Independent Statutory Auditors Report on the Audit
of Consolidated Annual Financial Statements of the
ING Bank Śląski S.A. Group
for the financial year ended
31 December 2023
Mazars Audyt Sp. z o.o.
ul. Piękna 18
00-549 Warsaw
Mazars Audyt Sp. z o.o.
Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy, XII Wydział Gospodarczy KRS nr 0000086577, kapitał zakładowy: 1 268 000,00 PLN,
NIP: 5260215409, REGON: 011110970
INDEPENDENT STATUTORY AUDITOR’S REPORT
ON THE AUDIT OF CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
Translation of the document originally issued in Polish
To the General Meeting and the Supervisory Board of ING Bank Śląski S.A.
Report on the Audit of Consolidated Annual Financial Statements
Opinion
We have audited the consolidated annual financial statements of the group, the parent
undertaking of which is ING Bank Śląski S.A. (“the Parent Undertaking, “the Bank”) (“Group”),
which comprise the consolidated statement of financial position as at 31 December 2023,
the consolidated income statement, the consolidated statement of comprehensive income,
the consolidated statement of changes in equity, the consolidated cash flow statement for
the financial year from 1 January to 31 December 2023 and notes to consolidated financial
statements, including accounting policy and additional notes (“the consolidated financial
statements”).
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated financial statements:
give a true and fair view of the Group’s consolidated property and financial position as
at 31 December 2023, and of its consolidated financial result and its consolidated cash
flow for the financial year then ended in accordance with the applicable International
Financial Reporting Standards approved by the European Union and the adopted
accounting principles (policy);
comply with the legislation applicable to the Group and with the provisions of the Parent
Undertaking’s Articles of Association as to the form and content;
The present opinion is consistent with the additional report to the Audit Committee that we
issued on 7 March 2024.
Mazars Audyt Sp. z o.o. 3
Basis for Opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with National Standards on Auditing as per
International Standards on Auditing adopted by resolution of the National Council of Statutory
Auditors No. 3430/52a/2019 of 21 March 2019 regarding national standards on auditing and
other documents, as amended, and resolution of the Council of the Polish Agency for Audit
Oversight No. 38/I/2022 of 15 November 2022 on national standards on quality control and
National Standard on Auditing 220 (Revised)
(“NSA”), as well as according to the Act on
Statutory Auditors, Audit Firms and Public Supervision of 11 May 2017 (“the Act on Statutory
Auditors” - Journal of Laws of 2023, item 1015 as amended) and Regulation (EU) No 537/2014
of 16 April 2014 on specific requirements regarding statutory audit of public-interest entities
and repealing Commission Decision 2005/909/EC (“EU Regulation” - Official Journal of the
European Union L 158/77 of 27 May 2014, as amended). Our responsibility under those
standards has been further described in “Statutory Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of
the Consolidated Financial Statements” section of our report.
We are independent of the Group Companies in accordance with the International Code of
Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence Standards) issued
by the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (“the IESBA Code”), adopted by
resolution of the National Council of Statutory Auditors No. 3431/52a/2019 of 25 March 2019
on the principles of professional ethics for statutory auditors, as amended and other ethical
requirements which are applicable to the audit of financial statements in Poland. We have
fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements and the IESBA
Code. During the audit the key statutory auditor and the audit firm remained independent of
the Group Companies in accordance with the Act on Statutory Auditors and with the EU
Regulation.
We believe that the audit evidence that we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to
provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Key Audit Matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most
significance in the audit of the consolidated financial statements of the current reporting
period. These include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement, including
the assessed risks of material misstatement due to fraud. These matters were addressed in
the context of our audit of the consolidated financial statements as a whole and in forming
our opinion thereon, and we summarized our responses to these risks, and, where deemed
appropriate, presented the most important observations related to these risks. We do not
provide a separate opinion on these matters.
Key audit matter
How our audit responded to this matter
Impairment for expected credit losses
on loans and other receivables to
customers
In accordance with the International
Financial Reporting Standard Financial
We critically analyzed the design and implementation
of the process for assessing credit risk and estimating
expected credit losses and verified the effectiveness of
the controls implemented by the Group for identifying
and estimating expected credit losses.
Mazars Audyt Sp. z o.o. 4
Instruments 9 ("IFRS 9"), the Group’s
management should determine the
value of expected credit losses that may
occur during the 12-month period or the
remaining life of the financial asset,
depending on classification of individual
assets into risk categories ("stages")
taking into account the impact of future
macroeconomic conditions on the level
of expected credit losses.
Determining the amount and timing of
recognition of expected credit losses
requires the use of significant judgment
and significant and complex estimates,
including primarily in terms of the
parameters of credit risk in the models
for calculating expected credit losses.
The estimate of the impairment for
expected credit losses takes into
account the issue of the impact of
changing macroeconomic conditions of
the economy. This estimate required the
application by the Group’s Management
Board additional assumptions and
expert adjustments, which take into
account the uncertainties associated
with the current and future
macroeconomic environment and reflect
risk factors that were not included in the
Group's models.
We considered this area to be a key
audit matter because the estimation of
the impairment for expected credit
losses involves significant inherent risks
of misstatements as well as uncertainty
in the estimates made and requires the
Group's management to exercise
significant judgment and, given the size
of the loan portfolio, has a material
impact on the financial statements.
Note III.3.1.1 Estimation of expected
credit losses for financial assets and
Note II.2 Credit risk provide details on
the methods and models used and the
We performed a reconciliation of the base of loans and
other receivables to customers with the Group's
general ledger to confirm the completeness of the
recognition of loans and other receivables to customers
that are the basis for the impairment for expected credit
losses, as well as the value of these allowances.
We performed analytical procedures for the coverage
of the loan portfolio with expected credit losses and
their changes, as well as the transfer of exposures
between stages.
We evaluated the Group's impairment methodology for
compliance with the requirements of IFRS 9, in
particular with regard to the application of the criteria
for identifying a significant increase in credit risk, the
definition of default, the credit risk parameters adopted
and the consideration of the impact of future
macroeconomic conditions (forward looking
information) on the level of expected credit losses.
For the portfolio of loans and other receivables to
customers assessed using the collective method:
we conducted an analysis of the methodology
used to calculate the impairment for expected
credit losses for exposures evaluated using the
collective method, including the adequacy of
the risk parameters used by the Group,
we conducted an independent verification of
the calculation of impairment for expected
credit losses for the entire population of loans,
we conducted an assessment of the
verification of models based on historical data
(so-called back-tests),
we verified the approach and assumptions
used to create adjustments not included in the
models created to reflect the impact of
uncertain economic conditions on the valuation
of the impairment for expected credit losses.
For the portfolio of loans and other receivables to
customers assessed using the individual method:
we conducted an analysis of the correctness of
the impairment identification process and
classification into stages,
Mazars Audyt Sp. z o.o. 5
level of impairment for expected credit
losses on loans and other receivables to
customers.
on a selected sample of credit exposures, we
reviewed documents on the borrower's
financial situation and verified the correctness
of the assignment to the appropriate stage,
for selected impaired loans and advances
(stage 3), we tested the assumptions used in
calculating expected credit losses, in particular
the expected scenarios and the probabilities
assigned to them, as well as the timing and
amounts of expected cash flows, including
cash flows from repayments and realization of
collateral.
We also assessed the adequacy and completeness of
disclosures regarding the impairment for expected
credit losses in the consolidated financial statements.
Impact of the legal risk of CHF-
indexed mortgage loans
The estimate of the impact of the legal
risk of CHF-indexed mortgage loans
resulting in the recognition of
adjustments to the gross carrying value
of these loans or related litigation
provisions is complex and requires a
significant degree of judgment in
determining the possible scenarios, as
well as with respect to the assumptions
made regarding the number of expected
lawsuits, the likelihood of their resolution
with consideration of the possibility of a
court settlement, and the amount of loss
if the Group loses a lawsuit or enters
into a court settlement.
The Group's estimates in this regard are
based on historical observations
indicating considerable uncertainty
about the number of lawsuits that will be
filed in court in the future, as well as the
lack of a consistent line of existing court
rulings.
Note III.3.6 Write-downs and portfolio
provisions related to the portfolio of
mortgage loans indexed to the CHF
exchange rate details the assumptions
In terms of estimating the amount of the impact of the
legal risk of CHF-indexed mortgage loans, our
examination procedures were mainly directed at
evaluating the model and the various assumptions
made by the Bank’s Management Board that have a
significant impact on the level of estimated legal risk
costs. In particular, we carried out the procedures
described below:
we carried out a critical evaluation of the model
for estimating the impact of legal risk on CHF-
indexed mortgage loans and the various
assumptions,
we held discussions with the Bank’s
Management Board and specialists, including
the Bank's lawyers, on the assumptions made,
taking into account historical observations,
including information and events subsequent to
the balance sheet date, past and possible legal
settlements, in particular settlements of the
Court of Justice of the European Union
(CJEU),
we analyzed the Group's documentation for the
purpose of estimating the statistical probability
of realization of the various scenarios of
possible settlements,
we verified the assumptions adopted by the
Group based on historical data for estimating
Mazars Audyt Sp. z o.o. 6
used to calculate the adjustment to the
gross carrying value of CHF-indexed
mortgages and related provisions for
litigation, as well as possible alternative
results presented as part of the
sensitivity analysis of the estimate.
the probability of future settlements and the
level of losses realized because of them,
we analyzed the calculation of the value of
potential losses under the various scenarios
adopted by the Group based on historical data,
we verified the model used by the Group to
estimate the impact of legal risk, verified the
correctness and completeness of the data
underlying the calculations, and confirmed the
mathematical correctness of the calculations,
we analyzed events after the balance sheet
date and their impact on the estimate of
provisions,
we analyzed the register of customer
complaints, with a particular focus on issues
related to and mortgage loans indexed to CHF.
We also assessed the adequacy and completeness of
the disclosures regarding the impact of legal risk on
CHF-indexed mortgage loans in the consolidated
financial statements.
Other Matters
The Group’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2022 have
been audited by an auditor acting on behalf of another audit firm. This auditor expressed an
unqualified opinion on these financial statements on 17 March 2023.
Responsibilities of the Parent Undertaking’s Management Board and
Supervisory Board for the Consolidated Financial Statements
The Parent Undertaking’s Management Board is responsible for preparing the consolidated
financial statements that give a true and fair view of the Group’s property and financial position
and its financial performance in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards
as adopted by the European Union and adopted accounting principles (policy), as well as with
the relevant legislation and with the provisions of the Parent Undertaking’s Articles of
Association. The Parent Undertaking’s Management Board is also responsible for such
internal control as the Management Board determines is necessary to enable the preparation
of consolidated financial statements that are free of material misstatement, whether due to
fraud or error.
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, the Parent Undertaking’s Management
Board is responsible for assessing the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern, as well
as for disclosing, if applicable, matters related to going concern and for adopting the going
concern assumption as an accounting basis, unless the Management Board either intends to
liquidate the Group or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.
Mazars Audyt Sp. z o.o. 7
The Parent Company’s Management Board and members of its Supervisory Board are obliged
to ensure that the consolidated financial statements meet the requirements set out in the
Accounting Act the of 29 September 1994 (“Accounting Act” - Journal of Laws of 2023, item
120 as amended). Members of the Parent Undertaking’s Supervisory Board are responsible
for supervising the financial reporting process.
Statutory Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Consolidated Financial
Statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial
statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and
to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of
assurance but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with the NSA will
always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or
error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be
expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these
consolidated financial statements.
The scope of audit does not include assurance as to the future profitability of the Group and
effectiveness or efficiency of running the Group’s affairs by the Parent Undertaking’s
Management Board at present or in the future.
According to NSA, we exercise professional judgement and maintain professional scepticism
throughout the audit, as well as:
we identify and assess the risk of material misstatement of the consolidated financial
statements, whether due to fraud or error, we design and perform audit procedures in
response to this risk and we obtain audit evidence which is sufficient and appropriate
to provide a basis for our audit opinion. The risk of not detecting a material
misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud
may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the
override of internal control;
we obtain understanding of internal control applied for the purposes of audit in order
to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the
purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the internal control in the
Group;
we evaluate the appropriateness of the accounting principles (policy) used, the
reasonableness of the accounting estimates and related disclosures, provided by the
Management Board of the Parent Undertaking;
we conclude on the appropriateness of the Parent Undertaking’s management’s use
of the going concern principle as a basis of accounting and, based on the audit
evidence obtained, whether a significant uncertainty related to events or conditions
exists and if that may cast significant doubt on the Group’s ability to continue as a
going concern. If we come to the conclusion that a material uncertainty exists, we are
required to pay attention in our auditor’s report on related disclosures in the
consolidated financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our
opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of
Mazars Audyt Sp. z o.o. 8
the auditor’s report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Group to
cease to continue as a going concern;
we evaluate the overall presentation, structure, and content of the consolidated
financial statements, including the disclosures, and whether the consolidated financial
statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that
achieves fair presentation.
we obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence related to the financial information
of entities and to the economic activities within the Group, in order to express the
opinion on the consolidated financial statements. We are responsible for directing,
supervising, and conducting the Group’s audit and we remain exclusively responsible
for our audit opinion.
We communicate with the Parent Undertaking’s Audit Committee regarding, among other
matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any
significant deficiencies in internal control identified by the auditor during the audit.
We also provide the Parent Undertaking’s Audit Committee with a statement that we have
complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence and that we will
communicate all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on
our independence, and, where applicable, related safeguards.
From the matters communicated to the Parent Undertaking’s Audit Committee, we determine
those matters that were of most significance in the audit of the consolidated financial
statements of the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these
matters in our auditor’s report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure or when, in
exceptional circumstances, we determine that a matter should not be communicated in our
report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected to
outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication.
Other Information, including the Management Report
Other information includes:
the Management Report on Operations of the ING Bank Śląski S.A. Group in 2023
(“the Management report”) with the Letter from the CEO and corporate governance
statement, which is a separate parts of this Management report,
a separate report on non-financial information specified in Article 55 (2c) of the
Accounting Act,
Letter from the Supervisory Board Charmain,
Representation of the Supervisory Board concerning the Audit Committee,
Assessment of the annual financial statements of ING Bank Śląski S.A. for 2023
prepared by the Supervisory Board,
Assessment of the ING Bank Śląski S.A. Group’s Operations in 2023 prepared by the
Supervisory Board.
(together “Other Information”).
Mazars Audyt Sp. z o.o. 9
Under Article 55 (2a) of the Accounting Act the Management report of the Group and of the
Parent Undertaking for 2023 were prepared jointly.
Responsibilities of the Management Board and Supervisory Board of the Parent
Undertaking
The Parent Undertaking’s Management Board is responsible for preparing the Other
Information in accordance with the applicable regulations.
The Parent Undertaking’s Management Board and members of the Parent Undertaking’s
Supervisory Board are obliged to ensure that the Management report along with the corporate
governance statement, which is a separate part of this Management report, and a separate
non-financial report specified in Article 55 (2c) of the Accounting Act, meet the requirements
set out in the Accounting Act.
Statutory Auditor’s Responsibility
Our opinion on the audit of the consolidated financial statements does not cover the Other
information. In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements, our
responsibility is to read the Other information and, in doing so, consider whether the Other
Information is materially inconsistent with the consolidated financial statements, or our
knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If, based on
the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this Other
Information, we are required to report that fact. In accordance with the Act on Statutory
Auditors, our responsibility is also to give an opinion whether the Management Report has
been prepared in accordance with applicable regulations and whether it complies with
information contained in the consolidated financial statements. In addition, in accordance with
requirements of Article 111a (3) of the Act of 29 August 1997 Banking Law (“Banking Law-
Journal of Laws of 2023, item 2488 as amended), our responsibility is to audit information
specified in Article 111a (2) of the Banking Law contained in the Management Report.
Moreover, we are obliged to communicate whether the Group prepared a non-financial
statement and issue an opinion whether the Group included the required information in the
corporate governance statement.
Opinion on the Management Report
Based on the work performed during the audit, in our opinion, the Management Report:
has been prepared according to Article 49 of the Accounting Act and paragraph 71 of
the Regulation of the Minister of Finance of 29 March 2018 on Current and Periodic
Information Provided by Issuers of Securities and Conditions of Recognition of
Information Required under the Regulations of the non-EU Member State as
Equivalent (“Regulation on Current Information” - Journal of Laws of 2018, item 757
as amended) and Article 111a (2) of the Banking Law,
is in line with information contained in the consolidated financial statements.
Mazars Audyt Sp. z o.o. 10
Opinion on Corporate Governance Statement
In our opinion, the Group included in the corporate governance statement information
specified in paragraph 70 (6) item 5 of the Regulation on Current Information. Moreover, in
our opinion, information specified in paragraph 70 (6) item 5 c-f, h and i of this Regulation
comprised in the corporate governance statement is compliant with the applicable provisions
and information contained in the consolidated financial statements.
Information on Non-financial Information
In accordance with requirements of the Act on Statutory Auditors we inform that the Group
prepared a non-financial statement referred to in Article 55 (2b) of the Accounting Act as a
separate part of the Group Management Report.
We have not conducted any assurance activities regarding the non-financial statement, and
we do not express any assurance about it.
Other Information Statement
Moreover, according to our knowledge of the Group and its environment obtained during the
audit, we declare that we have not identified any material misstatement in the Group
Management Report and the Other Information.
Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
Opinion on the Compliance of the Marking up of the Consolidated Financial
Statements Prepared in the Single Electronic Reporting Format with the
Requirements of the Regulation on Technical Standards on the Specification of
a Single Electronic Reporting Format
In connection with the audit of the consolidated financial statements we have been engaged
to perform an assurance engagement to obtain reasonable assurance in order to express an
opinion on whether the consolidated financial statements of the Group as at 31 December
2023 prepared in the single electronic reporting format (“consolidated financial statements in
ESEF format”) were marked up in accordance with the requirements specified in the
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/815 of 17 December 2018 supplementing
Directive 2004/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory
technical standards on the specification of a single electronic format (the “ESEF Regulation”).
Identification of Criteria and Description of the Subject of the Engagement
The consolidated financial statements in ESEF format were prepared by the Parent
Undertaking’s Management Board in order to fulfil the criteria regarding the marking up and
technical requirements concerning the specification of single electronic reporting formal which
are specified in the ESEF Regulation.
The subject matter of our assurance engagement is the compliance of marking up of the
consolidated financial statements in ESEF format with the requirements of the ESEF
Regulation, and the requirements specified in these regulations form, in our opinion,
Mazars Audyt Sp. z o.o. 11
adequate criteria to express our opinion.
Responsibilities of the Management Board and Supervisory Board of the Parent
Undertaking
The Management Board is responsible for the preparation of the consolidated financial
statements in ESEF format in accordance with the requirements regarding the marking up
and technical requirements concerning the specification of single electronic reporting formal
which are specified in the ESEF Regulation. Such responsibility includes the selection and
application of appropriate XBRL markups using the taxonomy specified in these regulations.
The responsibility of the Management Board also includes the design, implementation, and
maintenance of such internal control as determined to be necessary to enable the preparation
of the consolidated financial statements in ESEF format that are free from any material
incompliance with the ESEF Regulation.
Members of the Parent Undertaking’s Supervisory Board are responsible for supervising the
financial reporting process, also including the preparation of the financial statements
according to the format prescribed by applicable laws.
Statutory Auditor’s Responsibility
Our objective was to express an opinion, based on the performed assurance engagement
providing reasonable assurance that the consolidated financial statements in ESEF format
were marked up in accordance with the requirements of the ESEF Regulation.
We have performed our engagement in accordance with the National Standard on Assurance
Engagements for the audit of financial statements prepared in a single electronic format
3001PL (“NSAE 3001PL”), and where applicable, National Standard on Assurance
Engagements Other than Audit and Review 3000 (Revised) in the form of the International
Standard on Assurance Engagements 3000 (revised) ‘Assurance Engagements Other than
Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information (“NSAE 3000 (R)”).
This standard imposes an obligation on the auditor to plan and execute procedures in order
to obtain reasonable assurance that the consolidated financial statements in ESEF format
were prepared in accordance with specified criteria.
Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not a guarantee that an engagement
conducted in accordance with the NSAE 3001PL, and where applicable NSAE 3000(R), will
always detect a material misstatement when it exists.
The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the
risk of material misstatements due to fraud or error. When performing risk assessment and
in order to design procedures to be performed the auditor takes into consideration the internal
controls related to the preparation of the consolidated financial statements in ESEF format,
which can provide the auditor with sufficient and appropriate evidence. The assessment of
the internal controls was not performed for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the
effectiveness of the internal control.
Summary of the Work Performed
Procedures planned and performed by us included:
Mazars Audyt Sp. z o.o. 12
obtaining an understanding of the process of preparation of the consolidated financial
statements in ESEF format, including the process of selection and application of XBRL
markups by the Company and ensuring compliance with the ESEF Regulation, in
which the understanding of internal controls related to this process;
reconciling of the marked-up information included in the consolidated financial
statements in ESEF format to the audited consolidated financial statements;
using a specialized IT tool evaluating the compliance with technical standards
concerning the specification of single electronic format, evaluating the completeness
of marking up information in the consolidated financial statements in ESEF format
using XBRL markups;
evaluating the appropriateness of the use of XBRL markups from the taxonomy
specified in the ESEF Regulation and the creation of extension markups where no
suitable element in the core taxonomy specified in the ESEF Regulation has been
identified;
evaluating the appropriateness of anchoring of the applied taxonomy extensions to the
core taxonomy specified by the ESEF Regulation;
testing the correctness of the mathematical calculations for particular items marked up
using XBRL markups.
We believe that the evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a
basis for our opinion on the compliance of the marking up with requirements of the ESEF
Regulation.
Ethical Requirements, Including Independence
While performing the engagement, the statutory auditor and the audit firm complied with the
independence requirements and other ethical requirements as specified by the IESBA Code.
The IESBA Code is based on the fundamental principles related to integrity, objectivity,
professional competence and due care, confidentiality, and professional behaviour. We have
also complied with other independence and ethical requirements which are applicable to such
assurance engagement in Poland.
Quality Control Requirements
The audit firm applies national standards on quality control introduced by the resolution of the
Council of the Polish Agency for Audit Oversight No. 38/I/2022 of 15 November 2022.
National Standard on Quality Control 1 as per International Standard on Quality Management
(PL) 1 requires the audit firm to design, implement and operate a system of quality
management, including policies or procedures relating to compliance with ethical
requirements, professional standards and applicable legal and regulatory requirements.
Opinion on Compliance with ESEF Regulation Requirements
The matters described above constitute the basis for the auditor’s opinion which is why the
opinion should be read in conjunction with these matters.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements in ESEF format were marked up in all
material respects in accordance with the requirements of the ESEF Regulation.
Mazars Audyt Sp. z o.o. 13
Information on Observing Applicable Prudential Regulations
The Parent Undertaking’s Management Board is responsible for ensuring the compliance of
the Group’s operations with prudential regulations, in which for the correct determination of
capital ratios.
Our responsibility is to communicate in the auditor’s report whether the Group complies with
applicable prudential regulations, defined in separate provisions, and in particular whether the
Group correctly determined the capital ratios presented in note I.3.4. “Capital Adequacy”.
The purpose of the audit of the financial statements was not to express an opinion on the
Group’s compliance with applicable prudential regulations and therefore we do not express
such an opinion.
Based on our audit of the financial statements we would like to inform you that we have not
identified any breaches of applicable prudential regulations by the Group in the period from
1 January 2023 to 31 December 2023, defined by separate provisions, in particular with
respect to the correctness of the determination of capital ratios by the Group as at 31
December 2023, which could have a significant impact on the consolidated financial
statements.
Declaration on Non-audit Services
According to our best knowledge and belief we declare that non-audit services that we have
provided to the Group comply with laws and regulations applicable in Poland and that we have
not provided any non-audit services that are prohibited pursuant to Article 5 (1) of the EU
Regulation and Article 136 of the Act on Statutory Auditors. Non-audit services that we
provided to the Group during the audited period were specified in section “Selection of an
entity authorized to audit financial statements of the Group Management Report.
Appointment of an Audit Firm
We were appointed to conduct the audit of the consolidated financial statements of the Group
based on the resolution of the Parent Company’s Supervisory Board of 9 December 2022. We
have been auditing the consolidated financial statements of the Group for the first time.
Mazars Audyt Sp. z o.o. 14
The key statutory auditor responsible for the audit that was the base of the present
independent statutory auditor’s report is Małgorzata Pek.
Acting on behalf of Mazars Audyt Sp. z o.o. with its registered office in Warsaw, ul. Piękna 18,
entered on the list of audit firms under the no. 186, on behalf of which the key statutory auditor
audited the consolidated financial statements.
Małgorzata Pek
Key Statutory Auditor
No 13070
Warsaw, 7 March 2024