Independent Statutory Auditors Report on the Audit of
Separate Annual Financial Statements of
ING Bank Śląski S.A.
for the financial year ended 31 December 2025
Forvis Mazars Audyt Sp. z o.o.
ul. Piękna 18
00-549 Warsaw
Forvis Mazars Audyt Sp. z o.o.
Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy, XII Wydział Gospodarczy KRS nr 0000086577, kapitał zakładowy: 1 268 000,00 PLN,
NIP: 5260215409, REGON: 011110970
INDEPENDENT STATUTORY AUDITOR’S REPORT
ON THE AUDIT OF SEPARATE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Translation of the document originally issued in Polish
To the General Shareholders’ Meeting and the Supervisory Board of ING Bank Śląski S.A.
Report on the Audit of Separate Annual Financial Statements
Opinion
We have audited the separate annual financial statements of ING Bank Śląski S.A (“the Bank”), which
comprise the separate statement of financial position as at 31 December 2025, the income statement, the
statement of comprehensive income, the statement of changes in equity, the cash flow statement for
the financial year from 1 January to 31 December 2025 and notes to the financial statements comprising
significant accounting policies and other explanatory information (“separate financial statements”).
In our opinion, the accompanying separate financial statements:
give a true and fair view of the property and financial position of the Bank as at 31 December 2025,
and of its financial result and its cash flow for the financial year then ended in accordance with the
applicable International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union and the
adopted accounting principles (policy);
comply with the applicable legislation and with the provisions of the Bank’s Articles of Association
as to the form and content;
have been prepared based on the accounting books kept properly, in accordance with Chapter 2
of the Accounting Act of 29 September 1994 (the Accounting Act” - Journal of Laws of 2023, item
120 as amended).
The present opinion is consistent with the additional report to the Audit Committee that we issued on
4 March 2026.
Forvis Mazars Audyt Sp. z o.o. 3
Basis for Opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with National Standards on Auditing as per International Standards
on Auditing adopted by resolution of the National Council of Statutory Auditors no. 3430/52a/2019 of
21 March 2019 regarding national standards on auditing and other documents, as amended and resolution
of the Council of the Polish Agency for Audit Oversight no. 38/I/2022 of 15 November 2022 on national
standards on quality control and National Standard on Auditing 220 (Revised) (“NSA”), as well as
according to the Act on Statutory Auditors, Audit Firms and Public Supervision of 11 May 2017 (“the Act
on Statutory Auditors” - Journal of Laws of 2025, item 1891) and Regulation (EU) No 537/2014 of 16 April
2014 on specific requirements regarding statutory audit of public-interest entities and repealing
Commission Decision 2005/909/EC (“EU Regulation” - Official Journal of the European Union L 158/77 of
27 May 2014, as amended). Our responsibility under those standards has been further described in
“Statutory Auditors Responsibility for the Audit of the Separate Financial Statements” section of our report.
We are independent of the Bank in accordance with the International Code of Ethics for Professional
Accountants (including International Independence Standards) of the International Ethics Standards Board
for Accountants (“the IESBA Code”), adopted by resolution of the National Council of Statutory Auditors
No. 3431/52a/2019 of 25 March 2019 on the principles of professional ethics for statutory auditors, as
amended, and other ethical requirements which are applicable to the audit of financial statements in
Poland. We have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements and the
IESBA Code. During the audit the key statutory auditor and the audit firm remained independent of the
Bank in accordance with the independence requirements specified in the Act on Statutory Auditors and
EU Regulation.
We believe that the audit evidence that we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis
for our audit opinion.
Key Audit Matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in the auditor’s professional judgment, were of most significance
in the audit of the separate financial statements for the current reporting period. These include the most
significant assessed risks of material misstatement, including the assessed risks of material misstatement
due to fraud. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the separate financial statements
as a whole and in forming our opinion thereon, and we summarized our responses to these risks, and,
where deemed appropriate, presented the most important observations related to these risks. We do not
provide a separate opinion on these matters.
Key Audit Matter
How our audit responded to this matter
Impairment for expected credit losses on
loans and other receivables to customers
In accordance with the International Financial
Reporting Standard 9 Financial Instruments
("IFRS 9"), the Bank's management should
determine the value of expected credit losses that
may occur during the 12-month period or the
remaining life of the financial asset, depending on
classification of individual assets into risk
categories ("stages") taking into account the
We critically analyzed the design and implementation of the
process for assessing credit risk and estimating expected
credit losses and verified the effectiveness of the controls
implemented by the Bank for identifying and estimating
expected credit losses.
We performed a reconciliation of the base of loans and
other receivables to customers with the Bank's general
ledger to confirm the completeness of the recognition of
loans and other receivables to customers that are the basis
Forvis Mazars Audyt Sp. z o.o. 4
impact of future macroeconomic conditions on the
level of expected credit losses.
Determining the amount and timing of recognition
of expected credit losses requires the use of
significant judgment and significant and complex
estimates, including primarily in terms of the
parameters of credit risk in the models for
calculating expected credit losses.
The estimate of the allowance for expected credit
losses takes into account the issue of the impact
of changing macroeconomic conditions of the
economy. This estimate required the application
by the Bank's Management Board additional
assumptions and expert adjustments, which take
into account the uncertainties associated with the
current and future macroeconomic environment
and reflect risk factors that were not included in
the Bank's models.
We considered this area to be a key audit matter
because the estimation of the impairment for
expected credit losses involves significant
inherent risks of misstatements as well as
uncertainty in the estimates made and requires
the Bank's management to exercise significant
judgment and, given the size of the loan portfolio,
has a material impact on the separate financial
statements.
Note III.3.1. Estimation of expected credit losses
for financial assets and Note II.2 Credit risk
included in the "Risk and capital management"
chapter provide details on the methods and
models used and the level of impairment for
expected credit losses on loans and other
receivables to customers.
for the impairment for expected credit losses, as well as the
value of the impairment.
We performed analytical procedures for the coverage of the
loan portfolio with expected credit losses and their changes,
as well as the transfer of exposures between stages.
We evaluated the Bank's impairment methodology for
compliance with the requirements of IFRS 9 and
Recommendation R, in particular with regard to the
application of the criteria for identifying a significant
increase in credit risk, the definition of default, the credit risk
parameters adopted and the consideration of the impact of
future macroeconomic conditions (forward looking
information) on the level of expected credit losses.
For the portfolio of loans and other receivables to
customers assessed using the collective method:
we conducted an analysis of the methodology used
to calculate the impairment for expected credit
losses for exposures evaluated using the collective
method, including the adequacy of the risk
parameters used by the Bank,
we conducted an independent verification of the
calculation of impairment for expected credit losses
for the entire population of loans,
we conducted an assessment of the verification of
models based on historical data (so-called back-
tests),
we verified the approach and assumptions adopted
to create adjustments changing model parameters
or estimates of expected credit losses and
assessed their validity.
For the portfolio of loans and other receivables to
customers assessed using the individual method:
we conducted an analysis of the correctness of the
impairment identification process and classification
into stages,
on a selected sample of credit exposures, we
reviewed documents on the borrower's financial
situation and verified the correctness of the
assignment to the appropriate stage,
for selected impaired loans and advances (stage 3),
we tested the assumptions used in calculating
expected credit losses, in particular the expected
Forvis Mazars Audyt Sp. z o.o. 5
scenarios and the probabilities assigned to them,
as well as the timing and amounts of expected cash
flows, including cash flows from repayments and
realization of collateral.
We also assessed the adequacy and completeness of
disclosures regarding the impairment for expected credit
losses in the separate financial statements.
Impact of the legal risk of CHF-indexed
mortgage loans
The estimate of the impact of the legal risk of
CHF-indexed mortgage loans resulting in the
recognition of adjustments to the gross carrying
value of these loans or related litigation provisions
is complex and requires a significant degree of
judgment in determining the possible scenarios,
as well as with respect to the assumptions made
regarding the number of expected lawsuits, the
likelihood of their resolution with consideration of
the possibility of asettlement, and the amount of
loss if the Bank loses a lawsuit or enters into a
settlement.
The Bank's estimates in this regard are based on
historical observations indicating considerable
uncertainty about the number of lawsuits that will
be filed in court in the future or settlements
concluded.
Note III.3.3 Legal risk related to the portfolio of
mortgage loans indexed to the Swiss franc
exchange rate details the assumptions used to
calculate the adjustment to the gross carrying
value of CHF-indexed mortgages and related
provisions for litigation, as well as possible
alternative results presented as part of the
sensitivity analysis of the estimate.
In terms of estimating the amount of the impact of the legal
risk of CHF-indexed mortgage loans, our audit procedures
were mainly directed at evaluating the model and the
various assumptions made by the Bank's Management
Board that have a significant impact on the level of
estimated legal risk costs. In particular, we carried out the
procedures described below:
we assessed the accounting policy and
methodology for calculating the estimated loss
recognized on mortgage loans in CHF resulting
from legal risk,
we assessed the functioning and effectiveness of
internal controls in carrying out and accepting the
CHF loss estimate amount,
we carried out a critical evaluation of the model for
estimating the impact of legal risk on CHF-indexed
mortgage loans and the various assumptions,
we held discussions with the Bank's Management
Board and specialists, on the assumptions made,
taking into account historical observations,
including information and events subsequent to the
balance sheet date, past and possible legal
settlements, in particular settlements of the Court of
Justice of the European Union (CJEU),
we analyzed the Bank's documentation for the
purpose of estimating the statistical probability of
realization of the various scenarios of possible
settlements,
we verified the assumptions adopted by the Bank
based on historical data for estimating the
probability of future settlements and the level of
losses realized because of them,
we analyzed the calculation of the value of potential
losses under the various scenarios adopted by the
Bank based on historical data,
Forvis Mazars Audyt Sp. z o.o. 6
we verified the model used by the Bank to estimate
the impact of legal risk, verified the correctness and
completeness of the data underlying the
calculations, including the external confirmations
received from the law firms and confirmed the
mathematical correctness of the calculations,
we analyzed events after the balance sheet date
and their impact on the estimate of provisions,
we analyzed the register of customer complaints,
with a particular focus on issues related to and
mortgage loans indexed to CHF.
We also assessed the adequacy and completeness of the
disclosures regarding the impact of legal risk on CHF-
indexed mortgage loans in the separate financial
statements.
Responsibilities of the Management Board and Supervisory Board for the Separate
Financial Statements
The Bank's Management Board is responsible for preparing, based on the accounting books properly kept,
the separate financial statements that give a true and fair view of the Bank’s property and financial position
and its financial performance in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted
by the European Union and adopted accounting principles (policy), as well as with the relevant legislation
and with the provisions of the Bank’s Articles of Association. The Bank’s Management Board is also
responsible for such internal control as the Management Board determines is necessary to enable the
preparation of separate financial statements that are free of material misstatement, whether due to fraud
or error.
When preparing the separate financial statements, the Bank's Management Board is responsible for
assessing the Bank’s ability to continue as a going concern, as well as for disclosing, if applicable, matters
related to going concern and for adopting the going concern assumption as an accounting basis, unless
the Management Board either intends to liquidate the Bank or to cease operations or has no realistic
alternative but to do so.
The Bank's Management Board and members of the Supervisory Board are obliged to ensure that the
separate financial statements meet the requirements set out in the Accounting Act. Members of the
Supervisory Board are responsible for supervising the financial reporting process of the Bank.
Statutory Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Separate Financial Statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the separate financial statements as a
whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report
that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not a guarantee that
an audit conducted in accordance with the National Standards on Auditing will always detect a material
misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if,
individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of
users taken on the basis of these separate financial statements.
Forvis Mazars Audyt Sp. z o.o. 7
The scope of audit does not include assurance as to the future profitability of the Bank and effectiveness
or efficiency of running the Bank’s affairs by the Management Board at present or in the future.
According to National Standards on Auditing, we exercise professional judgement and maintain
professional scepticism throughout the audit, as well as:
we identify and assess risks of material misstatement of separate financial statements, whether
due to fraud or error, we design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks and we
obtain audit evidence which is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting
from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or
the override of internal control;
we obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the internal control in the Bank;
we evaluate the appropriateness of the accounting principles (policy) used and the reasonableness
of the accounting estimates and related disclosures made by the Management Board of the Bank;
we conclude on the appropriateness of the Bank’s Management Board’s use of the going concern
basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, as to whether a material uncertainty
exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Bank’s ability to
continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to
draw attention in our auditor’s report to the related disclosures in the separate financial statements
or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the
audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report. However, future events or conditions
may cause the Bank to cease to continue as a going concern;
we evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the separate financial statements,
including the disclosures, and whether the separate financial statements represent the underlying
transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.
We communicate with the Audit Committee regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing
of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we
identify during our audit.
We also provide the Audit Committee with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical
requirements regarding independence and that we will communicate all relationships and other matters
that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and, where applicable, related safeguards.
From the matters communicated to Audit Committee, we determine those matters that were of most
significance in the audit of the separate financial statements of the current period and are therefore the
key audit matters. We describe these matters in our auditor’s report unless law or regulation preclude their
public disclosure or when, in exceptional circumstances, we determine that a matter should not be
communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be
expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication.
Forvis Mazars Audyt Sp. z o.o. 8
Other Information, including the Management Report
Other information includes:
Management Board Report on Operations of the ING Bank Śląski S.A. Group in 2025 (“the
Management Report”) with the Letter from the President, Management Board statement on the
truthfulness and reliability of the reports presented, ING Bank Śląski S.A. Management Board
statement on the application of corporate governance principles and Sustainability Statement,
which are separate parts of this Management Report,
Supervisory Board Chairs statement,
Representation of the Supervisory Board concerning the Audit Committee,
Representation of the Supervisory Board concerning the Audit Firm,
Evaluation of the Bank's standing on a consolidated basis, including the assessment of adequacy
and effectiveness of the internal control system, risk management system, compliance and the
internal audit function prepared by Supervisory Board,
Assessment of the Annual Financial Statements of ING Bank Śląski S.A. for 2025, the Annual
Consolidated Financial Statements of the ING Bank Śląski S.A. Group for 2025 and the
Management Board Report on Operations of the ING Bank Śląski S.A. Group in 2025 covering the
Report on Operations of ING Bank Śląski S.A., including the Statement on the application of
corporate governance rules and the Sustainability Statement, prepared by the Supervisory Board
(together “Other Information”).
Under Article 55 (2a) of the Accounting Act the Management Report of the ING Bank Śląski S.A. Group
and of the Bank for 2025 were prepared jointly.
Responsibility of the Management Board and Supervisory Board
The responsibility for the preparation of the Other Information in accordance with the applicable regulations
lies with the Bank’s Management Board.
The Bank’s Management Board and members of the Supervisory Board are obliged to ensure that the
Management Report along with the corporate governance statement, which is a separate part of this
Management Report, meets the requirements set out in the Accounting Act.
Statutory Auditor’s Responsibility
Our opinion on the audit of the separate financial statements does not cover the Other Information. In
connection with our audit of the separate financial statements, our responsibility is to read the Other
information and, in doing so, consider whether the Other Information is materially inconsistent with the
separate financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears to be materially
misstated. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of
this Other Information, we are required to report that fact. In accordance with the Act on Statutory Auditors,
our responsibility is also to give an opinion whether the management report, to the extent not relevant to
sustainability reporting, has been prepared in accordance with applicable regulations and whether it
complies with the information contained in the separate financial statements. In addition, in accordance
with requirements of Article 111a (3) of the Act of 29 August 1997 Banking Law (Journal of Laws of 2025,
item 38) (“Banking Law”), our responsibility is to audit information specified in Article 111a (2) of the
Banking Law contained in the Management Report. Moreover, we are obliged to issue an opinion whether
the Bank included the required information in the corporate governance statement.
Forvis Mazars Audyt Sp. z o.o. 9
Opinion on the Management Report
Based on the work performed during the audit, in our opinion, the Bank’s Management Report:
has been prepared according to Article 49 of the Accounting Act and paragraph 72 of the
Regulation of the Minister of Finance of 6 June 2025 on Current and Periodic Information Provided
by Issuers of Securities and Conditions of Recognition of Information Required under the
Regulations of the non-EU Member State as Equivalent (“Regulation on Current Information” -
Journal of Laws of 2025, item 755) and Article 111a (2) of the Banking Law,
is in line with information contained in the separate financial statements.
Information on Sustainability Reporting and its Assurance
Sustainability reporting, referred to in Chapter 6c of the Accounting Act, which is a separate part of the
Management Report (section Sustainability Statement), is subject to a separate assurance engagement
performed by our audit firm and by the same key auditor who audits the separate financial statements.
Opinion on Corporate Governance Statement
In our opinion, the Bank included information specified in paragraph 72 (7) item 5 of the Regulation on
Current Information in the corporate governance statement. Moreover, in our opinion, information specified
in paragraph 72 (7) item 5 c-f, h and i of this Regulation comprised in the corporate governance statement
is compliant with the applicable provisions and information contained in the separate financial statements.
Other Information Statement
Moreover, according to our knowledge of the Bank and its environment obtained during the audit, we
declare that we have not identified any material misstatement in the Bank’s Management Report and the
Other Information.
Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
Information on Observing Applicable Prudential Regulations
The Bank’s Management Board is responsible for ensuring the compliance of the Bank’s operations with
prudential regulations, in which for the correct determination of capital ratios.
Our responsibility is to communicate in the auditor’s report whether the Bank complies with applicable
prudential regulations, defined in separate provisions, and in particular whether the Bank correctly
determined the capital ratios presented in "Risk and capital management" chapter in Note I.3.4 Capital
ratios.
The purpose of the audit of the separate financial statements was not to express an opinion on the Bank’s
compliance with applicable prudential regulations and therefore we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our audit of the separate financial statements we would like to inform you that we have not
identified any breaches of applicable prudential regulations by the Bank in the period from 1 January 2025
to 31 December 2025, defined by separate provisions, in particular with respect to the correctness of the
determination of capital ratios as at 31 December 2025, which could have a significant impact on the
separate financial statements.
Forvis Mazars Audyt Sp. z o.o. 10
Statement about Provision of Non-Audit Services
According to our best knowledge and belief we declare that non-audit services that we have provided to
the Bank comply with laws and regulations applicable in Poland and that we have not provided any non-
audit services that are prohibited pursuant to Article 5 (1) of the EU Regulation and Article 136 of the Act
on Statutory Auditors. Non-audit services that we have provided to the Bank in the audited period were
mentioned in section Selection of the entity authorised to audit the financial statements and attest
sustainability reporting of the Management Report.
Appointment of an Audit Firm
We were appointed to conduct the audit of the Bank’s separate financial statements based on the
resolution of the Bank Supervisory Board of 9 December 2022. We have been auditing the separate
financial statements of the Bank continuously, starting from the financial year ended 31 December 2023,
i.e. for 3 consecutive years.
The key statutory auditor responsible for the audit that was the base of this independent statutory auditor’s
report is Małgorzata Pek.
Acting on behalf of Mazars Audyt Sp. z o.o. with its registered office in Warsaw, ul. Piękna 18, entered on
the list of audit firms under no. 186, on behalf of which the key statutory auditor audited the separate
financial statements.
Małgorzata Pek
Key Statutory Auditor
No 13070
Warsaw, 4 March 2026