of raw materials to core products and markets Reducing specific energy consumption Investing in renewable energy sources |
|
People |
Lack of competent employees (e.g., due to competition or difficulties in finding new employees to replace an ageing workforce) |
Disruptions in operations (insufficient quantity or quality of products) Financial loss – money invested in training is lost |
Creating an attractive and ethical workplace to attract and retain employees |
Accidents at work |
Disruptions in operations Departure of qualified personnel Need for new investments at production sites if the damage is extensive Fines from authorities |
Health and safety training performed on a regular basis Detailed analysis of all incidents – from risk observation to injuries Improvement plans in place for all our mills Dedication to a zero-injury environment |
|
People and Business operations |
Limited visibility over suppliers and their human rights practices |
Disruptions in operations Reputational damage Financial loss
|
Scrutiny over actions of suppliers in the form of signed declarations Implementation Code of Conduct for Suppliers |
Global pandemic |
Implementation of policies, building an awareness and routines among the entire organization in order to protect our employees and the operations |
||
Environment and Business Operations
|
Shortage of pulp on the market, inability to buy certified pulp |
Disruptions in operations Financial loss Loss of customer credibility |
Careful monitoring of the market Building long-term relationships with qualified suppliers |
Disruptions in the energy market (e.g., lack of energy access or poor fuel quality) |
Diversification of sources of energy, seeking new energy investments |
||
Poor weather conditions (e.g. flooding) (see also “climate”) |
Continuity plans developed for mills |
||
Country-specific risks – linked to the supply chain, production, and distribution Risk due to climate change |
Disruptions in operations Financial loss Increased regulatory burden Reputational damage Raw material sourcing Energy sourcing |
Careful monitoring of world affairs of the global business environment Building long-term relationships with qualified suppliers
|
Arctic Paper has a long-standing and pioneering commitment to environmental and social sustainability.
We are proud of creating positive value by enabling and encouraging customers to use and recycle products made mainly using renewable resources. At the same time, we try to minimise the negative impact of our production and transportation services by engaging in sustainable practices at each stage of the paper production cycle. In addition to complying with environmental laws and regulations, we want to make sure that we work together with our major stakeholders to understand the forces driving sustainability within our industry. This, together with our internal follow-up work, is the basis for the development and evaluation of our products, processes and routines.
The ISO 14001 management system is in place at all of our mills. It guides the way we manage our environmental responsibilities at the mills, and how we work on continuously improving them. All certificates are widely available on our website.
In this report, we present the consolidated environmental performance of our three mills. The mills publish separate EMAS-reports, where more information on individual environmental performance is available. In addition, more environmental data regarding our products can be found on our website, in the form of product-specific environmental declarations called “Paper Profiles”. Importantly, each Paper Profile documents the environmental impact across the whole supply chain, as our Business operations are highly reliant on our suppliers.
A sustainable circular production system Arctic Paper is part of an industry that is to a large extent based on renewable wood from rationally managed forest. We are proud of being part of a sustainable circular production system. This means that resources are used, reused and recycled with little or no waste. In our case, the circular system starts with a renewable wood raw material.
The overarching goal of our environmental policy is to mitigate the adverse impact of our mills’ processes on the environment. We are committed to doing so both by introducing new solutions and improvements to the operations of our mills and by educating our employees about ways to protect the natural environment.
Environmental policies are present at the group and mill level. The environmental management system at all three mills is guided by ISO 14001. Arctic Paper is proud not only to have introduced routines and procedures to improve the environmental performance of our mills, but also to have efficiently integrated these routines and procedures into our daily operations.
Our mills are also EMAS-registered, which means that they fulfil additional requirements, beyond ISO 14001. Among others, these include stricter rules on how to measure and evaluate environmental performance. The certification also means that we need to present detailed information on our environmental performance in EMAS reports, available on our website.
Additionally, our mill in Grycksbo has a certified system of energy management, ISO 50001. This means that the energy system implemented at the mill follows a systematic approach, aimed at continuously improving energy consumption and energy efficiency.
Our mills in Grycksbo, Kostrzyn, and Munkedal have a chain of custody certificates for FSC® (Forest Stewardship Council®) and the corresponding for PEFC™ (Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification™). This means that we can guarantee our customers that our products come from responsible sources. Below we present the logos and certificate numbers for our mill at Munkedal.
We extensively train our employees on PEFC™ and FSC® product origin control systems. Our training is based on NEPCon materials (NEPCon is a non-profit organisation that supports better land management and business practices that benefit people, nature and the climate). We assess specific risks including unclear ownership structures and risk of bribery.
Arctic Paper is aware of the environmental regulations affecting our industry, and we carefully monitor the regulatory environment in Poland and Sweden, as well as at the European Union level. Apart from legal requirements, we are also interested in best practices within our business, and carefully follow developments in these areas. As an example, in the EMAS reports we benchmark our environmental figures on emissions to water to the Best Available Techniques (BAT) reference figures, prepared by the European Commission in collaboration with industry experts. These lead us to conclude that our environmental performance is aligned with the best practices within the industry.
Taking into account our production process, we focus our environmental efforts on four main areas selected during our materiality assessment. These areas will guide the next sections of this chapter: energy consumption, CO2 emissions, water consumption and waste management. We believe that our targets, defined in relation to production volumes, clearly demonstrate our commitment to progress in the area of environmental sustainability.
Climate change requires a revision of the entire industry’s social and economic attitude. As a company which is committed to environmental and social sustainability, we are focused on seeking new possibilities to improve our business activities and production processes by implementing new energy sources and increasing our energy efficiency.
Arctic Paper purchases energy both as fuel (biomass and natural gas) and as electricity (from the local power grid). We also produce electricity at our mills using hydropower plants (Arctic Paper Munkedal), counter-pressure steam turbines (Arctic Paper Grycksbo and Arctic Paper Kostrzyn) and gas turbines (Arctic Paper Kostrzyn), which we also sell to the market when appropriate. The most energy-intensive processes in paper production are the generation of steam, which is used in the drying of paper and the operation of motors used in paper machines, refiners and pumps.
Our goal is to reduce the amount of energy required at every stage of our production process. Energy efficiency is of the highest importance for the paper production cycle. We run projects for increasing the fraction of renewable energy sources used for our plants. Our energetic projects and programmes can help us to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, decrease demand for energy imports and drive down production costs.
Each year we initiate various types of energy efficiency programme at all three of our mills with the aim of reducing their environmental impact. We optimize and trim all installations and machinery and continuously evaluate our processes to identify future investments.
From an energy perspective 2020 year was difficult as the market, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, has been unpredictable giving a high frequence of market related stops in our production process. During starts and stops of the machines an energy consumption level increase significantly without any saleable production. Beside the frerquent starts and stops, shorter orders flow also meant that produced grades of paper were changed more often than usually. The paper machines are consuming more energy also when changing grades.
During 2020 the construction phase for a new hydro powerplant in Munkedal has been finished. The plant will double the hydropower production at the mill from 12 GWh to 25 GWh per annum. In December 2020 the plant was tested and since January 2021 it runs a regular production.
An energy mapping of the total operation in Munkedal has been done during the year and a number of potential energy saving projects has been listed.
On the other hand, the product variety at the mills has gradually changed into direction of packaging grades with higher demands for strength hence demanding more refining energy.
During 2019 the press section in Paper Machine no. 1 at Kostrzyn has replaced the traditional model with a shoe press. This will give us a significant decrease in thermal energy consumption and a small increase in electrical energy. In addition, older refiners have been replaced in Kostrzyn mill with new, state of the art equipment giving improved quality and lower specific energy consumption. In 2020 a new vacuum equipment ( turbofans) has been been installed.
In Grycksbo a number of energy projects has been done during last years that altogether contribute with saving of an energy amount comparable with the energy consumption of 480 regular household in the Nordic region. An important project for energy saving was a replacement of an old refiners with modern energy efficient machines.
Below you can find the latest figures on our energy consumption, one of our key performance indicators regarding environmental sustainability. The specific energy consumption reported in the table below is expanded compared to previous reporting year (also by historical data) by including purchased heat.
Key performance indicator |
Target 2022 |
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
2017 |
2016 |
Total net specific energy consumption (MWh/tonne paper) |
2,2 |
2,2 |
2,3 |
2,4 |
2,3 |
2,4 |
Total production of paper (in tonnes) |
695,000 |
587,364 |
601,564 |
639,073 |
658,645 |
654,000 |
Pollutants created during the energy production process leave our mills through chimneys as air pollutants, and as biomass ash. Air pollutants, in particular CO2 , accumulate in the atmosphere, contributing to climate change. Emission levels are monitored by management. Emissions carry an environmental cost, and they can also be associated with considerable financial, legal and commercial costs for our business.
We have been dedicated to reducing emissions for several years. Historically, the most important step in reducing CO2 emissions was made in Kostrzyn in 2007, when the coal boiler was replaced by modern natural gas boiler equipped with gas turbines and counter-pressure steam turbines, and in Grycksbo in 2008, when a significant investment in a biomass boiler was made, making the steam generation process at the mill fossil-free.
Below we present our greenhouse gas emissions levels based on Greenhouse Gas Protocol (GHG Protocol) accounting and reporting standards to measure, quantify and manage greenhouse gas emissions.
The GHG Protocol Corporate Standard classifies a company’s GHG emissions into three ‘scopes’.
Scope 1: direct emissions from sources owned or controlled by the company.
Scope 2: indirect emissions from the generation of purchased electricity consumed by the company.
Scope 3: all other indirect emissions (not included in scope 2). This includes emissions that occur in the value chain of the reporting company, including both upstream and downstream emissions, which occur from sources not owned or controlled by the company. We have divided this group into two sections, in relation to the most relevant participants of our supply chain – suppliers of raw materials (including pulp, filler coating pigment totally covering >90% of purchased raw material value ) and transportation companies.
Figures of direct CO2 emissions of 2016-2020 has been recalculated and the contribution from externaly sold energy has been deducted. CO2 contribution from externaly sold energy is presented in next table.
Key performance indicator (kg CO2/tonne paper) |
Target 2022 |
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
2017 |
2016 |
Direct CO2 emissions |
240 |
221 |
253 |
255 |
244 |
236 |
Indirect specific CO2 emissions from external electricity suppliers1 |
- |
10 |
9 |
|
|
|
Indirect specific CO2 emissions from our major supplier of raw material2 |
70 |
73 |
73 |
|
|
|
Indirect specific CO2 emissions from our transporters3 |
35 |
35 |
36 |
|
|
|
Total Indirect specific CO2 emissions |
115 |
118 |
118 |
|
|
|
Total specific CO2 emissions |
- |
385 |
415 |
|
|
|
Total production of paper (in tonnes) |
695,000 |
587,364 |
601,564 |
639,073 |
658,645 |
654,821 |
1.Figures describing the average CO2 load for the national grid in Poland and Sweden .
2.Covering >90% of the purchased raw materials (calculated as purchase value).
3.Figure based on average delivery points in Europe.
CO2 contribution from energy sold (heat and electricity) to external consumers.
|
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
2017 |
2016 |
Exported energy (GWh/year) |
118 |
109 |
104 |
109 |
176 |
Tonne CO2 per GWh |
228 |
228 |
228 |
228 |
228 |
Tonne CO2 per year |
26,809 |
24,948 |
23,800 |
24,948 |
40,161 |
During 2020 the availability of electricity in Sweden was on a high level due to good conditions in the water reservoirs, hence a significant portion of natural gas was substituted by electricity in the Munkedal mill giving significant reduction of direct CO2 emissions. On the other hand, for the same reason, there is a small increase of an indirect emissions from electricity suppliers.
It should be noted that the CO2 figures from our external sources are based on the most recent available data. In most cases, we used data from 2019 as not all of our external partners were able to provide us with 2020 data at the date of publication of this report.
CASE:
Products produced at Arctic Paper Munkedals AB awarded by Cradle to Cradle Certified™ Products Program
On June 24th 2020 the entire range of products produced by our mill in Munkedal has been certified by the Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute (C2CPII) with an overall certification at the Bronze level.
The Cradle to Cradle Certified™Product Standard is a globally recognized standard for safe, circular and sustainable products made for the circular economy. Achieving a C2C Certified™ certification means not only to minimise negative impacts influences but to leave a positive footprint. This creates products and processes that are safe for people, healthy for the environment and successful for business.
During 2020, the entire production process of the mill in Munkedal was inspected by EPEA GmbH, innovation partner and C2C Certified™ Assessment Body, and certified according to the C2C Certified™ Products Standard. Development opportunities were outlined and now will be implemented in the medium and long term perspective so we can thrive on even better results in the future.
To receive certification, products are assessed for environmental and social performance across five critical sustainability categories: material health, material reutilization, renewable energy and carbon management, water stewardship, and social fairness.
The certification requires a renewal every two years.
Additionally, a full product range of Munken papers produced by Arctic Paper Munkedal and Amber Graphic and Munken Kraft produced by Arctic Paper Kostrzyn was awarded a Silver Material Health Certificate by the C2CPII.
The C2C Certified™ Product Standard corresponds also to UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) which constitute our core values of sustainable and environmentally and socially committed operations of Arctic Paper. For more information about our contribution to the Sustainable Development Goals please check page no.10 of this report.
Water is an indispensable resource in the paper production process. It is used to slush the pulp into a fibre stock, and then to transport fibres to the paper machine headbox. Since the stock is dewatered once it is placed in the paper machine, most of the water can be reutilised in the mill. Water which is not recirculated is purified on-site, before being released back to the rivers from which it came – Warta, Munkedalsälven and Grycken. Internal effluent treatment plants conduct mechanical, biological and chemical treatments. At the same time, the separated deposit from the effluent treatment is mixed and dewatered, and then recycled as a soil improver or raw material for coverage of historically polluted areas such as old deposits.
We carefully monitor the quality of our water outputs; most notably we focus on Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD). COD indicates the effect the discharge water will have on the receiving environment; in our case the three rivers Warta, Munkedalsälven and Grycken. It measures organic compounds which consume oxygen during decompositions; very high levels of oxidizable organic material may be detrimental to aquatic life forms. As good practise, we also monitor the quality of our water inputs, exceeding the requirements set by regulators.
We have implemented a programme to reduce our emissions to water at our mill in Munkedal. Part of the programme was the installation of a separate water purification system for the power supply station in 2017, in order to improve our opportunities for water recycling.
The decrease of COD level is mainly a consequence of better operation conditions in our Kostrzyn mill. In 2018, a modernisation of the vacuum system was conducted, replacing old water ring vacuum pumps with turbofans, which have had important water-saving properties.
Our mill in Grycksbo has participated in a project organised by the Swedish Forest Industries Federation regarding environmental impact of old sediments. The main objective of this project was to improve the current monitoring programs in order to be able to evaluate the impact and ecological significance of sludge emissions. In order to assess the degree of environmental impact, a selected group of fish - perches - was tested. Using fish for environmental impact studies is a method that has been used for decades by the Swedish environmental monitoring system. One of the goals of the project was also to collect historical data and compare it with current data. In addition, the harvested fish were used to assess their health and reproductive capacity, and to develop a standardized procedure for this that could be included as part of future environmental monitoring programs.
Key performance indicator |
Target 2022 |
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
2017 |
2016 |
Specific water consumption (m3/tonne of paper) |
7,0 |
8,6 |
8,3 |
7,9 |
7,5 |
7,6 |
COD (kg/tonne paper) |
0,42 |
0,48 |
0,46 |
0,48 |
0,45 |
0,43 |
Total production of paper (in tonnes) |
695,000 |
587,364 |
601,564 |
639,073 |
658,645 |
654,821 |
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic the production stops frequency and change of the grades produced has been much higher than usual. Unfavorable production conditions caused by the changing market situation had a large impact on the unit level of water consumption. As the central functions in our effluent treatment plants are based on biological degradation of pollutants, even operation conditions are important for optimal function. Due to many starts and stops of production and grade changes, working conditions for the effluent treatment plants has been less favourable during 2020.
The specific water consumption in Munkedal since 2019 has increased as a consequence of the ongoing construction of a new hydropower plant in Munkedal. During the construction, a recirculation pipe for effluent water to in-going fresh water has been be dismantled. The new hydropower plant was taken in to operation by the end of December 2020 and since then the situation, form this perspective, is normalised.
Most of the waste emanating from our plants is sorted and sent to external recycling. Comparably smaller volumes of waste are used for energy recovery or are sent to landfills, and even smaller volumes of dangerous waste are sent for controlled destruction by third party contractors.
All our mills use certified handlers of waste. The volumes of different kinds of waste are appropriately reported to the handlers and the authorities. We closely monitor these values to ensure we maintain our waste management balance year-on-year and constantly improve waste recycling efficiency.
Waste
Key performance indicator |
Target 2022 |
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
2017 |
2016 |
Recycling or energy extraction (kg/tonne of paper) |
11 |
11,3 |
9,7 |
8,7 |
12,8 |
11,5 |
Hazardous (kg/tonne of paper) |
0,2 |
0,46 |
0,20 |
0,3 |
0,2 |
0,4 |
Landfill (kg/tonne of paper) |
0,4 |
0,2 |
0,2 |
0,2 |
0,4 |
0,4 |
Total production of paper (in tonnes) |
695,000 |
587,364 |
601,564 |
639,073 |
658,645 |
654,821 |
Arctic Paper COVID-19 health and safety commitment
Arctic Paper having regard to the safety of its employees, as well as contractors and suppliers, is carefully monitoring the COVID-19 situation on an ongoing basis in all countries where it has operations.
There is a continuous collaboration among the entire organization , weekly follow up meetings, sharing ideas and safety policy meetings in order to minimize the risk and to build awareness.
Arctic Paper takes a number of preventive actions that deal with the guidelines of the World Health Organization (WHO) and each countries governments guidelines and restrictions.
At the same time, we run the business as usual, so that the preventive actions do not interfere with the current operating activities of the company.
In March 2020, Arctic Paper has decided that both foreign and domestic business trips, including participation in trainings and conferences, are suspended until further notice. In the areas where it is necessary, office workers have been able to work remotely using modern means of remote communication. Operational workers work in a rotational system to reduce the number of people in cloakrooms, canteens and strategic places such as e.g. control desks.
We have implemented the basic hygiene rules. All bathrooms were provided by hand sanitiser and standard soaps were replaced with antibacterial ones.
All employees are informed about the current epidemiological situation and all actions taken by the units. We use all available means of communication, such as: video conferences, company newsletter, information boards, intranet, and e-mails in order to create safe work places for our employees.
Despite the ongoing pandemic, Arctic Paper maintains stable financial liquidity and the second quarter of 2020 most affected by the pandemic has shown that Arctic Paper has coped relatively well with the related challenges.
•We are fully aware of it is still a challenging and not secure environment to manoeuvre in;
•We follow the rules and recommendations in each state where we operate;
•We have been successful in protecting our employees and our operations during 2020;
•We have used the opportunity for short-term allowance in the countries where it has been offered;
We continuously monitor the market development and adapt our operations accordingly to the current situation and regulatory restrictions.
Arctic Paper aims to take responsibility for our employees, other people working for us and the societies in which we operate.
We consider our employees as our most valuableresource. We believe every employee should be treated with respect. This is also declared in our Corporate Social Responsibility policy and in our Code of Conduct. We strive to make our units safe workplaces, where employees have equal opportunities for development. We are aware of the fact that continuous dialogue with our employees is beneficial for both sides; for employees – by giving them an opportunity to express their needs and concerns, and for us – to understand what is important to them, and thus what should be important to us. We believe in taking our social responsibility and being a partner in the development of the society where we are located. By doing this we create an environment which is attractive to live and work in.
Our Mills support with different activities in the local community, in which our employees and their families are able to participate. For instance, we are supporting local sport clubs and culture events, donating paper to schools and kindergartens.
Health and safety are top prioritized issues for us. We are creating a work environment which prevents and minimises the risk of injuries. We have a systematic approach to safety at our mills. In 2019 we implemented a common Health and safety policy and started cooperation between the mills in H&S issues. Each mill has also implemented its own site-specific health and safety policy, complemented by appropriate routines and procedures.
Our mills have an occupational health service, as well as rescue teams trained to react in case of emergency. Some of our employees are also part of the local fire brigade, trained to respond to both internal and external incidents and accidents.
We carefully analyse all health and safety incidents raised by our employees, and take actions to avoid serious consequences in the future.
We maintain a register of “near misses” and accidents, where all incidents are recorded investigated and analysed.
We propose action plans to mitigate the risk that a near-miss could become a serious accident.
Today, very few accidents are caused by equipment malfunctions. A significant risk factor is human behaviour, hence the focus within work safety is becoming more and more oriented towards creating a safety culture based on the basic idea of “think first, then do”. Risk assessment before any new machinery is put into operation or working method implemented is the most important tool for increased safety.
Our target in this area is to create a zero-injury environment.
Key performance indicator |
Target 2022 |
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
2017 |
2016 |
Number of lost time injuries (LTIR) per million working hours |
<4 |
6,3 |
7,8 |
8,5 |
8,0 |
8,4 |
We continued to decrease accidents during 2020 compared to previous year.
The wellbeing of our employees is of crucial importance to our company. Well-being is strongly associated with engagement.
In 2019 an Employee Engagement Survey was conducted. Compared to 2017, we had a very high response rate which indicates a higher interest among our employees to be engaged in the development of the company. Overall, the results show that our employees feel well treated, understand their tasks, and have adequate resources to do their daily work. It also shows that the activities we started in 2018 to minimize weak areas have given results. As an outcome of employees surveys we have started to implement new initiatives which help us to keep our employees motivated and engaged in our mills’ activities with the purpose to further increase the well-being our employees. At Arctic Paper Munkedals, we have introduced a weekly newsletter in which employees will find up-to-date information about the mill's activities and production results. Next employee survey is planned for 2021/Q4.
Key performance indicator |
Target 2022 |
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
2017 |
2016 |
Employee survey response rate |
65% |
n/a |
74% |
n/a |
52% |
- |
Overall engagement capital |
55% |
n/a |
46% |
n/a |
42% |
- |
We encourage good habits and healthy lifestyles. We organise and support different health programs such as non-smoking and to eat healthy food. We also provide medical examinations to our employees.
We aim that every employee should have a yearly performance conversation. This will help them to understand how they can contribute towards the company goals and to develop their skills and abilities. We believe that this will create a synergy effect which will positively impact the work environment and bring tangible benefits to our business.
There is also a continuous collaboration with our employee representatives. Each month regularly meetings are held in the Mills and twice a year Europe Works council Meetings are held on a group level.
Arctic Paper intention is to offer employees a standard permanent unlimited employment agreements in our operations. Only substitutes for vacancies and project-hired persons have limited employment agreements.
|
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
2017 |
2016 |
Number of permanent unlimited contracts |
1181 |
1183 |
1224 |
1229 |
1229
|
Number of temporary contracts |
17 |
31 |
28 |
26 |
31 |
Among employees and within the Board
As explained in our Code of Conduct and our Corporate Social Responsibility policy, we do not accept any discrimination in our business operations. Arctic Paper Management Board has been striving to employ competent, creative people, holding appropriate qualifications, professional experience and education and who respond to the company’s needs.
Arctic Paper sees diversity as a strength. It is a tool for new ideas and innovations. We want Arctic Paper to mirror the societies in which it operates, and we want to make sure we promote and integrate people of diverse backgrounds..
Employment structure of Arctic Paper
|
Total |
men |
women |
Age<30 |
Age 30-50 |
Age >50 |
|
2016 |
Blue-collar |
806 |
680 |
126 |
90 |
358 |
358 |
White-collar |
421 |
248 |
173 |
20 |
225 |
176 |
|
2017 |
Blue-collar |
811 |
682 |
129 |
92 |
365 |
354 |
White-collar |
420 |
250 |
170 |
17 |
223 |
180 |
|
2018 |
Blue-collar |
807 |
683 |
124 |
106 |
353 |
348 |
White-collar |
416 |
245 |
171 |
16 |
220 |
180 |
|
2019 |
Blue-collar |
770 |
652 |
118 |
110 |
315 |
345 |
White-collar |
413 |
247 |
166 |
13 |
215 |
185 |
|
2020 |
Blue-collar |
774 |
655 |
119 |
114 |
333 |
327 |
White-collar |
407 |
246 |
161 |
16 |
212 |
179 |
Gender employment structure in Arctic Paper.
No major reorganisations have taken place during 2020, hence the overall workforce structure is unchanged.
Since 2018, our Management Board is made up of a Chief Executive Officer and a Chief Financial Officer. These functions were entrusted to two specific persons, irrespective of their gender, based on their professional background and experience. While we are interested in monitoring the diversity make-up of our management board as performance indicators, we do not plan to put in place a specific diversity policy regarding the board.
|
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
2017 |
2016 |
Total count of Management Board |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
% of women on the Management Board |
0% |
0%
|
0% |
0% |
20% |
% of men on the Management Board |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
80% |
The Supervisory Board of Arctic Paper S.A. consists of five members.
|
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
2017 |
2016 |
Total count of Supervisory Board |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
% of women on the Supervisory Board |
20% |
20%
|
0% |
0% |
0 |
% of men on the Supervisory Board |
80% |
80% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
We remunerate employees according to their qualifications and the value they create for the company. Adjustment to local conditions necessitates the use of slightly different systems between our mills. Our employees’ remuneration depends on their results at work, the agreement between the trade unions and the economic situation of the company. All conditions are documented and communicated accordingly. We also have a separate remuneration policy for management at the group level.
We believe in equality of opportunity when it comes to development. Mill-level procedures are in place to guide our recruitment and remuneration processes. For instance, we annually make regular payroll overviews at all our mills.
All employee suggestions and concerns can be raised with mill managers. The Kostrzyn mill has a specific committee of internal and external stakeholders, tasked with evaluating complaints. Additionally, the mill in Kostrzyn has an anonymous system in place, whereby complaints and suggestions can be raised by phone call with the CEO directly.
Overall, we are committed to protecting the human rights of our employees. At the same time, we know that this issue also involves other, external actors in our value chain. This aspect is further explained in the Responsible supply chain section.
Our business operations are based on well-established and trusted relationships with different stakeholders. Therefore, we need to ensure that all of our business operations are transparent – from sustainable sourcing, the production and delivery of our products, to the communication of our results to external stakeholders.
Arctic Paper cooperates with a wide net of suppliers around the world. These suppliers provide us with raw materials, chemicals, energy, logistics and other services that enable us to serve our customers. Aside from the sustainability of our own operations, it is crucial that we consider the approach taken by our suppliers. We aim to choose suppliers who can and are willing to assure us that they respect our values with regards to People and the Environment. In 2018 we established a Code of Conduct for Suppliers of Arctic Paper .
In addition, we want to be transparent and ethical in everything we do. We established and follow a Code of Conduct and a Corporate Social Responsibility policy, however, we are aware of the need to raise awareness of these topics among our employees.
Arctic Paper is deeply integrated into the global value chain. We have over 200 suppliers of materials, 30 of whom cover more than 90 percent of the purchased value and are considered core suppliers.
In our paper mills, we have procedures to help us produce paper with the smallest possible direct impact in terms of pollutants to water, air and land (waste). As the environment has no borders, the impact of our suppliers is of high importance, hence we gather information regarding their environmental performance so that we may make informed purchase decisions based on product specifications and environmental performance. Today the supplier with an excess of 90 percent of purchased value provides us with environmental declarations, which helps us to perform a life-cycle analysis for our products.
To ensure that our core suppliers take a responsible approach to their business, we ask them to submit a specific written report. The report is meant to detail their environmental performance with regards to energy consumption, pollutants to air, water and raw materials – in particular wood. We also ask them for information as to whether a Code of Conduct and a Corporate Social Responsibility policy are in place. At the same time, we expect our suppliers to take note of our Code of Conduct and Corporate Social Responsibility policy. We wish to follow a similar approach with regard to the rest of our suppliers.
Arctic Paper expects its Suppliers to comply with the high standards and values represented by our organisation. Since 2019 we intend to have all our suppliers to comply with our Code of Conduct for Suppliers either by signing our Code or by the supplier providing us with an equivalent document. However, at the end of the year 2020 we managed to achieve 83 percent.
Our Code of Conduct for Suppliers of Arctic Paper covers the most important areas: Laws and Regulations, Human and Labour Law, Corruption and Bribery, the Environment. This document is attached to each contract and is expected to be signed alongside the contract. Suppliers are also expected to follow the requirements set forth in this document. The Code of Conduct for Suppliers applies to all Arctic Paper suppliers as well as all third parties contracted by our suppliers.
Those suppliers who have their own Code of Conduct or CSR policy which are compatible with the Arctic Paper values described in our Code of Conduct for Suppliers, are asked to provide us with a copy of the appropriate documentation. This is equivalent to signing the Arctic Paper Code of Conduct for Suppliers.
Due to the nature of our business, we place a lot of attention on our pulp suppliers in particular. We additionally expect them to fulfil the demands of the FSC® and PEFC™ certification, and hence be audited by a third party in relation to forest management.
If we believe that our partner does not comply with our ethical requirements, we aim to confront and challenge them to change their behaviour, where Arctic Paper may offer guidance specifying which issues need to be improved. The supplier is then expected to take corrective actions, within a reasonable time, in order to meet the requirements in question. In the event that we are unsuccessful, we are prepared to end the cooperation.
We find it important to verify the statements of our pulp suppliers, which is why products sent over by our suppliers are subject to a three-step verification procedure. First, we ask our suppliers to submit environmental declaration, safety data sheets (following REACH EU Regulation) and the technical parameters of their products. Second, we test small samples of the products in our laboratories, to see if they possess the stated properties. Third, we conduct mill trials to see how the products behave in the production environment. Similar procedures are used for other suppliers. We also perform yearly checks into the validity of certificates possessed by our suppliers. In this way, we are able to certify the quality of our products. In this spirit, we also perform audits of our suppliers, to confirm their compliance with the planned Code of Conduct for Suppliers. Due to Covid-19 pandemic global restrictions and in order to keep our employees and our suppliers’ employees safe we have postponed planned audits for next year.
Key performance indicator |
Target 2022 |
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
2017 |
2016 |
Share of core suppliers providing existing signed environmental declarations |
100% |
83% |
98% |
64% |
75% |
56% |
Share of core suppliers who signed the Code of Conduct for Suppliers or has their own code of conduct |
90% |
83% |
85% |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
Number of suppliers who are subject to audits performed by Arctic Paper to confirm compliance with the Code of Conduct for Suppliers |
10 |
3 |
4 |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
Share of pulp suppliers who are FSC®- and/or PEFC™-certified |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
Since 2019 in cooperation with the Book Chain Project, we evaluated Arctic Paper Kostrzyn’s processes for responsible sourcing.The outcome of the evaluation helps us to improve our shared best practices and processes at the mill, and see the new opportunities and challenges which we face when managing responsible sourcing. We demonstrate a deep understanding for the sourcing countries of raw materials and the sustainability issues at forest level and have put strong, formal processes in place to stay up to date with new developments relating to forest issues/challenges. We regularly visit our supplier mills, to evaluate their environmental performance, forest plantations and nurseries. We follow industry analyses from the Brian McClay and Hawkins Wright agencies. We also work with NEPCon who share information and suggestions on sourcing countries. Each time we request a written report on environmental performance from our suppliers, and gather extensive data on energy, air and water pollutants and raw materials.
Our purchasing policy includes requirements to establish fibre traceability, to ensure no product contains controversial sources defined as:
Illegally harvested forest, or harvest not approved by the authority in question;
Wood harvested in opposition to traditional or citizen’s rights;
Wood from high conservation-value forests;
Wood harvested in areas being changed from naturally occurring forest into plantations;
Wood harvested in an area where genetically modified trees have been planted;
Wood harvested in violation of ILO principles (International Labour Conference 1998 – ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work)
We believe that the strength of our supply chain is based on reliable, long-term relationships with our suppliers. We make changes in our supplier portfolio to improve standards in all aspects – economic, ethical and environmental. If a correction is necessary, we are open to re-establishing relations with previous suppliers once the correction has taken place.
Transportation
When deciding on which companies we can entrust with transporting our products, we announce bids for particular routes. Factors we take into consideration when deciding on transportation services are the quality of the documentation provided, the price offered and the impact a given transport operator has on the environment.
Transport operations cause noise, emissions to air and consumption of fuels (mainly fossil fuels). Truck engines are divided into various EURO classes, in which higher figures represent engines with lower emissions, especially of nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide. We keep track of transportation statistics, which cover the transport of ready goods from our mills to their places of destination. We are focused on increasing the percentage shares of operations of EURO 5 and EURO 6 classes.
Key performance indicator |
Target 2022 |
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
2017 |
2016 |
Share of Euro 3 engine class |
0% |
0% |
1% |
1% |
3% |
3% |
Share of Euro 4 engine class |
5% |
1% |
3% |
6% |
11% |
13% |
Share of Euro 5 engine class |
50% |
44% |
47% |
54% |
53% |
50% |
Share of Euro 6 engine class |
45% |
55% |
49% |
39% |
34% |
34% |
The large transportation companies that are our main supplier of transportation services are focused on high transportation efficiency combined with an environmental profile, hence they are continuously renewing their vehicle fleet which moves the density point towards the higher EURO classes.
Having regard to the huge environmental effect of transportation we want to increase the efficiency of our transport chain while reducing Co2 emissions by implementing intermodal transport into our logistics process.
In 2020 20% of deliveries made from our mills to our customers were transported as intermodal transport.
We value transparency in internal and external relations, as any unethical behaviour may expose us to risks of reputational damage and financial loss. Our Code of Conduct contains clear guidelines regarding the business behaviour of our employees, including zero-tolerance for bribes, corruption and other unethical acts.
We are aware of the fact that our sales offices and purchasing and logistics departments are those where the risks of corruption and bribery exposure are most significant. Our approach to anti-corruption measures in these areas is structurally embedded in our processes.
We have a 7-step approach to procurement, which limits the scope for unethical behaviour. First, we divide item purchases into sourcing groups. Then, we gather information about the sourcing groups and the market. Subsequently, we create a portfolio of potential suppliers and choose a strategy for each sourcing group. We then negotiate with a selection of suppliers, and integrate further with our chosen suppliers. Lastly, we continuously monitor the procurement market to make sure our contracts remain competitive. As all decisions made during this process are never dependent on one person, the risk of bribery or corruption is reduced. For large investment projects, decisions regarding investment purchases are made by a dedicated committee, and we are considering extending this practice to other large purchases. The logistics department has a similar purchasing system in place.
When it comes to sales, we have set price lists approved by our management which are communicated to members of our sales teams. Bonuses to members of the sales team are not tied exclusively to their individual sales performance, but also to the overall financial performance of the company. We offer bonuses to our clients on a semi-annual and annual basis; however, these are linked to sales volumes, e.g., through sales volume brackets, which are strictly monitored. Arctic Paper does not offer other bonuses (for example in-kind) to clients.
To us, business ethics is very much a question of awareness. A part of the induction programme for new employees includes topics such as laws and regulations, anti-bribery and anti-corruption measures, human rights and environmental responsibility. Since 2018, the programme covers all units within the group. Thus, our key performance indicator in this respect is the number of our employees who attended such training.
The high target for 2022 will be reached by implementing a training programme for business ethics in all operations within Arctic Paper. In order to speed up the process, the intention is to have a training programme in place not only for new employees, but also for co-workers who have been with the company for a long time.
We also aim for our employees to sign declarations that they have familiarised themselves with our Code of Conduct. We are planning to have specialised training for those employed in procurement, logistics and sales – the three areas in which we consider the risk of abuse to be the largest. More basic, yet comprehensive training would be offered to other employees.
Key performance indicator |
Target 2022 |
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
2017 |
2016 |
Number of employees who participated in the Business ethics training programme (per year) |
100% |
32(544) |
20(553) |
179 (578) |
34 (419) |
22 (419) |
Figures witin the brackets are the acumulted
Complaints
Another aspect of maintaining the integrity of our operations is ensuring that our customers are satisfied with the way we carry out business and with the products we provide them. For this reason, we carefully monitor all customer complaints.
We categorise and evaluate all submitted complaints. Evaluation is primarily done by our sales teams and when necessary by management. We make sure that every complaint is addressed and resolved. Our target is to minimise the value of complaints, while remaining aware of the fact that not all complaints submitted to us are substantiated.
Key performance indicator |
Target 2022 |
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
2017 |
2016 |
Value of complaints as share of sales revenue |
0,5 |
0,48 |
0,47 |
0,58 |
0,61 |
0,58 |
Sales revenue (in MPLN) |
|
2,016 |
2,309 |
2,293 |
2,248 |
2,297 |
Actions are continuously taken to diminish the risk of complaints. In 2019, our technical teams from three mills have drafted a new Complaint handling procedures and policy and issued the General Recommendations for Handling and Accepting complaints. These documents aim to create, from the perspective of the sales company and customers, a predictable, consistent, time and cost-efficient claim handling process.
Legal and regulatory compliance
Due to the fact that Arctic Paper S.A. is a stock listed company, we are obliged to follow the principles outlined in the “Good Practice of GPW Listed Companies 2016”. We comply and adhere to all applicable laws and regulations in the European Union countries where we operate. A large part of those laws and regulations are uniform across the Union, although we are vigilant about any differences. Legal and regulatory compliance is a business necessity, but also a way for us to ensure the sustainability of our operations.
We monitor the number of open legal cases where Arctic Paper was found guilty of a breach of law or regulation. We separate them into business and non-business related, as well as into fines bigger and smaller than 2 million PLN. With regards to legal and regulatory compliance, our target is to minimise our risk of being sued.
Key performance indicator |
Business-related* |
Non-business-related* |
|
2016 |
Fine bigger than 2 MPLN |
0 |
0 |
Fine smaller than 2MPLN |
0 |
0 |
|
2017 |
Fine bigger than 2 MPLN |
0 |
0 |
Fine smaller than 2MPLN |
0 |
0 |
|
2018 |
Fine bigger than 2 MPLN |
0 |
0 |
Fine smaller than 2MPLN |
0 |
0 |
|
2019 |
Fine bigger than 2 MPLN |
0 |
0 |
Fine smaller than 2MPLN |
0 |
0 |
|
2020 |
Fine bigger than 2 MPLN |
0 |
0 |
Fine smaller than 2MPLN |
0 |
0 |
*Business related legal cases from customers. All others are defined as non-business.
Transparency
Apart from transparency in internal and external relations, we value constant and transparent communication with our stakeholders, as explained in our Corporate Social Responsibility policy. We understand that different topics have varying degrees of importance to our stakeholders. This is why we use different channels to communicate our actions.
A commonly used communication channel is our Investors Relation mailbox. Upon receiving a query, the message is forwarded to the person most competent to answer it. At the moment, this only covers the area of investor relations, but we aim for there to be a centralised inbox for all queries.
Below we include a matrix explaining how different communication channels are used to communicate issues regarding our material themes to different stakeholders. This Sustainability Report serves as a base point for information regarding our work on sustainability issues and is as such an important channel of communication.
|
Customers |
Employees |
Suppliers |
Shareholders |
Environment and Climate |
EMAS report “Paper Profiles” Environmental policy |
EMAS report |
EMAS report Code of Conduct and Corporate Social Responsibility policy “Paper Profiles” |
EMAS report “Paper Profiles” Environmental policy |
People |
Direct communication through sales offices Code of Conduct and Corporate Social Responsibility policy |
Intranet, widely accessible to all employees Meetings, both one-on-one and in groups Training and education |
Direct communication through purchasing departments Code of Conduct and Corporate Social Responsibility policy |
Our Code of Conduct and Corporate Social Responsibility policy |
Business operations |
Direct communication through sales offices Press releases Meetings |
Periodic and annual reports Annual meetings Press releases Code of Conduct and Corporate Social Responsibility policy |