Mazars Audyt Sp. z o.o. 7
The Parent Company’s Management Board and members of its Supervisory Board are obliged
to ensure that the consolidated financial statements meet the requirements set out in the
Accounting Act the of 29 September 1994 (“Accounting Act” - Journal of Laws of 2023, item
120 as amended). Members of the Parent Undertaking’s Supervisory Board are responsible
for supervising the financial reporting process.
Statutory Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Consolidated Financial
Statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial
statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and
to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of
assurance but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with the NSA will
always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or
error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be
expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these
consolidated financial statements.
The scope of audit does not include assurance as to the future profitability of the Group and
effectiveness or efficiency of running the Group’s affairs by the Parent Undertaking’s
Management Board at present or in the future.
According to NSA, we exercise professional judgement and maintain professional scepticism
throughout the audit, as well as:
• we identify and assess the risk of material misstatement of the consolidated financial
statements, whether due to fraud or error, we design and perform audit procedures in
response to this risk and we obtain audit evidence which is sufficient and appropriate
to provide a basis for our audit opinion. The risk of not detecting a material
misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud
may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the
override of internal control;
• we obtain understanding of internal control applied for the purposes of audit in order
to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the
purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the internal control in the
Group;
• we evaluate the appropriateness of the accounting principles (policy) used, the
reasonableness of the accounting estimates and related disclosures, provided by the
Management Board of the Parent Undertaking;
• we conclude on the appropriateness of the Parent Undertaking’s management’s use
of the going concern principle as a basis of accounting and, based on the audit
evidence obtained, whether a significant uncertainty related to events or conditions
exists and if that may cast significant doubt on the Group’s ability to continue as a
going concern. If we come to the conclusion that a material uncertainty exists, we are
required to pay attention in our auditor’s report on related disclosures in the
consolidated financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our
opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of