4
Our Independence
We have complied with the applicable independence principles and other ethical requirements specified in
the Manual of the International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence
Standards) introduced by the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) and adopted by the
National Council of Statutory Auditors (“the Code of Ethics”) based on the basic principles of integrity, objectivity,
professional competence and due care, confidentiality and professional behaviour, as well as other requirements
referred to in the Act of 11 May 2017 on statutory auditors, audit firms and public supervision (Journal of Laws of
2024, item 1035, as amended) and in Regulation (EU) No 537/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council
of 16 April 2014 on specific requirements regarding statutory audit of public-interest entities and repealing
Commission Decision 2005/909/EC. We have fulfilled our other ethical obligations in accordance with these
requirements and the Code of Ethics.
Summary of Work Performed
A limited assurance engagement involves performing procedures to obtain evidence about the Sustainability
Statement of the Group.
The nature, timing and extent of procedures selected depend on professional judgement, including the
identification of disclosures where material misstatements are likely to arise, whether due to fraud or error, in the
Sustainability Statement of the Group.
In conducting our limited assurance engagement, with respect to the Double Materiality Assessment Process, we:
− obtained an understanding of the Double Materiality Assessment Process by:
- performing inquiries to understand the sources of the information used by management,
- reviewing the Bank’s internal documentation of its Process,
- performing analytical procedures concerning selected impacts, risks and opportunities assessed during
the Group's double materiality analysis,
− evaluated whether the evidence obtained from our procedures about the Double Materiality Assessment
Process implemented by the Bank was consistent with the description of the Double Materiality Assessment
Process set out in the point 15.4 Double Materiality Assessment.
In conducting our limited assurance engagement, with respect to the Sustainability Statement of the Group, we
have performed, among the others the following procedures:
− obtained an understanding of the Bank’s reporting processes relevant to the preparation of its Sustainability
Statement of the Group by performing inquiries to understand the Bank’s control environment, processes
and information systems relevant to the preparation of the Sustainability Statement of the Group, but we
did not assess the design of specific control activities, we did not obtain evidence of their implementation
or test their effectiveness;
− evaluated whether material information identified as part of the Double Materiality Assessment Process
in order to identify the information presented in the Group's Sustainability Reporting is included therein;
− evaluated whether the structure and the presentation of the Sustainability Statement of the Group is in
accordance with the ESRS;
− performed inquires of relevant personnel and analytical procedures on selected disclosures
in the Sustainability Statement of the Group;
− performed substantive assurance procedures based on a sample basis on selected disclosures in the
Sustainability Statement of the Group;
− obtained evidence on the methods for developing material estimates and forward-looking information and
on how these methods were applied by the Group;
− obtained an understanding of the process of classifying economic activities and the relevant disclosures in