The reporting entity for the purposes of the global minimum tax is the ultimate parent entity, Nemus Holding AB. At
the same time, the Company has conducted a preliminary assessment of the potential impact of the top-up tax
regulations on its tax settlements. This assessment was based on available financial data and the current structure
of the Group’s operations, in particular on the level of effective tax rates achieved in the jurisdictions in which the
Group operates.
Based on the analysis performed, the Management Board does not expect that the implementation of the top-up
tax regulations will have a material impact on the Group’s financial results or tax position. This is primarily due to
the fact that the effective taxation of the Company’s operations is at a level close to, or higher than, the minimum
level of taxation provided for under the Pillar Two regulations.
At the same time, the Company monitors the development of practice in the application of the new regulations, as
well as published interpretative guidance, and will update its analyses on an ongoing basis with respect to the po-
tential impact of these regulations on future reporting periods.
4.9.3. Uncertainties related to tax settlements
Corporate income tax regulations are subject to frequent changes. Those frequent changes result in unavailability
of appropriate points of reference, inconsistent interpretations and few precedents that could apply. Additionally,
the applicable regulations contain also certain ambiguities that result in differences of opinion as to legal interpreta-
tions of tax regulations – among public authorities and between public authorities and enterprises.
Tax settlements may be audited by the authorities, who have the power to impose heavy fines and penalties,
and any additional tax liabilities resulting from the audit must be paid with high interest. These conditions make the
tax risk in Poland higher than in countries with a more developed tax system.
Therefore, the amounts presented and disclosed in the financial statements may change in the future as a result
of final decisions by tax inspection authorities.
The Company recognises and measures assets or liabilities applying the requirements of IAS 12 Income Taxes,
on the basis of profit (tax loss), taxation base, carried forward tax losses, unutilised tax credits and applicable tax
rates, and further subject to uncertainties related to tax settlements. When an uncertainty exists if and to what ex-
tent the tax authority accepts tax settlements to specific transactions, the Group recognises those settlements sub-
ject to uncertainty assessment.
Tax settlements can be audited for a period of five years, starting from the end of the year in which the tax was
paid. Consequently, the Company may be subject to additional tax liabilities, which may arise as a result of addi-
tional tax audits.
In the opinion of the Management Board, such risk does not exist as at 31 December 2025 and therefore the
Company has not established any provision for recognised and quantifiable tax risk.
5. Notes on financial instruments
Major accounting policies
The Company holds the following categories of financial instruments:
•
instruments measured at amortised cost,
•
instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss,
•
hedging instruments (see note 5.3 for a description of hedge accounting policies).
The derivatives used by the Company to hedge its exposure to interest rate movements are primarily interest
rate swap contracts (interest rate SWAPs). Such derivative financial instruments are measured at fair value. Such
derivatives are stated as assets when the value is positive and as liabilities when the value is negative.
All assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value or their fair value is disclosed in the financial statements,
are classified in the hierarchy of fair value in the way described below to the lowest level of input data which is ma-
terial for the measurement at fair value treated as a whole:
•
level 1 – listed (unadjusted) market prices in an active market for identical assets or liabilities;
•
level 2 – measurement techniques for which the lowest level of input data that is material for the measurement
at fair value as a whole is observable or indirectly observable;
•
level 3 – measurement techniques for which the lowest level of input data that is material for the measurement
at fair value as a whole is not observable.
As at each balance sheet date, for assets and liabilities occurring as at each balance sheet date in the financial
statements, the Company assesses if there have been transfers between the hierarchy levels by re-assessment of
the classification to each level, following the materiality of the input data from the lowest level which is material for
measurement at fair value treated as a whole.