tel.: +48 22 543 16 00

fax: +48 22 543 16 01

e-mail: office@bdo.pl

www.bdo.pl

BDO spółka z ograniczoną

odpowiedzialnością spółka

komandytowa

ul. Postępu 12

02-676 Warszawa

Poland

BDO spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością spółka komandytowa [limited partnership], District Court for the capital city of Warsaw, XIII Business Division,

KRS: 0000729684, REGON: 141222257, NIP: 108-000-42-12. The value of the capital contribution is PLN 10,037,500. Regional offices in Poland: Katowice 40-007,

ul. Uniwersytecka 13, tel.: +48 32 661 06 00, katowice@bdo.pl; Kraków 31-548, al. Pokoju 1, tel.: +48 12 378 69 00, krakow@bdo.pl; Poznań 60-650,

ul. Piątkowska 165, tel.: +48 61 622 57 00, poznan@bdo.pl; Wrocław 53-332, ul. Powstańców Śląskich 7a, tel.: +48 71 734 28 00, wroclaw@bdo.pl

BDO spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością spółka komandytowa is a member of BDO International Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, and

forms part of the worldwide network of independent legal entities, each of which provides professional services under the name “BDO”.

This document is a translation.

The Polish original should be referred to in matters of interpretation.

Independent Auditor’s Report

to the Shareholders and the Supervisory Board of CIECH S.A.

Report on the Audit of the Year-end Consolidated Financial Statements

Opinion

We have audited the year-end consolidated financial statements of the group, where the parent company

is CIECH S.A. (“the Parent Company”) (“the Group”), comprising the consolidated statement of financial

position as at 31 December 2022, the consolidated statement of profit and loss, the consolidated

statements of other comprehensive income, the statement of changes in consolidated equity and the

consolidated statement of cash flows for the financial year form 1 January to 31 December 2022, as well

as notes to the consolidated financial statements including a description of significant accounting

methods and other explanations (“the consolidated financial statements”).

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated financial statements:

- give a true and fair view of the Group’s financial position as at 31 December 2022, as well as of its

consolidated financial result and consolidated cash flows for the financial year then ended,

in accordance with the applicable International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the

European Union, as well as the adopted accounting methods (policies);

- are consistent, in content and in form, with the applicable laws and regulations and with the Parent

Company’s Statute.

The present opinion is consistent with the additional report to the Audit Committee, which we issued

on 23 March 2023.

Basis for Opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with National Standards on Auditing in the wording of International

Standards on Auditing adopted by resolution of the National Council of Certified Auditors ("NSA"), and in

compliance with the Act of 11 May 2017 on Certified Auditors, Audit Firms and on Public Oversight (“the

Certified Auditors Act” – 2022 Journal of Laws, item 1302 with subsequent amendments) and Regulation

(EU) No. 537/2014 of 16 April 2014 on specific requirements regarding statutory audit of public interest

entities (“Regulation EU” – OJ L 158). Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in

the Responsibilities of the Auditor for the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements section of this

report.

We are independent of the Group’s companies in accordance with the International Code of Ethics for

Professional Accountants (including International Standards of Independence) of the International Ethics

Standards Board for Accountants ("IESBA Code") adopted by resolution of the National Council of Certified

Auditors, as well as with other ethical requirements relevant to the audit of financial statements in

Poland. We have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements and

the IESBA Code. During the audit, the auditor in charge and the audit firm remained independent of the

Company in accordance with the independence requirements laid down in the Certified Auditors Act and

Regulation EU.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis

for our opinion.

Key Audit Matters

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of the most significance

in the audit of the consolidated financial statements for the current reporting period. They include the

most significant assessed types of risks of material misstatements, including assessed types of risks

of material misstatements resulting from fraud. We addressed these matters in the context of our audit

of the consolidated financial statements as a whole and in forming our opinion thereon, and have

summarized our response to these types of risks, and where relevant, presented our key observations

relating to those risks. We do not express a separate opinion on these matters.

Impairment of goodwill and property, plant and equipment

In its consolidated financial statements prepared as at 31 December 2022 the Group presented PLN

151 852 thousand in total goodwill. In accordance with the accounting policy adopted by the Group,

goodwill allocated to cash generating units is tested for impairment at least at the end of each financial

year.

The estimates involved in impairment testing of goodwill and property, plant and equipment are highly

dependent on judgments regarding future events, and thus carry a significant risk of changes due to

fluctuating market conditions. Because of inherent uncertainty with regard to the future realization

of significant assumptions, as well as the materiality of these assets, we have classified the impairment

analysis of goodwill and property, plant and equipment as a key audit matter.

Disclosures in the financial statements

Presented in notes 5.3 and 5.4

Audit procedures performed in response to the risk

Our audit procedures in response to the described key audit matter included:

− assessing the consistency of the Group’s accounting policy on the measurement of goodwill with

the methods arising out of relevant financial reporting standards;

− identifying, obtaining an understanding of and evaluating the process of goodwill impairment

testing and of the relevant internal controls;

− evaluating the Management’s analysis of indications of impairment of the Group’s property, plant

and equipment;

− with the support of our valuation experts, evaluating the Management’s assumptions and estimates

used in discounted cash flow models, including: analyzing the assumptions and reasonableness of

business projections used in future cash flows, analyzing the reasonableness of key macroeconomic

assumptions, assessing the continuity of application and reasonableness of the methodology applied

to the models used to determine cash flows and residual values, analyzing the correctness of

discount rate calculations and the consistency of those calculations with generally available

information;

− verifying the realization of budgets prepared in prior years;

− evaluating the Management’s analysis of subsequent events on prudent valuation;

− evaluating the adequacy of disclosures relating to goodwill impairment tests.

Inherent uncertainty associated with tax settlements

In the audited period Group companies were parties to tax audits and court proceedings with the tax

authorities. In accordance with the Group’s accounting policy, provisions for possible future tax

liabilities resulting from tax audits are formed when the likelihood that tax will be paid is high. In

addition, considered to be contingent liabilities are those obligations that arose from past events, but

have not been recognized in the consolidated financial statements because it is not probable that an

outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation, or the

amount of the obligation cannot be measured with sufficient reliability.

Ongoing proceedings require the Management to exercise judgment and assess the risk associated with

recognizing income tax liabilities and tax provisions in the consolidated financial statements, or

disclosing the related contingent liabilities. Because of material uncertainty associated with the

existence of the present obligation at the end of the reporting period, we have classified the tax

settlements of Group companies as a key audit matter.

Disclosures in the financial statements

Presented in notes 7.6 and 9.2. Additionally in note 4.3 the existence of an inherent uncertainty

related to taxes in connection with the General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR) was described.

Audit procedures performed in response to the risk

Our audit procedures in response to the described key audit matter included:

− assessing the consistency of the Group’s accounting policy on the recognition of receivables, income

tax liabilities, provisions and contingent liabilities with the methods arising out of relevant financial

reporting standards;

− identifying, obtaining an understanding of and evaluating the process of assessing risk and making

decisions regarding the recognition of tax provisions in the consolidated financial statements, and

of the relevant internal controls;

− analyzing documentation on ongoing tax cases and proceedings;

− evaluating the judgement and assumptions adopted by the Management in assessing the risk

associated with ongoing tax proceedings;

− with the support of our tax experts, analyzing existing rulings in similar cases;

− evaluating the Management’s documentation of subsequent events with respect to ongoing tax

proceedings;

− verifying the amount of income tax provisions and liabilities and evaluating the adequacy of

disclosures relating to ongoing tax proceedings.

Fair value measurement of derivative instruments

In its consolidated financial statements prepared as at 31 December 2022 the Group presented assets

and liabilities on the measurement of derivative instruments, amounting to PLN 363 592 thousand and

PLN 462 097 thousand, respectively. In accordance with the accounting policy adopted by the Group,

derivative instruments are measured at fair value by applying financial instrument valuation models

using generally available interest rates and currency exchange rates.

The estimates involved in determining the fair value of derivative instruments have a high degree of

complexity and as such are subject to an increased risk of uncertainty. Due to the high volume of

transactions and the increased risk of uncertainty associated with significant judgements, we have

classified the measurement of derivative instruments as a key audit matter.

Disclosures in the financial statements

Presented in notes 8.1 and 8.4

Audit procedures performed in response to the risk

Our audit procedures in response to the described key audit matter included:

− assessing the consistency of the Group’s accounting policy on the measurement of derivative

instruments with the methods arising out of relevant financial reporting standards;

− identifying, obtaining an understanding of and evaluating the process of measuring derivative

instruments and of the relevant internal controls;

− analyzing the measurements performed by the Group;

− with the support of our valuation experts, assessing the assumptions and estimates used by the

Management in financial instrument measurement models, including: analyzing the assumptions

relating to the sources of market data feeding the measurement models, assessing the continuity

of application and reasonableness of the methodology applied to the models;

− evaluating the adequacy of disclosures relating to derivative instruments.

Other Matters – scope of the audit

The Group’s consolidated financial statements for the financial year ended 31 December 2021 have been

audited by an engagement partner acting on behalf of another audit firm, who expressed an unmodified

opinion on the financial statements on 29 March 2022.

Responsibilities of the Parent Company’s Management and Supervisory Board for the Consolidated

Financial Statements

The Parent Company’s Management is responsible for the preparation of the consolidated financial

statements that give a true and fair view of the Group’s financial position and financial result

in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union,

the adopted accounting methods (policies), the applicable binding regulations and the Statute.

The Parent Company’s Management is also responsible for such internal controls as it considers necessary

to ensure that the consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatements resulting from

fraud or error.

In preparing the consolidated financial statements the Parent Company’s Management is responsible

for assessing the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, any matters

related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting, except in situations where the

Management intends to either liquidate the Group or discontinue its operations, or has no realistic

alternative but to do so.

The Parent Company’s Management and members of the Parent Company’s Supervisory Board

are required to ensure that the consolidated financial statements meet the requirements of the

Accounting Act of 29 September 1994 (“the Accounting Act” – 2023 Journal of Laws, item 120

with subsequent amendments). Members of the Parent Company’s Supervisory Board are responsible

for overseeing the financial reporting process.

Responsibilities of the Auditor for the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements

as a whole are free from material misstatements due to fraud or error, and to issue an independent

auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but it is not

a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with NSA will always detect an existing material

misstatement. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if it could be

reasonably expected that they, individually or in the aggregate, could influence the economic decisions

of users made on the basis of these consolidated financial statements.

The concept of materiality is applied by the auditor at the planning stage and when performing the audit

and evaluating the effect of identified misstatements on the audit and of uncorrected misstatements,

if any, on the financial statements, as well as when formulating the auditor’s opinion. In view of the

above, all of the opinions and statements contained in the auditor’s report are expressed subject to the

qualitative and quantitative level of materiality set in accordance with the applicable standards

on auditing and the auditor’s professional judgement.

The scope of the audit does not include an assurance regarding the Group’s future profitability,

or regarding the effectiveness of the Parent Company’s Management in the handling of the Group’s

affairs now or in the future.

Throughout an audit in accordance with NSA, we exercise professional judgement and maintain

professional skepticism, as well as:

- identify and assess the risks of a material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements

resulting from fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures in response to such risks and obtain

audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not

detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than the risk of not detecting

a material misstatement resulting from error, because fraud may involve collusion, forgery,

deliberate omission, misrepresentation or override of internal controls;

- obtain an understanding of the internal controls relevant to the audit in order to plan our audit

procedures, but not to express an opinion on the effectiveness of the Group’s internal controls;

- evaluate the appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the estimates

and related disclosures made by the Parent Company’s Management;

- conclude on the appropriateness of the Parent Company Management’s use of the going concern basis

of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether material uncertainty exists related

to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Group’s ability to continue as a going

concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our

auditor’s report to the related disclosures in the consolidated financial statements or, if such

disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence

obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report. However, future events or conditions may cause the

Group to cease to continue as a going concern;

- evaluate the overall presentation, structure and contents of the consolidated financial statements,

including the disclosures, and whether the consolidated financial statements represent the underlying

transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation;

- obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the financial information of the entities

or business activities within the Group in order to express an opinion on the consolidated financial

statements. We are responsible for the direction, supervision and performance of the Group’s audit

and remain solely responsible for our audit opinion.

We provide the Parent Company’s Supervisory Board with information about, among others, the planned

scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant weaknesses

of internal controls that we identify during our audit.

We provide the Parent Company’s Supervisory Board with a statement that we have complied with the

relevant ethical requirements relating to independence, and that we will communicate to them all

relationships and other matters that may reasonably be considered to constitute a threat to our

independence, and where applicable, inform them of the related safety measures.

From the matters communicated to the Parent Company’s Supervisory Board we determined those

matters that were of the most significance to the audit of the consolidated financial statements for the

current reporting period and were therefore chosen as key audit matters. We describe these matters

in our auditor’s report, unless law or regulations prohibit their public disclosure or when, in exceptional

cases, we find that a given matter should not be presented in our report because the adverse

consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such

information.

Other Information, Including Report on Activities

Other information comprises: the Management’s Report on the Group’s activities for the financial year

ended 31 December 2022 (“the Report on Activities”) along with a Statement on Corporate Governance

and information on the preparation of the Group’s Statement on Non-Financial Information – prepared

as a separate document of the Statement on Non-Financial Information referred to in Article 49b par. 1

of the Accounting Act, a letter from the President of the Parent Company’s Management Board, a

statement of the Parent Company’s Management Board, which we obtained prior to the date of this

auditor’s report, as well as the Supervisory Board statements and information from the Parent Company’s

Management Board on auditor appointment we expect to be made available to us after the date of this

auditor’s report (together “Other Information”).

Responsibilities of the Parent Company’s Management and Supervisory Board

The Parent Company’s Management is responsible for the preparation of Other Information in accordance

binding regulations.

The Parent Company’s Management and members of its Supervisory Board are required to ensure that

the Report on Activities along with its separate section meets the requirements of the Accounting Act.

Responsibilities of the Auditor

Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover Other Information. In connection

with our audit of the consolidated financial statements, our responsibility is to read Other Information

and, in doing so, consider whether it is materially inconsistent with the consolidated financial statements

or with our knowledge obtained during the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.

If based on the work we have performed, we find a material misstatement of Other Information, we are

required to state this fact in our auditor’s report. In accordance with the requirements of the Certified

Auditors Act, it is also our responsibility to issue an opinion whether the Report on Activities has been

prepared in accordance with binding regulations, and whether it is consistent with the information

presented in the consolidated financial statements. We are also required to issue an opinion whether the

Statement on the Application of Corporate Governance contains the required information.

We received the Report on Activities prior to the issue of the present auditor’s report, whereas the

Annual Report will be available after this date. In the event that we find a material misstatement in the

Annual Report, we are required to communicate this to the Parent Company’s Supervisory Board.

Opinion on the Report on Activities

Based on the work we have performed during the audit, in our opinion the Report on Activities:

− has been prepared in accordance with Article 49 of the Accounting Act and par. 71 of the Minister’s

of Finance Decree of 29 March 2018 on the current and periodic information reported by the issuers

of securities and on the conditions for recognizing as equally valid the information required by the

regulations of a state that is not a member state (the “Current Information Decree” – 2018 Journal

of Laws, item 757 with subsequent amendments);

− is consistent with the information presented in the consolidated financial statements.

Furthermore, based on our knowledge obtained during the audit about the Group and its environment

we have identified no material misstatements in the Report on Activities.

Opinion on the Statement on the Application of Corporate Governance

In our opinion, the Group’s Statement on the Application of Corporate Governance contains

the information specified in paragraph 70 section 6 point 5 of the Current Information Decree.

In addition, in our opinion, the information indicated in paragraph 70 section 6 point 5 letters c-f, h

and I of the Decree contained in the Statement on the Application of Corporate Governance is consistent

with the applicable regulations and with the information contained in the consolidated financial

statements.

Information on Non-financial Information

In accordance with the requirements of the Certified Auditors Act we confirm that the Parent Company

has prepared a Group’s Statement on Non-financial Information referred to in Article 49b par. 9 of the

Accounting Act as a separate section of the Report on Activities.

We have performed no assurance work on the Group’s Statement on Non-financial Information and,

accordingly, do not express any assurance thereon.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

Opinion on the consistency of the markup of the consolidated financial statements prepared in a

single electronic reporting format with the requirements of the regulation on technical standards on

the specification of a single electronic reporting format

In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements we were engaged to perform a

reasonable assurance engagement to express an opinion on whether the consolidated financial

statements of the Group prepared for the financial year ended 31 December 2022 in a single electronic

reporting format and contained in the file entitled ciechsa-2022-12-31-pl.zip (“consolidated financial

statements in the ESEF format”) have been marked up in accordance with the requirements specified in

the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/815 of 17 December 2018 supplementing Directive

2004/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards

on the specification of a single electronic reporting format (the “ESEF Regulation”).

Identification of the Applicable Criteria and Subject Matter

The consolidated financial statements in the ESEF format have been prepared by the Company’s

Management in order to meet the markup requirements and the technical requirements on the

specification of a single electronic reporting format set out in the ESEF Regulation.

The subject matter of the assurance engagement is the consistency of the consolidated financial

statements in the ESEF format with the requirements of the ESEF Regulation and, in our view, the

requirements set out in those regulations constitute appropriate criteria for our opinion.

Responsibilities of the Management and Supervisory Board

The Company’s Management is responsible for the preparation of the consolidated financial statements

in the ESEF format in accordance with the markup requirements and technical requirements on the

specification of a single electronic reporting format set out in the ESEF Regulation. This responsibility

includes the selection and application of appropriate XBRL markups, using the taxonomy referred to in

the regulations.

The Company’s Management is also responsible for designing, implementing and maintaining an internal

control system to ensure that the consolidated financial statements prepared in the ESEF format are free

from material incompliance with the ESEF requirements.

Members of the Company’s Supervisory Board are responsible for overseeing the financial reporting

process, which includes the preparation of financial statements in compliance with the format arising

out of binding legal regulations.

Responsibilities of the Auditor

Our objective was to express an opinion, based on the reasonable assurance engagement, on whether

the consolidated financial statements in the ESEF format have been marked up in accordance with the

requirements of the ESEF Regulation.

We performed the engagement in accordance with National Standard on Assurance Engagements Other

than Audits and Reviews 3001PL “Audit of Financial Statements Prepared in a Single Electronic Reporting

Format” (hereinafter “KSUA 3001PL”) and, where applicable, in accordance with National Standard on

Assurance Engagements Other than Audits and Reviews 3000 (Revised) in the wording of International

Standard on Assurance Engagements 3000 (Revised) – “Assurance Engagements Other than Audits or

Reviews of Historical Financial Information” (hereinafter: “KSUA 3000 (Z)”).

The standard requires us to plan and perform our procedures to obtain reasonable assurance that the

consolidated financial statements in the ESEF format have been prepared in accordance with the

applicable criteria.

Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but it is not a guarantee that an engagement performed

in accordance with KSUA 3001PL and, where applicable, with KSUA 3000 (Z), will always detect an

existing material misstatement.

Procedures are selected based on the auditor’s judgement, including the auditor’s assessment of the risk

of material misstatements resulting from fraud or error. In assessing such risk, the auditor considers the

internal control relevant to the preparation of the consolidated financial statements in the ESEF format,

in order to plan procedures that will allow the auditor to obtain sufficient and appropriate evidence. The

internal control system is not assessed for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of

its operation.

Summary of Work Performed

Our planned and performed procedures included:

- obtaining an understanding of the process of preparing the consolidated financial statements in the

ESEF format, including the Company’s process of selecting and applying the XBRL markups and

ensuring compliance with the ESEF Regulation, as well as an understanding of the internal control

system relevant to that process;

- agreeing the marked up information contained in the consolidated financial statements in the ESEF

format with the audited consolidated financial statements;

- with the use of specialized IT tools, assessing compliance with the technical standards on the

specification of a single electronic reporting format, assessing the completeness of marking up the

information in the consolidated financial statements in the ESEF format with XBRL markups;

- evaluating whether the applied XBRL markups from the taxonomy specified in the ESEF Regulation

have been applied correctly and whether taxonomy extensions have been created in situations when

no suitable elements have been identified in the core taxonomy specified in the ESEF Regulation;

- evaluating the correctness of embedding the created taxonomy markups in the core taxonomy

specified in the ESEF Regulation.

We believe that the evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our

opinion on the assurance engagement.

Ethical Standards, Including Independence

While performing the engagement the auditor and the audit firm complied with independence and other

ethical standards set out in the IESBA Code. The IESBA Code is based on the fundamental principles of

integrity, objectivity, professional competence and due care, confidentiality and professional conduct.

We have also complied with other independence and ethical requirements applicable to such assurance

engagements in Poland.

Quality Control Standards

The audit firm applies national quality control standards in the wording of the International Standard on

Quality Control 1 – “Quality Control for Firms that Perform Audits and Reviews of Financial Statements

and Other Assurance and Related Services Engagements” adopted by resolution of the National Council

of Certified Auditors (hereinafter: “ISQC”).

In accordance with the requirements of ISQC, the audit firm maintains a comprehensive system of quality

control that includes documentation of the policies and procedures relevant to compliance with ethical

requirements, professional standards and the applicable legal and regulatory requirements.

Opinion

As the auditor’s opinion has been formulated based on the matters described above, the opinion should

be read in consideration of those matters.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements in the ESEF format have been marked up, in all

material respects, in accordance with the requirements of the ESEF Regulation.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

Declaration on the Provision of Non-audit Services

To the best of our knowledge and belief we declare that any non-audit services we have provided to the

Group were consistent with the law and the regulations binding and Poland and that we have not provided

any non-audit services prohibited by virtue of Article 5 par. 1 of Regulation EU and Article 136 of the

Certified Auditors Act. The non-audit services we have provided to the Group in the audited period are

listed in note 7.16 to the Report on the Group's activities.

Appointment of the Auditor

We were first appointed as auditors of the Group’s consolidated financial statements in a resolution

passed by the Parent Company’s Supervisory Board on 10 January 2022.

We have audited the Group’s consolidated financial statements for the first time.

The auditor in charge of the audit resulting in this independent auditor’s report is Dr. Anna Bernaziuk.

BDO spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością sp.k. with its registered office in Warsaw

entered on the list of audit firms in number 3355

on behalf of which the audit was performed by the auditor in charge

Signed with a qualified electronic signature

Dr. Anna Bernaziuk

Certified Auditor

Registration No. 173

Warsaw, 23 March 2023